Top

TechTrends

Published in:

04-11-2023 | Original Paper

Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments

Authors: Minkyoung Kim, Lauren Adlof

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 1/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) language model, holds significant promise for improving the quality and efficiency of teaching and learning. However, its potential challenges and disruptions in education systems require further investigation for a deeper understanding and mitigation. Given that ChatGPT is already being utilized and complete prohibition is unlikely, it becomes crucial to consider how educators can harness its potential to enhance teaching and learning experiences, assuming successful implementation. This article explores the potential benefits and disruptions within the current education system, and proposes strategies for integrating ChatGPT into educational settings from a constructivist learning perspective. It focuses on four educational system attributes: context, collaboration, conversation, and construction. The article particularly emphasizes the utilization of ChatGPT as a means, rather than an end, to enhance student learning within a constructivist learning environment. This approach aims to address present concerns and challenges effectively.

previous article The Change We Work: Professional Agency and Ethics for Emerging AI Technologies

next article Prompting Change: Exploring Prompt Engineering in Large Language Model AI and Its Potential to Transform Education

Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article 429.

Alshater, M. M., (2022). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Academic Performance: A Case Study of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312358

Başer, V. G., & Mutlu, N. (2011). Analyzing pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2(4), 95–101.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.

Cao, L., & Dede, C. (2023). Navigating a world of generative AI: Suggestions for educators. The Next Level Lab at Harvard Graduate School of Education. President and Fellows of Harvard College: Cambridge.

Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4CrossRef

Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of Chatbot technology use in sustainable education. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940

D'Mello, S., Olney, A., Williams, C., & Hays, P. (2012). Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(5), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.004CrossRef

Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (2013). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Routledge.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143CrossRef

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15.

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22CrossRef

Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610

Hu, G. (2023). Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers. Accountability in Research, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2184262

Huang, K. (2023). Alarmed by A.I. chatbots, universities start revamping how they teach. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technology/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-universities.html

Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615

Jain, M., Kumar, P., Bhansali, I., Liao, Q., Truong, K., & Patel, S. (2018). FarmChat: A conversational agent to answer farmer queries. Proceedings of ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287048CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.CrossRef

Kashyap, R. (2023). A first chat with ChatGPT: The first step in the road-map for AI (Artificial Intelligence). https://doi.org/10.32388/DFE2XG

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kim, H. S., Cha, Y., & Kim, N. Y. (2021). Effects of AI chatbots on EFL students’ communication skills. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, 712–734. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202108.712CrossRef

Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3CrossRef

Lea, G. R. (2020). Constructivism and its risks in artificial intelligence. Prometheus, 36(4), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.36.4.0322CrossRef

Makewa, L. N. (2019). Constructivism theory in technology-based learning. In Technology-Supported Teaching and Research Methods for Educators (pp. 268–287). IGI Global.

Mann, D. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence discusses the role of artificial intelligence in translational medicine: A JACC: Basic to translational science interview with ChatGPT. Basic to Translational Science, 8(2), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.01.001

Miller, J., White, S., & Johnson, D. (2019). OCLC research works in progress webinar: Deakin Genie [Webinar]. Deakin University. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/presentations/2019/Deakin-Genie.pdf

Naumova, E. N. (2023). A mistake-find exercise: A teacher’s tool to engage with information innovations, ChatGPT, and their analogs. Journal of Public Health Policy, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-023-00400-1

OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Owston, R (2023). Contact North | Contact Nord to launch two new AI-powered tools at OEB Berlin, Online Educa Berlin (OEB) Insight. https://oeb.global/oeb-insights/contact-north-contact-nord-to-launch-two-new-ai-powered-tools-at-oeb-berlin/

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Reigeluth, C.M. (2012). Instructional theory and technology for the new paradigm of education. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 32, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/1b

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sallam, M. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.

Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2019). Systems thinking for principals of learning-focused schools. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 4(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v4i1.1939CrossRef

Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology, 307(2), e230163. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163

Supiano, B. (2023). Will ChatGPT change how professors assess learning? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 69(18), 21–24.

Terwiesch, C. (2023). Would Chat GPT3 get a Wharton MBA? A prediction based on its performance in the operations management course. Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton School: University of Pennsylvania.

Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. Academy of management annual meeting (AOM). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15903abstract

Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet?-A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924

Wu, E. H. K., Lin, C. H., Ou, Y. Y., Liu, C. Z., Wang, W. K., & Chao, C. Y. (2020). Advantages and constraints of a hybrid model K-12 E-learning assistant chatbot. Ieee Access, 8, 77788–77801. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988252CrossRef

Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN, Article 4312418. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4312418

Title: Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments
Authors: Minkyoung Kim
Lauren Adlof
Publication date: 04-11-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: TechTrends / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00899-x

Springer Professional

Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Don’t put the Cart Before the Horse: Self-Study on Using VR in Education

Are We Dupes? Limitations of AI Systems: What Should Educators Do with Them?

The Ethical Consequences, Contestations, and Possibilities of Designs in Educational Systems

Design and Development of an Advising Chatbot as a Student Support Intervention in a University System

Game-Based Learning and Systems Thinking: an Innovative Instructional Approach for the 21st Century

TechTrends: A New Year and Transitions