Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Active Learning for Improving Machine Learning of Student Explanatory Essays

Authors : Peter Hastings, Simon Hughes, M. Anne Britt

Published in: Artificial Intelligence in Education

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

share
SHARE

Abstract

There is an increasing emphasis, especially in STEM areas, on students’ abilities to create explanatory descriptions. Holistic, overall evaluations of explanations can be performed relatively easily with shallow language processing by humans or computers. However, this provides little information about an essential element of explanation quality: the structure of the explanation, i.e., how it connects causes to effects. The difficulty of providing feedback on explanation structure can lead teachers to either avoid giving this type of assignment or to provide only shallow feedback on them. Using machine learning techniques, we have developed successful computational models for analyzing explanatory essays. A major cost of developing such models is the time and effort required for human annotation of the essays. As part of a large project studying students’ reading processes, we have collected a large number of explanatory essays and thoroughly annotated them. Then we used the annotated essays to train our machine learning models. In this paper, we focus on how to get the best payoff from the expensive annotation process within such an educational context and we evaluate a method called Active Learning.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 50.000 Bücher
  • über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko





Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Footnotes
1
The percentages are all parameters to the model. These were selected because they allowed us to see the performance of the models at a reasonable granularity. It should be noted, however, that in our case, 10% of the total set represents over 100 additional essays. In real-world settings, a smaller increment would likely be used due to the cost of annotation.
 
2
We used a validation or holdout set to provide a consistent basis on which to judge the performance of the models.
 
3
For what it’s worth, these are analogous to the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate, respectively, with one giving more weight to more “populous” (i.e., frequent) entities, and the other giving “equal representation” to each entity.
 
4
Alternatively, we could have used the frequencies from the training set. We used frequencies from the remainder pool because they would be more accurate, especially at the earlier stages. In a real-life setting where the items in the remainder pool would be unlabeled, those frequencies would, of course, be unknown.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S.: Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41(10), 994–1020 (2004) CrossRef Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S.: Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41(10), 994–1020 (2004) CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Achieve Inc.: Next generation science standards (2013) Achieve Inc.: Next generation science standards (2013)
3.
go back to reference Hastings, P., Britt, M.A., Rupp, K., Kopp, K., Hughes, S.: Computational analysis of explanatory essay structure. In: Millis, K., Long, D., Magliano, J.P., Wiemer, K. (eds.) Multi-Disciplinary Approaches to Deep Learning. Routledge, New York (2018). Accepted for publication Hastings, P., Britt, M.A., Rupp, K., Kopp, K., Hughes, S.: Computational analysis of explanatory essay structure. In: Millis, K., Long, D., Magliano, J.P., Wiemer, K. (eds.) Multi-Disciplinary Approaches to Deep Learning. Routledge, New York (2018). Accepted for publication
4.
go back to reference Stenetorp, P., Pyysalo, S., Topić, G., Ohta, T., Ananiadou, S., Tsujii, J.: brat: a web-based tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In: Proceedings of the Demonstrations Session at EACL 2012, Avignon, France, Association for Computational Linguistics, April 2012 Stenetorp, P., Pyysalo, S., Topić, G., Ohta, T., Ananiadou, S., Tsujii, J.: brat: a web-based tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In: Proceedings of the Demonstrations Session at EACL 2012, Avignon, France, Association for Computational Linguistics, April 2012
5.
go back to reference Stenetorp, P., Topić, G., Pyysalo, S., Ohta, T., Kim, J.D., Tsujii, J.: BioNLP shared task 2011: Supporting resources. In: Proceedings of BioNLP Shared Task 2011 Workshop, Portland, Oregon, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 112–120, June 2011 Stenetorp, P., Topić, G., Pyysalo, S., Ohta, T., Kim, J.D., Tsujii, J.: BioNLP shared task 2011: Supporting resources. In: Proceedings of BioNLP Shared Task 2011 Workshop, Portland, Oregon, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 112–120, June 2011
6.
go back to reference Goldman, S.R., Greenleaf, C., Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M., Brown, W., Ko, M., Emig, J., George, M., Wallace, P., Blaum, D., Britt, M.: Project READI: Explanatory modeling in science through text-based investigation: Testing the efficacy of the READI intervention approach. Technical Report 27, Project READI (2016) Goldman, S.R., Greenleaf, C., Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M., Brown, W., Ko, M., Emig, J., George, M., Wallace, P., Blaum, D., Britt, M.: Project READI: Explanatory modeling in science through text-based investigation: Testing the efficacy of the READI intervention approach. Technical Report 27, Project READI (2016)
7.
go back to reference Shermis, M.D., Hamner, B.: Contrasting state-of-the-art automated scoring of essays: analysis. In: Annual National Council on Measurement in Education Meeting, pp. 14–16 (2012) Shermis, M.D., Hamner, B.: Contrasting state-of-the-art automated scoring of essays: analysis. In: Annual National Council on Measurement in Education Meeting, pp. 14–16 (2012)
8.
go back to reference Deane, P.: On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writ. 18(1), 7–24 (2013) CrossRef Deane, P.: On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writ. 18(1), 7–24 (2013) CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roscoe, R.D., Crossley, S.A., Snow, E.L., Varner, L.K., McNamara, D.S.: Writing quality, knowledge, and comprehension correlates of human and automated essay scoring. In: The Twenty-Seventh International Flairs Conference (2014) Roscoe, R.D., Crossley, S.A., Snow, E.L., Varner, L.K., McNamara, D.S.: Writing quality, knowledge, and comprehension correlates of human and automated essay scoring. In: The Twenty-Seventh International Flairs Conference (2014)
10.
go back to reference Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J.: Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current Applications and New Directions. Routledge (2013) Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J.: Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current Applications and New Directions. Routledge (2013)
11.
go back to reference Dikli, S.: Automated essay scoring. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 7(1), 49–62 (2015) Dikli, S.: Automated essay scoring. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 7(1), 49–62 (2015)
12.
go back to reference Condon, W.: Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings? Assessing Writ. 18(1), 100–108 (2013) CrossRef Condon, W.: Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings? Assessing Writ. 18(1), 100–108 (2013) CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Riaz, M., Girju, R.: Recognizing causality in verb-noun pairs via noun and verb semantics. EACL 2014, 48 (2014) Riaz, M., Girju, R.: Recognizing causality in verb-noun pairs via noun and verb semantics. EACL 2014, 48 (2014)
14.
go back to reference Rink, B., Bejan, C.A., Harabagiu, S.M.: Learning textual graph patterns to detect causal event relations. In: Guesgen, H.W., Murray, R.C. (eds.) FLAIRS Conference. AAAI Press (2010) Rink, B., Bejan, C.A., Harabagiu, S.M.: Learning textual graph patterns to detect causal event relations. In: Guesgen, H.W., Murray, R.C. (eds.) FLAIRS Conference. AAAI Press (2010)
16.
go back to reference Hughes, S.: Automatic inference of causal reasoning chains from student essays. Ph.D. thesis, DePaul University, Chicago, IL (2018) Hughes, S.: Automatic inference of causal reasoning chains from student essays. Ph.D. thesis, DePaul University, Chicago, IL (2018)
17.
go back to reference Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 5(2), 241–259 (1992) CrossRef Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 5(2), 241–259 (1992) CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2009) Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2009)
20.
go back to reference Sharma, M., Bilgic, M.: Most-surely vs. least-surely uncertain. In: 13th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 667–676. IEEE (2013) Sharma, M., Bilgic, M.: Most-surely vs. least-surely uncertain. In: 13th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 667–676. IEEE (2013)
21.
go back to reference Ferdowsi, Z.: Active learning for high precision classification with imbalanced data. Ph.D. thesis, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA, May 2015 Ferdowsi, Z.: Active learning for high precision classification with imbalanced data. Ph.D. thesis, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA, May 2015
22.
go back to reference Cawley, G.C.: Baseline methods for active learning. In: Active Learning and Experimental Design Workshop in Conjunction with AISTATS 2010, pp. 47–57 (2011) Cawley, G.C.: Baseline methods for active learning. In: Active Learning and Experimental Design Workshop in Conjunction with AISTATS 2010, pp. 47–57 (2011)
23.
go back to reference Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 45–66 (2001) MATH Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 45–66 (2001) MATH
24.
go back to reference Mirroshandel, S.A., Ghassem-Sani, G., Nasr, A.: Active learning strategies for support vector machines, application to temporal relation classification. In: Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 56–64 (2011) Mirroshandel, S.A., Ghassem-Sani, G., Nasr, A.: Active learning strategies for support vector machines, application to temporal relation classification. In: Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 56–64 (2011)
25.
go back to reference Blum, A., Mitchell, T.: Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 92–100. ACM (1998) Blum, A., Mitchell, T.: Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 92–100. ACM (1998)
26.
go back to reference Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995) CrossRef Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995) CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Joachims, T.: Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines - Methods, Theory, and Algorithms. Kluwer/Springer, New York (2002) CrossRef Joachims, T.: Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines - Methods, Theory, and Algorithms. Kluwer/Springer, New York (2002) CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Active Learning for Improving Machine Learning of Student Explanatory Essays
Authors
Peter Hastings
Simon Hughes
M. Anne Britt
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_11

Premium Partner