Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Events
Topic Page
Marketing
Log in
Learn more about individual access
Request company access
Electric Powertrains and Energy Systems 2025 | 26 + 27 March 2025

19th International MTZ Congress on Future Powertrains

Take this opportunity to attend the conference. Experts from the automotive industry, energy providers, and grid operators will meet up with representatives from politics and science to discuss important topics for this sector.
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Engineering with Computers
Published in:

14-06-2023 | Original Article

An SPH-based FSI framework for phase-field modeling of brittle fracture under extreme hydrodynamic events

Authors: Mohammad Naqib Rahimi, Georgios Moutsanidis

Published in: Engineering with Computers | Issue 4/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We present a proof-of-concept particle-based fluid–structure interaction (FSI) computational framework for modeling structural fracture and fragmentation under the impact of extreme hydrodynamic events. The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) approach is employed to discretize the equations of motion for both the fluid and structural domains. The meshfree nature of the discretization technique accommodates the simulation of scenarios involving extreme structural deformations and material separation, as well as free-surface flows. The framework is supplemented with a phase-field model of brittle fracture that allows for the simulation of crack nucleation, propagation, and branching, which leads to realistic modeling of structural responses during extreme hydrodynamic events. In the end, a novel algorithm for coupling the fluid and solid subproblems is presented. The proposed approach is verified and validated against existing computational methods and experimental results, and in the end, a few challenging problems involving complex fracture patterns and fragmentation are presented.

Graphical abstract

previous article Modeling of dendritic solidification and numerical analysis of the phase-field approach to model complex morphologies in alloys
next article Optimal solution of a general class of nonlinear system of fractional partial differential equations using hybrid functions

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Najibi N, Devineni N (2018) Recent trends in the frequency and duration of global floods. Earth Syst Dyn 9(2):757–783
2.
NOAA NCEI (2022) Noaa national centers for environmental information (NCEI) U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters
3.
Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110(2):399–406MATH
4.
Chen LF, Zang J, Hillis AJ, Morgan GCJ, Plummer AR (2014) Numerical investigation of wave-structure interaction using OpenFoam. Ocean Eng 88:91–109
5.
Wei Z, Dalrymple RA, Hérault A, Bilotta G, Rustico E, Yeh H (2015) SPH modeling of dynamic impact of tsunami bore on bridge piers. Coast Eng 104:26–42
6.
Akbari H (2017) Simulation of wave overtopping using an improved SPH method. Coast Eng 126:51–68
7.
Sarfaraz M, Pak A (2017) SPH numerical simulation of tsunami wave forces impinged on bridge superstructures. Coast Eng 121:145–157
8.
Arabi MG, Sogut DV, Khosronejad A, Yalciner AC, Farhadzadeh A (2019) A numerical and experimental study of local hydrodynamics due to interactions between a solitary wave and an impervious structure. Coast Eng 147:43–62
9.
Xie Z, Stoesser T (2020) Two-phase flow simulation of breaking solitary waves over surface-piercing and submerged conical structures. Ocean Eng 213:107679
10.
Bagherizadeh E, Zhang Z, Farhadzadeh A, Angelidis D, Ghazian Arabi M, Moghimi S, Khosronejad A (2021) Numerical modelling of solitary wave and structure interactions using level-set and immersed boundary methods by adopting adequate inlet boundary conditions. J Hydraul Res 59(4):559–585
11.
Sogut DV, Sogut E, Farhadzadeh A (2021) Interaction of a solitary wave with an array of macro-roughness elements in the presence of steady currents. Coast Eng 164:103829
12.
Sogut E, Sogut DV, Farhadzadeh A (2021) A comparative study of interaction of random waves with a cluster of structures on a berm with rans and les models. Coast Eng 168:103941
13.
Oñate E, Garcıa J (2001) A finite element method for fluid–structure interaction with surface waves using a finite calculus formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(6–7):635–660MATH
14.
Wall WA, Genkinger S, Ramm E (2007) A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid–structure interaction with free surfaces. Comput Fluids 36(1):169–183MATH
15.
Yan J, Korobenko A, Deng X, Bazilevs Y (2016) Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines. Comput Fluids 141:155–174MathSciNetMATH
16.
Yan J, Deng X, Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y (2017) Free-surface flow modeling and simulation of horizontal-axis tidal-stream turbines. Comput Fluids 158:157–166MathSciNetMATH
17.
Bazilevs Y, Yan J, Deng X, Korobenko A (2019) Computer modeling of wind turbines: 2. Free-surface FSI and fatigue-damage. Arch Comput Methods Eng 26(4):1101–1115MathSciNet
18.
Yan J, Deng X, Fei X, Songzhe X, Zhu Q (2020) Numerical simulations of two back-to-back horizontal axis tidal stream turbines in free-surface flows. J Appl Mech 87(6)
19.
Chen Z-P, Zhang X, Sze KY, Kan L, Qiu X-M (2018) vp material point method for weakly compressible problems. Comput Fluids 176:170–181MathSciNetMATH
20.
Idelsohn SR, Oñate E, Del Pin F, Calvo N (2006) Fluid–structure interaction using the particle finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(17–18):2100–2123MathSciNetMATH
21.
Yang X, Liu M, Peng S, Huang C (2016) Numerical modeling of dam-break flow impacting on flexible structures using an improved SPH-EBG method. Coast Eng 108:56–64
22.
Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Falahaty H, Shimizu Y (2018) An enhanced ISPH-SPH coupled method for simulation of incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions. Comput Phys Commun 232:139–164MathSciNetMATH
23.
Zhan L, Peng C, Zhang B, Wei W (2019) A stabilized TL-WC SPH approach with GPU acceleration for three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction. J Fluids Struct 86:329–353
24.
Sun PN, Le Touzé D, Zhang A-M (2019) Study of a complex fluid–structure dam-breaking benchmark problem using a multi-phase SPH method with APR. Eng Anal Bound Elem 104:240–258MathSciNetMATH
25.
Ng KC, Alexiadis A, Chen H, Sheu TWH (2020) A coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics-volume compensated particle method (SPH-VCPM) for fluid structure interaction (FSI) modelling. Ocean Eng 218:107923
26.
Sun P-N, Le Touze D, Oger G, Zhang A-M (2021) An accurate FSI-SPH modeling of challenging fluid–structure interaction problems in two and three dimensions. Ocean Eng 221:108552
27.
Khayyer A, Shimizu Y, Gotoh H, Hattori S (2021) Multi-resolution ISPH-SPH for accurate and efficient simulation of hydroelastic fluid–structure interactions in ocean engineering. Ocean Eng 226:108652
28.
O’Connor J, Rogers BD (2021) A fluid–structure interaction model for free-surface flows and flexible structures using smoothed particle hydrodynamics on a GPU. J Fluids Struct 104:103312
29.
Lyu H-G, Sun P-N, Huang X-T, Chen S-H, Zhang A-M (2021) On removing the numerical instability induced by negative pressures in SPH simulations of typical fluid–structure interaction problems in ocean engineering. Appl Ocean Res 117:102938
30.
O’Connor J, Revell A (2019) Dynamic interactions of multiple wall-mounted flexible flaps. J Fluid Mech 870:189–216MathSciNet
31.
Yang Q, Jones V, McCue L (2012) Free-surface flow interactions with deformable structures using an SPH-FEM model. Ocean Eng 55:136–147
32.
McLoone M, Quinlan NJ (2022) Coupling of the meshless finite volume particle method and the finite element method for fluid–structure interaction with thin elastic structures. Eur J Mech B Fluids 92:117–131MathSciNetMATH
33.
Gotoh H, Khayyer A, Shimizu Y (2021) Entirely Lagrangian meshfree computational methods for hydroelastic fluid–structure interactions in ocean engineering-reliability, adaptivity and generality. Appl Ocean Res 115:102822
34.
Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shimizu Y (2022) On systematic development of FSI solvers in the context of particle methods. J Hydrodyn 34(3):395–407
35.
Cirak F, Deiterding R, Mauch SP (2007) Large-scale fluid–structure interaction simulation of viscoplastic and fracturing thin-shells subjected to shocks and detonations. Comput Struct 85(11–14):1049–1065
36.
Wang KG, Lea P, Farhat C (2015) A computational framework for the simulation of high-speed multi-material fluid–structure interaction problems with dynamic fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 104(7):585–623MathSciNetMATH
37.
Moutsanidis G, Kamensky D, Chen JS, Bazilevs Y (2018) Hyperbolic phase field modeling of brittle fracture: Part II-immersed IGA–RKPM coupling for air-blast–structure interaction. J Mech Phys Solids 121:114–132MathSciNet
38.
Behzadinasab M, Moutsanidis G, Trask N, Foster JT, Bazilevs Y (2021) Coupling of IGA and peridynamics for air-blast fluid–structure interaction using an immersed approach. Forces Mech 4:100045
39.
Ni R, Li J, Zhang X, Zhou X, Cui X (2022) An immersed boundary-material point method for shock-structure interaction and dynamic fracture. J Comput Phys 470:111558MathSciNetMATH
40.
Rahimi MN, Kolukisa DC, Yildiz M, Ozbulut M, Kefal A (2022) A generalized hybrid smoothed particle hydrodynamics-peridynamics algorithm with a novel Lagrangian mapping for solution and failure analysis of fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 389:114370MathSciNetMATH
41.
Yao X, Huang D (2022) Coupled PD-SPH modeling for fluid–structure interaction problems with large deformation and fracturing. Comput Struct 270:106847
42.
Sun W-K, Zhang L-W, Liew KM (2022) A coupled SPH-PD model for fluid–structure interaction in an irregular channel flow considering the structural failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 401:115573MathSciNetMATH
43.
Ke W, Yang D, Wright N (2016) A coupled SPH-DEM model for fluid–structure interaction problems with free-surface flow and structural failure. Comput Struct 177:141–161
44.
Ng KC, Low WC, Chen H, Tafuni A, Nakayama A (2022) A three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction model based on SPH and lattice-spring method for simulating complex hydroelastic problems. Ocean Eng 260:112026
45.
Yang F, Xin G, Xia X, Zhang Q (2022) A peridynamics-immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid–structure interaction analysis. Ocean Eng 264:112528
46.
Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217:77–95MathSciNetMATH
47.
Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 181(3):375–389MATH
48.
Libersky LD, Petschek AG, Carney TC, Hipp JR, Allahdadi FA (1993) High strain Lagrangian hydrodynamics: a three-dimensional SPH code for dynamic material response. J Comput Phys 109(1):67–75MATH
49.
Monaghan JJ, Kos A (1999) Solitary waves on a cretan beach. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 125(3):145–155
50.
Vignjevic R, Reveles JR, Campbell J (2006) SPH in a total Lagrangian formalism. CMC-Tech Science Press- 4(3):181MathSciNetMATH
51.
Liu MB, Liu GR (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(1):25–76MathSciNetMATH
52.
Vacondio R, Rogers BD, Stansby PK, Mignosa P, Feldman J (2013) Variable resolution for SPH: a dynamic particle coalescing and splitting scheme. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 256:132–148MathSciNetMATH
53.
Crespo AJC, Domínguez JM, Rogers BD, Gómez-Gesteira M, Longshaw S, Canelas RJFB, Vacondio R, Barreiro A, García-Feal O (2015) Dualsphysics: Open-source parallel CFD solver based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Phys Commun 187:204–216MATH
54.
Fourtakas G, Stansby PK, Rogers BD, Lind SJ, Yan S, Ma Q (2018) On the coupling of incompressible SPH with a finite element potential flow solver for nonlinear free-surface flows. Int J Offsh Polar Eng 28(03):248–254
55.
Fourtakas G, Rogers BD, Nasar AMA (2021) Towards pseudo-spectral incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (ISPH). Comput Phys Commun 266:108028MathSciNetMATH
56.
King JRC, Lind SJ, Rogers BD, Stansby PK, Vacondio R (2022) Large eddy simulations of bubbly flows and breaking waves with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. arXiv:​2206.​01641
57.
Feng R, Fourtakas G, Rogers BD, Lombardi D (2022) Two-phase fully-coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) model for unsaturated soils and its application to rainfall-induced slope collapse. Comput Geotech 151:104964
58.
Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–2778MathSciNetMATH
59.
Borden MJ, Hughes TJR, Landis CM, Verhoosel CV (2014) A higher-order phase-field model for brittle fracture: Formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 273:100–118MathSciNetMATH
60.
Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55(2):383–405MathSciNetMATH
61.
Kakouris EG, Triantafyllou SP (2017) Phase-field material point method for brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 112(12):1750–1776MathSciNet
62.
Kamensky D, Moutsanidis G, Bazilevs Y (2018) Hyperbolic phase field modeling of brittle fracture: part I-theory and simulations. J Mech Phys Solids 121:81–98MathSciNet
63.
Svolos L, Bronkhorst CA, Waisman H (2020) Thermal-conductivity degradation across cracks in coupled thermo-mechanical systems modeled by the phase-field fracture method. J Mech Phys Solids 137:103861MathSciNet
64.
Kristensen PK, Niordson CF, Martínez-Paneda E (2020) Applications of phase field fracture in modelling hydrogen assisted failures. Theor Appl Fract Mech 110:102837
65.
Cui C, Ma R, Martínez-Pañeda E (2021) A phase field formulation for dissolution-driven stress corrosion cracking. J Mech Phys Solids 147:104254MathSciNet
66.
Svolos L, Mourad HM, Bronkhorst CA, Waisman H (2021) Anisotropic thermal-conductivity degradation in the phase-field method accounting for crack directionality. Eng Fract Mech 245:107554
67.
Svolos L, Mourad HM, Manzini G, Garikipati K (2022) A fourth-order phase-field fracture model: formulation and numerical solution using a continuous/discontinuous galerkin method. J Mech Phys Solids 165:104910MathSciNet
68.
Rahimi MN, Moutsanidis G (2022) A smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach for phase field modeling of brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 398:115191MathSciNetMATH
69.
Dalrymple RA, Rogers BD (2006) Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method. Coast Eng 53(2–3):141–147
70.
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164
71.
Griffith AA (1921) Vi. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 221(582–593):163–198MATH
72.
Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48(4):797–826MathSciNetMATH
73.
Kuhn C, Müller R (2008) A phase field model for fracture. In PAMM: Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics, vol 8. Wiley Online Library. p 10223–10224
74.
Rahimi MN, Moutsanidis G (2022) Modeling dynamic brittle fracture in functionally graded materials using hyperbolic phase field and smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 401:115642MathSciNetMATH
75.
76.
Bonet J, Lok TSL (1999) Variational and momentum preservation aspects of Smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180(1–2):97–115MathSciNetMATH
77.
Tofighi N, Ozbulut M, Rahmat A, Feng JJ, Yildiz M (2015) An incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for the motion of rigid bodies in fluids. J Comput Phys 297:207–220MathSciNetMATH
78.
Vincent S, Brändle JC, de Motta A, Sarthou J-LE, Simonin O, Climent E (2014) A Lagrangian VOF tensorial penalty method for the DNS of resolved particle-laden flows. J Comput Phys 256:582–614MathSciNetMATH
79.
Shadloo MS, Zainali A, Sadek SH, Yildiz M (2011) Improved incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for simulating flow around bluff bodies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9):1008–1020MathSciNetMATH
80.
Ozbulut M, Tofighi N, Goren O, Yildiz M (2017) Investigation of wave characteristics in oscillatory motion of partially filled rectangular tanks. J Fluids Eng 140(4):12
81.
Khayyer A, Shimizu Y, Gotoh T, Gotoh H (2023) Enhanced resolution of the continuity equation in explicit weakly compressible SPH simulations of incompressible free-surface fluid flows. Appl Math Model 116:84–121MathSciNetMATH
82.
Belytschko T, Guo Y, Kam Liu W, Ping Xiao S (2000) A unified stability analysis of meshless particle methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(9):1359–1400MathSciNetMATH
83.
Swegle JW, Hicks DL, Attaway SW (1995) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis. J Comput Phys 116(1):123–134MathSciNetMATH
84.
Islam MRI, Peng C (2019) A total Lagrangian SPH method for modelling damage and failure in solids. Int J Mech Sci 157:498–511
85.
Wang L, Fei X, Yang Y (2021) An improved total Lagrangian SPH method for modeling solid deformation and damage. Eng Anal Bound Elem 133:286–302MathSciNetMATH
86.
Monaghan JJ, Gingold RA (1983) Shock simulation by the particle method SPH. J Comput Phys 52(2):374–389MATH
87.
Rahimi MN, Moutsanidis G (2022) A coupled total Lagrangian SPH-phase-field framework for modeling dynamic brittle fracture. In: Giuseppe B (ed) 2022 International SPHERIC work., number June. Catania, Italy. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologi. p 71–76
88.
Shimizu Y, Khayyer A, Gotoh H (2022) An implicit SPH-based structure model for accurate fluid–structure interaction simulations with hourglass control scheme. Eur J Mech B Fluids 96:122–145MathSciNetMATH
89.
Khayyer A, Shimizu Y, Gotoh H, Nagashima K (2021) A coupled incompressible SPH-Hamiltonian SPH solver for hydroelastic FSI corresponding to composite structures. Appl Math Model 94:242–271MathSciNetMATH
90.
Diehl P, Lipton R, Wick T, Tyagi M (2022) A comparative review of peridynamics and phase-field models for engineering fracture mechanics. Comput Mech 69:1259–1293MathSciNetMATH
91.
Landau LD, Lifšic EM, Lifshitz EM, Kosevich AM, Pitaevskii LP (1986) Theory of elasticity, vol 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam
92.
Gray JP, Monaghan JJ, Swift RP (2001) SPH elastic dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(49):6641–6662MATH
93.
Monaghan JJ, Rafiee A (2013) A simple SPH algorithm for multi-fluid flow with high density ratios. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 71(5):537–561MathSciNetMATH
94.
Antuono M, Marrone S, Colagrossi A, Bouscasse B (2015) Energy balance in the \(\delta\)-SPH scheme. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:209–226MathSciNetMATH
95.
Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shimizu Y (2017) Comparative study on accuracy and conservation properties of two particle regularization schemes and proposal of an optimized particle shifting scheme in ISPH context. J Comput Phys 332:236–256MathSciNetMATH
96.
Lobovský L, Botia-Vera E, Castellana F, Mas-Soler J, Souto-Iglesias A (2014) Experimental investigation of dynamic pressure loads during dam break. J Fluids Struct 48:407–434
97.
Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Marrone S, Molteni D (2010) Free-surface flows solved by means of SPH schemes with numerical diffusive terms. Comput Phys Commun 181(3):532–549MathSciNetMATH
98.
Ting TS, Prakash M, Cleary PW, Thompson MC (2006) Simulation of high ||Reynolds number flow over a backward facing step using SPH. In: Stacey A, Blyth B, Shepherd J, Roberts AJ (eds) Proceedings of the 7th biennial engineering mathematics and applications conference, EMAC-2005, volume 47 of ANZIAM J. p C292–C309
99.
Kim J, Kline SJ, Johnston JP (1980) Investigation of a reattaching turbulent shear layer: flow over a backward-facing step. J Fluids Eng 102(3):302–308
100.
Fourey G, Hermange C, Le Touzé D, Oger G (2017) An efficient FSI coupling strategy between smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite element methods. Comput Phys Commun 217:66–81MathSciNetMATH
101.
Stephen T, Sergius W-K et al (1959) Theory of plates and shells, vol 2. McGraw-hill, New York
102.
Li Z, Leduc J, Nunez-Ramirez J, Combescure A, Marongiu JC (2015) A non-intrusive partitioned approach to couple smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite element methods for transient fluid–structure interaction problems with large interface motion. Comput Mech 55(4):697–718MathSciNetMATH
103.
Rafiee A, Thiagarajan KP (2009) An SPH projection method for simulating fluid-hypoelastic structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(33):2785–2795MATH
104.
Marti J, Idelsohn S, Limache A, Calvo N, D’Elía J (2006) A fully coupled particle method for quasi incompressible fluid-hypoelastic structure interactions. Mecánica Computacional 809–828
Metadata
Title
An SPH-based FSI framework for phase-field modeling of brittle fracture under extreme hydrodynamic events
Authors
Mohammad Naqib Rahimi
Georgios Moutsanidis
Publication date
14-06-2023
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Engineering with Computers / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0177-0667
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5663
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01857-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Multi-adaptive coupling of finite element meshes with peridynamic grids: robust implementation and potential applications

  • Original Article

A novel meshfree radial point interpolation method with discrete shear gap for nonlinear static analysis of functionally graded plates

  • Original Article

Elite-driven surrogate-assisted CMA-ES algorithm by improved lower confidence bound method

  • Original Article

A Physics-informed and data-driven deep learning approach for wave propagation and its scattering characteristics

  • Original Article

Optimal solution of a general class of nonlinear system of fractional partial differential equations using hybrid functions

  • Original Article

‘Grey-Box-Processing’: a novel validation method for use in vehicle safety applications

  • Open Access
  • Original Article