Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cellulose 4/2021

26-01-2021 | Original Research

AFM characterization of cellulose nanocrystal height and width using internal calibration standards

Authors: Maohui Chen, Jeremie Parot, Vincent A. Hackley, Shan Zou, Linda J. Johnston

Published in: Cellulose | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A variety of models have been suggested for the cross-sectional shape and dimensions of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). Although many studies report measurements of CNC width (from transmission electron microscopy, TEM) and height (from atomic force microscopy, AFM), few have measured both cross-sectional dimensions for the same CNC sample and the same particles. Previous work has demonstrated that the TEM width is approximately twice the AFM height, a result that was explained by lateral aggregation of CNCs. Here we examine this question in more detail by measuring both CNC width and height by a single technique, AFM. The ability to measure both cross-sectional dimensions was facilitated by several factors: access to a fractionated CNC sample with few agglomerated particles, AFM imaging at low applied force with a small, nominal probe radius and in situ calibration of the AFM probe radius using co-deposited gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Two sizes of AuNPs provided optimal calibration of the tip radius and allowed internal validation of the approach. The results show that the CNC width/height ratio covers a relatively wide range with a larger variation in width than height. The ratios indicate that approximately a third of the particles adsorb with their shorter cross-sectional side on the surface. A fraction of CNCs (28%) have an approximately symmetric cross-section whereas the remainder are asymmetric with one axis that is 2–3 times longer than the other. The results are consistent with a combination of laterally aggregated CNCs that cannot be resolved as individual particles and CNC particles that are comprised of multiple crystallites. This has important implications for applications in which the particle length/cross-section determines the CNC properties.

Graphic abstract

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The identification of any commercial product or trade name does not imply endorsement or recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or the National Research Council Canada.
 
2
High resolution TEM images of AuNPs typically show that the particles are slightly asymmetric (Rice et al. 2013), although this is not evident from the AFM images of the AuNPs used here. Measuring particle diameter as the average of 4 cross sections will average any systematic errors due to particle asymmetry.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bushell M, Meija J, Chen M, Batchelor W, Browne C, Cho J-Y, Clifford CA, Al-Rekabi Z, Vanderfleet O, Cranston E, Lawn M, Coleman VA, Nyström G, Arcari M, Mezzenga R, Park BC, Ren L, Saito T, Kaku Y, Wagner R, Johnston LJ (2021) Particle size distributions for cellulose nanocrystals measured by atomic force microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison. Cellulose in press Bushell M, Meija J, Chen M, Batchelor W, Browne C, Cho J-Y, Clifford CA, Al-Rekabi Z, Vanderfleet O, Cranston E, Lawn M, Coleman VA, Nyström G, Arcari M, Mezzenga R, Park BC, Ren L, Saito T, Kaku Y, Wagner R, Johnston LJ (2021) Particle size distributions for cellulose nanocrystals measured by atomic force microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison. Cellulose in press
go back to reference Davis CS, Moon RJ, Ireland S, Foster EJ, Johnston LJ, Shatkin JA, Nelson K, Forster AM, Postek MT, Vladar AE, Gilman JW (2015) NIST-TAPPI workshop on measurement needs for cellulose nanomaterials, vol 1192 . NIST special publication. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1192 Davis CS, Moon RJ, Ireland S, Foster EJ, Johnston LJ, Shatkin JA, Nelson K, Forster AM, Postek MT, Vladar AE, Gilman JW (2015) NIST-TAPPI workshop on measurement needs for cellulose nanomaterials, vol 1192 . NIST special publication. https://​doi.​org/​10.​6028/​NIST.​SP.​1192
go back to reference Foster EJ, Moon RJ, Agarwal UP, Bortner MJ, Bras J, Camarero-Espinosa S, Chen KJ, Clift MJD, Cranston ED, Eichhorn SJ, Fox DM, Hamad WY, Heux L, Jean B, Korey M, Nieh W, Ong KJ, Reid MS, Renneckar S, Roberts R, Shatkin JA, Simonsen J, Stinson-Bagby K, Wanasekara N, Youngblood J (2018) Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 47:2609–2679. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00895JCrossRefPubMed Foster EJ, Moon RJ, Agarwal UP, Bortner MJ, Bras J, Camarero-Espinosa S, Chen KJ, Clift MJD, Cranston ED, Eichhorn SJ, Fox DM, Hamad WY, Heux L, Jean B, Korey M, Nieh W, Ong KJ, Reid MS, Renneckar S, Roberts R, Shatkin JA, Simonsen J, Stinson-Bagby K, Wanasekara N, Youngblood J (2018) Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 47:2609–2679. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1039/​C6CS00895JCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference ISO 19716:2016. Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals ISO 19716:2016. Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals
go back to reference Majoinen J, Haataja JS, Appelhans D, Lederer A, Olszewska A, Seitsonen J, Aseyev V, Kontturi E, Rosilo H, Österberg M, Houbenov N, Ikkala O (2014) Supracolloidal multivalent interactions and wrapping of dendronized glycopolymers on native cellulose nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 136:866–869. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja411401rCrossRefPubMed Majoinen J, Haataja JS, Appelhans D, Lederer A, Olszewska A, Seitsonen J, Aseyev V, Kontturi E, Rosilo H, Österberg M, Houbenov N, Ikkala O (2014) Supracolloidal multivalent interactions and wrapping of dendronized glycopolymers on native cellulose nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 136:866–869. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1021/​ja411401rCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Meija J, Bushell M, Couillard M, Beck S, Bonevich J, Cui K, Foster J, Will J, Fox D, Cho W, Heidelmann M, Park BC, Park YC, Ren L, Xu L, Stefaniak A, Knepp AK, Theissmann R, Purwin H, Wang Z, de Val N, Johnston LJ (2020) Particle size distributions for cellulose nanocrystals measured by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison. Anal Chem 92:13434–13442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02805CrossRefPubMed Meija J, Bushell M, Couillard M, Beck S, Bonevich J, Cui K, Foster J, Will J, Fox D, Cho W, Heidelmann M, Park BC, Park YC, Ren L, Xu L, Stefaniak A, Knepp AK, Theissmann R, Purwin H, Wang Z, de Val N, Johnston LJ (2020) Particle size distributions for cellulose nanocrystals measured by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison. Anal Chem 92:13434–13442. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1021/​acs.​analchem.​0c02805CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
AFM characterization of cellulose nanocrystal height and width using internal calibration standards
Authors
Maohui Chen
Jeremie Parot
Vincent A. Hackley
Shan Zou
Linda J. Johnston
Publication date
26-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cellulose / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Electronic ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03678-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Cellulose 4/2021 Go to the issue