Top

Water Resources Management

Published in:

06-06-2020

A Generalized Storage Function Model for the Water Level Estimation Using Rating Curve Relationship

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 8/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This study proposes a novel generalized storage function (GSF) model for water level estimation from the rating curve relationship by considering (i) the spatial distribution of rainfall over the basin and (ii) incorporating all the possible inflow and outflow components to reduce the uncertainties involved. The proposed GSF model, along with three other models, was then applied in two watersheds of Japan to examine its applicability in different types of watersheds with optimized parameters: (i) the Iga watershed, a semi-urban watershed and (ii) the Oto watershed, a rural watershed. Further, the proposed model’s effectiveness was identified based on hydrograph reproducibility, Akaike information criterion, and Akaike weight. The results showed that the GSF model performed well in both watersheds compared to the other models. Moreover, the Morris global sensitivity method has used to analyze the sensitivity of the GSF model parameters for the objective function of root mean square error.

previous article On the Applicability of the Expected Waiting Time Method in Nonstationary Flood Design

next article Correction to: Developing a Model for Decision-Makers in Dynamic Modeling of Urban Water System Management

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Adachi T (2009) Flood damage mitigation efforts in Japan. In: Proceedings of the fifth US-Japan conference on flood control and water resources management, Tokyo, Japan, 27–29 September 2009

Akaike H (1981) Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econ 16:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90071-3 CrossRef

Akaike H (1998) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Springer, New York, pp 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 CrossRef

Ando Y, Takahashi Y, Mao H, Jiansi J (1982) A hydrological cycle of hillslope basins and its change by urbanisation. Proc 26th Japanese conf on hydraulics, JSCE, pp 251–260

Andrews FT, Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ (2011) An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development. Environ Model Softw 26:1171–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.006 CrossRef

Azhikodan G, Yokoyama K (2019) Seasonal Morphodynamic evolution in a Meandering Channel of a macrotidal estuary. Sci Total Environ 684:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.289 CrossRef

Baba H, Hoshi K, Hashimoto N (1999) Synthetic storage routing model coupled with loss mechanisms. Proc Hydraul Eng Japan Soc Civ Eng 43:1085–1090. https://doi.org/10.2208/prohe.43.1085

Beven K (1993) Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv Water Resour 16(1):41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E CrossRef

Bubeck P, Botzen WJ, Aerts JC (2012) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal 32:1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x CrossRef

Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A (2007) An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Model Softw 22:1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004 CrossRef

Chen YC, Hsu YC, Kuo KT (2013) Uncertainties in the methods of flood discharge measurement. Water Resour Manag 27:153–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0174-2 CrossRef

Domeneghetti A, Castellarin A, Brath A (2012) Assessing rating-curve uncertainty and its effects on hydraulic model calibration. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1191-2012 CrossRef

Duan QY, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 28:1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985 CrossRef

Đukić V, Radić Z (2016) Sensitivity analysis of a physically based distributed model. Water Resour Manag 30:1669–1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1243-8 CrossRef

Hoshi K, Yamaoka H (1982) A relationship between kinematic wave and storage routing models. Proc 26^th Japanese Conf on Hydraul JSCE, pp 273–278. https://doi.org/10.2208/prohe1975.26.273

Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336663 CrossRef

Karbasi M, Shokoohi A, Saghafian B (2018) Loss of life estimation due to flash floods in residential areas using a regional model. Water Resour Manag 32:4575–4589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2071-9 CrossRef

Kimura T (1961) The flood runoff analysis method by the storage function model. The Public Works Research Institute, Ministry of Construction

Liu Y, Chaubey I, Bowling LC, Bralts VF, Engel BA (2016) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the L-THIA-LID 2.1 model. Water Resour Manag 30:4927–4949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1462-z CrossRef

Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33:161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804 CrossRef

Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 CrossRef

Neumann MB (2012) Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for pollutant degradation modelling: a case study from drinking water treatment. Sci Total Environ 433:530–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.026 CrossRef

Okazakishi (2015) Creating master plan of Okazaki municipal water environment: draft; Master Plan of Okazaki Municipal Water Environment: Okazaki, Japan

Okazakishi (2019) Current status and problems of biodiversity, environmental policy division. Available online: http://www.city.okazaki.lg.jp/1300/1303/1326/p011109.html. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

Padiyedath SG, Kawamura A, Takasaki T, Amaguchi H, Azhikodan G (2018a) An effective storage function model for an urban watershed in terms of hydrograph reproducibility and Akaike information criterion. J Hydrol 563:657–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.035 CrossRef

Padiyedath SG, Kawamura A, Takasaki T, Amaguchi H, Azhikodan G (2018b) Performance evaluation of urban storage function (USF) model compared with various conventional storage function models for an urban watershed. J Japan Soc Civ Eng Ser B1 (Hydraul Eng) 74(4):973–978. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejhe.74.I_973

Park M, Kim D, Kwak J, Kim H (2012) Evaluation of parameter characteristics of a storage function model. J Hydrol Eng 19:308–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000678 CrossRef

Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 242:275–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00393-0 CrossRef

Pickup G (1977) Potential and limitations of rainfall-runoff models for prediction on ungauged catchments: a case study from the Papua New Guinea highlands. J Hydrol N Z 16(1):87–102

Prasad R (1967) A nonlinear hydrologic system response model. J Hydraul Div ASCE 93-HY4:201–221

Rimba A, Setiawati M, Sambah A, Miura F (2017) Physical flood vulnerability mapping applying geospatial techniques in Okazaki City, Aichi prefecture, Japan. Urban Sci 1(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1010007 CrossRef

Sahoo B, Saritha PG (2015) Estimating Floods from an ungauged river basin using GIUH-based Nash model. ISFRAM 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-365-1_11

Seckin N, Guven A (2012) Estimation of peak flood discharges at ungauged sites across Turkey. Water Resour Manag 26:2569–2581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0033-1 CrossRef

Shin MJ, Guillaume JHA, Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ (2013) Addressing ten questions about conceptual rainfall-runoff models with global sensitivity analyses in R. J Hydrol 503:135–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.047 CrossRef

Sivapragasam C, Muttil N (2005) Discharge rating curve extension – a new approach. Water Resour Manag 19:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-6811-2 CrossRef

Sugiyama H, Kadoya M, Nagai A, Lansey K (1997) Evaluation of the storage function model parameter characteristics. J Hydrol 191:332–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03026-0 CrossRef

Takasaki T, Tsuchiya T, Masuda N (2005) Prediction of water level in small urban rivers using genetic algorithm approach. J Japan Soc Civ Eng (Water Engineering Research) 49:451–456. https://doi.org/10.2208/prohe.49.451

Takasaki T, Kawamura A, Amaguchi H, Araki K (2009) New storage function model considering urban runoff process. J Japan Soc Civ Eng B 65(3):217–230. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejb.65.217

Tamura T, Yamashita A, Muto Y (2013) A method for establishing stage-discharge curve by using rainfall, water level data and runoff model. J Japan Soc Civ Eng Ser B1 (Hydraul Eng) 69(4):517–522. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejhe.69.I_517

van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324(1–4):10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008 CrossRef

Vatanchi SM, Maghrebi MF (2019) Uncertainty in rating-curves due to manning roughness coefficient. Water Resour Manag 33:5153–5167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02421-6 CrossRef

Vaze J, Post DA, Chiew FHS, Perraud J-M, Teng J, Viney NR (2011) Conceptual rainfall–runoff model performance with different spatial rainfall inputs. J Hydrometeorol 12:1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jhm1340.1 CrossRef

Vaze J, Jordan P, Beecham R, Frost A, Summerell G (2012) Guidelines for rainfall-runoff modelling. Australian Government Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research

Zhan CS, Song XM, Xia J, Tong C (2013) An efficient integrated approach for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters. Environ Model Softw 41:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.009 CrossRef

Title: A Generalized Storage Function Model for the Water Level Estimation Using Rating Curve Relationship
Publication date: 06-06-2020
Published in: Water Resources Management / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02585-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

On the Applicability of the Expected Waiting Time Method in Nonstationary Flood Design

The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region

Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change in a Well-preserved Upland Watershed

Evaluation of Nexus-Sustainability and Conventional Approaches for Optimal Water-Energy-Land-Crop Planning in an Irrigated Canal Command

Optimal Design of Groundwater Monitoring Network Using the Combined Election-Kriging Method

Quantifying the Inter- and Intra-Annual Variations in Regional Water Consumption and Scarcity Incorporating Water Quantity and Quality