Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. A Systematic Review on Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Science

Authors : Mohamed Alloghani, Dhiya Al-Jumeily, Jamila Mustafina, Abir Hussain, Ahmed J. Aljaaf

Published in: Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Machine learning is as growing as fast as concepts such as Big data and the field of data science in general. The purpose of the systematic review was to analyze scholarly articles that were published between 2015 and 2018 addressing or implementing supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques in different problem-solving paradigms. Using the elements of PRISMA, the review process identified 84 scholarly articles that had been published in different journals. Of the 84 articles, 6 were published before 2015 despite their metadata indicating that they were published in 2015. The existence of the six articles in the final papers was attributed to errors in indexing. Nonetheless, from the reviewed papers, decision tree, support vector machine, and Naïve Bayes algorithms appeared to be the most cited, discussed, and implemented supervised learners. Conversely, k-means, hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis also emerged as the commonly used unsupervised learners. The review also revealed other commonly used algorithms that include ensembles and reinforce learners, and future systematic reviews can focus on them because of the developments that machine learning and data science is undergoing at the moment.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
next chapter Overview of One-Pass and Discard-After-Learn Concepts for Classification and Clustering in Streaming Environment with Constraints
Literature
1.
Sandhu, T. H. (2018). Machine learning and natural language processing—A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 9(2), 582–584.CrossRef
2.
Libbrecht, M. W., & Noble, W. S. (2015). Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 16(6), 321–332.CrossRef
3.
Alpaydın, E. (2014). Introduction to machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.MATH
4.
Kotsiantis, S. B. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Informatica, 31, 249–268.MathSciNetMATH
5.
MathWorks. (2016). Applying supervised learning. Machine Learning with MATLAB.
6.
Ng, A. (2012). 1. Supervised learning. Machine Learning, 1–30.
7.
Hofmann, T. (2001). Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning, 42, 177–196.MATHCrossRef
8.
Dougherty, J., Kohavi, R., & Sahami, M. (1995). Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features. In Machine Learning Proceedings.
9.
Marshland, S. (2015). Machine learning: An algorithm perspective. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
10.
Baharudin, B., Lee, L. H., & Khan, K. (2010). A review of machine learning algorithms for text-documents classification. Journal on Advance in Information Technology, 1(1), 4–20.
11.
Praveena, M. (2017). A literature review on supervised machine learning algorithms and boosting process. International Journal of Computer Applications, 169(8), 975–8887.MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Qazi, A., Raj, R. G., Hardaker, G., & Standing, C. (2017). A systematic literature review on opinion types and sentiment analysis techniques: Tasks and challenges. Internet Research, 27(3), 608–630.CrossRef
13.
Hutton, B., et al. (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine, 163(7), 566–567.CrossRef
14.
Zorzela, L., Loke, Y. K., Ioannidis, J. P., Golder, S., Santaguida, P., Altman, D. G., et al. (2016). PRISMA harms checklist: Improving harms reporting in systematic reviews. BMJ (Online), 352, i157.
15.
Shamseer, L., et al. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Online), 349, g7647.
16.
Moher, D., et al. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1.CrossRef
17.
Stroup, D. F., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA, 283(15), 2008–2012.CrossRef
18.
Bloch, M. H., Landeros-Weisenberger, A., Rosario, M. C., Pittenger, C., & Leckman, J. F. (2008). Meta-analysis of the symptom structure of obsessive-compulsive disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(12), 1532–1542.CrossRef
19.
Fujimoto, M. S., Suvorov, A., Jensen, N. O., Clement, M. J., & Bybee, S. M. (2016). Detecting false positive sequence homology: A machine learning approach. BMC Bioinformatics, 17, 101.CrossRef
20.
Mani, S., et al. (2013). Machine learning for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(4), 688–695.CrossRef
21.
Kovačević, A., Dehghan, A., Filannino, M., Keane, J. A., & Nenadic, G. (2013). Combining rules and machine learning for extraction of temporal expressions and events from clinical narratives. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(5), 859–866.CrossRef
22.
Klann, J. G., Anand, V., & Downs, S. M. (2013). Patient-tailored prioritization for a pediatric care decision support system through machine learning. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e2), e267–e274.CrossRef
23.
Gultepe, E., Green, J. P., Nguyen, H., Adams, J., Albertson, T., & Tagkopoulos, I. (2014). From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: A machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(2), 315–325.CrossRef
24.
Mani, S., et al. (2014). Medical decision support using machine learning for early detection of late-onset neonatal sepsis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(2), 326–336.MathSciNetCrossRef
25.
Nguyen, D. H. M., & Patrick, J. D. (2014). Supervised machine learning and active learning in classification of radiology reports. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(5), 893–901.CrossRef
26.
Deo, R. C. (2015). Machine learning in medicine HHS public access. Circulation, 132(20), 1920–1930.CrossRef
27.
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87–106.CrossRef
28.
Wu, M.-J., et al. (2017). Identification and individualized prediction of clinical phenotypes in bipolar disorders using neurocognitive data, neuroimaging scans and machine learning. NeuroImage, 145, 254–264.CrossRef
29.
Oudah, M., & Henschel, A. (2018). Taxonomy-aware feature engineering for microbiome classification. BMC Bioinformatics, 19, 227.CrossRef
30.
Palma, S. I. C. J., Traguedo, A. P., Porteira, A. R., Frias, M. J., Gamboa, H., & Roque, A. C. A. (2018). Machine learning for the meta-analyses of microbial pathogens’ volatile signatures. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–15.CrossRef
31.
Jaspers, S., De Troyer, E., & Aerts, M. (2018). Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA. EFSA Supporting Publications, 15(6), 1427E.CrossRef
32.
Crawford, M., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Prusa, J. D., Richter, A. N., & Al Najada, H. (2015). Survey of review spam detection using machine learning techniques. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 1–24.CrossRef
33.
Dinov, I. D. (2016). Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting Big Healthcare Data. Gigascience, 5, 12.CrossRef
34.
Dimou, A., Vahdati, S., Di Iorio, A., Lange, C., Verborgh, R., & Mannens, E. (2017). Challenges as enablers for high quality Linked Data: Insights from the Semantic Publishing Challenge. PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e105.CrossRef
35.
Trilling, D., & Boumans, J. (2018). Automatische inhoudsanalyse van Nederlandstalige data. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 46(1), 5–24.
36.
Van Nieuwenburg, E. P. L., Liu, Y., & Huber, S. D. (2017). Learning phase transitions by confusion. Nature Physics, 13(5), 435–439.CrossRef
37.
Hoyt, R., Linnville, S., Thaler, S., & Moore, J. (2016). Digital family history data mining with neural networks: A pilot study. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 13, 1c.
38.
Dobson, J. E. (2015). Can an algorithm be disturbed? Machine learning, intrinsic criticism, and the digital humanities. College Literature, 42(4), 543–564.CrossRef
39.
Downing, N. S., et al. (2017). Describing the performance of U.S. hospitals by applying big data analytics. PLoS One, 12(6), e0179603.CrossRef
40.
Hoang, X. D., & Nguyen, Q. C. (2018). Botnet detection based on machine learning techniques using DNS query data. Future Internet, 10(5), 43.CrossRef
41.
Kothari, U. C., & Momayez, M. (2018). Machine learning: A novel approach to predicting slope instabilities. International Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 9.CrossRef
42.
Thompson, J. A., Tan, J., & Greene, C. S. (2016). Cross-platform normalization of microarray and RNA-seq data for machine learning applications. PeerJ, 4, e1621.CrossRef
43.
Ahmed, M. U., & Mahmood, A. (2018). An empirical study of machine learning algorithms to predict students’ grades. Pakistan Journal of Science, 70(1), 91–96.
44.
Carifio, J., Halverson, J., Krioukov, D., & Nelson, B. D. (2017). Machine learning in the string landscape. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(9), 1–36.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
45.
Choudhari, P., & Dhari, S. V. (2017). Sentiment analysis and machine learning based sentiment classification: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(3).
46.
Lloyd, S., Garnerone, S., & Zanardi, P. (2016). Quantum algorithms for topological and geometric analysis of data. Nature Communications, 7, 10138.CrossRef
47.
Pavithra, D., & Jayanthi, A. N. (2018). A study on machine learning algorithm in medical diagnosis. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 9(4), 42–46.CrossRef
48.
Krittanawong, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Aydar, M., & Kitai, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(21), 2657–2664.CrossRef
49.
Kaytan, M., & Aydilek, I. B. (2017). A review on machine learning tools. 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium, 8(3), 1–4.
50.
Lynch, C. M., van Berkel, V. H., & Frieboes, H. B. (2017). Application of unsupervised analysis techniques to lung cancer patient data. PLoS One, 12(9), e0184370.CrossRef
51.
Beck, D., Pfaendtner, J., Carothers, J., & Subramanian, V. (2017). Data science for chemical engineers. Chemical Engineering Progress, 113(2), 21–26.
52.
Heylman, C., Datta, R., Sobrino, A., George, S., & Gratton, E. (2015). Supervised machine learning for classification of the electrophysiological effects of chronotropic drugs on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. PLoS One, 10(12), e0144572.CrossRef
53.
Torkzaban, B., et al. (2015). Machine learning based classification of microsatellite variation: An effective approach for Phylogeographic characterization of olive populations. PLoS One, 10(11), e0143465.CrossRef
54.
Guo, Z., Shao, X., Xu, Y., Miyazaki, H., Ohira, W., & Shibasaki, R. (2016). Identification of village building via Google earth images and supervised machine learning methods. Remote Sensing, 8(4), 271.CrossRef
55.
Xia, C., Fu, L., Liu, Z., Liu, H., Chen, L., & Liu, Y. (2018). Aquatic toxic analysis by monitoring fish behavior using computer vision: A recent progress. Journal of Toxicology, 2018, 11.CrossRef
56.
Fuller, D., Buote, R., & Stanley, K. (2017). A glossary for big data in population and public health: Discussion and commentary on terminology and research methods. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(11), 1113.
57.
Gibson, D., & de Freitas, S. (2016). Exploratory analysis in learning analytics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(1), 5–19.CrossRef
58.
Cuperlovic-Culf, M. (2018). Machine learning methods for analysis of metabolic data and metabolic pathway modeling. Metabolites, 8(1), 4.CrossRef
59.
Tan, M. S., Chang, S.-W., Cheah, P. L., & Yap, H. J. (2018). Integrative machine learning analysis of multiple gene expression profiles in cervical cancer. PeerJ, 6, e5285.CrossRef
60.
Meenakshi, K., Safa, M., Karthick, T., & Sivaranjani, N. (2017). A novel study of machine learning algorithms for classifying health care data. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(5), 1429–1432.CrossRef
61.
Dey, A. (2016). Machine learning algorithms: A review. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 7(3), 1174–1179.
62.
Zhao, C., Wang, S., & Li, D. (2016). Determining fuzzy membership for sentiment classification: A three-layer sentiment propagation model. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165560.CrossRef
63.
Mossotto, E., Ashton, J. J., Coelho, T., Beattie, R. M., MacArthur, B. D., & Ennis, S. (2017). Classification of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 7, 1–10.CrossRef
64.
Lau, O., & Yohai, I. (2016). Using quantitative methods in industry. Political Science and Politics, 49(3), 524–526.CrossRef
65.
Qiu, J., Wu, Q., Ding, G., Xu, Y., & Feng, S. (2016). A survey of machine learning for big data processing. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2016, 1–16.CrossRef
66.
Parreco, J. P., Hidalgo, A. E., Badilla, A. D., Ilyas, O., & Rattan, R. (2018). Predicting central line-associated bloodstream infections and mortality using supervised machine learning. Journal of Critical Care, 45, 156–162.CrossRef
67.
Wuest, T., Irgens, C., & Thoben, K.-D. (2016). Changing states of multistage process chains. Journal of Engineering, 2016, 1.CrossRef
68.
Tarwani, N. (2017). Survey of cyberbulling detection on social media big-data. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(5).
69.
Martinelli, E., Mencattini, A., Daprati, E., & Di Natale, C. (2016). Strength is in numbers: Can concordant artificial listeners improve prediction of emotion from speech? PLoS One, 11(8), e0161752.CrossRef
70.
Liu, N., & Zhao, J. (2016). Semi-supervised online multiple kernel learning algorithm for big data. TELKOMNIKA, 14(2), 638–646.CrossRef
71.
Goh, K. L., & Singh, A. K. (2015). Comprehensive literature review on machine learning structures for Web spam classification. Procedia Computer Science, 70, 434–441.CrossRef
72.
Mishra, C., & Gupta, D. L. (2017). Deep machine learning and neural networks: An overview. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 6(2), 66–73.CrossRef
73.
Yan, X., Bai, Y., Fang, S., & Luo, J. (2016). A kernel-free quadratic surface support vector machine for semi-supervised learning. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(7), 1001–1011.CrossRef
74.
Yared, R., & Abdulrazak, B. (2016). Ambient technology to assist elderly people in indoor risks. Computers, 5(4), 22.CrossRef
75.
Osborne, J. D., et al. (2016). Efficient identification of nationally mandated reportable cancer cases using natural language processing and machine learning. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 83(5), 605–623.
76.
Kolog, E. A., Montero, C. S., & Tukiainen, M. (2018). Development and evaluation of an automated e-counselling system for emotion and sentiment analysis. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 21(1), 1–19.
77.
Rafiei, M. H., Khushefati, W. H., Demirboga, R., & Adeli, H. (2017). Supervised deep restricted Boltzmann machine for estimation of concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 114(2), 237–244.CrossRef
78.
Almasre, M. A., & Al-Nuaim, H. (2017). Comparison of four SVM classifiers used with depth sensors to recognize Arabic sign language words. Computers, 6(2), 20.CrossRef
79.
Hashem, K. (2018). The rise and fall of machine learning methods in biomedical research. F1000Research, 6, 2012.CrossRef
80.
Torshin, I. Y., & Rudakov, K. V. (2015). On the theoretical basis of metric analysis of poorly formalized problems of recognition and classification. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 25(4), 577–587.CrossRef
81.
Petrelli, M., & Perugini, D. (2016). Solving petrological problems through machine learning: The study case of tectonic discrimination using geochemical and isotopic data. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 171(10), 1–15.CrossRef
82.
83.
Alicante, A., Corazza, A., Isgrò, F., & Silvestri, S. (2016). Unsupervised entity and relation extraction from clinical records in Italian. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 72, 263–275.CrossRef
84.
Shanmugasundaram, G., & Sankarikaarguzhali, G. (2017). An investigation on IoT healthcare analytics. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 9(2), 11.CrossRef
85.
Huang, G., Song, S., Gupta, J. N. D., & Wu, C. (2014). Semi-supervised and unsupervised extreme learning machines. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(12), 2405–2417.CrossRef
86.
Rastogi, R., & Saigal, P. (2017). Tree-based localized fuzzy twin support vector clustering with square loss function. Applied Intelligence, 47(1), 96–113.CrossRef
87.
Muscoloni, A., Thomas, J. M., Ciucci, S., Bianconi, G., & Cannistraci, C. V. (2017). Machine learning meets complex networks via coalescent embedding in the hyperbolic space. Nature Communications, 8, 1–19.CrossRef
88.
Saeys, Y., Van Gassen, S., & Lambrecht, B. N. (2016). Computational flow cytometry: Helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data. Nature Reviews. Immunology, 16(7), 449–462.CrossRef
89.
Gonzalez, A., Pierre, & Forsberg, F. (2017). Unsupervised machine learning: An investigation of clustering algorithms on a small dataset (pp. 1–39).
90.
Necula, S.-C. (2017). Deep learning for distribution channels’ management. Informatica Economică, 21(4), 73–85.CrossRef
91.
Munther, A., Razif, R., AbuAlhaj, M., Anbar, M., & Nizam, S. (2016). A preliminary performance evaluation of K-means, KNN and em unsupervised machine learning methods for network flow classification. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 6(2), 778–784.
92.
Alalousi, A., Razif, R., Abualhaj, M., Anbar, M., & Nizam, S. (2016). A preliminary performance evaluation of K-means, KNN and EM unsupervised machine learning methods for network flow classification. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 6(2), 778–784.
93.
Alanazi, H. O., Abdullah, A. H., & Qureshi, K. N. (2017). A critical review for developing accurate and dynamic predictive models using machine learning methods in medicine and health care. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(4), 1–10.CrossRef
94.
Almatarneh, S., & Gamallo, P. (2018). A lexicon based method to search for extreme opinions. PLoS One, 13(5), e0197816.CrossRef
95.
Assem, H., Xu, L., Buda, T. S., & O’sullivan, D. (2016). Machine learning as a service for enabling Internet of things and people. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(6), 899–914.CrossRef
96.
Azim, M. A., & Bhuiyan, M. H. (2018). Text to emotion extraction using supervised machine learning techniques. TELKOMNIKA, 16(3), 1394–1401.CrossRef
97.
Sirbu, A. (2016). Dynamic machine learning for supervised and unsupervised classification ES. Machine Learning.
98.
Wahyudin, I., Djatna, T., & Kusuma, W. A. (2016). Cluster analysis for SME risk analysis documents based on pillar K-means. TELKOMNIKA, 14(2), 674.CrossRef
99.
Davis, S. E., Lasko, T. A., Chen, G., Siew, E. D., & Matheny, M. E. (2018). Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24, 1052–1061.CrossRef
100.
Wallace, B. C., Noel-Storr, A., Marshall, I. J., Cohen, A. M., Smalheiser, N. R., & Thomas, J. (2017). Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(6), 1165–1168.CrossRef
101.
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum machine learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195–202.CrossRef
102.
Bisaso, K. R., Anguzu, G. T., Karungi, S. A., Kiragga, A., & Castelnuovo, B. (2017). A survey of machine learning applications in HIV clinical research and care. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 91, 366–371.CrossRef
103.
Bauder, R., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Seliya, N. (2017). A survey on the state of healthcare upcoding fraud analysis and detection. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 17(1), 31–55.CrossRef
104.
Bashiri, A., Ghazisaeedi, M., Safdari, R., Shahmoradi, L., & Ehtesham, H. (2017). Improving the prediction of survival in cancer patients by using machine learning techniques: Experience of gene expression data: A narrative review. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 46(2), 165–172.
105.
Breckels, L. M., Mulvey, C. M., Lilley, K. S., & Gatto, L. (2018). A bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data. F1000Research, 5, 2926.CrossRef
106.
Saad, S. M., et al. (2017). Pollutant recognition based on supervised machine learning for indoor air quality monitoring systems. Applied Sciences, 7(8), 823.CrossRef
107.
Fiorini, L., Cavallo, F., Dario, P., Eavis, A., & Caleb-Solly, P. (2017). Unsupervised machine learning for developing personalised behaviour models using activity data. Sensors, 17(5), 1034.CrossRef
108.
Bunn, J. K., Hu, J., & Hattrick-Simpers, J. R. (2016). Semi-supervised approach to phase identification from combinatorial sample diffraction patterns. JOM, 68(8), 2116–2125.CrossRef
109.
Cárdenas-López, F. A., Lamata, L., Retamal, J. C., & Solano, E. (2018). Multiqubit and multilevel quantum reinforcement learning with quantum technologies. PLoS One, 13(7), e0200455.CrossRef
110.
Chen, R., Niu, W., Zhang, X., Zhuo, Z., & Lv, F. (2017). An effective conversation-based botnet detection method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 4934082.
Metadata
Title
A Systematic Review on Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Science
Authors
Mohamed Alloghani
Dhiya Al-Jumeily
Jamila Mustafina
Abir Hussain
Ahmed J. Aljaaf
Copyright Year
2020
Book
Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22474-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-22475-2

Copyright Year: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22475-2_1