Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neural Computing and Applications 14/2020

07-11-2019 | Original Article

An improved fuzzy inference system-based risk analysis approach with application to automotive production line

Authors: Hamzeh Soltanali, Abbas Rohani, Mohammad Tabasizadeh, Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard, Aditya Parida

Published in: Neural Computing and Applications | Issue 14/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reliability and safety in the process industries like automotive industry are important key success factors for upgrading availability and preventing catastrophic failures. In this context, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) technique is a proactive diagnostic tool for evaluating all failure modes which reduces the highest risk priority failures. However, it still suffers from subjective uncertainty and ambiguity which are important factors in risk analysis procedures. Hence, this paper provides a comprehensive survey to overcome the drawbacks of the traditional FMEA through improved FMEA, incorporating the fuzzy inference system (FIS) environment. For this purpose, the effective attributes, such as; various scales and rules, various membership functions, different defuzzification algorithms and their impacts on fuzzy RPN (FRPN) have been investigated. Moreover, three types of sensitivity analysis were performed to identify the effect and authority control of risk parameters, i.e., severity, occurrence and detection on FRPN. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed framework, as a practical example, the method was implemented in complex equipment in an automotive production line. The result of FIS-FMEA model revealed that the proposed framework could be useful in recognizing the failure modes with critical risk values compared to the traditional FMEA. Given the potential applications of this approach, suitable maintenance actions can be recommended to improve the reliability and safety of process industry, such as automotive production line.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Carbone TA, Tippett DD (2004) Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Eng Manag J 16(4):28–35 Carbone TA, Tippett DD (2004) Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Eng Manag J 16(4):28–35
2.
go back to reference Bahill AT, Smith ED (2009) An industry standard risk analysis technique. Eng Manag J 21(4):16–29 Bahill AT, Smith ED (2009) An industry standard risk analysis technique. Eng Manag J 21(4):16–29
3.
go back to reference Chemweno P, Pintelon L, Muchiri PN, Van Horenbeek A (2018) Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: a review of dependability modelling approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 173:64–77 Chemweno P, Pintelon L, Muchiri PN, Van Horenbeek A (2018) Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: a review of dependability modelling approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 173:64–77
4.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Yin S (2018) Recent advances in key-performance-indicator oriented prognosis and diagnosis with a matlab toolbox: Db-kit. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 15(5):2849–2858 Jiang Y, Yin S (2018) Recent advances in key-performance-indicator oriented prognosis and diagnosis with a matlab toolbox: Db-kit. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 15(5):2849–2858
5.
go back to reference Soltanali H, Garmabaki AHS, Thaduri A, Parida A, Kumar U, Rohani A (2019) Sustainable production process: an application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 233(4):682–697 Soltanali H, Garmabaki AHS, Thaduri A, Parida A, Kumar U, Rohani A (2019) Sustainable production process: an application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 233(4):682–697
6.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Yin S, Kaynak OJIA (2018) data-driven monitoring and safety control of industrial cyber-physical systems: basics and beyond. IEEE Access 6:47374–47384 Jiang Y, Yin S, Kaynak OJIA (2018) data-driven monitoring and safety control of industrial cyber-physical systems: basics and beyond. IEEE Access 6:47374–47384
7.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Yin S (2017) Recursive total principle component regression based fault detection and its application to vehicular cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(4):1415–1423 Jiang Y, Yin S (2017) Recursive total principle component regression based fault detection and its application to vehicular cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(4):1415–1423
8.
go back to reference Duffuaa SO, Raouf A (2015) Reliability-centered maintenance, in planning and control of maintenance systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 245–260 Duffuaa SO, Raouf A (2015) Reliability-centered maintenance, in planning and control of maintenance systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 245–260
9.
go back to reference Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N (2013) Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):828–838 Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N (2013) Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):828–838
10.
go back to reference Kumru M, Kumru PY (2013) Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchasing process in a public hospital. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):721–733 Kumru M, Kumru PY (2013) Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchasing process in a public hospital. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):721–733
11.
go back to reference Keskin GA, Özkan C (2009) An alternative evaluation of FMEA: fuzzy ART algorithm. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(6):647–661 Keskin GA, Özkan C (2009) An alternative evaluation of FMEA: fuzzy ART algorithm. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(6):647–661
12.
go back to reference Sharma RK, Sharma P (2015) Qualitative and quantitative approaches to analyse reliability of a mechatronic system: a case. J Ind Eng Int 11(2):253–268 Sharma RK, Sharma P (2015) Qualitative and quantitative approaches to analyse reliability of a mechatronic system: a case. J Ind Eng Int 11(2):253–268
13.
go back to reference Hsu HM, Chen CT (1996) Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(3):279–285MathSciNet Hsu HM, Chen CT (1996) Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(3):279–285MathSciNet
14.
go back to reference Woodhouse S (2003) Engineering for safety: use of failure mode and effects analysis in the laboratory: a well-known engineering tool now being used to assure patient safety. Lab Med 36(1):16–18 Woodhouse S (2003) Engineering for safety: use of failure mode and effects analysis in the laboratory: a well-known engineering tool now being used to assure patient safety. Lab Med 36(1):16–18
15.
go back to reference Silva MM, De Gusmão APH, Poleto T, Silva LC, Costa APCS (2014) A multidimensional approach to information security risk management using FMEA and fuzzy theory. Int J Inf Manag 34(6):733–740 Silva MM, De Gusmão APH, Poleto T, Silva LC, Costa APCS (2014) A multidimensional approach to information security risk management using FMEA and fuzzy theory. Int J Inf Manag 34(6):733–740
16.
go back to reference Wang YM, Chin KS, Poon GKK, Yang JB (2009) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1195–1207 Wang YM, Chin KS, Poon GKK, Yang JB (2009) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1195–1207
17.
go back to reference Feili HR, Akar N, Lotfizadeh H, Bairampour M, Nasiri S (2013) Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) technique. Energy Convers Manag 72:69–76 Feili HR, Akar N, Lotfizadeh H, Bairampour M, Nasiri S (2013) Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) technique. Energy Convers Manag 72:69–76
18.
go back to reference Cagliano AC, Grimaldi S, Rafele C (2011) A systemic methodology for risk management in healthcare sector. Saf Sci 49(5):695–708 Cagliano AC, Grimaldi S, Rafele C (2011) A systemic methodology for risk management in healthcare sector. Saf Sci 49(5):695–708
19.
go back to reference Hekmatpanah M, Shahin A, Ravichandran N (2011) The application of FMEA in the oil industry in Iran: the case of four litre oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company. Afr J Bus Manag 5(7):3019 Hekmatpanah M, Shahin A, Ravichandran N (2011) The application of FMEA in the oil industry in Iran: the case of four litre oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company. Afr J Bus Manag 5(7):3019
20.
go back to reference Kang HG, Kim MC, Lee SJ, Lee HJ, Eom HS, Choi JG, Jang SC (2009) An overview of risk quantification issues for digitalized nuclear power plants using a static fault tree. Nucl Eng Technol 41(6):849–858 Kang HG, Kim MC, Lee SJ, Lee HJ, Eom HS, Choi JG, Jang SC (2009) An overview of risk quantification issues for digitalized nuclear power plants using a static fault tree. Nucl Eng Technol 41(6):849–858
21.
go back to reference Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M, Massini R (2006) FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control 17(2):137–145 Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M, Massini R (2006) FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control 17(2):137–145
22.
go back to reference Pollard SJ, Strutt JE, MacGillivray BH, Hamilton PD, Hrudey SE (2004) Risk analysis and management in the water utility sector: a review of drivers, tools and techniques. Process Saf Environ Prot 82(6):453–462 Pollard SJ, Strutt JE, MacGillivray BH, Hamilton PD, Hrudey SE (2004) Risk analysis and management in the water utility sector: a review of drivers, tools and techniques. Process Saf Environ Prot 82(6):453–462
23.
go back to reference Press D (2003) Guidelines for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), for automotive, aerospace, and general manufacturing industries, Chapter 12. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 67–72 Press D (2003) Guidelines for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), for automotive, aerospace, and general manufacturing industries, Chapter 12. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 67–72
24.
go back to reference Liu HC, Li P, You JX, Chen YZ (2015) A novel approach for FMEA: combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(5):761–772 Liu HC, Li P, You JX, Chen YZ (2015) A novel approach for FMEA: combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(5):761–772
25.
go back to reference Chanamool N, Naenna T (2016) Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Appl Soft Comput 43:441–453 Chanamool N, Naenna T (2016) Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Appl Soft Comput 43:441–453
26.
go back to reference Kirkire MS, Rane SB, Jadhav JR (2015) Risk management in medical product development process using traditional FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: a case study. J Ind Eng Int 11(4):595–611 Kirkire MS, Rane SB, Jadhav JR (2015) Risk management in medical product development process using traditional FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: a case study. J Ind Eng Int 11(4):595–611
27.
go back to reference Li Y, Wang X (2018) Risk assessment for public–private partnership projects: using a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process method and expert opinion in China. J Risk Res 21(8):952–973 Li Y, Wang X (2018) Risk assessment for public–private partnership projects: using a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process method and expert opinion in China. J Risk Res 21(8):952–973
28.
go back to reference Yazdi M, Daneshvar S, Setareh H (2017) An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf Sci 98:113–123 Yazdi M, Daneshvar S, Setareh H (2017) An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf Sci 98:113–123
29.
go back to reference Zhou Q, Thai VV (2016) Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Saf Sci 83:74–79 Zhou Q, Thai VV (2016) Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Saf Sci 83:74–79
30.
go back to reference Liu HC, Chen YZ, You JX, Li H (2016) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach. J Intell Manuf 27(4):805–816 Liu HC, Chen YZ, You JX, Li H (2016) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach. J Intell Manuf 27(4):805–816
31.
go back to reference Helvacioglu S, Ozen E (2014) Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design. Ocean Eng 79:131–141 Helvacioglu S, Ozen E (2014) Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design. Ocean Eng 79:131–141
32.
go back to reference Kuo RJ, Wu YH, Hsu TS (2012) Integration of fuzzy set theory and TOPSIS into HFMEA to improve outpatient service for elderly patients in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 75(7):341–348 Kuo RJ, Wu YH, Hsu TS (2012) Integration of fuzzy set theory and TOPSIS into HFMEA to improve outpatient service for elderly patients in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 75(7):341–348
33.
go back to reference Feng M (2008) FMEA method based upon fuzzy set theory and grey relational theory. Ind Eng J 11(4):109–112 Feng M (2008) FMEA method based upon fuzzy set theory and grey relational theory. Ind Eng J 11(4):109–112
34.
go back to reference Hadi-Vencheh A, Hejazi S, Eslaminasab Z (2013) A fuzzy linear programming model for risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis. Neural Comput Appl 22(6):1105–1113 Hadi-Vencheh A, Hejazi S, Eslaminasab Z (2013) A fuzzy linear programming model for risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis. Neural Comput Appl 22(6):1105–1113
35.
go back to reference Camastra F, Ciaramella A, Giovannelli V, Lener M, Rastelli V, Staiano A, Staiano G, Starace A (2015) A fuzzy decision system for genetically modified plant environmental risk assessment using Mamdani inference. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1710–1716 Camastra F, Ciaramella A, Giovannelli V, Lener M, Rastelli V, Staiano A, Staiano G, Starace A (2015) A fuzzy decision system for genetically modified plant environmental risk assessment using Mamdani inference. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1710–1716
36.
go back to reference Geramian A, Abraham A, Ahmadi Nozari M (2018) Fuzzy logic-based FMEA robust design: a quantitative approach for robustness against groupthink in group/team decision-making. Int J Prod Res 57(5):1–14 Geramian A, Abraham A, Ahmadi Nozari M (2018) Fuzzy logic-based FMEA robust design: a quantitative approach for robustness against groupthink in group/team decision-making. Int J Prod Res 57(5):1–14
37.
go back to reference Chiozza ML, Ponzetti C (2009) Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA): a model for reducing medical errors. Clin Chim Acta 404(1):75–78 Chiozza ML, Ponzetti C (2009) Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA): a model for reducing medical errors. Clin Chim Acta 404(1):75–78
38.
go back to reference Dağsuyu C, Göçmen E, Narlı M, Kokangül A (2016) Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Comput Ind Eng 101:286–294 Dağsuyu C, Göçmen E, Narlı M, Kokangül A (2016) Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Comput Ind Eng 101:286–294
39.
go back to reference Renjith V, Kumar PH, Madhavan D (2018) Fuzzy FMECA (failure mode effect and criticality analysis) of LNG storage facility. J Loss Prev Process Ind 56:537–547 Renjith V, Kumar PH, Madhavan D (2018) Fuzzy FMECA (failure mode effect and criticality analysis) of LNG storage facility. J Loss Prev Process Ind 56:537–547
40.
go back to reference Filo G, Fabiś-Domagała J, Domagała M, Lisowski E, Momeni H (2018) The idea of fuzzy logic usage in a sheet-based FMEA analysis of mechanical systems. In: MATEC web of conferences. EDP Sciences, vol 183, p 03009 Filo G, Fabiś-Domagała J, Domagała M, Lisowski E, Momeni H (2018) The idea of fuzzy logic usage in a sheet-based FMEA analysis of mechanical systems. In: MATEC web of conferences. EDP Sciences, vol 183, p 03009
41.
go back to reference Tay KM, Lim CP (2010) Enhancing the failure mode and effect analysis methodology with fuzzy inference techniques. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 21(1–2):135–146 Tay KM, Lim CP (2010) Enhancing the failure mode and effect analysis methodology with fuzzy inference techniques. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 21(1–2):135–146
42.
go back to reference Liu HC, You JX, Lin QL, Li H (2015) Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(7):701–714 Liu HC, You JX, Lin QL, Li H (2015) Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(7):701–714
43.
go back to reference Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK (2011) Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(1):102–110 Gargama H, Chaturvedi SK (2011) Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(1):102–110
44.
go back to reference Liu HT, Tsai YL (2012) A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Saf Sci 50(4):1067–1078 Liu HT, Tsai YL (2012) A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Saf Sci 50(4):1067–1078
45.
go back to reference Rafie M, Namin FS (2015) Prediction of subsidence risk by FMEA using artificial neural network and fuzzy inference system. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(4):655–663 Rafie M, Namin FS (2015) Prediction of subsidence risk by FMEA using artificial neural network and fuzzy inference system. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(4):655–663
46.
go back to reference Geramian A, Mehregan MR (2017) Fuzzy inference system application for failure analyzing in automobile industry. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 34(9):1493–1507 Geramian A, Mehregan MR (2017) Fuzzy inference system application for failure analyzing in automobile industry. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 34(9):1493–1507
47.
go back to reference Segismundo A, Augusto Cauchick Miguel P (2008) Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in the context of risk management in new product development: a case study in an automotive company. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(9):899–912 Segismundo A, Augusto Cauchick Miguel P (2008) Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in the context of risk management in new product development: a case study in an automotive company. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(9):899–912
48.
go back to reference Blackhurst JV, Scheibe KP, Johnson DJ (2008) Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(2):143–165 Blackhurst JV, Scheibe KP, Johnson DJ (2008) Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(2):143–165
49.
go back to reference Xu K, Tang LC, Xie M, Ho SL, Zhu ML (2002) Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75(1):17–29 Xu K, Tang LC, Xie M, Ho SL, Zhu ML (2002) Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75(1):17–29
51.
go back to reference Vinodh S, Santhosh D (2012) Application of FMEA to an automotive leaf spring manufacturing organization. TQM J 24(3):260–274 Vinodh S, Santhosh D (2012) Application of FMEA to an automotive leaf spring manufacturing organization. TQM J 24(3):260–274
52.
go back to reference Johnson K, Khan MK (2003) A study into the use of the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA) in the automotive industry in the UK. J Mater Process Technol 139(1):348–356 Johnson K, Khan MK (2003) A study into the use of the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA) in the automotive industry in the UK. J Mater Process Technol 139(1):348–356
53.
go back to reference Yazdi M, Soltanali H (2019) Knowledge acquisition development in failure diagnosis analysis as an interactive approach. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13(1):193–210 Yazdi M, Soltanali H (2019) Knowledge acquisition development in failure diagnosis analysis as an interactive approach. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13(1):193–210
54.
go back to reference Guimarães ACF, Lapa CMF (2007) Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Appl Soft Comput 7(1):17–28 Guimarães ACF, Lapa CMF (2007) Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Appl Soft Comput 7(1):17–28
55.
go back to reference Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(4):503–524 Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(4):503–524
Metadata
Title
An improved fuzzy inference system-based risk analysis approach with application to automotive production line
Authors
Hamzeh Soltanali
Abbas Rohani
Mohammad Tabasizadeh
Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard
Aditya Parida
Publication date
07-11-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Neural Computing and Applications / Issue 14/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04593-z

Other articles of this Issue 14/2020

Neural Computing and Applications 14/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partner