Top

Published in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Agreement Technologies and the Semantic Web

Author : Axel Polleres

Published in: Agreement Technologies

Publisher: Springer Netherlands

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Here we discuss the relationship between Agreement Technologies and the Semantic Web, especially focusing on how Semantic Web standards play a role in the Agreement Technologies stack, but also issues related to Linked Data and the Web of Data. We start the chapter with an account of Semantic Web standards and ensue with the role they play in Agreement Technologies.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Agreements as the Grease (Not the Glue) of Society: A Cognitive and Social Science Perspective

next chapter Logical Formalisms for Agreement Technologies

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki

http://www.w3.org/Policy/pling/

http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/

http://www.sioc-project.org/

Adida, B., M. Birbeck, S. McCarron, and S. Pemberton. 2008. RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing. W3C Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/.

Angele, J., H. Boley, J. de Bruijn, D. Fensel, P. Hitzler, M. Kifer, R. Krummenacher, H. Lausen, A. Polleres, and R. Studer. 2005. Web Rule Language (WRL). W3C Member Submission. http://www.w3.org/Submission/WRL/.

Angles, R., and C. Gutierrez. 2008. The expressive power of sparql. In international semantic web conference (ISWC 2008). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5318, 114–129. Karlsruhe: Springer.

Baader, F. 2003. Terminological cycles in a description logic with existential restrictions. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI2003), Acapulco, Mexico, 325–330.

Baader, F., S. Brandt, and C. Lutz. 2005. Pushing the el envelope. InProceedings of the nineteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI2005), 364–369. Edinburgh: Professional Book Center.

Baselice, S., P. A. Bonatti, and G. Criscuolo. 2009. On finitely recursive programs. TPLP 9(2): 213–238.MathSciNetMATH

Beckett, D., and T. Berners-Lee. 2008. Turtle – Terse RDF triple language. W3c Team Submission, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/.

Beckett, D., and B. McBride. 2004. RDF/XML syntax specification (Revised). W3c Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/.

Berners-Lee, T. 2006. Linked data – Design issues. Available at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.

Berners-Lee, T., and D. Connolly. 2008. Notation3 (N3): A readable RDF syntax. W3c Team Submission, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/.

Berners-Lee, T., D. Connolly, L. Kagal, Y. Scharf, and J. Hendler. 2008. N3logic: a logical framework for the world wide web. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 8(3): 249–269.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Berrueta, D., and J. Phipps. 2008. Best practice recipes for publishing rdf vocabularies. W3C Working Group Note. http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/.

Bojārs, U., J. G. Breslin, D. Berrueta, D. Brickley, S. Decker, S. Fernández, C. Görn, A. Harth, T. Heath, K. Idehen, K. Kjernsmo, A. Miles, A. Passant, A. Polleres, L. Polo, and M. Sintek. 2007. SIOC core ontology specification. W3C Member Submission Available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/sioc-spec/.

Boley, H., and M. Kifer. 2010. RIF basic logic dialect. W3C Proposed Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-bld-20100511/.

Boley, H., G. Hallmark, M. Kifer, A. Paschke, A. Polleres, and D. Reynolds. 2010. RIF core dialect. W3C Proposed Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-core-20100511/.

Bray, T., J. Paoli, and C. Sperberg-McQueen. 1998. XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0. W3C recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.

Brickley, D., R. Guha, B. McBride. 2004. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. Tech. rep., W3C. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.

Bruijn, J. d., and S. Heymans. 2007. Logical foundations of (e)RDF(S): Complexity and reasoning. In Proceedings of the 6th international semantic web conference and 2nd Asian semantic web conference (ISWC2007+ASWC2007), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, no. 4825, 86–99. Busan: Springer. http://www.debruijn.net/publications/frames-rdf-conference.pdf.

Bruijn, J. d., E. Franconi, and S. Tessaris. 2005. Logical reconstruction of normative RDF. In OWL: experiences and directions workshop (OWLED-2005), Galway, Ireland. http://www.debruijn.net/publications/owl-05.pdf.

Caldwell, B., M. Cooper, L. G. Reid, and G. Vanderheiden. 2008. Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.0. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.

Calimeri, F., S. Cozza, G. Ianni, and N. Leone. 2009. Magic sets for the bottom-up evaluation of finitely recursive programs. In Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning, 10th international conference (LPNMR 2009). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. E. Erdem, F. Lin, and T. Schaub, vol. 5753, 71–86. Potsdam: Springer.

Calvanese, D., G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. 2007. Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The dl-lite family. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39(3): 385–429.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Chamberlin, D., J. Robie, S. Boag, M. F. Fernández, J. Siméon, and D. Florescu. 2007. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. W3C Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/.

Cranor, L., B. Dobbs, S. Egelman, G. Hogben, J. Humphrey, M. Langheinrich, M. Marchiori, M. Presler-Marshall, J. Reagle, M. Schunter, D. A. Stampley, and R. Wenning. 2006. The platform for privacy preferences 1.1 (P3P1.1) specification. W3C Working Group Note. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P11/.

de Bruijn, J. 2010. RIF RDF and OWL compatibility. W3C Propose Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-rdf-owl-20100511/.

de Bruijn, J., A. Polleres, R. Lara, and D. Fensel. 2005. OWL⁻. Final draft d20.1v0.2, WSML.

de Sainte Marie, C., G. Hallmark, and A. Paschke. 2010. RIF production rule dialect. W3C Proposed Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-prd-20100511/.

Eiter, T., G. Ianni, A. Polleres, R. Schindlauer, and H. Tompits. 2006a. Reasoning with rules and ontologies. In Reasoning Web 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. P. Barahona, et al., vol. 4126, 93–127. Berline/Heidelberg: Springer. http://www.polleres.net/publications/eit-etal-2006_rowSchool.pdf.

Eiter, T., G. Ianni, R. Schindlauer, and H. Tompits. 2006b. Effective integration of declarative rules with external evaluations for semantic-web reasoning. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2006). LNCS, vol. 4011, 273–287. Budva: Montenegro.

Eiter, T., G. Ianni, T. Krennwallner, and A. Polleres. 2008. Rules and ontologies for the semantic web. In Reasoning Web 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. C. Baroglio, P. A. Bonatti, J. Maluszynski, M. Marchiori, A. Polleres, and S. Schaffert, vol. 5224, 1–53. Venice: Springer. http://www.polleres.net/publications/eite-etal-2008.pdf.

Eiter, T., and M. Simkus. 2010. FDNC: Decidable nonmonotonic disjunctive logic programs with function symbols. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 11(2): 1–45.MathSciNetCrossRef

Euzenat, J., and P. Shvaiko. 2007. Ontology matching. Heidelberg: Springer.MATH

Fensel, D., H. Lausen, A. Polleres, J. de Bruijn, M. Stollberg, D. Roman, and J. Domingue. 2006. Enabling semantic web services : The web service modeling Ontology. Berlin/New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/west/home/business/business+information+systems?SGWID=4-170-22-173663112-0.

Grosof, B. N., I. Horrocks, R. Volz, and S. Decker. 2003. Description logic programs: Combining logic programs with description logic. In 12th international conference on world wide web (WWW’03), 48–57. Budapest: ACM.

Gutiérrez, C., C. A. Hurtado, A. O. Mendelzon. 2004. Foundations of semantic web databases. In Proceedings of the twenty-third acm sigact-sigmod-sigart symposium on principles of database systems (PODS 2004), 95–106. Paris: ACM.

Harth, A., J. Umbrich, A. Hogan, and S. Decker. 2007. YARS2: A federated repository for querying graph structured data from the web. In 6th international semantic web conference, 2nd Asian semantic web conference, 211–224. Berlin/New York: Springer

Hayes, P. 2004. RDF semantics, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/.

Hitzler, P., M. Krötzsch, B. Parsia, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and S. Rudolph. 2009. OWL 2 web ontology language primer. W3c recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/.

Horrocks, I., and P. F. Patel-Schneider. 2004. Reducing owl entailment to description logic satisfiability. Journal of Web Semantics 1(4): 345–357.CrossRef

Horrocks, I., P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean. 2004. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.

Horrocks, I., O. Kutz, and U. Sattler. 2006. The even more irresistible sroiq. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR’06), 57–67. Lake District of the United Kingdom: AAAI.

Ianni, G., A. Martello, C. Panetta, and G. Terracina. 2009. Efficiently querying RDF(S) ontologies with Answer Set Programming. Journal of Logic and Computation (Special issue) 19(4): 671–695. doi:10.1093/logcom/exn043.MathSciNetMATH

Kay, M. 2007. XSL transformations (XSLT) version 2.0. W3C Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20.

Kifer, M., G. Lausen, and J. Wu. 1995. Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. Journal of the ACM 42(4): 741–843.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Krötzsch, M., S. Rudolph, and P. Hitzler. 2007. Complexity boundaries for horn description logics. In Proceedings of the twenty-second aaai conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), Vancouver, 452–457.

Moses, T. 2005. eXtensible access control markup language (XACML) version 2.0. OASIS Standard

Motik, B., B. C. Grau, I. Horrocks, Z. Wu, A. Fokoue, C. Lutz, D. Calvanese, J. Carroll, G. D. Giacomo, J. Hendler, I. Herman, B. Parsia, P. F. Patel-Schneider, A. Ruttenberg, U. Sattler, and M. Schneider. 2009. OWL 2 web ontology language profiles. W3c recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/.

Muñoz, S., J. Pérez, and C. Gutiérrez. 2007. Minimal deductive systems for rdf. In Proceedings of the 4th European semantic web conference (ESWC2007), ed. E. Franconi, M. Kifer, and W. May. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4519, 53–67. Innsbruck: Springer.

Paschke, A., D. Hirtle, A. Ginsberg, P. L. Patranjan, F. McCabe. 2008. RIF use cases and requirements. W3C Working Draft. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-ucr/.

Pérez, J., M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. 2006. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In International semantic web conference (ISWC 2006), 30–43. Berlin/New York: Springer.

Pérez, J., M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. 2009. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 34(3): Article 16, 45p.

Pichler, R., A. Polleres, F. Wei, and S. Woltran. 2008. Entailment for domain-restricted RDF. In Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference (ESWC2008), 200–214. Tenerife: Springer. http://www.polleres.net/publications/pich-etal-2008.pdf.

Polleres, A. 2006. SPARQL rules!. Tech. Rep. GIA-TR-2006-11-28. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles. Available at http://www.polleres.net/TRs/GIA-TR-2006-11-28.pdf.

Polleres, A. 2007. From SPARQL to rules (and back). In Proceedings of the 16th world wide web conference (WWW2007), 787–796. Banff: ACM. Available at http://www2007.org/paper435.php.

Polleres, A., H. Boley, and M. Kifer. 2010. RIF datatypes and Built-Ins 1.0. W3C Proposed Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-dtb-20100511/.

Polleres, A., and D. Huynh (eds.). 2009. Special issue: The web of data. Journal of Web Semantics 7(3): 135. Elsevier.

Prud′hommeaux, E., and A. Seaborne. 2008. SPARQL query language for RDF. W3c Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.

Schindlauer, R. 2006. Answer-set programming for the semantic web. Ph.D. thesis, Vienna University of Technology.

Schmidt, M., M. Meier, and G. Lausen. 2010. Foundations of SPARQL query optimization. In 13th international conference on database theory (ICDT2010), Lausanne.

Smith, M. K., C. Welty, D. L. McGuinness. 2004. OWL web ontology language guide. W3c Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.

SQL-99. 1999. Information technology – database language SQL- Part 3: call level interface (SQL/CLI). Tech. Rep. INCITS/ISO/IEC 9075-3, INCITS/ISO/IEC. Standard Specification.

ter Horst, H. J. 2005. Completeness, decidability and complexity of entailment for rdf schema and a semantic extension involving the owl vocabulary. Journal of Web Semantics 3: 79–115.MathSciNetCrossRef

Thompson, H. S., D. Beech, M. Maloney, and N. Mendelsohn. 2004. XML schema Part 1: Structures, 2nd ed. W3C Recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/.

Weitzner, D. 2004. W3c patent policy. Available at http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/.

Title: Agreement Technologies and the Semantic Web
Author: Axel Polleres
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Book: Agreement Technologies
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5582-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-5583-3

Copyright Year: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner