Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Americans’ Economic Rights

Authors : Charles M. Lamb, Jacob R. Neiheisel

Published in: Constitutional Landmarks

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

America is predominantly a capitalist nation with a safety net for the economically less fortunate, so decisions influencing who gets what, when, how, and why can be critical economic issues in politics and law. Relying on McCloskey’s theory of the three constitutional eras, we show that the Marshall Court relied on economic rights to bolster federal power, the Court from Chief Justice Taney to the Great Depression permitted business rights to flourish as the nation increasingly became industrialized, and Court decisions since the New Deal have emphasized individual civil rights as well as economic rights in a more regulated economy.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Seemingly, Marshall’s opinion was not influenced by the fact that land speculators had bribed Georgia legislators in order to facilitate this gargantuan swindle.
 
2
Indeed, Marshall thought of contracts as “sacred” arrangements, intended to last forever.
 
3
See Gillman (1993) for one prominent revisionist interpretation of Lochner.
 
4
See Chapter 1, note 3 concerning how liberal Takings Clause cases are defined by the US Supreme Court Database.
 
Literature
go back to reference Colby, Thomas, and Peter J. Smith. 2015. The Return to Lochner. Cornell Law Review 100(3): 527–602. Colby, Thomas, and Peter J. Smith. 2015. The Return to Lochner. Cornell Law Review 100(3): 527–602.
go back to reference Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 2020a. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints. 10th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 2020a. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints. 10th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
go back to reference ———. 2020b. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice. 10th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press. ———. 2020b. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice. 10th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
go back to reference Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldman, Sheldon. 1991. Constitutional Law: Cases and Essays. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins. Goldman, Sheldon. 1991. Constitutional Law: Cases and Essays. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
go back to reference Greene, Jamel. 2011. The Anticanon. Harvard Law Review 125(2): 373–475. Greene, Jamel. 2011. The Anticanon. Harvard Law Review 125(2): 373–475.
go back to reference Magrath, C. Peter. 1966. Yazoo: Law and Politics in the New Republic: The Case of Fletcher v. Peck. Providence, RI: Brown University Press. Magrath, C. Peter. 1966. Yazoo: Law and Politics in the New Republic: The Case of Fletcher v. Peck. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
go back to reference McCloskey, Robert G. 1951. American Conservatism in the Age of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef McCloskey, Robert G. 1951. American Conservatism in the Age of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2016. The American Supreme Court. 6th rev. ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ———. 2016. The American Supreme Court. 6th rev. ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference O’Brien, David M., and Gordon Silverstein. 2020b. Constitutional Law and Politics: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. 11th ed. Vol. 2. New York: Norton. O’Brien, David M., and Gordon Silverstein. 2020b. Constitutional Law and Politics: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. 11th ed. Vol. 2. New York: Norton.
go back to reference Wright, Benjamin F. 1938. The Contract Clause of the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wright, Benjamin F. 1938. The Contract Clause of the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Metadata
Title
Americans’ Economic Rights
Authors
Charles M. Lamb
Jacob R. Neiheisel
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55575-7_5