Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Material Forming
Published in: International Journal of Material Forming 4/2019

06-08-2018 | Original Research

Adaptive metamodel-assisted shape optimization for springback in metal forming processes

Authors: Van-Tuan Dang, Carl Labergère, Pascal Lafon

Published in: International Journal of Material Forming | Issue 4/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper aims to propose a shape optimization strategy for springback shape in metal forming processes based on the adaptive metamodel of the spatial field that can reduce the computational time and cost. The first stage includes solving metal forming problem using finite element simulation and building of Reduction Order Model of spatial field based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. Then, the metamodel of spatial field is built using the combination of Reduction Order Model and Kriging method to replace the expensive high fidelity model. In the second stage, the metamodel of spatial field is used within the iterative optimization procedure to find the optimal design for the final shape after springback in the metal forming processes. This strategy allows reducing computational cost to achieve the optimal design with respect to the approach based on the traditional metamodel. The proposed methodology is illustrated with the “U-shape bending” from the Numisheet2011 benchmark problem. Two parameters: the blank holder force and the die radius are chosen to optimize the springback effect.
previous article The effects of pressure control technique on hot gas blow forming of Mg AZ31 sheets
next article Investigation of the effect of forming parameters in incremental sheet forming using a micromechanics based damage model

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Chatterjee A (2000) An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Curr Sci 78:808–817
2.
3.
Buhmann MD (2013) Radial basis functions: theory and implementations. Cambridge Monogr Appl Comput Math 37:8930–8945MATH
4.
Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle RiverMATH
5.
Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerospace Sci 45:50–79CrossRef
6.
Forrester AIJ, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ (2006) Optimization using surrogate models and partially converged computational fluid dynamics simulations. Proc R Soc A 462:2177–2204MATHCrossRef
7.
8.
9.
Sobester A, Leary SJ, Kean AJ (2005) On the Design of Optimization Strategies Based on Global Response Surface Approximation Models. J Glob Optim 33:31–59MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
10.
Ghanbari H, Scheinberg K (2017) Black-box optimization in machine learning with trust region based derivative free algorithm, Computing Research Repository (CoRR). arXiv:1703.​06925
11.
12.
Carlberg K, Farhat C (2009) An adaptive POD-Krylov reduced-order model for structural optimization. 8th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
13.
Courard A, Néron D, Ladevèze P, Ballere L (2016) Integration of PGD-virtual charts into an engineering design process. Comput Mech 57:637–651MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
14.
Chinesta F, Ammar A (2010) E Cueto:Proper generalized decomposition of multiscale models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:1114–1132MATHCrossRef
15.
Ravindran S (2000) A reduced-order approach for optimal control of fluids using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 34:425–448MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
16.
Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures, Part1: Coherent structures, quarterly of applied mathematics 3. Brown University. Division Appl Math 45:561–571MATH
17.
Couplet M, Basdevant C, Sagaut P (2005) Calibrated reduced-order pod-galerkin system for fluid flow modeling. J Comput Phys 207:192–220MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
18.
Liberge E, Hamdouni A (2010) Reduced order modelling method via proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for flow around an oscillating cylinder. J Fluids Struct 26:292–311CrossRef
19.
Raghavan B, Breitkopf P, Tourbier Y, Villon P (2013) Towards a space reduction approach for efficient structural shape optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 48:987–1000CrossRef
20.
Quillieca G-L, Raghavanb B, Breitkop P (2015) A manifold learning-based reduced order model for springback shape characterization and optimization in sheet metal forming. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 285:621–638MathSciNetCrossRef
21.
Nayroles B, Touzot G, Villon P (1992) Generalizing the finite element method Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements. Comput Mech 10:307–318MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
22.
Lafon P, Adragna P-A, Nguyen V-D (2016) Multi-objective optimization under uncertainty for sheet metal forming. MATEC Web of Conferences 80:10004CrossRef
23.
Meng F, Labergere C, Lafon P, Duguy M, Daniel L (2014) Multi-objective optimization based on meta-models of an aeronautical hub including the ductile damage constraint. Int J Damage Mech 23(8):1055–1076CrossRef
24.
McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245MathSciNetMATH
25.
Laurent L (2013) Stratégie multiparamétrique et métamodèles pour l’optimisation multiniveaux de structures. Ph.D. dissertation, ENS Cachan, Cachan, France
26.
Saka Y, Gunzburger M, Burkardt J (2007) Latinized, improved lhs, and cvt point sets in hypercubes. Int J Numer Anal Model 4(3–4):729–743MathSciNetMATH
27.
Toal D-JJ, Bressloff N-W, Keane A-J (2010) Geometric filtration using proper orthogonal decomposition for aerodynamic design optimization. AIAA J 5:48
28.
Hamdaoui M, Le Quilliec G, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2014) POD surrogates for real-time multi-parametric sheet metal forming problems. Int J Mater Form 7(3):337–358CrossRef
29.
Dang V-T, Labergere C, Lafon P (2017) POD surrogate models using adaptive sampling space parameters for springback optimization in sheet metal forming. Procedia Eng 207(2017):1588–1593CrossRef
30.
Liang YC, Lee HP, Lim SP, Lin WZ, Lee KH, Wu CG (2002) Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications: part I – theory. J Sound Vib 252(3):527–544MATHCrossRef
31.
De Vuyst F (2013) PDE metamodeling using principal component analysis, . In: Breitkopf P, Coelho RF (eds) Multidisciplinary design optimization in computational mechanics. Wiley, Hoboken
32.
Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1981) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London
33.
Simpson TW, Peplinski J, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17:129–150MATHCrossRef
34.
Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press, CambridgeMATH
35.
Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sodergaard J (2002) DACE - A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox, Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling Technical University of Denmark
36.
Couckuyt I, Dhaene T, Demeester P (2012) Oodace toolbox. Adv Eng Softw (Elsevier) 49(3):1–13MATH
37.
Couckuyt I, Dhaene T, Demeester P (2014) OoDACE toolbox: A flexible object-oriented Kriging implementation. J Mach Learn Res 15:3183–3186MATH
38.
Simpson TW, Peplinski JD, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17:129–150MATHCrossRef
39.
40.
Matérn B (1960) Spatial variation Lecture NotesStatist, vol 36. Springer, Berlin
41.
Toal DJJ, Forrester AIJ, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ, Holden C An adjoint for likelihood maximization. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London a: Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol 465, no 2111 (Nov. 8, 2009), pp 3267–3287
42.
Toal DJJ, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ (2008) Kriging hyperparameter tuning strategies. AIAA J 46(5):1240–1252CrossRef
43.
The Mathworks Inc (2004) Optimization toolbox for use with MATLAB: User’s guide, V. 3
44.
Ugray Z, Lasdon L, Plummer J, Glover F, Kelly J, Martí R (2007) Scatter search and local NLP solvers: A multistart framework for global optimization. INFORMS J Comput 19(3):328–340MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
45.
SHWCH H, Chung K (2011) Benchmark study of the 8th international conference and workshop on numerical simulation of 3D sheet metal forming processes. Proc Numisheet 2011 37:8930– 8945
46.
Nguyen V-D, Adragna P-A, Lafon P (2015) Multi-objective optimization under uncertainty and decision-making support for sheet metal forming. Key Eng Mater 651:1400–1405CrossRef
47.
Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic ow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 193:281–297. (Cited on page 40.)MATHCrossRef
48.
Niederreiter H (1992) Random number generation and quasi-monte Carlo methods. SIAM, PhiladelphiaMATHCrossRef
49.
Romeroa V-J, Burkardtb J-V, Gunzburgerb M-D, Petersonb J-S (2006) Comparison of pure and ”Latinized” centroidal Voronoi tessellation against various other statistical sampling methods. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:1266–1280CrossRef
50.
Gorissen D, Crombecq K, Couckuyt I, Dhaene T, Demeester P (2010) A Surrogate Modeling and Adaptive Sampling Toolbox for Computer Based Design. J Mach Learn Res 11:2051–2055
51.
Leary SJ, Bhaskar A, Keane AJ (2004) Derivative based surrogate model for approximating and optimizing the output of an expensive computer simulation. J Glob Optim 30:39–58MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adaptive metamodel-assisted shape optimization for springback in metal forming processes
Authors
Van-Tuan Dang
Carl Labergère
Pascal Lafon
Publication date
06-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
International Journal of Material Forming / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1960-6206
Electronic ISSN: 1960-6214
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1433-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

International Journal of Material Forming 4/2019 Go to the issue

Original Research

Process-induced defects in an L-shape profile ring rolling process

Original Research

Single point incremental forming of AA6061 thin sheet: calibration of ductile fracture models incorporating anisotropy and post forming analyses

Original Research

Numerical modeling of local capillary effects in porous media as a pressure discontinuity acting on the interface of a transient bi-fluid flow

Original Research

Predictive and control models of the spring-back in thick hull plate forming

Original Research

An extension of Rice localization criterion to predict the onset of shear localization in semi-solid materials

Original Research

The effects of pressure control technique on hot gas blow forming of Mg AZ31 sheets

Premium Partners

    Image Credits