Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. A Methodological Framework for Nuclear Proliferation in the South

Authors : Lucky E. Asuelime, Raquel A. Adekoye

Published in: Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents a methodological framework for nuclear proliferation and how the South African case may be situated. This chapter provides a unique prism through which nuclear proliferation can be methodologically understood. This is important due to the fact that nuclear-related data are largely undefined and states usually carry out nuclear activities in a clandestine manner. Nuclear politics and levels of advancement are shrouded in secrecy. Therefore, to ensure objectivity and the validity of data, a case study approach is projected as a viable method of analyzing nuclear history and politics. We cross-examined different sources of both primary and secondary information on the five recognized nuclear weapons powers—Britain, USA, Soviet Union, China, and France. This ensures the validity of the claims that we make in the study through the analysis of this material in the context of the cases.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Those who considered only an actual nuclear explosive test as nuclear proliferation would have had an optimistic view of proliferation trends, since only six countries had tested their nuclear explosive devices by the end of the 1980s, but others who regarded the possession of nuclear capability as proliferation would have projected 25–30 nuclear countries.
 
2
Note that the data here and in subsequent tables in other chapters reflect the situation during the 1980s and, therefore, do not reflect current policy positions. South Africa is categorized as a latent nuclear country in this study since I proceed as if South Africa had not officially announced that it had built six-and-a-half nuclear bombs. This approach is necessary for the most part of the study, simply for the purpose of analysis. This approach enables identification of the causes of future nuclear proliferation issues. Therefore, for the purposes of this study, the focus is on pre-1993 South Africa, when it was still internationally regarded as a nuclear threshold country.
 
3
North Korea may be included in this list, but it is not considered since no reliable information or data on its level of nuclear development was available at the time of the study.
 
4
In the case of South Africa, there was constant competition between Britain, France, and Germany regarding who would win the bid to supply nuclear infrastructure.
 
5
Testing nuclear explosive devices has been regarded an essential technical element of a nuclear weapons program since testing was known to be one of the critical constraints for any country that wishes to obtain highly reliable nuclear bombs. However, many have recently argued that test explosions are no longer necessary, owing to sophisticated laboratory equipment, pretested bomb plans obtained from advanced nuclear countries, and the technique of zero-yield tests.
 
6
For a review and assessment of the literature dealing with the Israeli case, see Dowth (1978).
 
Literature
go back to reference Alder, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground. European Journal of International Relations, 3, 319.CrossRef Alder, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground. European Journal of International Relations, 3, 319.CrossRef
go back to reference Asuelime, L. (2013). Drivers of nuclear proliferation in the global south: A historical analysis of South Africa. A PhD Thesis International Relations, submitted to the College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Unpublished). Asuelime, L. (2013). Drivers of nuclear proliferation in the global south: A historical analysis of South Africa. A PhD Thesis International Relations, submitted to the College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Unpublished).
go back to reference Asuelime, L., & Francis, S. (2014). Drivers of nuclear proliferation: South Africa’s incentives and constraints. Journal for Contemporary History, 39(1), 55–68. Asuelime, L., & Francis, S. (2014). Drivers of nuclear proliferation: South Africa’s incentives and constraints. Journal for Contemporary History, 39(1), 55–68.
go back to reference Baber, R. J. (1975). LDC nuclear power prospects, 1975–1990: Commercial, economic and security implications. Washington, DC: Baber Associate. Baber, R. J. (1975). LDC nuclear power prospects, 1975–1990: Commercial, economic and security implications. Washington, DC: Baber Associate.
go back to reference Beaton, L., & Maddox, J. (1962). The spread of nuclear weapon. New York: Praeger. Beaton, L., & Maddox, J. (1962). The spread of nuclear weapon. New York: Praeger.
go back to reference Brennan, D. (1976). A comprehensive test ban: Everybody or nobody. International Security, 1, 1 (Summer), 108. Brennan, D. (1976). A comprehensive test ban: Everybody or nobody. International Security, 1, 1 (Summer), 108.
go back to reference Cannizzo, C. (1982). A critique of the technical approach. In W. H. Kincade & C. Bertram (Eds.), Nuclear proliferation in the 1980s: Perspectives and proposals. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Cannizzo, C. (1982). A critique of the technical approach. In W. H. Kincade & C. Bertram (Eds.), Nuclear proliferation in the 1980s: Perspectives and proposals. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
go back to reference Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London: Sage.
go back to reference Dowth, A. (1978). Nuclear proliferation: The Israeli case. International Studies Quarterly, 22(March), 79–120.CrossRef Dowth, A. (1978). Nuclear proliferation: The Israeli case. International Studies Quarterly, 22(March), 79–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Dunn, L., & Overholt, W. (1976). The next phase in nuclear proliferation research. Orbis, 20, 2 (Summer), 1–2. Dunn, L., & Overholt, W. (1976). The next phase in nuclear proliferation research. Orbis, 20, 2 (Summer), 1–2.
go back to reference Filstead, W. J. (1970). Qualitative methodology: Firsthand involvement with the social world. Chicago: Markham. Filstead, W. J. (1970). Qualitative methodology: Firsthand involvement with the social world. Chicago: Markham.
go back to reference Goldblat, J. (1986). Will the NPT survive? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 42, 1 (January), 36. Goldblat, J. (1986). Will the NPT survive? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 42, 1 (January), 36.
go back to reference Kegley, C. W., Jr. (1980). International and domestic correlates of nuclear proliferation: A comparative analysis. Korea and World Affairs, 4, 5–37. Kegley, C. W., Jr. (1980). International and domestic correlates of nuclear proliferation: A comparative analysis. Korea and World Affairs, 4, 5–37.
go back to reference Kegley, C. W., Jr., Raymond, G. A., & Skinner, R. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of nuclear armament. In P. McGowan & C. W. Kegley Jr. (Eds.), Threats, weapons and foreign policy (pp. 231–255). London: Sage. Kegley, C. W., Jr., Raymond, G. A., & Skinner, R. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of nuclear armament. In P. McGowan & C. W. Kegley Jr. (Eds.), Threats, weapons and foreign policy (pp. 231–255). London: Sage.
go back to reference Kramish, A. (1963). The peaceful atom in foreign policy. New York: Harper and Row. Kramish, A. (1963). The peaceful atom in foreign policy. New York: Harper and Row.
go back to reference Meyer, S. M. (1984). The dynamics of nuclear proliferation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Meyer, S. M. (1984). The dynamics of nuclear proliferation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
go back to reference Office of Technology Assessment. (1977). Nuclear proliferation and safeguards. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service. Office of Technology Assessment. (1977). Nuclear proliferation and safeguards. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service.
go back to reference Potter, W. (1982). Nuclear power and nonproliferation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain. Potter, W. (1982). Nuclear power and nonproliferation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
go back to reference Quester, G. (1973). The politics of nuclear proliferation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Quester, G. (1973). The politics of nuclear proliferation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
go back to reference Reiss, M. (1988). Without the bomb: The politics of nuclear nonproliferation. New York: Columbia University Press. Reiss, M. (1988). Without the bomb: The politics of nuclear nonproliferation. New York: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Rosecrance, R. (1966). Problems of nuclear proliferation. Los Angeles: University of California. Rosecrance, R. (1966). Problems of nuclear proliferation. Los Angeles: University of California.
go back to reference Schlesinger, J. R. (1972). The strategic consequence of nuclear proliferation. In M. L. Rakov (Ed.), Arms and foreign policy in the nuclear age (pp. 360–361). New York: Oxford University Press. Schlesinger, J. R. (1972). The strategic consequence of nuclear proliferation. In M. L. Rakov (Ed.), Arms and foreign policy in the nuclear age (pp. 360–361). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Silverman, D. (1985). Qualitative methodology: Describing the social world. Aldershot: Brookfield. Silverman, D. (1985). Qualitative methodology: Describing the social world. Aldershot: Brookfield.
go back to reference Snyder, J. C. (1985). Iraq. In J. C. Snyder & S. F. Wells (Eds.), Limiting nuclear proliferation (pp. 3–42). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Snyder, J. C. (1985). Iraq. In J. C. Snyder & S. F. Wells (Eds.), Limiting nuclear proliferation (pp. 3–42). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
go back to reference Spector, L. (1984). Nuclear proliferation today. New York: Vintage Books. Spector, L. (1984). Nuclear proliferation today. New York: Vintage Books.
go back to reference Spector, L. S. (1985). Nuclear proliferation: The silent spread. Foreign Policy, 58(Spring), 53–78.CrossRef Spector, L. S. (1985). Nuclear proliferation: The silent spread. Foreign Policy, 58(Spring), 53–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Maanen, J. (1983). Qualitative methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage. Van Maanen, J. (1983). Qualitative methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
go back to reference Wentz, W. (1963). Nuclear proliferation. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. Wentz, W. (1963). Nuclear proliferation. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
Metadata
Title
A Methodological Framework for Nuclear Proliferation in the South
Authors
Lucky E. Asuelime
Raquel A. Adekoye
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33373-1_2