Top

next article The Just World Gap, Privilege, and Legal Social...

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

26-08-2019 | Issue 1/2020

A Latent Factor Approach to Belief in a Just World and its Association with Well-Being

Journal:: Social Justice Research > Issue 1/2020

Authors:: Carolyn L. Hafer, Michael A. Busseri, Alicia N. Rubel, Caroline E. Drolet, Jennifer N. Cherrington

Supplementary Content

» Get access to the full-text

Important notes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00342-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Drawing on justice motive theory (Lerner et al. in Berkowitz and Walster (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, 1976), in the present work we examine belief in a just world as an underlying (latent) factor, reflected in general and personal beliefs. We first conducted a meta-analysis encompassing 51 articles, 76 samples, 19 countries and 23,900 participants, which revealed a positive association between the two forms of belief in a just world across studies (meta-analytic r = .52 [95% CI = .48, .56], p < .001) and within each of the individual samples. These results suggest that general and personal belief in a just world could be treated as joint indicators of a latent belief in a just world factor. In a second study, an online sample of participants (n = 311 participants, 54% women, M_age = 37.78 years) completed measures of general and personal belief in a just world, which we treated as indicators of latent belief in a just world. Measures of subjective well-being and psychological well-being were treated as indicators of latent well-being. Indicators loaded strongly on their respective latent factors, and the latent factors were strongly positively correlated (r = .74, p < .001). These results suggest that the link between belief in a just world and well-being may be even more substantial than has been previously recognized. In accordance with the original conceptualization of belief in a just world in justice motive theory, our results suggest benefits to examining the shared and unique aspects of general and personal beliefs in a just world.

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 58.000 Bücher
über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press. CrossRef

Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310391271. CrossRefPubMed

Chen, S. X., Lam, B. C. P., Wesley, C. H. W., Ng, J. C. K., Butchel, E. E., Guan, Y., et al. (2016). Do people’s world views matter? The why and how. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000061. CrossRefPubMed

Correia, I., Batista, M. T., & Lima, M. L. (2009). Does the belief in a just world bring happiness? Causal relationships among belief in a just world, life satisfaction and mood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530802579515. CrossRef

Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2007). Belief in a just world, justice concerns, and well-being at Portuguese schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173464. CrossRef

Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047. CrossRef

Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3383-9. CrossRef

Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world as motive: Validity correlates of two scales]. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596–615.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. CrossRef

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y. CrossRef

Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000209. CrossRefPubMed

Donat, M., Peter, F., Dalbert, C., & Kamble, S. V. (2016). The meaning of students’ personal belief in a just world for positive and negative aspects of school-specific well-being. Social Justice Research, 29, 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0247-5. CrossRef

ǅuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: The impact of belief in a just world. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 732–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00240.x. CrossRef

Fatima, I., & Suhail, K. (2010). Belief in a just world and subjective well-being: Mothers of normal and Down syndrome children. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207591003774519. CrossRefPubMed

Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77, 1025–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x. CrossRefPubMed

Hafer, C. L., & Rubel, A. N. (2015a). Long-term focus and prosocial-antisocial tendencies interact to predict belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.006. CrossRef

Hafer, C. L., & Rubel, A. N. (2015b). The why and how of defending belief in a just world. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 51, pp. 41–96). London: Elsevier.

Hafer, C. L., & Sutton, R. (2016). Belief in a just world. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). New York: Springer. CrossRef

Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0. CrossRef

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York: Free Press.

Jiang, H., Chen, G., & Wang, T. (2017). Relationship between belief in a just world and Internet altruistic behavior in a sample of Chinese undergraduates: Multiple mediating roles of gratitude and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.005. CrossRef

Jovanovic, V. (2015). Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.026. CrossRef

Kamble, S. V., & Dalbert, C. (2012). Belief in a just world and wellbeing in Indian schools. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.626047. CrossRefPubMed

Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007. CrossRefPubMed

Khera, M. L. K., Harvey, A. J., & Callan, M. J. (2014). Beliefs in a just world, subjective well-being and attitudes towards refugees among refugee workers. Social Justice Research, 27, 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0220-8. CrossRef

King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179. CrossRefPubMed

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum. CrossRef

Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 133–162). New York: Academic Press.

Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023562. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Linton, M.-J., Diepee, P., & Medina-Lara, A. (2016). Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: Exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. British Medical Journal Open, 6, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641. CrossRef

Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227002. CrossRef

Lucas, T., Kamble, S. V., Shengtao Wu, M., Zhdanova, L., & Wendorf, C. A. (2016). Distributive and procedural justice for self and others: Measurement invariance and links to life satisfaction in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115615962. CrossRef

Lucas, T., Zhdanova, L., Wendorf, C. A., & Alexander, S. (2013). Procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others: Multilevel associations with life satisfaction and self-related health. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9387-6. CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. CrossRefPubMed

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069. CrossRef

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719. CrossRefPubMed

Schaafsma, J. (2013). Through the lens of justice: Just world beliefs mediate relationships between perceived discrimination and subjective well-being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.04.002. CrossRef

Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism? Cognition and Emotion, 16, 705–719. CrossRef

Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010. CrossRef

Trent, J., Lavelock, C., & King, L. A. (2013). Processing fluency, positive affect, and judgments of meaning in life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.772220. CrossRef

Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678. CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063. CrossRefPubMed

Wilson, D. B. (2005). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Retrieved from: http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html.

Wu, M. S., Yan, X., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Li, J., Zhu, Z., et al. (2011). General belief in a just world and resilience: Evidence from a collectivistic culture. European Journal of Personality, 25, 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.807. CrossRef

Zhdanova, L., & Lucas, T. (2016). Justice beliefs, personal well-being and harsh social attitudes: Initial demonstration of a polynomial regression and response surface methodology. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 35, 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9328-8. CrossRef

Title: A Latent Factor Approach to Belief in a Just World and its Association with Well-Being
Authors:: Carolyn L. Hafer
Michael A. Busseri
Alicia N. Rubel
Caroline E. Drolet
Jennifer N. Cherrington
Publication date: 26-08-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00342-8
Publisher: Springer US
Journal: Social Justice Research
Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6725

Premium Partner

Image Credits

Springer Professional

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher's Note

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Measuring Neoliberalism: Development and Initial Validation of a Scale of Anti-Neoliberal Attitudes

Neoliberalism: An Ideological Barrier to Feminist Identification and Collective Action

The Just World Gap, Privilege, and Legal Socialization: A Study Among Brazilian Preadolescents

The Complexity of Policy Preferences: Examining Self-interest, Group-Interest, and Race Consciousness Across Race and Political Ideology

Premium Partner