Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 9/2022

17-06-2022 | Original Paper

A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models

Authors: Shadi M. Hanandeh, Wassel A. Al-Bodour, Mustafa M. Hajij

Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Issue 9/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Liquefaction of saturated granular soils is marked by the total loss of shear strength of soil under dynamic cyclic or transient loading conditions due to excess pore water pressure that builds up to produce a soil regime that mechanically performs as a liquid. The cone penetration test (CPT) is widely recognized as a means of evaluating liquefaction susceptibility. This study presents a comparative supervised machine learning-based assessment for CPT-based liquefaction data. In particular, this study views soil liquefaction as a binary classification problem, whether the soil is liquefied or not, by utilizing three supervised machine learning classifiers: support vector machine, Decision Trees, and Quadratic Discrimination Analysis. To build the supervised machine learning models, three different soil characterization data sets were selected by performing CPTs at specific locations. The first input data (input data-1) is constructed as a function of the Mean Grain Size (D50), Measured CPT Tip Resistance (qc), Earthquake Magnitude (M), and Cyclic Shear Resistance (CSR). The second input data (input data-2) employed D50, Normalized CPT Tip Resistance (qc−1), M, CSR. Finally, the third input data (input data-3) consists of D50, qc−1, M, the Maximum Ground Acceleration (amax), Effective Vertical Overburden Stress, and Total Overburden Stress. The significance feature analysis shows the most important feature for assessing liquefaction susceptibility in the soil using input data for model 1 is measured CPT Tip Resistance, for input data model 2 it is normalized CPT Tip Resistance, and finally, for input data model 3, it is measured CPT Tip Resistance. Conclusively, this study proposed simple and quick approaches to evaluate soil liquefaction susceptibility without complicated calculations.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Andrus R, Stokoe K, Chung R, Juang H (2003) Guidelines for evaluating liquefaction resistance using shear wave velocity measurement and simplified procedures Andrus R, Stokoe K, Chung R, Juang H (2003) Guidelines for evaluating liquefaction resistance using shear wave velocity measurement and simplified procedures
go back to reference Baez JI, Martin GR, Youd TL (2000) Comparison of SPT-CPT liquefaction evaluations and CPT interpretations. In: Proceedings of innovations and applications in Geotechnical Site Characterization (GSP 97), Geo-Denver 2000, Denver, Colorado, pp 17–32 Baez JI, Martin GR, Youd TL (2000) Comparison of SPT-CPT liquefaction evaluations and CPT interpretations. In: Proceedings of innovations and applications in Geotechnical Site Characterization (GSP 97), Geo-Denver 2000, Denver, Colorado, pp 17–32
go back to reference Ghojogh B, Crowley M (2019) Linear and quadratic discriminant analysis: tutorial. arXiv Prepr arXiv190602590 Ghojogh B, Crowley M (2019) Linear and quadratic discriminant analysis: tutorial. arXiv Prepr arXiv190602590
go back to reference Hanandeh S (2007) Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus by artificial neural network. Jordan University of Science and Technology Hanandeh S (2007) Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus by artificial neural network. Jordan University of Science and Technology
go back to reference Hanandeh S, Alabdullah SF, Aldahwi S, et al (2020a) Development of a constitutive model for evaluation of bearing capacity from CPT and theoretical analysis using ann techniques. Int J Geomate Hanandeh S, Alabdullah SF, Aldahwi S, et al (2020a) Development of a constitutive model for evaluation of bearing capacity from CPT and theoretical analysis using ann techniques. Int J Geomate
go back to reference Huang S, Cai N, Pacheco PP et al (2018) Applications of support vector machine (SVM) learning in cancer genomics. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 15:41–51 Huang S, Cai N, Pacheco PP et al (2018) Applications of support vector machine (SVM) learning in cancer genomics. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 15:41–51
go back to reference Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
go back to reference Mohanty S, Patra NR (2018) Ground motions and site response. In: Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 504–513 Mohanty S, Patra NR (2018) Ground motions and site response. In: Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 504–513
go back to reference Njock PGA, Shen S-L, Zhou A, Lyu H-M (2020) Evaluation of soil liquefaction using AI technology incorporating a coupled ENN/t-SNE model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 130:105988 Njock PGA, Shen S-L, Zhou A, Lyu H-M (2020) Evaluation of soil liquefaction using AI technology incorporating a coupled ENN/t-SNE model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 130:105988
go back to reference Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) A simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:1249CrossRef Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) A simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:1249CrossRef
go back to reference Seed HB, Mori K, Chan CK (1975) Influence of seismic history on the liquefaction characteristics of sands. University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center Seed HB, Mori K, Chan CK (1975) Influence of seismic history on the liquefaction characteristics of sands. University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center
go back to reference Seed HB, Mori K, Chan C (1975) Influence of seismic history on the liquefaction characteristics of sands. Report EERC 75-25, University of California, Berkeley Seed HB, Mori K, Chan C (1975) Influence of seismic history on the liquefaction characteristics of sands. Report EERC 75-25, University of California, Berkeley
go back to reference Sideras SS (2019) Evolutionary intensity measures for more accurate and informative evaluation of liquefaction triggering. University of Washington Sideras SS (2019) Evolutionary intensity measures for more accurate and informative evaluation of liquefaction triggering. University of Washington
go back to reference Yang Y, Morillo IG, Hospedales TM (2018) Deep neural decision trees. arXiv180606988 Yang Y, Morillo IG, Hospedales TM (2018) Deep neural decision trees. arXiv180606988
go back to reference Youd TL (2000) Updating assessment procedures and developing a screening guide for liquefaction sponsors sponsors Youd TL (2000) Updating assessment procedures and developing a screening guide for liquefaction sponsors sponsors
Metadata
Title
A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models
Authors
Shadi M. Hanandeh
Wassel A. Al-Bodour
Mustafa M. Hajij
Publication date
17-06-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Issue 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02180-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2022

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 9/2022 Go to the issue