Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Fire Technology 1/2009

01-03-2009

An Experimental Examination of Dead Air Space for Smoke Alarms

Authors: Joseph Z. Su, George P. Crampton

Published in: Fire Technology | Issue 1/2009

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

North American smoke-alarm installation standards and manufacturer’s recommendations require that smoke alarms be installed not less than 100 mm from any adjoining wall if mounted on a flat ceiling, and not closer than 100 mm and not farther than 300 mm from the adjoining ceiling surface if mounted on walls. The aim of this prescriptive rule is to avoid installation of smoke alarms in the “dead air space”, where it is assumed to be difficult for smoke to reach. However, there was little scientific basis and experimental evidence for this prescriptive rule. A series of experimental studies were conducted in a residential dwelling as well as in a laboratory room to examine the effect of “dead air space” on smoke-alarm response. Small and slow-growing smouldering and flaming fire sources were used to challenge the smoke alarms. The results show that smoke can reach the “dead air space” under the experimental conditions and the smoke alarms installed in the “dead air space” can respond to the fire at times comparable to, and in many cases even earlier than, the smoke alarms installed at conventional locations. There was no obvious evidence of the “dead air space” effect. The prescriptive “dead air space” as currently defined in the standards is questionable as far as early fire detection is concerned when fires are still small and smoke flows caused by the fires are still slow. Performance-based approaches should be used to identify those spaces where smoke may be difficult to reach.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Bukowski RW, Waterman TE, Christian WJ (1976) Detector sensitivity and siting requirements for dwellings. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., Report# PB 247 483 (NBS GCR 75-51) Bukowski RW, Waterman TE, Christian WJ (1976) Detector sensitivity and siting requirements for dwellings. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., Report# PB 247 483 (NBS GCR 75-51)
2.
go back to reference Harpe SW, Waterman TE, Christians WJ (1977) Detector sensitivity and siting requirements for dwellings—Phase 2. National Fire Protection Association, Boston, MA, Report# SPP43A (NBS-GCR 77-82) Harpe SW, Waterman TE, Christians WJ (1977) Detector sensitivity and siting requirements for dwellings—Phase 2. National Fire Protection Association, Boston, MA, Report# SPP43A (NBS-GCR 77-82)
3.
go back to reference Waterman TE, Harpe SW, Christian WJ (1977) An engineering approach to the positioning of fire detectors in residences. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, SFPE Technology Report 77-6 Waterman TE, Harpe SW, Christian WJ (1977) An engineering approach to the positioning of fire detectors in residences. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, SFPE Technology Report 77-6
4.
go back to reference Kennedy RH, Riley KWP, Rogers SP (1978) A study of the operation and effectiveness of fire detectors installed in the bedrooms and corridors of residential institutions. Building Research Establishment, Garston, Watford, CP26/78, April 1978 Kennedy RH, Riley KWP, Rogers SP (1978) A study of the operation and effectiveness of fire detectors installed in the bedrooms and corridors of residential institutions. Building Research Establishment, Garston, Watford, CP26/78, April 1978
5.
go back to reference Bukowski RW (1979) Investigation of the effects of heating and air conditioning on the performance of smoke detectors in mobile home. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., NBSIR 79-1915, October 1979 Bukowski RW (1979) Investigation of the effects of heating and air conditioning on the performance of smoke detectors in mobile home. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., NBSIR 79-1915, October 1979
6.
go back to reference Drouin JA, Cote AE (1984) Smoke and heat detector performance: field demonstration test results. Fire J (Boston) 78:34–38, 69 Drouin JA, Cote AE (1984) Smoke and heat detector performance: field demonstration test results. Fire J (Boston) 78:34–38, 69
7.
go back to reference Cote AE (1984) Field test and evaluation of residential sprinkler systems. Part 3. Fire Technol 20:41–46CrossRef Cote AE (1984) Field test and evaluation of residential sprinkler systems. Part 3. Fire Technol 20:41–46CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Davis WD, Forney GP, Bukowski RW (1997) Developing detector siting rules from computational experiments in spaces with complex geometries. Fire Safety J 29:129–139CrossRef Davis WD, Forney GP, Bukowski RW (1997) Developing detector siting rules from computational experiments in spaces with complex geometries. Fire Safety J 29:129–139CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bukowski RW, Peacock RD, Averill JD, Cleary TG, Bryner NP, Walton WD, Reneke PA, Kuligowski ED (2003) Performance of home smoke alarms analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, NIST Technical Note 1455, December 2003 (revised March 2006) Bukowski RW, Peacock RD, Averill JD, Cleary TG, Bryner NP, Walton WD, Reneke PA, Kuligowski ED (2003) Performance of home smoke alarms analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, NIST Technical Note 1455, December 2003 (revised March 2006)
10.
go back to reference CAN/ULC-S553-02 (2002) Standard for the installation of smoke-alarms, 2nd edn. Underwriters’ Laboratories of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada CAN/ULC-S553-02 (2002) Standard for the installation of smoke-alarms, 2nd edn. Underwriters’ Laboratories of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
11.
go back to reference NFPA 72 (2007) National fire alarm code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, 2007 Edition NFPA 72 (2007) National fire alarm code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, 2007 Edition
12.
go back to reference Su JZ, Crampton GP, Carpenter DW, McCartney C, Leroux P (2003) Kemano fire studies—Part 1: response of residential smoke alarms. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Research Report 108 (URL: http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/rr/rr108/) Su JZ, Crampton GP, Carpenter DW, McCartney C, Leroux P (2003) Kemano fire studies—Part 1: response of residential smoke alarms. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Research Report 108 (URL: http://​irc.​nrc-cnrc.​gc.​ca/​pubs/​rr/​rr108/​)
Metadata
Title
An Experimental Examination of Dead Air Space for Smoke Alarms
Authors
Joseph Z. Su
George P. Crampton
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Fire Technology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0015-2684
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8099
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0043-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Fire Technology 1/2009 Go to the issue