Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 10/2021

24-06-2021 | Research Article-Systems Engineering

A Hybrid Type-2 Fuzzy Performance Evaluation Model for Public Transport Services

Author: Fatih Öztürk

Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Issue 10/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study provides a framework through customer satisfaction surveys performed by the Directorate of Istanbul Electricity, Tramway and Tunnel Enterprises (IETT) in 2017 with 3350 participants. The main contribution of this study is to create a type-2 fuzzy set multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework consisting of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) in order to join the opinions of professionals with those of passengers with the aim of making a precise assessment on passenger satisfaction and focus areas. In general, these types of MCDM methods are used to choose the best option between given scenarios. The difference here is the application of this framework to find the actual performances of the already applied decisions by including them in the survey questions, rather than finding the best among several alternatives. The model determines the performances of pre-determined criteria by cross-checking them with expert opinions and survey data, providing a better investment strategy for local bodies and useful insights for both city planners and public transportation agencies in general. The aim of developing the model is to compare the criteria value, given by the experts, with the passenger evaluations for the same criteria to check for consistency, which shows us the level of agreement between passenger needs and expert opinions. Our results show that most passengers using IETT services are pleased with the punctuality of buses and information provided.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Grise, E.; El-Geneidy, A.: Where is the happy transit rider? Evaluating satisfaction with regional rail service using a spatial segmentation approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 114, 84–96 (2018)CrossRef Grise, E.; El-Geneidy, A.: Where is the happy transit rider? Evaluating satisfaction with regional rail service using a spatial segmentation approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 114, 84–96 (2018)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nalmpantis, D.; Roukouni, A.; Genitsaris, E.; Stamelou, A.; Naniopoulos, A.: Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 11(22), 1–16 (2019) Nalmpantis, D.; Roukouni, A.; Genitsaris, E.; Stamelou, A.; Naniopoulos, A.: Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 11(22), 1–16 (2019)
3.
go back to reference Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Nor, K.M.; Khalifah, Z.; Zakwan, N.; Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 516–571 (2015)CrossRef Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Nor, K.M.; Khalifah, Z.; Zakwan, N.; Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 516–571 (2015)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Macharis, C.; Bernardini, A.: Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: time for a multi-actor approach. Transp. Policy 37, 177–186 (2015)CrossRef Macharis, C.; Bernardini, A.: Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: time for a multi-actor approach. Transp. Policy 37, 177–186 (2015)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mardani, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Khalifah, Z.; Jusoh, A.; Nor, K.M.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature. Transport 31(3), 359–385 (2016)CrossRef Mardani, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Khalifah, Z.; Jusoh, A.; Nor, K.M.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature. Transport 31(3), 359–385 (2016)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Radwan, N.; Senousy, M.; Alaa El Din, M.: Neutrosophic AHP multi criteria decision making method applied on the selection of learning management system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 8(5), 95–105 (2016) Radwan, N.; Senousy, M.; Alaa El Din, M.: Neutrosophic AHP multi criteria decision making method applied on the selection of learning management system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 8(5), 95–105 (2016)
7.
8.
go back to reference Ayodele, T.; Ogunjuyigbe, A.; Odigie, O.; Munda, J.: A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: the case study of Nigeria. Appl. Energy 228, 1853–1869 (2018)CrossRef Ayodele, T.; Ogunjuyigbe, A.; Odigie, O.; Munda, J.: A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: the case study of Nigeria. Appl. Energy 228, 1853–1869 (2018)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lazim, A.; Liana, N.: A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3297–3305 (2014)CrossRef Lazim, A.; Liana, N.: A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3297–3305 (2014)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kahraman, C.; Öztayşi, B.; Sarı, İU.; Turanlıoğlu, E.: Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 59, 48–57 (2014)CrossRef Kahraman, C.; Öztayşi, B.; Sarı, İU.; Turanlıoğlu, E.: Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 59, 48–57 (2014)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Türk, S.; Deveci, M.; Özcan, E.; Canıtez, F.; John, R.: Interval type-2 fuzzy sets improved by Simulated Annealing for locating the electric charging stations. Inf. Sci. 547, 641–666 (2021)MathSciNetCrossRef Türk, S.; Deveci, M.; Özcan, E.; Canıtez, F.; John, R.: Interval type-2 fuzzy sets improved by Simulated Annealing for locating the electric charging stations. Inf. Sci. 547, 641–666 (2021)MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Deveci, M.; Canıtez, F.; Gökaşar, I.: WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustain. Urban Areas 41, 777–791 (2018) Deveci, M.; Canıtez, F.; Gökaşar, I.: WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustain. Urban Areas 41, 777–791 (2018)
13.
go back to reference Bilisik, O.N.; Erdogan, M.; Kaya, I.; Baracli, H.: A hybrid fuzzy methodology to evaluate customer satisfaction in a public transportation system for Istanbul. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 24, 1141–1159 (2013)CrossRef Bilisik, O.N.; Erdogan, M.; Kaya, I.; Baracli, H.: A hybrid fuzzy methodology to evaluate customer satisfaction in a public transportation system for Istanbul. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 24, 1141–1159 (2013)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Celik, E.; Bilisik, O.N.; Erdogan, M.; Gumus, A.T.; Baracli, H.: An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transp. Res. E-Log 58, 28–51 (2013)CrossRef Celik, E.; Bilisik, O.N.; Erdogan, M.; Gumus, A.T.; Baracli, H.: An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transp. Res. E-Log 58, 28–51 (2013)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kesten, A.S.; Ogut, K.S.: A new passenger-oriented performance measurement framework for public rail transportation systems. Promet-Traffic Transp. 26, 299–311 (2014)CrossRef Kesten, A.S.; Ogut, K.S.: A new passenger-oriented performance measurement framework for public rail transportation systems. Promet-Traffic Transp. 26, 299–311 (2014)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Celik, E.; Aydin, N.; Gumus, A.T.: A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: a real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transp. Policy 36, 283–293 (2014)CrossRef Celik, E.; Aydin, N.; Gumus, A.T.: A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: a real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transp. Policy 36, 283–293 (2014)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aydin, N.; Celik, E.; Gumus, A.T.: A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 61–81 (2015)CrossRef Aydin, N.; Celik, E.; Gumus, A.T.: A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 61–81 (2015)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Isikli, E.; Aydin, N.; Celik, E.; Gumus, A.T.: Identifying key factors of rail transit service quality: an empirical analysis for Istanbul. J. Public Transp. 20, 63–90 (2017)CrossRef Isikli, E.; Aydin, N.; Celik, E.; Gumus, A.T.: Identifying key factors of rail transit service quality: an empirical analysis for Istanbul. J. Public Transp. 20, 63–90 (2017)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yanik, S.; Aktas, E.; Topcu, Y.I.: Traveler satisfaction in rapid rail systems: the case of Istanbul metro. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 642–658 (2017)CrossRef Yanik, S.; Aktas, E.; Topcu, Y.I.: Traveler satisfaction in rapid rail systems: the case of Istanbul metro. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 642–658 (2017)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Aydin, N.: A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems. Transp. Policy 55, 87–98 (2017)CrossRef Aydin, N.: A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems. Transp. Policy 55, 87–98 (2017)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ekinci, Y.; Uray, N.; Ulengin, F.; Duran, C.: A segmentation based analysis for measuring customer satisfaction in maritime transportation. Transport 33, 104–118 (2018)CrossRef Ekinci, Y.; Uray, N.; Ulengin, F.; Duran, C.: A segmentation based analysis for measuring customer satisfaction in maritime transportation. Transport 33, 104–118 (2018)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ona, J.; Ona, R.; Lopez, G.: Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: a step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation. Transportation 43, 725–747 (2016)CrossRef Ona, J.; Ona, R.; Lopez, G.: Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: a step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation. Transportation 43, 725–747 (2016)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Guirao, B.; Garcia-Pastor, A.; Eugenia Lopez-Lambas, M.: The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners’ needs. Transp. Policy 49, 68–77 (2016)CrossRef Guirao, B.; Garcia-Pastor, A.; Eugenia Lopez-Lambas, M.: The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners’ needs. Transp. Policy 49, 68–77 (2016)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Joewono, T.B.; Tarigan, A.K.M.; Susilo, Y.O.: Road-based public transportation in urban areas of Indonesia: what policies do users expect to improve the service quality? Transp. Policy 49, 114–124 (2016)CrossRef Joewono, T.B.; Tarigan, A.K.M.; Susilo, Y.O.: Road-based public transportation in urban areas of Indonesia: what policies do users expect to improve the service quality? Transp. Policy 49, 114–124 (2016)CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shen, W.; Xiao, W.; Wang, X.: Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: a structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transp. Policy 46, 20–31 (2016)CrossRef Shen, W.; Xiao, W.; Wang, X.: Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: a structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transp. Policy 46, 20–31 (2016)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kim, S.H.; Chung, J.-H.; Park, S.; Choi, K.: Analysis of user satisfaction to promote public transportation: a pattern-recognition approach focusing on out-of-vehicle time. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 582–592 (2017)CrossRef Kim, S.H.; Chung, J.-H.; Park, S.; Choi, K.: Analysis of user satisfaction to promote public transportation: a pattern-recognition approach focusing on out-of-vehicle time. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 582–592 (2017)CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Colesca, S.E.; Pacesila, M.; Burcea, S.G.; Ciocoiu, C.N.; Bugheanu, A.M.: Analysis of passenger’s satisfaction with the quality of the public transportation mode choices in Bucharest: a fuzzy approach. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 51, 109–125 (2017) Colesca, S.E.; Pacesila, M.; Burcea, S.G.; Ciocoiu, C.N.; Bugheanu, A.M.: Analysis of passenger’s satisfaction with the quality of the public transportation mode choices in Bucharest: a fuzzy approach. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 51, 109–125 (2017)
28.
go back to reference Dehghani, A.; Kheirkhah, A.S.; Ahadi, H.R.: A hierarchical TOPSIS method based on type-2 fuzzy sets to evaluate service quality of public transportation. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Pract. 24, 505–525 (2017) Dehghani, A.; Kheirkhah, A.S.; Ahadi, H.R.: A hierarchical TOPSIS method based on type-2 fuzzy sets to evaluate service quality of public transportation. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Pract. 24, 505–525 (2017)
29.
go back to reference Nassereddine, M.; Eskandari, H.: An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 106, 427–439 (2017)CrossRef Nassereddine, M.; Eskandari, H.: An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 106, 427–439 (2017)CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fu, X.; Juan, Z.: Understanding public transit use behavior: integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory. Transportation 44, 1021–1042 (2017)CrossRef Fu, X.; Juan, Z.: Understanding public transit use behavior: integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory. Transportation 44, 1021–1042 (2017)CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Allen, J.; Carlos Munoz, J.; Dios Ortuzar, J.: Modelling service-specific and global transit satisfaction under travel and user heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113, 509–528 (2018)CrossRef Allen, J.; Carlos Munoz, J.; Dios Ortuzar, J.: Modelling service-specific and global transit satisfaction under travel and user heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113, 509–528 (2018)CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sun, S.-C.: Public transit loyalty modeling considering the effect of passengers' emotional value: a case study in Xiamen. China. J. Adv. Transp. 2018, 1–12 (2018) Sun, S.-C.: Public transit loyalty modeling considering the effect of passengers' emotional value: a case study in Xiamen. China. J. Adv. Transp. 2018, 1–12 (2018)
33.
go back to reference Bajcetic, S.; Tica, S.; Zivanovic, P.; Milovanovic, B.; Dorojevic, A.: Analysis of public transport users’ satisfaction using quality function deployment: Belgrade case study. Transport 33, 609–618 (2018)CrossRef Bajcetic, S.; Tica, S.; Zivanovic, P.; Milovanovic, B.; Dorojevic, A.: Analysis of public transport users’ satisfaction using quality function deployment: Belgrade case study. Transport 33, 609–618 (2018)CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Weng, J.; Di, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Mao, L.: A bus service evaluation method from passenger’s perspective based on satisfaction surveys: a case study of Beijing, China. Sustainability 10, 2723 (2018)CrossRef Weng, J.; Di, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Mao, L.: A bus service evaluation method from passenger’s perspective based on satisfaction surveys: a case study of Beijing, China. Sustainability 10, 2723 (2018)CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lin, Z.; Vlachos, I.: An advanced analytical framework for improving customer satisfaction: a case of air passengers. Transp. Res. E-Log. 114, 185–195 (2018)CrossRef Lin, Z.; Vlachos, I.: An advanced analytical framework for improving customer satisfaction: a case of air passengers. Transp. Res. E-Log. 114, 185–195 (2018)CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Baouni, T.; De Ona, R.; Merad, B.; Tahraoui, L.; Machado-Leon, J.L.; De Ona, J.: Analysıs of the main service quality dimensions affecting satisfaction of the metropolitan rail public transit users in Algiers. Tema-J. Land Use Mobil. Environ. 2018(1), 67–82 (2018) Baouni, T.; De Ona, R.; Merad, B.; Tahraoui, L.; Machado-Leon, J.L.; De Ona, J.: Analysıs of the main service quality dimensions affecting satisfaction of the metropolitan rail public transit users in Algiers. Tema-J. Land Use Mobil. Environ. 2018(1), 67–82 (2018)
37.
go back to reference Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, H.: Assessing customer satisfaction of urban rail transit network in Tianjin based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision model. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2018, 1–11 (2018) Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, H.: Assessing customer satisfaction of urban rail transit network in Tianjin based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision model. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2018, 1–11 (2018)
38.
go back to reference Mavi, R.K.; Zarbakhshnia, N.; Khazraei, A.: Bus rapid transit (BRT): a simulation and multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. Transp. Policy 72, 187–197 (2018)CrossRef Mavi, R.K.; Zarbakhshnia, N.; Khazraei, A.: Bus rapid transit (BRT): a simulation and multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. Transp. Policy 72, 187–197 (2018)CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Aquino, J.T.; Coutinho de Melo, F.J.; Jeronimo, T.B.; Medeiros, D.D.: Evaluation of quality in public transport services: the use of quality dimensions as an input for fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 176–193 (2019)CrossRef Aquino, J.T.; Coutinho de Melo, F.J.; Jeronimo, T.B.; Medeiros, D.D.: Evaluation of quality in public transport services: the use of quality dimensions as an input for fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 176–193 (2019)CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Valencia, A.; Rosas-Satizabal, D.; Paris, D.: Importance-performance analysis in public transportation: methodological revision for practical implementation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673, 710–723 (2019)CrossRef Rodriguez-Valencia, A.; Rosas-Satizabal, D.; Paris, D.: Importance-performance analysis in public transportation: methodological revision for practical implementation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673, 710–723 (2019)CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Görener, A.; Ayvaz, B.; Kuşakcı, A.O.; Altınok, E.: A hybrid type-2 fuzzy based supplier performance evaluation methodology: the Turkish Airlines technic case. Appl. Soft Comput. 56, 436–445 (2017)CrossRef Görener, A.; Ayvaz, B.; Kuşakcı, A.O.; Altınok, E.: A hybrid type-2 fuzzy based supplier performance evaluation methodology: the Turkish Airlines technic case. Appl. Soft Comput. 56, 436–445 (2017)CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Gorzałczany, M.B.: A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 21(1), 1–17 (1987)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Gorzałczany, M.B.: A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 21(1), 1–17 (1987)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
43.
go back to reference John, R.; Coupland, S.: Type-2 fuzzy logic: a historical view. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2(1), 57–62 (2007)CrossRef John, R.; Coupland, S.: Type-2 fuzzy logic: a historical view. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2(1), 57–62 (2007)CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Chen, S.-M.; Lee, L.-W.: Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 824–833 (2010)CrossRef Chen, S.-M.; Lee, L.-W.: Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 824–833 (2010)CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Chen, S.-M.; Yang, M.-W.; Lee, L.-W.; Yang, S.-W.: Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(5), 5295–5308 (2012)CrossRef Chen, S.-M.; Yang, M.-W.; Lee, L.-W.; Yang, S.-W.: Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(5), 5295–5308 (2012)CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Celik, E.; Gumus, A.T.; Alegoz, M.: A trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to identify and evaluate critical success factors for humanitarian relief logistics management. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27(6), 2847–2855 (2014)CrossRef Celik, E.; Gumus, A.T.; Alegoz, M.: A trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to identify and evaluate critical success factors for humanitarian relief logistics management. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27(6), 2847–2855 (2014)CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Abdullah, L.; Najib, L.: A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3297–3305 (2014)CrossRef Abdullah, L.; Najib, L.: A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3297–3305 (2014)CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Cevik Onar, S.; Oztaysi, B.; Kahraman, C.: Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval Type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 7(5), 1002–1021 (2014)CrossRef Cevik Onar, S.; Oztaysi, B.; Kahraman, C.: Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval Type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 7(5), 1002–1021 (2014)CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Öztayşi, B.: A group decision making approach using interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP for enterprise information systems project selection. J. Multiple-valued Logic Soft Comput. 24(5–6), 475–500 (2015) Öztayşi, B.: A group decision making approach using interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP for enterprise information systems project selection. J. Multiple-valued Logic Soft Comput. 24(5–6), 475–500 (2015)
50.
go back to reference Şahin, A.; Yapıcı Pehlivan, N.: Evaluation of lifequality by integrated method of AHP and TOPSIS based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 46(3), 511–523 (2017)MATH Şahin, A.; Yapıcı Pehlivan, N.: Evaluation of lifequality by integrated method of AHP and TOPSIS based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 46(3), 511–523 (2017)MATH
51.
go back to reference Yilmaz, M.K.; Kusakci, A.O.; Tatoglu, E.; Icten, O.; Yetgin, F.: Performance evaluation of real estate investment trusts using a hybridized interval Type-2 fuzzy AHP-DEA approach: the case of Borsa Istanbul. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 18(6), 1785–1820 (2019)CrossRef Yilmaz, M.K.; Kusakci, A.O.; Tatoglu, E.; Icten, O.; Yetgin, F.: Performance evaluation of real estate investment trusts using a hybridized interval Type-2 fuzzy AHP-DEA approach: the case of Borsa Istanbul. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 18(6), 1785–1820 (2019)CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Calik, A.: A multi-criteria evaluation for sustainable supplier selection based on fuzzy sets. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 10(1), 95–113 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef Calik, A.: A multi-criteria evaluation for sustainable supplier selection based on fuzzy sets. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 10(1), 95–113 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Hwang, C.; Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)MATHCrossRef Hwang, C.; Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)MATHCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Erdogan, M.; Kaya, I.: An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 12(1), 1–25 (2015)MathSciNet Erdogan, M.; Kaya, I.: An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 12(1), 1–25 (2015)MathSciNet
55.
go back to reference Dymova, L.; Sevastjanov, P.; Tikhonenko, A.: An interval type-2 fuzzy extension of the TOPSIS method using alpha cuts. Knowl. Based Syst. 83, 116–127 (2015)CrossRef Dymova, L.; Sevastjanov, P.; Tikhonenko, A.: An interval type-2 fuzzy extension of the TOPSIS method using alpha cuts. Knowl. Based Syst. 83, 116–127 (2015)CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Mesut, K.; Kaya, I.: Investment project evaluation by a decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 27, 399–410 (2015)CrossRef Mesut, K.; Kaya, I.: Investment project evaluation by a decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 27, 399–410 (2015)CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Liao, T.W.: Two interval type 2 fuzzy TOPSIS material selection methods. Mater. Des. 88, 1088–1099 (2015)CrossRef Liao, T.W.: Two interval type 2 fuzzy TOPSIS material selection methods. Mater. Des. 88, 1088–1099 (2015)CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Deveci, M.; Demirel, N.Ç.; Ahmetoglu, E.: Airline new route selection based on interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM: a case study of new route between Turkey-North American region destinations. J. Air Transp. Manag. 59, 83–99 (2017)CrossRef Deveci, M.; Demirel, N.Ç.; Ahmetoglu, E.: Airline new route selection based on interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM: a case study of new route between Turkey-North American region destinations. J. Air Transp. Manag. 59, 83–99 (2017)CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Celik, E.; Akyuz, E.: An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Eng. 155, 371–381 (2018)CrossRef Celik, E.; Akyuz, E.: An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Eng. 155, 371–381 (2018)CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.: A novel approach to multi attribute group decision making based on trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy soft sets. Appl. Math. Model. 37(7), 4948–4971 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.: A novel approach to multi attribute group decision making based on trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy soft sets. Appl. Math. Model. 37(7), 4948–4971 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
61.
go back to reference UNE-EN:13186, Transportation-Logistics and services-Public passenger transport-Service quality definition, targeting and measurement, AENOR (2003) UNE-EN:13186, Transportation-Logistics and services-Public passenger transport-Service quality definition, targeting and measurement, AENOR (2003)
Metadata
Title
A Hybrid Type-2 Fuzzy Performance Evaluation Model for Public Transport Services
Author
Fatih Öztürk
Publication date
24-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Issue 10/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Electronic ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05687-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2021

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 10/2021 Go to the issue

Premium Partners