Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
State sovereignty is undermined to the extent that powerful corporations are involved in the exercise of political authority without being legitimated for this and without submitting to the usual responsibilities incumbent on government authorities.
—Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp. 433–434.
According to Palazzo and Scherer, the changing role of business corporations in society requires that we take new measures to integrate these organizations into society-wide processes of democratic governance. We argue that their model of integration has a fundamental problem. Instead of treating business corporations as agents that must be held accountable to the democratic reasoning of affected parties, it treats corporations as agents who can hold others accountable. In our terminology, it treats business corporations as “supervising authorities” rather than “functionaries.” The result is that Palazzo and Scherer’s model does not actually address the democratic deficit that it is meant to solve. In order to fix the problem, we advocate removing business corporations from any policymaking role in political CSR and limiting participation to political NGOs and other groups that meet the standards we set out for a politically representative organization (PRO).
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Anderson, E. (1993). Value in ethics and economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Archer, R. (1996). The philosophical case for economic democracy. In U. Pagano & B. Rowthorn (Eds.), Democracy and efficiency in the economic enterprise (pp. 13–35). New York: Routledge.
Banerjee, S. B. (2014). A critical perspective on corporate social responsibility: Towards a global goverance framework. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 10(1/2), 84–95. CrossRef
Baur, D. (2011). NGOs as legitimate partners of corporations: A political conceptualization. Dordrecht: Springer.
Baur, D., & Arenas, D. (2014). The value of unregulated business–NGO interaction: A deliberative perspective. Business and Society,53(2), 157–186. CrossRef
Baur, D., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly,21(4), 579–604. CrossRef
Beitz, C. R. (1989). Political equality: An essay in democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Boatright, J. R. (1994). Fiduciary duties and the shareholder–management relation: Or, what’s so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly,4(4), 393–407. CrossRef
Boatright, J. R. (2004). Employee governance and the ownership of the firm. Business Ethics Quarterly,14(1), 1–21. CrossRef
Brenkert, G. G. (1992a). Freedom, participation, and corporations: The issue of corporate (economic) democracy. Business Ethics Quarterly,2(3), 251–269. CrossRef
Brenkert, G. G. (1992b). Private corporations and public welfare. Public Affairs Quarterly,6(2), 155–168.
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17–34). New York: Blackwell.
Cragg, W. (2000). Human rights and business ethics: Fashioning a new social contract. Journal of Business Ethics,27(1/2), 205–214. CrossRef
Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Dahl, R. A. (1985). A preface to economic democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Doh, J. P. (2005). Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies,42(3), 695–703. CrossRef
Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2008). Structures, identities, and politics: Bringing corporate citizenship into the corporation. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 405–429). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Ellerman, D. P. (1992). Property and contract in economics: The case for economic democracy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Fort, T. L., & Schipani, C. A. (2004). The role of business in fostering peaceful societies. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews,17(4), 483–509. CrossRef
Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests and its alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs,35(1), 40–68. CrossRef
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansmann, H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hsieh, N.-H. (2005). Rawlsian justice and workplace republicanism. Social Theory & Practice,31(1), 115–142. CrossRef
Hussain, W. (2012). Is ethical consumerism an impermissible form of vigilantism? Philosophy & Public Affairs,40(2), 111–143. CrossRef
Hussain, W. (2013, August 17). [Review of the book Public Capitalism: The Political Authority of Corporate Executives, by C. McMahon]. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/41657-public-capitalism-the-political-authority-of-corporate-executives/.
Hussain, W., & Moriarty, J. (2014). Corporations, the democratic deficit, and voting. Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 12(special issue), 429–450.
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly,12(2), 235–256. CrossRef
Kobrin, S. J. (2009). Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly,19(3), 349–374. CrossRef
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211–239). New York: Oxford University Press.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review,30(1), 166–179. CrossRef
McCall, J. J. (2001). Employee voice in corporate governance: A defense of strong participation rights. Business Ethics Quarterly,11(1), 195–213. CrossRef
McMahon, C. (1994). Authority and democracy: A general theory of government and management. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McMahon, C. (2013). Public capitalism: The political authority of corporate executives. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. (2015). The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics,128(3), 469–493. CrossRef
Moriarty, J. (2014). Stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy: An excavation and defense. Business and Society,53(6), 820–852. CrossRef
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics,66(1), 71–88. CrossRef
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rubenstein, J. C. (2013). The misuse of power, not bad representation: Why it is beside the point that no one elected Oxfam. Journal of Political Philosophy,22(2), 204–230. CrossRef
Ruggie, J. G. (2004). Reconstituting the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations,10(4), 499–531. CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review,32(4), 1096–1120. CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies,48(4), 899–931. CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly,16(4), 505–532. CrossRef
Singer, P. (1974/2012). All animals are equal. In D. Schmidtz & E. Willott (Eds.), Environmental ethics: What really matters, what really works (pp. 49–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business and Society,49(1), 68–87. CrossRef
Whelan, F. G. (1983). Prologue: Democratic theory and the boundary problem. In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Liberal democracy (pp. 13–47). New York: New York University Press.
- Accountable to Whom? Rethinking the Role of Corporations in Political CSR
- Publication date
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww