Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Study on Trust in a Robotic Suitcase

Authors : Beatriz Quintino Ferreira, Kelly Karipidou, Filipe Rosa, Sofia Petisca, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Ana Paiva

Published in: Social Robotics

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This work presents a study on human-robot interaction between a prototype of a robotic suitcase – aBag – and people using it. Importantly, for an autonomous robotic suitcase to be successful as a product, people need to trust it. Therefore, a study was performed, where participants used aBag (remotely operated using the Wizard of Oz technique) for carrying their belongings. Two different conditions were created: (1) aBag follows the participant at a close range; (2) aBag follows the participant on a further distance. We expected that participants would trust more aBag when it was following them at a close range, but interestingly participants seemed to trust more when aBag was further away. Also, regardless of the conditions, the level of trust in aBag was significantly higher after the interaction compared to before, bringing positive results to the development of this kind of robotic apparatus.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A video presenting the experiment using the recordings from the participants’ interactions with aBag is available at https://​www.​youtube.​com/​watch?​v=​M4mw5WX-AS8&​feature=​youtube.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Argyle, M.: Bodily Communication, 2nd edn. Routledge (1975) Argyle, M.: Bodily Communication, 2nd edn. Routledge (1975)
2.
go back to reference Correia, F., Alves-Oliveira, P., Maia, N., Ribeiro, T., Petisca, S., Melo, F.S., Paiva, A.: Just follow the suit! trust in human-robot interactions during card game playing. In: RO-MAN (2016, in Press) Correia, F., Alves-Oliveira, P., Maia, N., Ribeiro, T., Petisca, S., Melo, F.S., Paiva, A.: Just follow the suit! trust in human-robot interactions during card game playing. In: RO-MAN (2016, in Press)
3.
go back to reference Gockley, R., Forlizzi, J., Simmons, R.: Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In: HRI (2007) Gockley, R., Forlizzi, J., Simmons, R.: Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In: HRI (2007)
4.
go back to reference Hancock, P., et al.: A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53(5), 517–527 (2011)CrossRef Hancock, P., et al.: A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53(5), 517–527 (2011)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Huttenrauch, H., et al.: Investigating spatial relationships in human-robot interaction. In: IROS (2006) Huttenrauch, H., et al.: Investigating spatial relationships in human-robot interaction. In: IROS (2006)
6.
go back to reference Lee, J., Moray, N.: Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergon. 35(10), 1243–1270 (1992)CrossRef Lee, J., Moray, N.: Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergon. 35(10), 1243–1270 (1992)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pacchierotti, E., et al.: Evaluation of passing distance for social robots. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2006) Pacchierotti, E., et al.: Evaluation of passing distance for social robots. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2006)
9.
go back to reference Salem, M., et al.: Evaluating trust and safety in HRI: practical issues and ethical challenges. In: Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction (2015) Salem, M., et al.: Evaluating trust and safety in HRI: practical issues and ethical challenges. In: Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction (2015)
10.
go back to reference Satake, J., Miura, J.: Robust stereo-based person detection and tracking for a person following robot. In: ICRA – Workshop on People Detection and Tracking (2009) Satake, J., Miura, J.: Robust stereo-based person detection and tracking for a person following robot. In: ICRA – Workshop on People Detection and Tracking (2009)
11.
go back to reference Schaefer, K.: The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Central Florida, USA (2013) Schaefer, K.: The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Central Florida, USA (2013)
12.
go back to reference Syrdal, D., et al.: A personalized robot companion? – the role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. In: RO-MAN (2007) Syrdal, D., et al.: A personalized robot companion? – the role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. In: RO-MAN (2007)
13.
go back to reference Syrdal, D., et al.: Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario-anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems (2008) Syrdal, D., et al.: Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario-anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems (2008)
14.
go back to reference Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C.: Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IROS (2009) Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C.: Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IROS (2009)
15.
go back to reference Tapus, A., et al.: Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(1), 35–42 (2007)CrossRef Tapus, A., et al.: Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(1), 35–42 (2007)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Can we trust robots? [Special report]. IEEE Spectrum 53(6), 26–27 (2016). IEEE Can we trust robots? [Special report]. IEEE Spectrum 53(6), 26–27 (2016). IEEE
Metadata
Title
A Study on Trust in a Robotic Suitcase
Authors
Beatriz Quintino Ferreira
Kelly Karipidou
Filipe Rosa
Sofia Petisca
Patrícia Alves-Oliveira
Ana Paiva
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_18

Premium Partner