Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neural Computing and Applications 6/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

A new multi-criteria weighting and ranking model for group decision-making analysis based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets to selection problems

Authors: Hossein Gitinavard, S. Meysam Mousavi, Behnam Vahdani

Published in: Neural Computing and Applications | Issue 6/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The multi-criteria group decision-making methods under fuzzy environments are developed to cope with imprecise and uncertain information for solving the complex group decision-making problems. A team of some professional experts for the assessment is established to judge candidates or alternatives among the chosen evaluation criteria. In this paper, a novel multi-criteria weighting and ranking model is introduced with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy setting, namely IVHF-MCWR, based on the group decision analysis. The interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set theory is a powerful tool to deal with uncertainty by considering some interval-values for an alternative under a set regarding assessment factors. In procedure of the proposed IVHF-MCWR model, weights of criteria as well as experts are considered to decrease the errors. In this regard, optimal criteria’ weights are computed by utilizing an extended maximizing deviation method based on IVHF-Hamming distance measure. In addition, experts’ judgments are taken into account for computing the criteria’ weights. Also, experts’ weights are determined based on proposed new IVHF technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution method. Then, a new IVHF-index based on Hamming distance measure is introduced to compute the relative closeness coefficient for ranking the candidates or alternatives. Finally, two application examples about the location and supplier selection problems are considered to indicate the capability of the proposed IVHF-MCWR model. In addition, comparative analysis is reported to compare the proposed model and three fuzzy decision methods from the recent literature. Comparing these approaches and computational results shows that the IVHF-MCWR model works properly under uncertain conditions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
3.
go back to reference Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540MathSciNetCrossRef Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540MathSciNetCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen S-M, Niou S-J (2011) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 38:3865–3872CrossRef Chen S-M, Niou S-J (2011) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 38:3865–3872CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23CrossRef Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dubois DJ (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, WalthamMATH Dubois DJ (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, WalthamMATH
7.
go back to reference Dymova L, Sevastjanov P, Tikhonenko A (2013) A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 40(12):4841–4847CrossRef Dymova L, Sevastjanov P, Tikhonenko A (2013) A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 40(12):4841–4847CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402CrossRefMATH Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402CrossRefMATH
10.
go back to reference Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Davoodi AR (2009) Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: interval efficiency. Math Comput Model 49:1137–1142MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Davoodi AR (2009) Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: interval efficiency. Math Comput Model 49:1137–1142MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
12.
go back to reference Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
13.
go back to reference Kannan D, Khodaverdi R, Olfat L, Jafarian A, Diabat A (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367CrossRef Kannan D, Khodaverdi R, Olfat L, Jafarian A, Diabat A (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Li L-G, Peng D-H (2014) Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy Hamacher synergetic weighted aggregation operators and their application to shale gas areas selection. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–15. doi:10.1155/2014/181050 Li L-G, Peng D-H (2014) Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy Hamacher synergetic weighted aggregation operators and their application to shale gas areas selection. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–15. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​181050
15.
go back to reference Mata F, Martínez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:279–290CrossRef Mata F, Martínez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:279–290CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Miyamoto S (2000) Multisets and fuzzy multisets. In: Liu ZQ, Miyamoto S (eds) Soft computing and human-centered machines. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 9–33 Miyamoto S (2000) Multisets and fuzzy multisets. In: Liu ZQ, Miyamoto S (eds) Soft computing and human-centered machines. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 9–33
17.
go back to reference Peng D-H, Gao C-Y, Gao Z-F (2013) Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decision-making. Appl Math Model 37:5837–5850MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Peng D-H, Gao C-Y, Gao Z-F (2013) Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decision-making. Appl Math Model 37:5837–5850MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
go back to reference Peng D-H, Wang H (2014) Dynamic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multi-period decision making. Kybernetes 43:715–736MathSciNetCrossRef Peng D-H, Wang H (2014) Dynamic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multi-period decision making. Kybernetes 43:715–736MathSciNetCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Peng D-H, Wang T-D, Gao C-Y, Wang H (2014) Continuous hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to decision making under interval-valued hesitant fuzzy setting. Sci World J. doi:10.1155/2014/897304 Peng D-H, Wang T-D, Gao C-Y, Wang H (2014) Continuous hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to decision making under interval-valued hesitant fuzzy setting. Sci World J. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​897304
20.
go back to reference Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2010) A mobile decision support system for dynamic group decision-making problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40:1244–1256CrossRef Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2010) A mobile decision support system for dynamic group decision-making problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40:1244–1256CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sengupta A, Pal TK (2009) Fuzzy preference ordering of interval numbers in decision problems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATH Sengupta A, Pal TK (2009) Fuzzy preference ordering of interval numbers in decision problems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATH
22.
go back to reference Streimikiene D, Baležentis T (2013) Multi-criteria assessment of small scale CHP technologies in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:183–189CrossRef Streimikiene D, Baležentis T (2013) Multi-criteria assessment of small scale CHP technologies in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:183–189CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539MATH Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539MATH
25.
go back to reference Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 2009 FUZZ-IEEE 2009. IEEE, pp 1378–1382 Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 2009 FUZZ-IEEE 2009. IEEE, pp 1378–1382
27.
go back to reference Wang Y-J (2014) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model by associating technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution with relative preference relation. Inf Sci 268:169–184MathSciNetCrossRef Wang Y-J (2014) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model by associating technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution with relative preference relation. Inf Sci 268:169–184MathSciNetCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wang Y-J (2015) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 30:412–420CrossRef Wang Y-J (2015) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 30:412–420CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wei G, Zhao X, Lin R (2013) Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 46:43–53CrossRef Wei G, Zhao X, Lin R (2013) Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 46:43–53CrossRef
30.
32.
go back to reference Xu Z (2004) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 166:19–30MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Xu Z (2004) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 166:19–30MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
33.
go back to reference Xu Z (2007) Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 37:1500–1511CrossRef Xu Z (2007) Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 37:1500–1511CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-Based Syst 52:53–64CrossRef Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl-Based Syst 52:53–64CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Yeh T-M, Pai F-Y, Liao C-W (2014) Using a hybrid MCDM methodology to identify critical factors in new product development. Neural Comput Appl 24:957–971CrossRef Yeh T-M, Pai F-Y, Liao C-W (2014) Using a hybrid MCDM methodology to identify critical factors in new product development. Neural Comput Appl 24:957–971CrossRef
36.
38.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Wang C, Tian D, Li K (2014) Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 67:116–138CrossRef Zhang Z, Wang C, Tian D, Li K (2014) Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 67:116–138CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Zhou L, Chen H (2012) A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 26:216–224CrossRef Zhou L, Chen H (2012) A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 26:216–224CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Zhou L, Chen H, Liu J (2012) Generalized power aggregation operators and their applications in group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 62:989–999CrossRef Zhou L, Chen H, Liu J (2012) Generalized power aggregation operators and their applications in group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 62:989–999CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new multi-criteria weighting and ranking model for group decision-making analysis based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets to selection problems
Authors
Hossein Gitinavard
S. Meysam Mousavi
Behnam Vahdani
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Neural Computing and Applications / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1958-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Neural Computing and Applications 6/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner