Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

An Empirical Analysis of the Macroeconomic Dynamics of Innovation

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Since the beginning of the second half of the twentieth century, it has been generally accepted that innovation plays a key role in economic growth and development, both in developed and developing countries

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–574.CrossRef Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–574.CrossRef
go back to reference Archibugi, D., Evangelista, R., & Simonetti, R. (1995). Concentration, firm size and ınnovation: Evidence from ınnovation costs. Technovation, 15(3), 153–163.CrossRef Archibugi, D., Evangelista, R., & Simonetti, R. (1995). Concentration, firm size and ınnovation: Evidence from ınnovation costs. Technovation, 15(3), 153–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Reserach Council (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://www.nber.org/books/univ62-1. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Reserach Council (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://​www.​nber.​org/​books/​univ62-1.
go back to reference Avermaete, T., Viaene, J., Morgan, E. J., & Crawford, N. (2003). Determinants of innovation in small food firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 8–17.CrossRef Avermaete, T., Viaene, J., Morgan, E. J., & Crawford, N. (2003). Determinants of innovation in small food firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 8–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664.CrossRef Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155–162.CrossRef Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155–162.CrossRef
go back to reference Bush, V. (1995). Science: the endless frontier. (Reprint, 1945, North Stratford: Ayer Co). Bush, V. (1995). Science: the endless frontier. (Reprint, 1945, North Stratford: Ayer Co).
go back to reference Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.CrossRef Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232–243.CrossRef Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232–243.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of ınnovation and market structure. In R. Schmalansee & R. D. Willing (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 2, pp. 1059–1107). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V. Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of ınnovation and market structure. In R. Schmalansee & R. D. Willing (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 2, pp. 1059–1107). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
go back to reference Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: Strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 709–728.CrossRef Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: Strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 709–728.CrossRef
go back to reference Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010.CrossRef Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010.CrossRef
go back to reference Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41(8), 1283–1295.CrossRef Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41(8), 1283–1295.CrossRef
go back to reference Geroski, P. A., & Walters, C. F. (1995). Innovative activity over the business cycle. The Economic Journal, 105(431), 916–928.CrossRef Geroski, P. A., & Walters, C. F. (1995). Innovative activity over the business cycle. The Economic Journal, 105(431), 916–928.CrossRef
go back to reference Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(6), 639–667.CrossRef Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(6), 639–667.CrossRef
go back to reference Hong, S., Oxley, L., McCann, P., & Le, T. (2016). Why firm size matters: Investigating the drivers of innovation and economic performance in New Zealand using the Business Operations Survey. Applied Economics, 48(55), 5379–5395.CrossRef Hong, S., Oxley, L., McCann, P., & Le, T. (2016). Why firm size matters: Investigating the drivers of innovation and economic performance in New Zealand using the Business Operations Survey. Applied Economics, 48(55), 5379–5395.CrossRef
go back to reference Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation., Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation., Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Khan, A. M., & Roy, P. A. (2011). Globalization and the determinants of innovation in BRICS versus OECD economies: A macroeconomic study. Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets, 3, 29–45. Khan, A. M., & Roy, P. A. (2011). Globalization and the determinants of innovation in BRICS versus OECD economies: A macroeconomic study. Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets, 3, 29–45.
go back to reference Rogers, M. (2004). Network, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153.CrossRef Rogers, M. (2004). Network, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle., Harvard Economic Studies Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle., Harvard Economic Studies Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
go back to reference Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Sun, Y., & Du, D. (2010). Determinants of industrial innovation in China: Evidence from its recent economic census. Technovation, 30(9–10), 540–550.CrossRef Sun, Y., & Du, D. (2010). Determinants of industrial innovation in China: Evidence from its recent economic census. Technovation, 30(9–10), 540–550.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk, B., Den Hertog, R., Menkveld, B., & Thurik, R. (1997). Some new evidence on the determinants of large- and small-firm ınnovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343.CrossRef Van Dijk, B., Den Hertog, R., Menkveld, B., & Thurik, R. (1997). Some new evidence on the determinants of large- and small-firm ınnovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagner, E. R., & Hansen, E. R. (2005). Innovation in large versus small companies: Insights from the US woods products ındustry. Management Desicion, 43(6), 837–850. Wagner, E. R., & Hansen, E. R. (2005). Innovation in large versus small companies: Insights from the US woods products ındustry. Management Desicion, 43(6), 837–850.
Metadata
Title
An Empirical Analysis of the Macroeconomic Dynamics of Innovation
Author
Cigdem Borke Tunali
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55926-1_7