2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
A Multi-stage Approach to Curve Extraction
Authors : Yuliang Guo, Naman Kumar, Maruthi Narayanan, Benjamin Kimia
Published in: Computer Vision – ECCV 2014
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
We propose a multi-stage approach to curve extraction where the curve fragment search space is iteratively reduced by removing unlikely candidates using geometric constrains, but without affecting recall, to a point where the application of an objective functional becomes appropriate. The motivation in using multiple stages is to avoid the drawback of using a global functional directly on edges, which can result in non-salient but high scoring curve fragments, which arise from non-uniformly distributed edge evidence. The process progresses in stages from local to global: (
i
) edges, (
ii
) curvelets, (
iii
) unambiguous curve fragments, (
iv
) resolving ambiguities to generate a full set of curve fragment candidates, (
v
) merging curve fragments based on a learned photometric and geometric cues as well a novel
lateral edge sparsity
cue, and (
vi
) the application of a learned objective functional to get a final selection of curve fragments. The resulting curve fragments are typically visually salient and have been evaluated in two ways. First, we measure the stability of curve fragments when images undergo visual transformations such as change in viewpoints, illumination, and noise, a critical factor for curve fragments to be useful to later visual processes but one often ignored in evaluation. Second, we use a more traditional comparison against human annotation, but using the CFGD dataset and CFGD evaluation strategy rather than the standard BSDS counterpart, which is shown to be not appropriate for evaluating curve fragments. Under both evaluation schemes our results are significantly better than those state of the art algorithms whose implementations are publicly available.