Skip to main content
Top
Published in: NanoEthics 1/2013

01-04-2013 | Introduction

Anticipating the Societal Challenges of Nanotechnologies

Authors: Diana M. Bowman, Elen Stokes, Michael G. Bennett

Published in: NanoEthics | Issue 1/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

“In this article we sketch out the landscape for this Special Issue on anticipating and embedding the societal challenge of nanotechnologies. Tools that actors may choose to employ for these processes are articulated, and further explored through the introduction of the seven articles which comprise this Issue. Taken together, these articles create a cogent narrative on the societal challenges posed by nanotechnologies. They are drawn together by three distinct themes, each of which is briefly considered within this context of this Introductory article”.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Dittmar JE (2011) Information technology and economic change: the impact of the printing press. Q J Econ 126(3):1133–1172CrossRef Dittmar JE (2011) Information technology and economic change: the impact of the printing press. Q J Econ 126(3):1133–1172CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Doubleday R (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9(2):211–227CrossRef Doubleday R (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9(2):211–227CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eisenstein EL (1979) The printing press as an agent of change. CUP, Cambridge Eisenstein EL (1979) The printing press as an agent of change. CUP, Cambridge
4.
go back to reference Elzen B, Geels FW, Hofman PS, Green K (2004) Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transaction policy: an example from the traffic and transport domain. In: Boelie E, Geels FW, Green K (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 251 Elzen B, Geels FW, Hofman PS, Green K (2004) Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transaction policy: an example from the traffic and transport domain. In: Boelie E, Geels FW, Green K (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 251
5.
go back to reference Fiedler FA, Reynolds GH (1994) Legal problems of nanotechnology: an overview. South Calif Interdiscip Law J 3:593–629 Fiedler FA, Reynolds GH (1994) Legal problems of nanotechnology: an overview. South Calif Interdiscip Law J 3:593–629
6.
go back to reference Foresight (2012) Annual review 2011. HM Government, London Foresight (2012) Annual review 2011. HM Government, London
7.
go back to reference Genus A, Coles AM (2005) On constructive technology assessment and limitations on public participation in technology assessment. Technol Anal Strat Manag 17(4):433–443CrossRef Genus A, Coles AM (2005) On constructive technology assessment and limitations on public participation in technology assessment. Technol Anal Strat Manag 17(4):433–443CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guston D (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940–941CrossRef Guston D (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940–941CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Guston D, Sarawitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24(1–2):93–109CrossRef Guston D, Sarawitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24(1–2):93–109CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hobsbawm EJ, Wrigley C (1999) Industry and empire: the birth of the industrial revolution. Penguin, New York Hobsbawm EJ, Wrigley C (1999) Industry and empire: the birth of the industrial revolution. Penguin, New York
11.
go back to reference Johnston R (2001) Foresight—refining the process. Int J Technol Manag 21(7):711–725CrossRef Johnston R (2001) Foresight—refining the process. Int J Technol Manag 21(7):711–725CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kuosa T (2012) The evolution of strategic foresight: navigating public policy making. Gower, Surrey Kuosa T (2012) The evolution of strategic foresight: navigating public policy making. Gower, Surrey
13.
go back to reference Landes DS (2003) The unbound Prometheus: technological chance and industrial development in western Europe from 1750 to the present. CUP, Cambridge Landes DS (2003) The unbound Prometheus: technological chance and industrial development in western Europe from 1750 to the present. CUP, Cambridge
14.
go back to reference Rip A, te Kulve H (2008) Construction technology assessment and socio-technical scenarios. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore JM (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnologies in society, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 49–70 Rip A, te Kulve H (2008) Construction technology assessment and socio-technical scenarios. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore JM (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnologies in society, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 49–70
15.
go back to reference Roco MC, Harthorn B, Guston D, Shapira P (2011) Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. In: Roco MC et al. Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Science Policy Reports, 1, 561–617 Roco MC, Harthorn B, Guston D, Shapira P (2011) Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. In: Roco MC et al. Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Science Policy Reports, 1, 561–617
16.
go back to reference Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 54(203):251–268CrossRef Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 54(203):251–268CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Seear K, Petersen A, Bowman DM (2010) Communicating with citizens about nanotechnologies: views of key stakeholders in Australia. Monash University and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Seear K, Petersen A, Bowman DM (2010) Communicating with citizens about nanotechnologies: views of key stakeholders in Australia. Monash University and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne
18.
go back to reference Wilsdon J, Wills R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London Wilsdon J, Wills R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
Metadata
Title
Anticipating the Societal Challenges of Nanotechnologies
Authors
Diana M. Bowman
Elen Stokes
Michael G. Bennett
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
NanoEthics / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Electronic ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-013-0170-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

NanoEthics 1/2013 Go to the issue