Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Quantitative Economics 1/2018

15-02-2017 | Original Article

Ad-Hoc Black–Scholes vis-à-vis TSRV-based Black–Scholes: Evidence from Indian Options Market

Authors: Alok Dixit, Shivam Singh

Published in: Journal of Quantitative Economics | Issue 1/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This research paper examines one-day-ahead out-of-sample performance of the volatility smirk-based options pricing models, namely, Ad-Hoc-Black–Scholes (AHBS) models on the CNX Nifty index options of India. Further, we compare the performance of these models with that of a TSRV-based Black–Scholes (BS) model. For the purpose, the study uses tick-by-tick data. The results on the AHBS models are highly satisfactory and robust across all the subgroups considered in the study. Notably, a daily constant implied volatility based ad-hoc approach outperforms the TSRV-based BS model substantially. The performance of the ad-hoc approaches improves further when the smile/smirk effect is considered. For the estimation of the implied volatility smile, we apply three weighting schemes based on the Vega and liquidity of the options. All the schemes offer equally competing results. The major contribution of the study to the existing literature on options pricing is in terms of the ex-ante examination of the ad-hoc approaches to price the options by calibrating volatility smile/smirk on a daily basis.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
From the preliminary analysis, we find that the AHBS models provide considerable improvements over the BS model, both in terms of the MAPE and the MPE. However, the SDs for the AHBS models are comparable to those of the BS; and in some cases, even higher. This indicates the presence of outliers in the data (especially, in the case of the AHBS models). However, in the case of the BS model, the SD fails to reflect the presence of outliers in the data. This may be traced to the considerably biased MPE. Further investigation of the data corroborates the presence of outliers (in some cases the MPE is as high as 10,000% or more). To remove the effect of such extreme outliers on the results, a 5% trimming scheme is applied on the overall mispricing data.
 
2
A non-parametric test is applied in view of the stylised fact that the financial data, in general, is expected to show non-normality. The Jarque Bera test is conducted to confirm the non-normality of pricing errors. The test reveals that the data is not normally distributed since the null hypothesis of normality can be rejected with a very high level of confidence (p-value \(2.2\times 10^{-16})\). In view of this, it is appropriate to use a non-parametric test. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test is also known as the Mann-Whitney U test/Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aït-Sahalia, Y., P.A. Mykland, and L. Zhang. 2005. How often to sample a continuous-time process in the presence of market microstructure noise. Review of Financial Studies 18: 351–416.CrossRef Aït-Sahalia, Y., P.A. Mykland, and L. Zhang. 2005. How often to sample a continuous-time process in the presence of market microstructure noise. Review of Financial Studies 18: 351–416.CrossRef
go back to reference Andersen, T.G., T. Bollerslev, and N. Meddahi. 2005. Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high-frequency data and realized volatilities. Econometrica 73: 279–296.CrossRef Andersen, T.G., T. Bollerslev, and N. Meddahi. 2005. Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high-frequency data and realized volatilities. Econometrica 73: 279–296.CrossRef
go back to reference Beckers, S. 1981. Standard deviations implied in option prices as predictors of future stock price variability. Journal of Banking and Finance 5: 363–381.CrossRef Beckers, S. 1981. Standard deviations implied in option prices as predictors of future stock price variability. Journal of Banking and Finance 5: 363–381.CrossRef
go back to reference Bakshi, G., C. Cao, and Z. Chen. 1997. Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models. Journal of Finance 52: 2003–2049.CrossRef Bakshi, G., C. Cao, and Z. Chen. 1997. Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models. Journal of Finance 52: 2003–2049.CrossRef
go back to reference Ball, C.A., and W.N. Torous. 1985. On Jumps in Common Stock Prices and Their Impact on Call Option Pricing. Journal of Finance 40 (1): 155–173.CrossRef Ball, C.A., and W.N. Torous. 1985. On Jumps in Common Stock Prices and Their Impact on Call Option Pricing. Journal of Finance 40 (1): 155–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Baruníková, M.V. 2009. Option Pricing: The empirical tests of the Black–Scholes pricing formula and the feed-forward networks, IES Working Papers. Baruníková, M.V. 2009. Option Pricing: The empirical tests of the Black–Scholes pricing formula and the feed-forward networks, IES Working Papers.
go back to reference Chance, D.M. 1988. Boundary condition tests of bid and ask prices of index call options. The Journal of Financial Research 11 (1): 21–31.CrossRef Chance, D.M. 1988. Boundary condition tests of bid and ask prices of index call options. The Journal of Financial Research 11 (1): 21–31.CrossRef
go back to reference de Almeida, C.I.R., and S. Dana. 2005. Stochastic Volatility and Option Pricing in the Brazilian Stock Market: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 4: 169–206.CrossRef de Almeida, C.I.R., and S. Dana. 2005. Stochastic Volatility and Option Pricing in the Brazilian Stock Market: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 4: 169–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Dumas, B., J. Fleming, and R. Whaley. 1998. Implied volatility functions: Empirical tests. Journal of Finance 53: 2059–2106.CrossRef Dumas, B., J. Fleming, and R. Whaley. 1998. Implied volatility functions: Empirical tests. Journal of Finance 53: 2059–2106.CrossRef
go back to reference Grover, R., and S. Thomas. 2012. Liquidity Considerations in Estimating Implied Volatility. Journal of Futures Markets 32 (8): 714–741. Grover, R., and S. Thomas. 2012. Liquidity Considerations in Estimating Implied Volatility. Journal of Futures Markets 32 (8): 714–741.
go back to reference Heston, S. 1993. A closed form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies 6: 327–343.CrossRef Heston, S. 1993. A closed form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies 6: 327–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Heynen, R. 1993. An Empirical Investigation of Observed Smile Patterns. Review of Future Markets 13: 317–353. Heynen, R. 1993. An Empirical Investigation of Observed Smile Patterns. Review of Future Markets 13: 317–353.
go back to reference Huang, J., and L. Wu. 2004. Specification Analysis of Option Pricing Models Based on Time-Changed Lévy Processes. The Journal of Finance 59 (3): 1405–1440.CrossRef Huang, J., and L. Wu. 2004. Specification Analysis of Option Pricing Models Based on Time-Changed Lévy Processes. The Journal of Finance 59 (3): 1405–1440.CrossRef
go back to reference Hull, J., and C. and Basu, S. 2013. Options, Futures, And Other Derivatives, 8th ed. New Delhi: Pearson Publication. Hull, J., and C. and Basu, S. 2013. Options, Futures, And Other Derivatives, 8th ed. New Delhi: Pearson Publication.
go back to reference Jackwerth, J. C., and M. Rubinstein. 2001. Recovering stochastic processes from option prices. University of Konstanz and University of California at Berkeley Working Paper. Jackwerth, J. C., and M. Rubinstein. 2001. Recovering stochastic processes from option prices. University of Konstanz and University of California at Berkeley Working Paper.
go back to reference Kim, S. 2009. The Performance of Traders’ Rules in Options Market. Journal Futures Markets 29: 999–1020.CrossRef Kim, S. 2009. The Performance of Traders’ Rules in Options Market. Journal Futures Markets 29: 999–1020.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, I.J., and S. Kim. 2004. Empirical comparison of alternative stochastic volatility option pricing models: Evidence from Korean KOSPI 200 index options market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 12: 117–142.CrossRef Kim, I.J., and S. Kim. 2004. Empirical comparison of alternative stochastic volatility option pricing models: Evidence from Korean KOSPI 200 index options market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 12: 117–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirgiz, I. 2001. An empirical comparison of alternative stochastic volatility option pricing models. Dubai Group Working Paper. Kirgiz, I. 2001. An empirical comparison of alternative stochastic volatility option pricing models. Dubai Group Working Paper.
go back to reference Koopman, S.J., B. Jungbacker, and E. Hol. 2005. Forecasting daily variability of the S&P 100 stock index using historical, realized and implied volatility measurements. Journal of Empirical Finance 12: 445–475.CrossRef Koopman, S.J., B. Jungbacker, and E. Hol. 2005. Forecasting daily variability of the S&P 100 stock index using historical, realized and implied volatility measurements. Journal of Empirical Finance 12: 445–475.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, A.V., and S. Jaiswal. 2013. The Information Content of Alternate Implied Volatility Models: Case of Indian Markets. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 12: 293–321.CrossRef Kumar, A.V., and S. Jaiswal. 2013. The Information Content of Alternate Implied Volatility Models: Case of Indian Markets. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 12: 293–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Latane, H.A., and R.J. Rendleman Jr. 1976. Standard deviations of stock price ratios implied in option prices. Journal of Finance 31: 369–381.CrossRef Latane, H.A., and R.J. Rendleman Jr. 1976. Standard deviations of stock price ratios implied in option prices. Journal of Finance 31: 369–381.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, M., and N.D. Pearson. 2007. A horse race among competing option pricing models using S&P 500 index options. Georgia Institute of Technology and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Working Paper. Li, M., and N.D. Pearson. 2007. A horse race among competing option pricing models using S&P 500 index options. Georgia Institute of Technology and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Working Paper.
go back to reference Liu, Y. 1996. Numerical pricing of path-dependent options, unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto. Liu, Y. 1996. Numerical pricing of path-dependent options, unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.
go back to reference Macbeth, James D., and J.M. Larry. 1979. An Empirical Examination of the Black-Scholes Call Option pricing Model. Journal of Finance 34: 1173–1186.CrossRef Macbeth, James D., and J.M. Larry. 1979. An Empirical Examination of the Black-Scholes Call Option pricing Model. Journal of Finance 34: 1173–1186.CrossRef
go back to reference Martens, M. 2002. Measuring and Forecasting S&P 500 Index-Futures Volatility Using High-Frequency Data. Journal of Futures Markets 22 (6): 497–518.CrossRef Martens, M. 2002. Measuring and Forecasting S&P 500 Index-Futures Volatility Using High-Frequency Data. Journal of Futures Markets 22 (6): 497–518.CrossRef
go back to reference McKenzie, S., D. Gerace, and Z. Subedar. 2007. An empirical investigation of the Black-Scholes model: Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal 1: 71–82. McKenzie, S., D. Gerace, and Z. Subedar. 2007. An empirical investigation of the Black-Scholes model: Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal 1: 71–82.
go back to reference Nagendran, R., and V. Vadivel. 2005. A Study on the Biases of Black-Scholes European Formula in Pricing the Call Options with Reference to Indian Stock-Option Market, Business Management Practices, Policies and Principles, Allied Publishers Private Limited, New Delhi, pp. 206–214 (ISBN: 81-7764-841-1). Nagendran, R., and V. Vadivel. 2005. A Study on the Biases of Black-Scholes European Formula in Pricing the Call Options with Reference to Indian Stock-Option Market, Business Management Practices, Policies and Principles, Allied Publishers Private Limited, New Delhi, pp. 206–214 (ISBN: 81-7764-841-1).
go back to reference Rubinstein, M. 1994. Implied binomial trees. Journal of Finance 49: 771–818.CrossRef Rubinstein, M. 1994. Implied binomial trees. Journal of Finance 49: 771–818.CrossRef
go back to reference Scholes, M., and J. Williams. 1977. Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data. Journal of Financial Economics 5: 309–327.CrossRef Scholes, M., and J. Williams. 1977. Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data. Journal of Financial Economics 5: 309–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, V.K. 2013. Empirical Performance of Option Pricing Models: Evidence from India. International Journal of Economics and Finance 5: 141–154.CrossRef Singh, V.K. 2013. Empirical Performance of Option Pricing Models: Evidence from India. International Journal of Economics and Finance 5: 141–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, S., and A. Dixit. 2016. Performance of the Heston’s Stochastic Volatility Model: A Study in Indian Index Options Market. Theoretical Economics Letters 6 (2): 151–165.CrossRef Singh, S., and A. Dixit. 2016. Performance of the Heston’s Stochastic Volatility Model: A Study in Indian Index Options Market. Theoretical Economics Letters 6 (2): 151–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, V.K., and P. Pachori. 2013. A Kaleidoscopic Study of Pricing Performance of Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing Models: Evidence from Recent Flaring up of Indian Economic Turbulence. Vikalpa-Journal of IIM Ahmadabad 38: 21–39.CrossRef Singh, V.K., and P. Pachori. 2013. A Kaleidoscopic Study of Pricing Performance of Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing Models: Evidence from Recent Flaring up of Indian Economic Turbulence. Vikalpa-Journal of IIM Ahmadabad 38: 21–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, S., and Vipul. 2015. Performance of Black-Scholes model with TSRV estimates. Managerial Finance 41 (8): 857–870. Singh, S., and Vipul. 2015. Performance of Black-Scholes model with TSRV estimates. Managerial Finance 41 (8): 857–870.
go back to reference Tan, S. 2008. The Role of Options in Long Horizon Portfolio Choice. Journal of Derivatives 20: 60–77.CrossRef Tan, S. 2008. The Role of Options in Long Horizon Portfolio Choice. Journal of Derivatives 20: 60–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Vipul., 2005. Futures and options expiration-day effects: The Indian evidence. Journal of Futures Markets 25: 1045–1065. Vipul., 2005. Futures and options expiration-day effects: The Indian evidence. Journal of Futures Markets 25: 1045–1065.
go back to reference Vipul, and J. Jacob., 2007. Forecasting performance of extreme value volatility estimators. Journal of Futures Markets 27: 1085–1105. Vipul, and J. Jacob., 2007. Forecasting performance of extreme value volatility estimators. Journal of Futures Markets 27: 1085–1105.
go back to reference Vipul,. 2008. Cross-Market Efficiency in the Indian Derivatives Market: A Test of Put-Call Parity. Journal of Futures Markets 28: 889–910. Vipul,. 2008. Cross-Market Efficiency in the Indian Derivatives Market: A Test of Put-Call Parity. Journal of Futures Markets 28: 889–910.
go back to reference Whaley, R.E. 1982. Valuation of American call options on dividend-paying stocks: Empirical tests. Journal of Financial Economics 10: 29–58.CrossRef Whaley, R.E. 1982. Valuation of American call options on dividend-paying stocks: Empirical tests. Journal of Financial Economics 10: 29–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Yan, S. 2011. Jump risk, stock returns, and slope of implied volatility smile. Journal of Financial Economics 99 (1): 216–233.CrossRef Yan, S. 2011. Jump risk, stock returns, and slope of implied volatility smile. Journal of Financial Economics 99 (1): 216–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, L., P.A. Mykland, and Y. Aït-Sahalia. 2005. A tale of two time scales: Determining integrated volatility with noisy high-frequency data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100: 1394–1411.CrossRef Zhang, L., P.A. Mykland, and Y. Aït-Sahalia. 2005. A tale of two time scales: Determining integrated volatility with noisy high-frequency data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100: 1394–1411.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ad-Hoc Black–Scholes vis-à-vis TSRV-based Black–Scholes: Evidence from Indian Options Market
Authors
Alok Dixit
Shivam Singh
Publication date
15-02-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Journal of Quantitative Economics / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0971-1554
Electronic ISSN: 2364-1045
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-017-0078-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Quantitative Economics 1/2018 Go to the issue