2005 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
American Options
Authors : Marek Musiela, Marek Rutkowski
Published in: Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
In contrast to the holder of a European option, the holder of an
American option
is allowed to exercise his right to buy (or sell) the underlying asset at any time before or at the expiry date. This special feature of American-style options – and more generally of American claims – makes the arbitrage pricing of American options much more involved than the valuation of standard European claims. We know already that arbitrage valuation of American claims is closely related to specific optimal stopping problems. Intuitively, one might expect that the holder of an American option will choose her exercise policy in such a way that the expected payoff from the option will be maximized. Maximization of the expected discounted payoff under subjective probability would lead, of course, to non-uniqueness of the price. It appears, however, that for the purpose of arbitrage valuation, the maximization of the expected discounted payoff should be done under the martingale measure (that is, under risk-neutral probability). Thus, the uniqueness of the arbitrage price of an American claim holds.