Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

13-01-2024 | Original Research

An improved criterion for almost marginal conditional stochastic dominance

Authors: Wei-Han Liu, Jow-Ran Chang, Guo-Jun Yang

Published in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting | Issue 3/2024

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We contribute to redefining the criteria based on Almost Stochastic Dominance for better portfolio comparison in four ways. First, we refine the first order of Marginal Conditional Stochastic Dominance (Yitzhaki and Olkin in Concentration indices and concentration curves, Vol 19, Lecture notes-monograph series: stochastic orders and decision under risk, 1991; Shalit and Yitzhaki in Manag Sci 40(5):670–684, 1994), which is designed for pairwise asset comparison. Second, we redefine Almost Marginal Conditional Stochastic Dominance (AMCSD) by Denuit et al. (J Bank Finance 41:57–66, 2014) and Chen et al. (Q Rev Econ Finance 85 (C):260–269, 2022), which considers multiple asset changes in a portfolio, especially in the case of second-order stochastic dominance. Our effort secures the hierarchy property (Guo et al. in Econ Lett 121:252–256, 2013) which is absent in previous studies. Third, we extend the analysis of multiple assets and apply our AMCSD definition and Marginal Conditional Stochastic Dominance. Our AMCSD treatment is confirmed to be more appropriate than those in previous study. Finally, for the sake of portfolio risk management, we compose three hypothetical portfolios with option-based indices for empirical analysis. The empirical outcomes support our efforts.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
\(E\left({X}_{k}\right)-E\left({X}_{j}\right)=E\left[E\left[{X}_{k}|P=p\right]\right]-E\left[E\left[{X}_{j}|P=p\right]\right]={\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\left[{\mu }_{k}\left(t\right)-{\mu }_{j}\left(t\right)\right]{f}_{\alpha }(t)dt\ge 0\)
 
2
This method contains algorithms for solving linear and nonlinear programs of general structure. This technique is straightforward and efficient for its major tasks in piecewise calculation and summation.
 
5
For example, on 2017/7/21, the one-year T-bond price at the discount rate of 1.2071% is calculated as 1000/(1 + 1.2071%) = USD 988.073 with par value USD 1000.
 
8
We do not report the details for the sake of brevity.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bawa VS (1975) Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. J Financ Econ 2:95–121CrossRef Bawa VS (1975) Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. J Financ Econ 2:95–121CrossRef
go back to reference Board J, Sutcliffe C, Patrinos E (2000) The performance of covered calls. Eur J Financ 6(1):1–17CrossRef Board J, Sutcliffe C, Patrinos E (2000) The performance of covered calls. Eur J Financ 6(1):1–17CrossRef
go back to reference Chen T-Y, Tsai A-M, Tzeng LY (2022) Revisiting almost marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Q Rev Econ Finance 85(C):260–269CrossRef Chen T-Y, Tsai A-M, Tzeng LY (2022) Revisiting almost marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Q Rev Econ Finance 85(C):260–269CrossRef
go back to reference Clark E, Kassimatis K (2012) An empirical analysis of marginal conditional stochastic dominance. J Bank Finance 36(4):1144–1151CrossRef Clark E, Kassimatis K (2012) An empirical analysis of marginal conditional stochastic dominance. J Bank Finance 36(4):1144–1151CrossRef
go back to reference Clark E, Kassimatis K (2013) International equity flows, marginal conditional stochastic dominance and diversification. Rev Quant Financ Acc 40(2):251–271CrossRef Clark E, Kassimatis K (2013) International equity flows, marginal conditional stochastic dominance and diversification. Rev Quant Financ Acc 40(2):251–271CrossRef
go back to reference Denuit MM, Huang RJ, Tzeng LY, Wang CW (2014) Almost marginal conditional stochastic dominance. J Bank Finance 41:57–66CrossRef Denuit MM, Huang RJ, Tzeng LY, Wang CW (2014) Almost marginal conditional stochastic dominance. J Bank Finance 41:57–66CrossRef
go back to reference Edwards C (2015) The instantaneous return and volatility of a covered call position. Appl Econ Lett 22(13):1059–1063MathSciNetCrossRef Edwards C (2015) The instantaneous return and volatility of a covered call position. Appl Econ Lett 22(13):1059–1063MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Brown SJ, Goetzmann WN (2014) Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis, 9th edn. Wiley, New York Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Brown SJ, Goetzmann WN (2014) Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis, 9th edn. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Graves SB, Ringuest JL (2009) Probabilistic dominance criteria for comparing uncertain alternatives: a tutorial. Omega 37:346–357CrossRef Graves SB, Ringuest JL (2009) Probabilistic dominance criteria for comparing uncertain alternatives: a tutorial. Omega 37:346–357CrossRef
go back to reference Israelov R, Nielsen LN (2014) Covered call strategies: one fact and eight myths. Financ Anal J 70(6):23–31CrossRef Israelov R, Nielsen LN (2014) Covered call strategies: one fact and eight myths. Financ Anal J 70(6):23–31CrossRef
go back to reference Kallio M, Hardoroudi ND (2018) Second-order stochastic dominance constrained portfolio optimization: theory and computational tests. Eur J Oper Res 264(2):675–685MathSciNetCrossRef Kallio M, Hardoroudi ND (2018) Second-order stochastic dominance constrained portfolio optimization: theory and computational tests. Eur J Oper Res 264(2):675–685MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Kuosmanen T (2004) Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Manage Sci 50(10):1309–1461 Kuosmanen T (2004) Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Manage Sci 50(10):1309–1461
go back to reference Leshno M, Levy H (2002) Preferred by “all” and preferred by “most” decision makers: almost stochastic dominance. Manage Sci 48(8):1074–1085CrossRef Leshno M, Levy H (2002) Preferred by “all” and preferred by “most” decision makers: almost stochastic dominance. Manage Sci 48(8):1074–1085CrossRef
go back to reference Levy H (1992) Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manage Sci 38(4):555–593CrossRef Levy H (1992) Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manage Sci 38(4):555–593CrossRef
go back to reference Levy H (2016) Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Levy H (2016) Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
go back to reference Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7:77–91 Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7:77–91
go back to reference Markowitz HM, Peter Todd G, Sharpe WF (2000) Mean-variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Wiley, New York Markowitz HM, Peter Todd G, Sharpe WF (2000) Mean-variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Posta T, Kopa M (2013) General linear formulations of stochastic dominance criteria. Eur J Oper Res 230(2):321–332MathSciNetCrossRef Posta T, Kopa M (2013) General linear formulations of stochastic dominance criteria. Eur J Oper Res 230(2):321–332MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (1994) Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Manage Sci 40(5):670–684CrossRef Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (1994) Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Manage Sci 40(5):670–684CrossRef
go back to reference Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (2003) An asset allocation puzzle: comment. American Economic Review 93(3):1002–1008CrossRef Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (2003) An asset allocation puzzle: comment. American Economic Review 93(3):1002–1008CrossRef
go back to reference Tzeng LY, Huang RJ, Shih P-T (2013) Revisiting almost second-degree stochastic dominance. Manage Sci 59(5):1250–1254CrossRef Tzeng LY, Huang RJ, Shih P-T (2013) Revisiting almost second-degree stochastic dominance. Manage Sci 59(5):1250–1254CrossRef
go back to reference Yitzhaki S, Olkin I (1991) Concentration indices and concentration curves, vol 19, Lecture notes-monograph series: stochastic orders and decision under risk Yitzhaki S, Olkin I (1991) Concentration indices and concentration curves, vol 19, Lecture notes-monograph series: stochastic orders and decision under risk
Metadata
Title
An improved criterion for almost marginal conditional stochastic dominance
Authors
Wei-Han Liu
Jow-Ran Chang
Guo-Jun Yang
Publication date
13-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0924-865X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7179
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01235-3

Premium Partner