Top

Review of Managerial Science

Published in:

27-05-2023 | Original Paper

A matter of motivation: the impact of enterprise digital transformation on green innovation

Authors: Qiuqin He, Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete, Dolores Botella-Carrubi

Published in: Review of Managerial Science | Issue 5/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technology has increasingly challenged conventional knowledge in corporate green innovation. Debate surrounding whether and how enterprise digital transformation enhances green innovation outcomes is gathering pace. However, there remains no conclusive evidence, in large part because the motivation for green innovation is overlooked. Using data from Chinese publicly listed firms between 2008 and 2021, this study explores the impact of digital transformation on the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions of green innovation through the lens of company motivations, distinguishing green innovation as substantive-driven and strategic-driven. The results reveal that digital transformation significantly impacts green innovation by strengthening the resource and knowledge bases, which is consistent with the resource-based view. However, considering the motivations of green innovation, we find that digital transformation positively affects substantive innovation, but does not affect strategic green innovation. We further explore the boundary conditions of digital transformation’s effects on green innovation by analyzing the moderating effect of environmental orientation (EO) and separating EO’s motivations into voluntary-driven and mandatory-driven. The results show that environmental orientation positively moderates the relationship between digital transformation and green innovation and that only voluntary-driven EO has a positive moderating effect. Our findings add new insights to the theory linking strategy decision-making to green innovation performance, with specific regard to firms’ motivations.

previous article Setting the development of digitalization: state-of-the-art and potential for future research in cooperatives

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aboelmaged M, Hashem G (2019) Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: the mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. J Clean Prod 220:853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.150CrossRef

Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Denyer D, Overy P (2016) Sustainability-oriented innovation: a systematic review. Int J Manag Rev 18(2):180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068CrossRef

Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes IIKE (2004) The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Acc Organ Soc 29(5–6):447–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00032-1CrossRef

Alzamora-Ruiz J, Fuentes-Fuentes MD, Martinez-Fiestas M (2021) Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs. Int Entrep Manag J 17(4):1917–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00743-9CrossRef

Ardito L, Raby S, Albino V, Bertoldi B (2021) The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: implications for innovation performance. J Bus Res 123:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022CrossRef

Åström J, Reim W, Parida V (2022) Value creation and value capture for AI business model innovation: a three-phase process framework. Rev Manag Sci 16(7):2111–2133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00521-zCrossRef

Awan U, Arnold MG, Gölgeci I (2021) Enhancing green product and process innovation: towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment. Bus Strategy Environ 30(2):1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2684CrossRef

Banerjee SB (2002) Corporate environmentalism: the construct and its measurement. J Bus Res 55(3):177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1CrossRef

Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108CrossRef

Barney JB (2001) Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. J Manage 27(6):643–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602CrossRef

Barroso-Castro C, Castaneda MDD, Serrano MDR (2022) Listed SMEs and innovation: the role of founding board members. Int Entrep Manag J 18(2):901–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00709-3CrossRef

Boons F, Montalvo C, Quist J, Wagner M (2013) Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J Clean Prod 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013CrossRef

Bossle MB, de Barcellos MD, Vieira LM, Sauvée L (2016) The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. J Clean Prod 113:861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.033CrossRef

Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):793–808. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815736CrossRef

Bu M, Qiao Z, Liu B (2020) Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China. Econ Model 89:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.12.020CrossRef

Chen H, Tian Z (2022) Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: a fuzzy-set QCA approach. J Bus Res 139:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.048CrossRef

Chen X, Tan Y, Lin M, Zhang G, Ma W, Yang S, Peng Y (2021) How information technology investment affects green innovation in Chinese heavy polluting enterprises. Front Energy 9

Claggett JL, Karahanna E (2018) Unpacking the structure of coordination mechanisms and the role of relational coordination in an era of digitally mediated work processes. Acad Manage Rev 43(4):704–722. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0325CrossRef

De Marchi V (2012) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 41(3):614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002CrossRef

de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC, Foropon C, Godinho Filho M (2018) When titans meet–can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technol Forecast Soc Change 132:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017CrossRef

Diez-Martinez I, Peiro-Signes A, Segarra-Oña M (2022) The links between active cooperation and eco-innovation orientation of firms: a multi-analysis study. Bus Strategy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3145CrossRef

Du X, Weng J, Zeng Q, Chang Y, Pei H (2017) Do lenders applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from chinese private-owned firms. J Bus Ethics 143(1):179–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2758-2CrossRef

Endres H, Huesig S, Pesch R (2022) Digital innovation management for entrepreneurial ecosystems: services and functionalities as drivers of innovation management software adoption. Rev Manag Sci 16(1):135–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00441-4CrossRef

Feng L, Zhao W, Li H, Song Y (2018) The effect of environmental orientation on green innovation: do political ties matter? Sustainability 10(12):4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124674CrossRef

Feng H, Wang F, Song G, Liu L (2022) Digital Transformation on Enterprise Green Innovation: effect and transmission mechanism. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(17):10614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710614CrossRef

Ferreira JJ, Fernandes CI, Kraus S (2019) Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Rev Manag Sci 13(1):181–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3CrossRef

Fiorini PDC, Jabbour CJC, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Stefanelli NO, Fernando Y (2018) Interplay between information systems and environmental management in ISO 14001-certified companies: implications for future research on big data. Manage Decis 57(8):1883–1901. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0739CrossRef

Fryxell GE, Szeto A (2002) The influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification: an empirical study of ISO 14001 certified facilities in Hong Kong. J Environ Manage 65(3):223–238. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0538CrossRef

Gil-Alana LA, Škare M, Claudio-Quiroga G (2020) Innovation and knowledge as drivers of the ‘great decoupling’ in China: using long memory methods. J Innov Knowl 5(4):266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.08.003CrossRef

Giusti JD, Alberti FG, Belfanti F (2020) Makers and clusters. Knowledge leaks in open innovation networks. J Innov Knowl 5(1):20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.04.001CrossRef

Gong C, Ribiere V (2021) Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation 102:102217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217CrossRef

González-Benito J, González‐Benito O (2005) An analysis of the relationship between environmental motivations and ISO14001 certification. Br J Manage 16(2):133–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00436.xCrossRef

Graham S, Potter A (2015) Environmental operations management and its links with proactivity and performance: a study of the UK food industry. Int J Prod Econ 170:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.021CrossRef

Hajli N (2015) Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. J Manage Inform Syst 35(2):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005CrossRef

He J, Su H (2022) Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: the moderating role of Regulatory pressure and International Opportunities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(20):13321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013321CrossRef

Jiang W, Chai H, Shao J, Feng T (2018) Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: a dynamic capability perspective. J Clean Prod 198:1311–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.104CrossRef

Kang Y, He X (2018) Institutional forces and environmental management strategy: moderating effects of environmental orientation and innovation capability. Manag Organ Rev 14(3):577–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.56CrossRef

Khanin D, Rosenfield R, Mahto RV, Singhal C (2022) Barriers to entrepreneurship: opportunity recognition vs. opportunity pursuit. Rev Manag Sci 16(4):1147–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00477-6CrossRef

Klimas P, Czakon W (2022) Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems. Rev Manag Sci 16(1):249–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00439-4CrossRef

Kraus S, Roig-Tierno N, Bouncken RB (2019) Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 13(3):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00333-8CrossRef

Kraus S, Jones P, Kailer N, Weinmann A, Chaparro-Banegas N, Roig-Tierno N (2021) Digital transformation: an overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open 11(3):21582440211047576. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576CrossRef

Kraus S, Durst S, Ferreira JJ, Veiga P, Kailer N, Weinmann A (2022) Digital transformation in business and management research: an overview of the current status quo. Int J Inf Manage 63:102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466CrossRef

Kunapatarawong R, Martínez-Ros E (2016) Towards green growth: how does green innovation affect employment? Res Policy 45(6):1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.013CrossRef

Lee KH, Min B (2015) Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108:534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114CrossRef

Lee MT, Suh I (2022) Understanding the effects of Environment, Social, and governance conduct on financial performance: arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustain Technol Entrep 1(1):100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004CrossRef

Li W, Zheng M (2016) Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? ——Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ innovation. Econ Res J (In Chinese) 04:60–73

Li D, Zheng M, Cao C, Chen X, Ren S, Huang M (2017) The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: evidence from China top 100. J Clean Prod 141:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123CrossRef

Li-Ying J, Mothe C, Nguyen TTU (2018) Linking forms of inbound open innovation to a driver-based typology of environmental innovation: evidence from french manufacturing firms. Technol Forecast Soc Change 135:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.031CrossRef

Melville NP (2010) Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Q 34(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721412CrossRef

Meyskens M, Carsrud AL (2013) Nascent green-technology ventures: a study assessing the role of partnership diversity in firm success. Small Bus Econ 40:739–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9400-1CrossRef

Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M (2019) The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res Policy 48(8):103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018CrossRef

Ortigueira-Sánchez LC, Welsh DH, Stein WC (2022) Innovation Drivers for Export Performance. Sustain Technol Entrep 1(2):100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100013CrossRef

Pagoropoulos A, Pigosso DC, McAloone TC (2017) The emergent role of digital technologies in the Circular Economy: a review. Procedia CIRP 64:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047CrossRef

Parker LD (2000) Green strategy costing: early days. Aust Acc Rev 10(20):46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2000.tb00054.xCrossRef

Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. Am J Political Sci 49(2):235–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.xCrossRef

Prajogo D, Tang AK, Lai KH (2012) Do firms get what they want from ISO 14001 adoption?: an australian perspective. J Clean Prod 33:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.019CrossRef

Quan X, Ke Y, Qian Y, Zhang Y (2023) CEO foreign experience and green innovation: evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 182:535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04977-zCrossRef

Ramanathan R, Black A, Nath P, Muyldermans L (2010) Impact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector. Manage Decis 48(10):1493–1513. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011090298CrossRef

Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32(2):319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3CrossRef

Rennings K, Ziegler A, Ankele K, Hoffmann E (2006) The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecol Econ 57(1):45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.013CrossRef

Rubio-Andrés M, del Ramos-González M, Sastre-Castillo M MÁ (2022) Driving innovation management to create shared value and sustainable growth. Rev Manag Sci 16(7):2181–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00520-0CrossRef

Saarikko T, Westergren UH, Blomquist T (2017) The internet of things: are you ready for what’s coming? Bus Horiz 60(5):667–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.010CrossRef

Sahoo S, Kumar A, Mani V, Venkatesh VG, Kamble S (2022) Big Data Management Activities for Sustainable Business Performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the indian Pharmaceutical Sector. IEEE T Eng Manage. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3174782CrossRef

Song W, Yu H (2018) Green innovation strategy and green innovation: the roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(2):135–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1445CrossRef

Song Y, Escobar O, Arzubiaga U, De Massis A (2022) The digital transformation of a traditional market into an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Rev Manag Sci 16(1):65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00438-5CrossRef

Srivastava RK, Fahey L, Christensen HK (2001) The resource-based view and marketing: the role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. J Manage 27(6):777–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700610CrossRef

Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

Tipu SAA (2022) Organizational change for environmental, social, and financial sustainability: a systematic literature review. Rev Manag Sci 16(6):1697–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00494-5CrossRef

Tong TW, He W, He ZL, Lu J (2014) Patent regime shift and firm innovation: Evidence from the second amendment to China’s patent law. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1):14174. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.14174abstract

Westerman G, Bonnet D, McAfee A (2014) Leading digital: turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press, Boston

Xie X, Huo J, Qi G, Zhu KX (2015) Green process innovation and financial performance in emerging economies: moderating effects of absorptive capacity and green subsidies. IEEE T Eng Manage 63(1):101–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2507585CrossRef

Yang Y, Jiang Y (2023) Does suppliers’ slack influence the relationship between buyers’ environmental orientation and green innovation? J Bus Res 157:113569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113569CrossRef

Zameer H, Wang Y, Yasmeen H, Mubarak S (2022) Green innovation as a mediator in the impact of business analytics and environmental orientation on green competitive advantage. Manage Decis 60(2):488–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2020-0065CrossRef

Zhang JA, Walton S (2017) Eco-innovation and business performance: the moderating effects of environmental orientation and resource commitment in green‐oriented SMEs. R D Manag 47(5):E26–E39. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12241CrossRef

Zhang F, Zhu L (2019) Enhancing corporate sustainable development: stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Bus Strategy Environ 28(6):1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2298CrossRef

Zhang T, Shi ZZ, Shi YR, Chen NJ (2021) Enterprise digital transformation and production efficiency: mechanism analysis and empirical research. Econ Res-Ekon Istraz 35(1):2781–2792. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1980731CrossRef

Zhang XE, Teng X, Le Y, Li Y (2022) Strategic orientations and responsible innovation in SMEs: the moderating effects of environmental turbulence. Bus Strategy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3283CrossRef

Zhou X, Jia M, Wang L, Sharma GD, Zhao X, Ma X (2022) Modelling and simulation of a four-group evolutionary game model for green innovation stakeholders: contextual evidence in lens of sustainable development. Renew Energy 197:500–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.068CrossRef

Ziegler A, Nogareda JS (2009) Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: exploring the causal relationship. Res Policy 38(5):885–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.020CrossRef

Title: A matter of motivation: the impact of enterprise digital transformation on green innovation
Authors: Qiuqin He
Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete
Dolores Botella-Carrubi
Publication date: 27-05-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Review of Managerial Science / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00665-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Setting the development of digitalization: state-of-the-art and potential for future research in cooperatives

How life context affects entrepreneurs' passion and performance

Leadership in a different light: understanding co-worker exchange in a triad

Performance below and above aspirations as an antecedent of succession planning in family firms: A socio-emotional wealth mixed gamble approach

Developing a measurement scale of corporate socially responsible entrepreneurship in sustainable management

The EFQM excellence model, the knowledge management process and the corresponding results: an explanatory and predictive study