Six wetting compositions, which contained mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants, organic solvents and hydrotropic agents, were employed in the tests. The data on the components of the wetting agents and their basic physicochemical properties are listed in Table
1. The formulations of the W-50, W-52 and W-56 compositions were restricted by patents [
32‐
37]. The formulations of the W-10, W-11 and W-32 compositions were similar to the W-50 composition but contained different proportions of compounds.
Table 1
Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Wetting Agents
Composition | | | | | | |
Anionic surfactants, % (sodium pareth sulfate + 3 EO) | 37 | 37 | 37 | 55 | 55 | 37 |
Non-ionic surfactants, % (C13 iso,alcohol + 7 EO and APG C8-C10) | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
Organic solvents, % | 15 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Foam stabilisers, % | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
Aqua, % | 33 | 32 | 43 | 24 | 24 | 36 |
Density, g ml−1
| 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.04 |
pH | 7.5 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 7.7 |
Surface tension, mN m−1
| 33.6 | 28.5 | 25.9 | 29.1 | 29.9 | 31.1 |
Viscosity, mPa s | 6.9 | 7.6 | 6.1 | 10.1 | 13.8 | 6.9 |
In some additional experiments, three commercial agents: Kerylo produced by WZChG “Pollena”, Poland (density 1.03 g ml−1, surface tension 33.8 mN m−1, viscosity 3.5 mPa s), BioFor C produced by Bio-Ex SA, France (density 1.03 g ml−1, surface tension 25 mN m−1, viscosity 31 mPa s) and Prosintex A produced by Profoam, Italy (density 1.02 g ml−1, surface tension 27 mN m−1, viscosity 13 mPa s) were applied for comparison with these new proposed formulations.
2.1 Testing Methods
In the studies, typical laboratory tests to determine the rate of wetting and typical extinguishing fire tests were performed. The results from studies regarding the wetting and fire extinguishing of various wetting compositions in comparison to commercial agents were presented in [
18].
For each concentration of the wetting agent series, seven measurements were performed. Two extreme values of the series were rejected. The results consisted of the arithmetic mean of the measurements with a standard deviation of 2% for laboratory tests and less than 5% of the mean value for the field experiments.
2.1.1 Laboratory Tests
The laboratory tests of the capacity of the elaborated compositions of a wetting agent to wet loose and pressed samples of vegetal materials were performed using a reference material in the form of powdered and screened rotting wood.
All laboratory measurements were carried out at 294 ± 1 K. The measurement uncertainty as the standard deviation was estimated.
2.1.2 The Determination of the Wettability of Loose Rotting Wood
The study assesses the speed of penetration of a liquid through the layers of surface fuels and the amount of absorbed liquid. The test was performed for 0.5 and 1.0% solutions of six wetting compositions. The tests were performed in a column with a 12 mm inner diameter that was closed from below by a bottom with a thin venting tube.
The column with a known weight was filled with 1 g of rotting wood in an air-dry state; the wood had been screened earlier with a 1 mm mesh screen. Subsequently, the content of the column was pressed to 3 cm
3 volume and weighed with a maximum accuracy of 1 mg. The column was vertically placed in a stand and subsequently filled from above with 4 ml of the solution. The time required for the first drop of the solution to flow out was measured. After the entire solution had penetrated, the container was re-weighed. The amount of the retained solution was determined using dependence (
1)
$$ R = \frac{{m_{n} - m_{0} }}{{m_{0} }} \cdot 100\% $$
(1)
where m
n represents the weight of the material after wetting [g] and m
0 represents the weight of a sample in an air-dry state [g].
2.1.3 The Determination of the Rate of Wetting of Pressed Rotting Wood
The tests of the capacity to wet with solutions of wetting agents were performed on the surface of 0.5 g pellets, which were composed of powdered forest material (rotting wood) in an air-dry state using a hand press to prepare samples for testing in a bomb calorimeter. All pellets were composed with the same number of rotations of the screw of the press.
Using a dropper, 50 μl of the solution of a wetting agent with concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0% was applied on a pellet. The time of the drop penetration was measured until the pellet lost its lustre at the point at which the solution was applied.
Statistical analysis of adsorption ability was made according to the Kruskal–Wallis test. Taking into account the lack of normal distribution application of non-parametric test was not possible.
2.1.4 Field Application Tests
In Poland, forest fire protection rules are governed by legal regulations on forests, nature conservation and fire protection. Their provisions prohibit the kindling of a fire in forests, and burning soil cover and plant residues. It is also forbidden to perform these tasks within a distance of 100 m from a forest. In addition, the Nature Conservation Act prohibits the burning of meadows, pastures, wastelands, roadside strips, railway routes and rushes and reed.
As a consequence of the above, the authors have not carried out studies of extinguishing forest fires at real scale or field tests using different extinguishing agents. A test for efficiency in extinguishing a forest fire using the developed wetting agent was carried out in an area of young forest dedicated to felling only.
The tests to determine the usefulness of the wetting compositions in real conditions were performed in real conditions in 120-year-old pine stands in a mixed fresh coniferous forest site. The field tests evaluated basic weather parameters, such as the air temperature, the relative air humidity, the wind speed and cloud cover, and the number of days without precipitation preceding the date of the measurement was determined.
The moisture content of forest materials was determined by the weight loss in oven-drying method using moisture analysers WPS110S produced by Radwag (Poland). The weather measurements were conducted by an automatic weather station that was located approximately 1 km from the experimental plots.
The moisture content of the litter in the tests was 8%. The composition W-52 was applied in an extinguishing test using an airplane, whereas the compositions W-50 and W-52 were applied in an extinguishing test using vehicles.
2.1.5 The Wetting Efficiency and Extinguishing Tests Using Ground Equipment and Aircraft
The wetting efficiency and extinguishing tests were performed in areas that were deforested in connection with the expansion of the area occupied by the Bełchatów Lignite Mine (in Central Poland). Their objective was to determine the usefulness of a wetting agent for extinguishing soil cover fires using ground extinguishing equipment and aircraft. The following extinguishing equipment was employed in the tests:
-
a M-18 B Dromader airplane,
-
a patrol and the Mitsubishi L200 firefighting vehicle which was equipped with a mounted module with a 400 l capacity and a pump AR503SP with a 40 l min−1 capacity,
-
hand equipment in the form of the backpack stirrup pump-type HPE-19/H.
2.1.6 The Wetting Efficiency in the Field Conditions
In the tests, the experimental plots were wetted by hand extinguishing equipment with solutions of wetting agents with selected concentrations and doses. To evaluate the agents, a reference plot, which was wetted with water that contained the same dose, and a control plot without an extinguishing agent, were employed. After the solutions of the compositions of the agents had been applied in the experimental plots, the moisture content of the upper litter and the moisture content of the rotting wood were measured. The first measurements were conducted after 10 min, and the moisture content of the material was measured four times every hour.
2.1.7 Fire Breaks
These tests assessed the usefulness of a wetting agent for making fire breaks and for direct suppression of soil cover fires. The usefulness of a wetting agent to extinguish a soil cover fire was performed using two methods: using hand extinguishing equipment and using a patrol and firefighting vehicle.
The tests of the usefulness of a preparation for making fire breaks using a backpack stirrup pump consisted of enclosing a 2 × 2 m experimental plot by a fire break with a width of approximately 1 m, which was wetted with a dose of a solution at a rate of 2 l m−2. The experimental plot was oriented to ensure that one of the diagonals coincided with the prevailing wind speed.
The tests of the usefulness of an extinguishing agent for making fire breaks were conducted using a patrol and firefighting vehicle in a 5 × 5 m plot enclosed by a fire break with a width that was approximately 2 m, which was wetted with a dose of a solution at a rate of 5 l m−2.
In addition to litter, both types of plots were located in places in which a layer of small felling remains, with an average thickness of 15 cm, was located. Ten minutes after the application of an agent in the central part of the experimental plots that were enclosed by a fire break, combustion was initiated and fire spread within the plots and in the fire break. The measurements included the time at which the fire break stopped the fire, the depth of penetration by the fire into the fire break and the time of the possible crossing of the fire break by the fire.
2.1.8 Extinguishing of Soil Cover Fires Using Ground Equipment
The tests of the usefulness of a solution of a wetting composition for extinguishing forest fires using stirrup pumps consisted of the determination of the extinguishing time and the amount of the solution applied during the suppression of a fire and the smouldering of the soil cover within a designated area of approximately 5 m2.
The tests of the usefulness of an extinguishing agent for direct firefighting using a patrol and firefighting vehicle consisted of initiating combustion in a selected part of a felling site with a layer of small felling remains with a thickness of approximately 0.5 m thick. After the fire had reached an area of approximately 25 m2, the extinguishing operation began at its perimeter; the entire area was subsequently damped down. In the course of the tests, the extinguishing time and the required amount of solution were measured.
2.1.9 Extinguishing Tests Using Aircraft Equipment
Drops of a solution of a wetting agent—1500 l with an 0.5% concentration—were applied to a 116-year-old pine stand in a fresh coniferous forest site. Drops were applied from a height range of 10 m to 15 m above the tree crowns from an extinguishing aircraft that was flying at the speed of approximately 180 km h−1. Thirty minutes after the drop, the moisture content of the upper litter and the rotting wood were measured.
Two types of extinguishing tests were also performed. In the first test, an extinguishing aircraft was employed to make a drop onto an area of approximately 0.1 ha in a 12-year-old pine thicket. In the second test, a patrol and firefighting vehicle and two firefighting units that were equipped with vehicles with 2500 and 5000 l tanks the attempted to extinguish the burning felling remains in an area of approximately 0.1 ha.
2.1.10 Tests of Biodegradation
Biodegradation tests were performed for three compositions: W-50, W-52 and W-56.
The tests for 0.5% solutions were performed according to the procedure No. 301A—Biodegradation—the decay of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) [
38‐
40]. The prepared mixtures were aerated for 28 days at temperatures of 20°C to 25°C, in diffused light. Based on the results, the DOC content in a given mixture was calculated after a specific time of biodegradation and the biodegradability of the preparation was subsequently tested in an aqueous medium. Biodegradation, which was defined as the percentage loss of DOC in the solution, in the course of the observed decay was calculated according to Equation (
2)
$$ R_{t} = \left( {1 - \frac{Ct - CB}{CA - CBA}} \right) \cdot 100 $$
(2)
where
R
t
denotes the percentage rate of decay in the time
t,
C
A
denotes the mean content of DOC in mg/l in a container with the tested substance measured after 3 ± 30 min,
C
t
represents the mean content of DOC in mg/l after the time
t in a container with the tested substance,
C
BA
represents the mean content of DOC in mg/l in blind experiments after 3 ± 30 min and
C
B
denotes the mean content of DOC in mg/l in blind experiments after the time
t.