Top

previous chapter Talking Tomorrow’s Technology, Framing Politica...

next chapter Ideas and Objects, Meaning and Causation—Frame ...

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. An Idea—And More Than an Idea: Climate Engineering in Research and Decision-Making

Read first chapter

Author: Judith Kreuter

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Published in: Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization

» Get access to the full-text

Abstract

This chapter offers a concise summary of the current state of Climate Engineering, introducing these emerging technologies as existing, to a large degree, so far only in the minds of people and the calculations for climate models. As well as outlining the ideas on which these approaches are based which date back decades, in some cases centuries, the chapter outlines the currently few political discussions of CE at the margins of climate policy. Kreuter discusses this peculiar state of affairs and explores the relevance of social construction in this context based on the state of the art of social science analysis of CE.

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 50.000 Bücher
über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 58.000 Bücher
über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

For insightful overviews, see Fleming ( 2010); Keith ( 2000); Bonnheim ( 2010); Bowden ( 2010); Fleming ( 2012, 2013).

To the knowledge of the author.

An overview over the history of ocean iron fertilization research and experimentation can be found in Strong et al. ( 2009).

Such as Climeworks ( https://www.climeworks.com/) or Carbon Engineering ( https://carbonengineering.com/).

Such as the NGO Carbon180 ( https://carbon180.org/work).

Some ideas expressed in this section have been published in Kreuter ( 2015a, b).

I use the terms ‚expert ‘ or ‚academic ‘ here instead of ‚scientific ‘ in order to highlight that this discursive field is not limited to natural scientists, but includes also engineers, social scientists and scholars of the humanities. In this, I follow the definition presented in the Epistemic Communities approach (Adler and Haas 1992; Haas 1992).

Other assessments of the relative representation of speakers from specific social groups in the discussion about CE differentiate, for example, between global regions (Biermann and Möller 2019; Buck 2013) or membership in indigenous groups (Whyte 2019).

See Chaps. 5 and 6.

Translated by JK; original: „Während das moral-hazard-Phänomen bei anderen technischen Neuerungen, wie zum Beispiel dem Einführen von Sicherheitsgurten in Autos, statistisch belegt werden kann, gibt es im Kontext von Climate Engineering kein empirisches Material, das die moral-hazard-These unterstützt.“ (Rickels et al. 2011a: 86).

Scott ( 2013) differentiates three ‘philosophies of technology’: technological progressivism, technological pessimism and technological pragmatism (D. Scott 2013). According to Scott, the main idea of technological pessimism can be described in the statement that “human history is now on a dangerous trajectory where technology is destined to become the ‘determining and controlling influence on society and culture’” (D. Scott 2013: 5; see also White 1967: 1206) Technological pragmatism espouses a more nuanced take on technology: The assumption is that technology is not inherently good or bad (see Borgmann 1987: 40ff.).

This dictum has recently been qualified in Barrett et al. ( 2014).

Adler E, Haas PM (1992) Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. Int Organ 46(1):367–390 CrossRef

Amelung D, Dietz W, Fernow H, Heyen D, Reichwein D, Wiertz T (2012) Beyond calculation: climate engineering risks from a social sciences perspective (Forum Marsilius-Kolleg). Marsilius-Kolleg, Heidelberg

Anshelm J, Hansson A (2014a) Battling promethean dreams and trojan horses: revealing the critical discourses on geoengineering. Energy Res Soc Sci 2:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.001 CrossRef

Anshelm J, Hansson A (2014b) The last chance to save the planet? An analysis of the geoengineering advocacy discourse in the public debate. Environ Human 5:101–123 CrossRef

Anshelm J, Hansson A (2015) Has the grand idea of geoengineering as Plan B run out of steam? Anthrop Rev 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615614592

Armeni C (2015) Global experimentalist governance, international law and climate change technologies. Int Compar Law Q 64(4):875–904 CrossRef

Asayama S (2014) Catastrophism toward ‘opening up’ or ‘closing down’? Going beyond the apocalyptic future and geoengineering. Cur Sociol 63(1):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114559849 CrossRef

Asayama S, Sugiyama M, Ishii A (2017) Ambivalent climate of opinions: Tensions and dilemmas in understanding geoengineering experimentation. Geoforum 80:82–92 CrossRef

Bahn O, Chesney M, Gheyssens J, Knutti R, Pana AC (2015) Is there room for geoengineering in the optimal climate policy mix? Environ Sci Pol 48:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.014 CrossRef

Barrett S (2008) The incredible economics of geoengineering. Environ Resource Econ 39:45–54 CrossRef

Barrett S, Lenton TM, Millner A, Tavoni A, Carpenter SR, Anderies JM et al (2014) Climate engineering reconsidered. . Nature Clim Change 4:527–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2278

Bellamy R (2013) Framing geoengineering assessment. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Bellamy R (2014) Safety first! framing and governing climate geoengineering experimentation. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 014

Bellamy R (2016) A sociotechnical framework for governing climate engineering. Sci Technol Human Values 41(2):135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915591855 CrossRef

Bellamy R, Hulme M (2011) Beyond the tipping point: understanding perceptions of abrupt climate change and their implications. Weather, Clim Soc 3:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011WCAS1081.1 CrossRef

Bellamy R, Lezaun J (2015) A review of deliberative public engagements with climate engineering. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 019

Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2012) A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Clim Change 3(6):597–615 CrossRef

Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2012a) Appraising geoengineering. Tyndall Working Paper Series, 153

Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE (2016) Deliberative mapping of options for tackling climate change: citizens and specialists ‘open up’ appraisal of geoengineering. Publ Understand Sci 25(3):269–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514548628 CrossRef

Bellamy R, Lezaun J, Palmer J (2017) Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: an experimental deliberative approach. Global Environ Change 45:194–202 CrossRef

Belter CW, Seidel DJ (2013) A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research. WIREs Climate Change 4(5):417–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.229 CrossRef

Bengtsson T (2006) Geo-engineering to confine climate change: Is it at all feasible? Climatic Change 77(3–4):229–234 CrossRef

Bickel JE (2010) The climate engineering option: economic and policy implications. Prepared for the AEI

Bickel JE, Agrawal S (2013) Reexamining the economics of aerosol geoengineering. Clim Change 119(3–4):993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0619-x CrossRef

Biermann F, Möller I (2019) Rich man's solution? Climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the South. International Environmental Agreements, Online first, 1–17

Bluemling B, Kim RE, Biermann F (2019) Seeding the clouds to reach the sky: will China's weather modification practices support the legitimization of climate engineering? AMBIO. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01180-3

Bodansky D (1996) May We Engineer the Climate? Climatic Change 33(3):309–321 CrossRef

Bodansky D (2013) The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance. Climatic Change 121:539–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0759-7 CrossRef

Bonnheim NB (2010) History of climate engineering. WIREs Clim Change 1(6):891–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.82 CrossRef

Borgmann A (1987) Technology and the character of contemporary life: a philosophical inquiry, reprint. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL CrossRef

Borgmann A (2012) The setting of the scene: technological fixes and the design of the good life. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington, Plymouth, UK, pp 189–200

Böttcher M, Gabriel J, Low S (2016) Solar radiation management: foresight for governance. IASS Working Paper Series

Bowden G (2010) Rock, paper, scissors: uncertainty, innovation, and the evolving ecoloy of climate change discourse. Proc Media Ecol Assoc 11:67–78

Boyd PW (2016) Development of geopolitically-relevant ranking criteria for geoengineering methods. Earth’s Future 4(11):523–531. eft2.2016EF000447

Boyd PW, Abraham ER (2001) Iron-mediated changes in phytoplankton photosynthetic competence during SOIREE. Deep-Sea Res II 48:2529–2550 CrossRef

Boyd PW, Law CS (2001) The southern ocean iron release experiment (SOIREE)—introduction and summary. Deep-Sea Res II 48:2425–2438 CrossRef

Braun C, Merk C, Pönitzsch G, Rehdanz K, Schmidt U (2018) Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence. Clim Pol 18(4):471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888 CrossRef

Brzoska M, Link PM, Neuneck G (2012) Geoengineering—Möglichkeiten und Risiken. Sicherheit & Frieden 30(4):185–193 CrossRef

Buck HJ (2010) What can geoengineering do for us? Public participation and the new media landscape. Working Paper

Buck HJ (2012) Geoengineering: re-making climate for profit or humanitarian intervention? Develop Change 43(1):253–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01744.x CrossRef

Buck HJ (2013) Climate engineering: spectacle, tragedy or solution? A content analysis of news media framing. In: Methmann C, Rothe D, Stephan B (eds) Interpretive approaches to global climate governance. (De)constructing the greenhouse. London, Routledge, pp 166–180

Buck HJ (2016) Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications. Clim Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6

Buck HJ (2018) Perspectives on solar geoengineering from Finnish Lapland: local insights on the global imaginary of Arctic geoengineering. Geoforum 91:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.020 CrossRef

Budyko MI (1977) Climatic changes. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC CrossRef

Bunzl M (2009) Researching geoengineering: should not or could not? Environ Res Lett 4(4):1–3 CrossRef

Burns WCG (2013) Climate geoengineering: solar radiation management and its implications for intergenerational equity. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoengineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 200–220 CrossRef

Burns WCG (2016) The Paris agreement and climate geoengineering governance: the need for a human rights-based component. CIGI Papers

Burns WCG, Nicholson S (2016) Governing climate engineering. In: Nicholson S, Jinnah S (eds) New earth politics. Essays from the Anthropocene. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, pp 343–366

Burns ET, Flegal J, Keith DW, Mahajan A, Tingley D, Wagner G (2016) What do people think when they about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research. Earth's Future 4:536–542

C2G2 (2019) C2G2 mission. https://www.c2g2.net/c2g2-mission/. Accessed 22 Mar 2019

Cairns R (2013) Examining framings of geoengineering using Q methodology. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 002

Cairns R, Stirling A (2014) Maintaining planetary systems’ or ‘concentrating global power’? High stakes in contending framings of climate geoengineering. Global Environ Change 28:25–38 CrossRef

Campbell-Arvai V, Hart PS, Raimi KT, Wolske KS (2017) The influence of learning about carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on support for mitigation policies. Clim Change 143:321–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2005-1 CrossRef

Carr W (2013) Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now. Clim Change 121(3):567–577 CrossRef

Carr W, Preston CJ (2017) Skewed vulnerabilities and moral corruption in global perspectives on climate engineering. Environ Values 26:757–777. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X15046905490371 CrossRef

Carr W, Yung L (2018) Perceptions of climate engineering in the South Pacific, Sub-Saharan Africa, and North American Arctic. Clim Change 147:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2138-x CrossRef

Carr W, Yung L, Preston CJ (2014) Swimming upstream: engaging the American public early on climate engineering. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 70(3):38–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340214531180 CrossRef

CBD (2010) Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its tenth meeting: X/33. Biodiversity and Climate Change. Nagoya: Convention on Biological Diversity

Cicerone RJ (2006) Geoengineering: encouraging research and overseeing implementation. Climatic Change 77(3–4):221–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9102-x CrossRef

Clingerman F, O’Brien KJ (2014) Playing God: Why religion belongs in the climate engineering debate. Bull Atom Scient 70(3):27–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340214531181 CrossRef

Corner A, Pidgeon N (2015) Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Clim Change 130:425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6 CrossRef

Corner A, Pidgeon N (2010) Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications. Environ Sci Pol Sustain Dev 52(1):24–37

Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N (2011) Experiment earth: reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Working Paper

Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan NE (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environ Change 23(5):938–947 CrossRef

Corner A, Pidgeon N (2014) Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 372(2031):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0063 CrossRef

Corry O (2014) Questioning the plan-B framing of climate engineering: political feasibility and emergency measures . In: Paper presented at the climate engineering conference “critical global discussions”. Berlin, 18–21 Aug 2014

Corry O (2017) The international politics of geoengineering: the feasibility of Plan B for tackling climate change. Secur Dial 48(8):297–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617704142 CrossRef

Cressey D (2012) Geoengineering experiment cancelled amid patent row. Nat News 485:429 CrossRef

Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma. Climatic Change 77:211–219 CrossRef

Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The “Anthropocene” . Global Change Newsletter 41:17–18

Cunha D (2015) The anthropocene as fetishism. Mediations—J Marxist Lit Group 28(2):65–77

Dalby S (2015) Geoengineering: the next era of geopolitics? Geogr Compass 9(4):190–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12195 CrossRef

Davies G (2013) The psychological costs of geoengineering: why it may be hard to accept even if it works. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoenegineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp 59–80 CrossRef

Dickinson RE (1996) Climate engineering. A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balance. Climatic Change 33(3):279–290

Dietz S, Bowen A, Doda B, Gambhir A, Warren R (2018) The economics of 1.5 °C climate change. Ann Rev Environ Resour 43:455–480 CrossRef

Doda B (2014) Why is geoengineering so tempting? Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper Series

Doughty J (2015) Past forays into srm field research and implications for future governance. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Edney K, Symons J (2014) China and the blunt temptations of geo-engineering: the role of solar radiation management in China’s strategic response to climate change. Pacif Rev 27(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2013.807865 CrossRef

Egede-Nissen B (2010) Scientists in the geoengineering discourse: social advocates or neutral umpires? In: Paper presented at the Workshop “ethics of geoengineering: investigating the moral challenges of solar radiation management”, University of Montana, 18–20 Oct 2010

Emmerling J, Tavoni M (2018) Exploration of the interaction between mitigation and solar radiation management in cooperative and non-cooperative international governance settings. Global Environ Change 53:244–251 CrossRef

Fairbrother M (2016) Geoengineering, moral hazard, and trust in climate science: evidence from a survey experiment in Britain [journal article]. Clim Change 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1818-7

Fernow, H. (2012). Complex Risks and the Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Forum Marsilius-Kolleg(2: Beyond calculation - Climate Engineering risks from a social sciences perspective), 12–18, doi: https://doi.org/10.11588/fmk.2012.0.9408

Fialka J (2020) U.S. Geoengineering research gets a lift with $4 million from Congress (23 January 2020) Science

Flegal J (2018) The evidentiary politics of the geoengineering imagninary. UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Fleming JR (2010) Fixing the sky. The checkered history of weather and climate control. Columbia University Press, New York, NY

Fleming JR (2012) Will geoengineering bring security and peace? What does history tell us? Sicherheit Frieden 30(4):200–204 CrossRef

Fleming JR (2013) A history of weather and climate control. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Fletcher JO (1968) Changing climate. In: Corporation R (ed) Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation

Fletcher JO (1969) Managing climatic resources vol. P-4000–1. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation

Foley RW, Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2015) Toward the anticipatory governance of geoengineering. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Galaz V (2012) Geo-engineering, governance, and social-ecological systems: critical issues and joint research needs. Ecol Soc 17(1):24–33 CrossRef

Gannon KE, Hulme M (2018) Geoengineering at the ‘edge of the world’: exploring perceptions of ocean fertilisation through the Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation. Geo: Geogr Environ https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.54

Gardiner SM (2011a) A perfect moral storm: the ethical challenge of climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRef

Gardiner SM (2011b) Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: a commentary on the values of the royal society report. Environ Values 20(2):163–188 CrossRef

Gardiner SM (2013a) The desperation argument for geoengineering. PS: Polit Sci Polit 46(1):28–33

Gardiner SM (2013b) Geoengineering and Moral Schizophrenia. What is the question? In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoengineering. philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp 11–38

Gardiner SM, Fragnière A (2018) The tollgate principles for the governance of geoengineering: moving beyond the oxford principles to an ethically more robust approach. Ethics, Pol Environ 21(2):143–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2018.1509472

Geden O (2019) Targeting carbon dioxide removal in the European Union. Climate Pol 19(4)

Geden O, Scott V, Palmer J (2018) Integrating carbon dioxide removal into EU climate policy: prospects for a paradigm shift. WIREs Clim Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.521 CrossRef

Goeschl T, Heyen D, Moreno-Cruz J (2013) The intergenerational transfer of solar radiation management capabilities and atmospheric carbon stocks. Environ Resour Econ 56(1):85–104 CrossRef

Goes M, Tuana N, Keller K (2011) The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering. Clim Change 109(3–4):719–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9961-z CrossRef

Granger Morgan M, Nordhaus RR, Gottlieb P (2013) Needed: research guidelines for solar radiation management. Issues in Science and Technology, Spring, 37–44

Greene C (2010) Shifting the debate on geoengineering. Science 328(5979):690–691 CrossRef

Greene C, Monger B, Huntley M (2010) geoengineering: the inescapable truth of getting to 350. Solut Sustain Desir Fut 1(5):57–66

Gupta A, Möller I (2018) De facto governance: how authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance. Environ Polit https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1452373

Güssow K, Oschlies A, Proelss A, Rehdanz K, Rickels W (2013) Ocean iron fertilization: time to lift the research taboo. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoenegineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp 242–262 CrossRef

Haas PM (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35 CrossRef

Hale B (2012) The world that would have been. moral hazard arguments against geoengineering. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Plymouth, UK, Lexington Books, pp 113–131

Hamilton C (2013a) Earthmasters. the dawn of the age of climate engineering. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

Hamilton C (2013b) The ethical foundations of climate engineering. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoenegineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp 39–58 CrossRef

Harding A, Moreno-Cruz J (2016) Solar geoengineering economics: from incredible to inevitable and half-way back. Earth’s Fut 4(12):569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000462 CrossRef

Harding A, Moreno-Cruz JB (2019) The economics of geoengineering. In: Letcher TME (ed) Managing global warming. An interface of technology and human issues. Amsterdam, Academic Press, pp 729–750

Harnisch S, Uther S, Böttcher M (2015) From ‘go slow’ to ‘gung ho’? Climate engineering discourses in the UK, the US and Germany. Global Environ Polit 15(2):57–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00298

Heutel G, Moreno-Cruz J, Shayegh S (2018) Solar geoengineering, uncertainty, and the price of carbon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 87:24–41 CrossRef

Heyen D (2012) An economic perspective on risk of climate change and SRM—limitations of methodology, new concepts and the precautionary principle. Forum Marsilius-Kolleg, 2: beyond calculation—climate engineering risks from a social sciences perspective, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.11588/fmk.2012.0.9408

Heyen D, Wiertz T, Irvine JP (2015) Regional disparities in SRM impacts: the challenge of diverging preferences. Clim Change 133:557–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1526-8 CrossRef

Heyward C, Rayner S (2013) Apocalypse Nicked! Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 006

Hiller S, Renn O (2012) Public perception of geoengineering. Sicherheit & Frieden 30(4):215–220 CrossRef

Himmelsbach R (2018) How scientists advising the European Commissions on research priorities view climate engineering proposals. Sci Publ Pol 45(1):124–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx053 CrossRef

Hoppe R (2005) Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poeisis Prax 3(3):199–215 CrossRef

Horton JB (2013) Geoengineering and the myth of unilateralism: pressures and prospects for international cooperation. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoenegineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp 168–181 CrossRef

Horton, J. B. (2015). The emergency framing of solar geoenengineering: time for a different approach. Anthropocene Rev, Prepubl. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615579922

Horton JB, Reynolds J (2016) The international politics of climate engineering: a review and prospectus for international relations. Int Stud Rev 18:438–461 CrossRef

Hourdequin M (2018) Geoengineering justice: the role of recognition. Science, technology, and human values, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918802893

Hourdequin M (2019) Climate change, climate engineering, and the ‘global poor’: What does justice require? Ethics, Policy Environ Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2018.1562525

Hubert A.-M, Reichwein D (2015) An exploration of a code of conduct for responsible scientific research involving geoengineering. IASS Working Paper Series

Hulme M (2003) Abrupt climate change: can society cope? Philos Trans Royal Soc A 361:2001–2021 CrossRef

Hulme M (2014) Can science fix climate change? A Case against climate engineering. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

Hulme M (2017) Calculating the incalculable: is SAI the lesser of two evils? Ethics Int Aff 31(4):507–512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679417000491 CrossRef

Huttunen S, Hildén M (2014) Framing the controversial: geoengineering in academic literature. Sci Commun 36(3):3–29 CrossRef

Huttunen S, Skytén E, Hildén M (2015) Emerging policy perspectives on geoengineering: an international comparison. Anthropocene Rev 2(1):14–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614557958 CrossRef

IISD Reporting Services (2018) Summary of the Katowice climate change conference: 2–15 December 2018. Earth Negot Bull 12(747)

IISD Reporting Services (2019) Summary of the Fourth Session of the United Nations Environment Assembly. Earth Negot Bull 16(153)

IPCC (2014b). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva, IPCC

Izrael YA, Zakharov VM, Petrov NN, Ryaboshapko AG, Ivanov VN, Savchenko AV et al (2009) Field studies of a geo-engineering method of maintaining a modern climate with aerosol particles. Russ Meteorol Hydrol 34(10):635–638. https://doi.org/10.3103/S106837390910001X CrossRef

Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and international climate change. Clim Change 33(3):323–336 CrossRef

Joint Science Academies (2008) Statement: climate change adaptation and the transition to a low carbon society. Amsterdam, InterAcademy Council

Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Tarantola T, Silva CL, Draman D (2015) Geoengineering and climate change polarization: testing a two-channel model of science communication. Anna Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 658:193–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214559002 CrossRef

Keith DW (2000) Geoengineering the climate: history and prospect. Annu Rev Energy Env 25:245–284 CrossRef

Keith DW (2013) A case for climate engineering. boston review, Cambridge/London CrossRef

Keith DW, Duren R, MacMartin DG (2014) Field experiments on solar geoengineering: report of a workshop exploring a representative research portfolio. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 372:20140175

Kerr RA (2006) Pollute the planet for climate’s sake? Science 314(5798):401–403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.314.5798.401a CrossRef

Kiehl JT (2006) Geoengineering climate change: treating the symptom over the cause? Climatic Change 77(3–4):227–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9132-4 CrossRef

Kintisch E (2010) Hack the planet. Science’s best hope—or worst nightmare—for averting climate catastrophe. Wiley, New York, NY

Klein N (2014) This changes everything—capitalism versus the climate. London, Allen Lane

Klepper G (2012) What are the costs and benefits of climate engineering? And can we assess them? Sicherheit Frieden 30(4):211–214 CrossRef

Klepper G, Rickels W (2014) Climate engineering: economic considerations and research challenges. Rev Environ Econ Pol 8(2):270–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu010 CrossRef

Kreuter J (2015a) Discussion of climate engineering in social science literature: technofix, plan B or ultima ratio? The Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment Blog

Kreuter J (2015b) Technofix, plan B or ultima ratio? A review of the social science literature on climate engineering technologies. INSIS Occasional Papers Series

Kreuter J, Matzner N, Baatz C, Keller DP, Markus T, Wittstock F et al (2020) Unveiling assumptions through interdisciplinary scrutiny: observations from the German priority program on climate engineering (SPP 1689). Clim Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02777-4

Lane L (2013) Climate engineering and the anthropocene era. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoenegineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp 115–145 CrossRef

Larson EJ (2016) The red dawn of geoengineering: first step toward an effective governance for stratospheric injections. Duke Law & Technology Review 14(1):157–191

Latham J, Bower K, Choularton T, Coe H, Connolly P, Cooper G et al (2012) Marine cloud brightening. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 370:4217–4262. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0086 CrossRef

Launder B, Thompson JMT (2008) Preface. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 366(1882):3841–3842. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0151 CrossRef

Lawrence MG (2006) the geoengineering dilemma: to speak or not to speak. Climatic Change 77(3–4):245–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9131-5 CrossRef

Lawrence MG, Crutzen P (2017) Was breaking the taboo on research on climate engineering via albedo modification a moral hazard, or a moral imperative? Earth Future 5(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000463 CrossRef

Lawrence MG, Schäfer S, Muri H, Scott V, Oschlies A, Vaughan NE et al (2018) Evaluation climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris agreement temperature goals. Nature Commun 9(3734). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3

Lederer M, Kreuter J (2018) Organising the unthinkable in times of crises: Will climate engineering become the weapon of last resort in the Anthropocene? Organization 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418759186

Lenton TM (2011) Early warning of climate tipping points. Nat Clim Change 1:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1143 CrossRef

Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahmstorf S et al (2008) Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. PNAS 105(6):1786–1793 CrossRef

Lin AC (2013) Does geoengineering present a moral hazard? Ecol Law Q 40:673–712

Linnér B-O, Wibeck V (2015) Dual high-stake emerging technologies: a review of the climate engineering research literature. WIREs Climate Change 6:255–268 CrossRef

Lloyd ID, Oppenheimer M (2014) On the design of an international governance framework for geoengineering. Global Environ Polit 14(2):45–63 CrossRef

Low S (2017) The futures of climate engineering. Earth’s Future 5:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000442 CrossRef

Luokkanen M, Huttunen S, Hildén M (2014) Geoengineering, news media and metaphors: framing the controversial. Public Understand Sci 23(8):966–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513475966 CrossRef

Maas A, Scheffran J (2012) Climate conflicts 2.0? Climate engineering as a challenge for international peace and security. Sicherheit & Frieden 30(4):193–200

MacMartin DG, Ricke KL, Keith DW (2017) Solar geoengineerig as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5 °C Paris target. Philos Trans Royal Soc A, 376(20160454). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0454

Macnaghten P, Szerszynski B (2013) Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Glob Environ Change 23:465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-gloenvcha.2012.12.008 CrossRef

Macnaghten P, Owen R (2011) Good governance for geoenegineering. Nature 479(7373):293. https://doi.org/10.1013/479293a CrossRef

Mahajan A, Tingley D, Wagner G (2018) Fast, cheap and imperfect? US public opinion about solar geoengineering. Environ Polit 28(3):523–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1479101 CrossRef

Markusson N (2013) Tensions in framings of geoengineering: constitutive diversity and ambivalence. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 003

Markusson N, Wong P.-H (2015) Geoengineering governance, the linear model of innovation, and the accompanying geoengineering approach. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 020

Markusson N, Ginn F, Ghaleigh NS, Scott V (2013) In case of emergency press here’: framing geoengineering as a response to dangerous climate change. WIREs Clim Change 5(2):281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.263 CrossRef

Markusson N, Gjefsen MD, Stephens JC, Tyfield D (2017) The political economy of technical fixes: the (mis)alignment of clean fossil and polical regimes. Energy Res Soc Sci 23:1–10 CrossRef

Marland G (1996) Could we/should we engineer the earth’s climate? Climatic Change 33(3):275–278 CrossRef

Matzner N, Herrenbrück R (2016) Simulating a climate engineering crisis: climate politics simulated by students in model United Nations. Simulation & Gaming, Early Edition. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116680513

Matzner N, Barben D (2018) Verantwortungsvoll das Klima manipulieren? Unsicherheit und Verantwortung im Diskurs um Climate Engineering. In: Janich N, Rhein L (eds) Unsicherheit als Herauforderung für die Wissenschaft. Peter Lang, Berlin et al., pp 143–179

McClellan J, Keith DW, Apt J (2012) Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems. Environ Res Lett 7:1–8 CrossRef

McLaren D (2015) Comparing measures of justice in climate engineering assessment . In: Paper presented at the climate engineering symposium 2015, Berlin, July 2015

McLaren D (2016) Mitigation deterrence and the ‘moral hazard’ of solar radiation management. Earth’s Future 4:596–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000445 CrossRef

Mercer AM, Keith DW, Sharp JD (2011) Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environ Res Lett 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044006 CrossRef

Merk C, Pönitzsch G, Kniebes C, Rehdanz K, Schmidt U (2015) Exploring public perceptions of stratospheric sulfate injection. Clim Change 130:299–312 CrossRef

Merk C, Pönitzsch G, Rehdanz K (2016) Knowledge about aerosol injection does not reduce individual mitigation efforts. Environ Res Lett 11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054009

Merk C, Pönitzsch G, Rehdanz K (2018) Do climate engineering experts display moral hazard behavior? Clim Pol 19(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1494534 CrossRef

Michaelson J (2013) Geoengineering and climate management. From marginality to inevitability. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoengineering. philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks, pp 81–114. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA

Moore JC, Chen Y, Cui X, Yuan W, Dong W, Gao Y et al (2016) Will China be the first to initiate climate engineering? Earth’s Future 4:588–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000402 CrossRef

Moreno-Cruz J, Keith DW (2013) Climate policy under uncertainty: a case for geoengineering. Clim Change 121(3):431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0487-4 CrossRef

Moreno-Cruz J, Smulders S (2010 Revisiting the economics of climate change: the role of geoengineering. Selected Works from Juan B. Moreno-Cruz

Moreno-Cruz J, Ricke K, Wagner G (2015) The economics of climate engineering. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Morrow DR (2014) Starting a flood to stop a fire? Some moral constraints on solar radiation management. Ethics, Polit Environ 17(2):123–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2014.926056 CrossRef

Morrow DR (2014a) Ethical aspects of the mitigation obstruction argument against climate engineering research. Philos Trans Royal Soc A, 372(2031). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0062

Morrow DR (2017) International governance of climate engineering. a survey of reports on climate engineering, 2009–2015. FCEA Working Paper Series

Morrow DR, Kopp RE, Oppenheimer M (2009) Toward ethical norms and institutions for climate engineering research. Environ Res Lett 4:1–8 CrossRef

National Science Foundation Special Commission on Weather Modification (1965). Weather and Climate Modification. In N. S. Foundation (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation

NAS (1992). Policy implications of greenhouse warming: mitigation, adaptation, and the science base (C. o. S. Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, Engineering and Public Policy, Trans.). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

NAS (2015a) Climate intervention: reflecting sunlight to cool earth. The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C

NAS (2015b) Climate intervention: carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration. Nat Acad Sci, Washington, D.C

NERC (2010) Experiment Earth? Report on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Natural Environment Research Council, Swindon, UK

Nerlich B, Jaspal R (2012) Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor Symb 27(2):131–147 CrossRef

Neuber F (2018) Buying time with climate engineering? An analysis of the buying time framing in favor of climate engineering. Hochschulschrift. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000084294

Nicholson, S., & Thompson, J. M. T. (2015). Strange Bedfellows: Climate Engineering Politics in the United States. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Nicholson S, Jinnah S, Gillespie A (2018) Solar radiation management: a proposal for immediate polycentric governance. Clim Policy 18(3):322–334 CrossRef

Nightingale P, Cairns R (2014) The security implications of geoengineering: blame, imposed agreement and the security of critical infrastructure. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 018

Oldham P, Szerszynski B, Stilgoe J, Brown C, Eacott B, Yuille A (2014) Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 372:2031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0065

Parson EA, Keith DW (2013) End the deadlock on governance of geoengineering research. Science 339:1278–1279. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232527 CrossRef

Pasztor J (2017b) Toward governance frameworks for climate engineering. Global cooperation in dangerous times. Global Challenges Quarterly Risk Report

Peters GP, Geden O (2017) Catalysing a political shift from low to negative carbon. Nature Clim Change 7:619–621 CrossRef

Pidgeon N, Corner A, Parkhill K, Spence A, Butler C, Poortinga W (2012) Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 370(1974):4176–4196 CrossRef

Pidgeon N, Parkhill K, Corner A, Vaughan NE (2013) Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nat Clim Change 3(5):451–457 CrossRef

Porter KE, Hulme M (2013) The emergence of the geoengineering debate in the UK print media: a frame analysis. Geogr J 179(4):342–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12003 CrossRef

Preston CJ (2012a) Introduction. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, Plymouth, UK, pp 1–12

Preston CJ (2012b) The extraordinary ethics of solar radiation management. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington, Plymouth, UK, pp 1–11

Preston CJ, Carr W (2019) Recognitional justice, climate engineering, and the care approach. Ethics, Policy Environ Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2018.1562527

Rabitz F (2016) Going rogue? Scenarios for unilateral geoengineering. Futures 84:98–107 CrossRef

Raimi KT, Maki A, Dana D, Vandenbergh MP (2019) Framing of geoengineering affects support for climate change mitigation. Environ Commun J Nat Cult 13(3):300–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1575258 CrossRef

Rasch PJ, Tilmes S, Turco RR, Robock A, Oman L, Chen C.-C et al (2008) An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols. Philos Trans Royal Soc A, 366:4007–4037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131

Rayner S (2014) To know or not to know? A note on ignorance as a rhetorical resource in geoengineering debates. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series, 010

Rayner S (2016) What might Evans-Pritchard have made of two degrees? Anthropology Today 32(4):1–2 CrossRef

Rayner S, Heyward C, Kruger T, Pidgeon N, Redgwell C, Savulescu J (2013) The Oxford principles. Clim Change 121:499–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2 CrossRef

Reynolds J (2015) A critical examination of the climate engineering moral hazard and risk compensation concern. Anthrop Rev 2(2):174–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614554304 CrossRef

Reynolds J (2018) Governing experimental responses. Negative emissions technologies and solar climate engineering. In: Jordan A, Huitema D, Van Asselt H, Forster J (eds) Governing CLIMATE CHANGE. Policentricity in action? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 285–302

Rickels W, Klepper G, Dovern J, Betz G, Brachatzek N, Cacean S et al (2011a) Gezielte Eingriffe in das Klima? Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Debatte zu Climate Engineering. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Berlin

Ricke K, Moreno-Cruz J, Caldeira K (2013) Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation. Environ Res Lett 8:1–8

Robock A (2008) 20 reasons why geoengineering might be a bad idea. Bull Atom Scient 64(2):14–18. https://doi.org/10.2968/064002006 CrossRef

Robock A, Bunzl M, Kravitz B, Stenchikov GL (2010) A test for geoengineering? Science 327:530–531. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186237 CrossRef

Roshan E, Khabhazan MM, Held H (2019) Cost-Risk Trade-off of mitigation and solar geoengienering: considering regional disparities under probabilistic climate sensitivity. Environ Resour Econ 72:263–279 CrossRef

Russell LM (2012) Offsetting climate change by engineering air pollution to brighten clouds. Bridge 42(4):10–15

Russell LM, Sorooshian A, Seinfeld JH, Albrecht BA, Nenes A, Ahlm L et al (2013) Eastern Pacific emitted aerosol cloud experiment. Bull Am Meteor Soc 94:709–729 CrossRef

Sandler T (2018) Collective action and geoengineering. Rev Int Organ 13(1):105–125 CrossRef

Schäfer S, Stelzer H, Maas A, Lawrence MG (2014) Earth’s future in the anthropocene: technological interventions between piecemeal and utopian social engineering. Earth’s Fut 2(4):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000190 CrossRef

Scheer D, Renn O (2014) Public Perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Clim Change 125:305–318 CrossRef

Schelling TC (1996) The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Climatic Change 33(3):303–307 CrossRef

Schneider SH (1996) Geoengineering: could—or should—we dot it? Climatic Change 33(3):291–302 CrossRef

Schneider SH (2008) Geoengineering: could we or should we make it work? Philos Trans Royal Soc A 366:3843–3862 CrossRef

Scholte S, Vasileiadou E, Petersen A (2013) Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing. J Integr Environ Sci 10(1):1–16 CrossRef

Scott D (2012) Insurance policy or technological fix? The ethical implications of framing solar radiation management. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington, Plymouth, UK, pp 151–168

Scott KN (2013) Regulating ocean fertilization under international law: the risks. Carbon Clim Law Rev 2:108–116 CrossRef

Scott D (2013) Philosophy of technology and geoengineering. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Shepherd J, Cox P, Haigh D, Keith DW, Launder B, Mace G et al (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society, London

Sikka T (2012a) A critical discourse analysis of geoengineering advocacy. Critic Disc Stud 9(2):163–175 CrossRef

Sikka T (2012b) A critical theory of technology applied to the public discussion of geoengineering. Technol Soc 34:109–117 CrossRef

Sikka T (2019) Activism and neoliberalism: two sides of geoengineering discourse. Capit Nat Social, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1554690

Sillmann J, Lenton TM, Levermann A, Ott K, Hulme M, Benduhn F et al (2015) Climate emergencies do not justify engineering the climate. Nature Clim te Change 5:290–292 CrossRef

Singer C, Matchett L (2015) Climate action gaming experiment: methods and example results. Challenges 6:202–228 CrossRef

Singer C, Milligan T, Rethinaraj TSG (2014) How China’s options will determine global warming. Challenges 5:1–25 CrossRef

Smit WA (2006) Military technologies and politics. In: Goodin RE, Tilly C (eds) The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), pp 722–744

Speicher C (2017) Zürcher Startup Unternehmen mit Weltpremiere: CO ₂ wird aus der Luft gefiltert (31 May 2017) Neue Zürcher Zeitung

SPP 1689 (2019a) Climate engineering und unsere Klimaziele—eine überfällige debatte. In: Schwerpunktprogramm 1689 der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft “climate engineering: risks, opportunities?” (SPP 1689) (ed). Kiel, Kiel Earth Institute

Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 369:842–867 CrossRef

Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C (2015) The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthrop Rev 2(1):81–98 CrossRef

Steffen W, Rockström J, Richardson K, Lenton TM, Folke C, Liverman D et al (2018) Trajectories Of The Earth System In The Anthropocene. PNAS 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115

Stilgoe J (2015) Geoengineering as collective experimentation. Sci Eng Ethics, Online, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9646-0

Strong AL, Cullen JJ, Chisholm SW (2009) Ocean fertilization: science, policy, and commerce. Oceanography 22(3):235–261. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.83 CrossRef

Sugiyama M, Kosugi T, Ishii A, Asayama S (2016) Public attitudes to climate engineering research and field experiments: preliminary results of a web survey on students’ perception in six Asia-Pacific countries. PARI Working Papers

Svoboda T (2015) Geoengineering, agent-regret, and the lesser of two evils argument. Environ Ethics 37(5):207–220 CrossRef

Svoboda T, Buck HJ, Suarez P (2018) Climate engineering and human rights. Environ Polit 28(3):397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1448575 CrossRef

Svoboda T, Irvine PJ, Callies DE, Sugiyama M (2019) The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice. J Global Ethics https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2018.1552180

Szerszynski B (2010) Reading and writing the weather: Climate technics and the moment of responsibility. Theory Cult Soc 27(9):9–30 CrossRef

Szerszynski B (2014) Geoengineering and religion: a history in four characters. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Szerszynski B, Galarraga M (2013) Geoengineering knowledge: interdisciplinarity and the shaping of climate engineering research. Environ Plann A 45:2817–2824 CrossRef

Talberg A, Christoff P, Thomas S, Karoly D (2018) Geoengineering governance-by-default: an earth system governance perspective. Int Environ Agreem 18:229–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9374-9 CrossRef

Teller E, Wood L, Hyde R (1997) Global warming and ice ages: projects for a physics-based modulation of global change. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Teller E, Hyde R, Wood L (2002) Active climate stabilization: practical physics-based approaches to prevention of climate change. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Thiele S, Fuchs BM, Ramaiah N, Amann R (2012) Microbial community response during the iron fertilization experiment LOHAFEX. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(24):8803–8812 CrossRef

Tingley D, Wagner G (2017) Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media. Palgrave Commun 3:12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0014-3 CrossRef

Tollefson J (2012) Ocean-fertilization project off Canada sparks furore. Nature News 490:458–459 CrossRef

Treasury HM (2020) Plan for jobs. Presented to parliament by the chancellor of the exchequer by command of her majesty. London, HM Treasury

Turkaly C, Nicholson S, Livingston D, Thompson JMT (2017) Establishing a climate engineering research clearinghouse. In: Assessment FFCE (ed) FCEA papers and reports. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington D.C.

Uther S (2014) Diskurse des climate engineering. argumente, Akteure und Koalitionen in Deutschland und Großbritannien. Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien

Victor DG (2008) On the regulation of geoengineering. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 24(2):322–336 CrossRef

Victor DG, Morgan MG, Apt J, Steinbrunner J, Ricke K (2009) The geoengineering option: a last resort against global warming? Foreign Affairs 88(2):64–76

UN (1977) Convention on the prohibition of military and any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. In U. Nations (Ed.). New York, United Nations

Weili W, Ying C (2014) A Chinese perspective on solar geoengineering. Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series

Weinberg AM (1966) Can technology replace social engineering? Bull Atomic Scient 22(10):4–8 CrossRef

Wendt A (1998) On constitution and causation in international relations. Rev Int Stud 24(Special Issue):101–117

White LJ (1967) The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155(3767):1203–1207 CrossRef

Whyte KP (2012) Indigenous peoples, solar radiation management, and consent. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington, Plymouth, UK, pp 65–76

Whyte, K. P. (2019). Indigeneity in geoengineering discourses: some considerations. Ethics, Policy Environ Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.1562529

Wibeck V, Hansson A, Anshelm J (2015) Questioning the technological fix to climate change—Lay sense-making of geoengineering in Sweden. Energy Res Soc Sci 7:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.03.001 CrossRef

Wiertz T (2012) From prediction to critique: the moral hazard debate. Forum Marsilius-Kolleg, 2: beyond calculation—climate engineering risks from a social sciences perspective 49–56. https://doi.org/10.11588/fmk.2012.0.9408

Wiertz T (2016) Visions for climate control: solar radiation management in climate simulations. Sci Technol Human Values 41(3):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915606524 CrossRef

Wong P-H (2015) Confucian environmental ethics, climate engineering, and the ‘playing God’ argument. Zygon 50(1):28–41 CrossRef

Yusoff K (2013) The geoengine: geoengineering and the geopolitics of planetary modification. Environ Plann A 45:2799–2808 CrossRef

Title

An Idea—And More Than an Idea: Climate Engineering in Research and Decision-Making

Book

Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60339-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-60340-3

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60340-3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60340-3_2

Author:

Judith Kreuter

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Sequence number

Chapter number

Chapter 2

Premium Partner

Image Credits