Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. Aquifer Vulnerability and Contamination Risk

Authors : Rajandrea Sethi, Antonio Di Molfetta

Published in: Groundwater Engineering

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Water supply systems must be designed in such a way to ensure groundwater extraction sustainability. In addition, the quality of pumped water must also be guaranteed, and this entails protecting the groundwater source from contamination. To do so, it is necessary to identify the physical and hydraulic characteristics of the soil, the unsaturated medium and the aquifer itself that influence the migration of contaminants spilled at the surface towards the aquifer, and hence potentially towards sensitive targets (i.e., drinking water pumping wells). The susceptibility of an aquifer to become polluted following a contaminant spill is called vulnerability, and its assessment is the focus of this chapter. Of the four categories of vulnerability assessment methods, i.e., overlay, index and statistical methods, and process-based simulation models, this chapter presents examples of the former two, which are of easier implementation and are widely used. Overlay methods define aquifer vulnerability on the basis of groundwater circulation and rely on the superposition of maps of the hydrogeologic, structural and morphologic setting. Index methods, instead, are based on the assignment of scores (sometimes weighed) to sets of parameters that are likely to affect the degree of vulnerability. Specific methods of these two categories described in detail in this chapter are the one developed by the Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières in France, the Italian CNR-GNDCI and SINTACS methods, the US-EPA DRASTIC method and the British GOD method. The suitability of different methods is discussed, and how vulnerability assessment can be used to determine the risk of contamination is presented. On this basis, an example of contamination risk reduction strategies is illustrated.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference M. Albinet, J. Margat, Cartographie de la vulnerabilité à la pollution des nappes d’eaux souterraines. Bull BRGM 2, 13–22 (1970) M. Albinet, J. Margat, Cartographie de la vulnerabilité à la pollution des nappes d’eaux souterraines. Bull BRGM 2, 13–22 (1970)
2.
go back to reference L. Aller, T. Bennett, J. Lehr, R. Petty, G. Hackett, DRASTIC: standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. J. Geol. Soc. India 29 (1987) L. Aller, T. Bennett, J. Lehr, R. Petty, G. Hackett, DRASTIC: standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. J. Geol. Soc. India 29 (1987)
3.
go back to reference ASTM, D6030 - 15 standard guide for selection of methods for assessing groundwater or aquifer sensitivity and vulnerability, Technical report, West Conshohocken, PA (1999) ASTM, D6030 - 15 standard guide for selection of methods for assessing groundwater or aquifer sensitivity and vulnerability, Technical report, West Conshohocken, PA (1999)
4.
go back to reference J.R. Boulding, J.S. Ginn, Practical Handbook of Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention, and Remediation, 2nd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004) J.R. Boulding, J.S. Ginn, Practical Handbook of Soil, Vadose Zone, and Ground-Water Contamination: Assessment, Prevention, and Remediation, 2nd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004)
5.
go back to reference BURVAL, B.W. Group, Aquifer vulnerability, in Groundwater Resources in Buried Valleys (Leibniz Institute for Applied Geosciences (GGA Institut), Hannover, 2006), pp. 149–156 BURVAL, B.W. Group, Aquifer vulnerability, in Groundwater Resources in Buried Valleys (Leibniz Institute for Applied Geosciences (GGA Institut), Hannover, 2006), pp. 149–156
6.
go back to reference M. Civita, Una metodologia per la definizione e il dimensionamento delle aree di salvaguardia delle opere di presa delle sorgenti normali. Bollettino dell’Associazione Mineraria Subalpina 25(4), 423–440 (1988) M. Civita, Una metodologia per la definizione e il dimensionamento delle aree di salvaguardia delle opere di presa delle sorgenti normali. Bollettino dell’Associazione Mineraria Subalpina 25(4), 423–440 (1988)
7.
go back to reference M. Civita, M. De Maio, Sintacs. Un sistema parametrico per la valu- tazione e la cartografia della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Metodologia e automatizzazione, Quaderni di tecniche di protez. ambient. (Pitagora, Bologna, 1997) M. Civita, M. De Maio, Sintacs. Un sistema parametrico per la valu- tazione e la cartografia della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Metodologia e automatizzazione, Quaderni di tecniche di protez. ambient. (Pitagora, Bologna, 1997)
8.
go back to reference M. Civita, C. De Regibus, Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi, in Acts of the Second National Conference, vol. 3 (1995), pp. 63–72 M. Civita, C. De Regibus, Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi, in Acts of the Second National Conference, vol. 3 (1995), pp. 63–72
9.
go back to reference A. Corniello, D. Ducci, P. Napolitano, Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using a GIS: an example in the ‘Piana Campana’, Southern Italy, vol. 1 (1997), pp. 1721–1726 A. Corniello, D. Ducci, P. Napolitano, Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using a GIS: an example in the ‘Piana Campana’, Southern Italy, vol. 1 (1997), pp. 1721–1726
10.
go back to reference J.W. Delleur, Handbook of Groundwater Engineering (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006) J.W. Delleur, Handbook of Groundwater Engineering (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006)
11.
go back to reference A. Di Molfetta, L. Gautero, Il monitoraggio delle acque sotterranee in siti pericolosi: impostazione metodologica, strumenti e costi. IGEA 37–46 (1997) A. Di Molfetta, L. Gautero, Il monitoraggio delle acque sotterranee in siti pericolosi: impostazione metodologica, strumenti e costi. IGEA 37–46 (1997)
12.
go back to reference N. Doeriger, P.-Y. Jeannin, F. Zwahlen, Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environ. Geol. 39, 165–176 (1999) N. Doeriger, P.-Y. Jeannin, F. Zwahlen, Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environ. Geol. 39, 165–176 (1999)
13.
go back to reference M.J. Focazio, Assessing Ground-Water Vulnerability to Contamination: Providing Scientifically Defensible Information for Decision Makers (U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 2002) M.J. Focazio, Assessing Ground-Water Vulnerability to Contamination: Providing Scientifically Defensible Information for Decision Makers (U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 2002)
14.
go back to reference S.S.D. Foster, Fundamental Concepts in Aquifer Vulnerability, Pollution Risk and Protection Strategy: International Conference, 1987, Noordwijk Aan Zee, the Netherlands Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, 1987) S.S.D. Foster, Fundamental Concepts in Aquifer Vulnerability, Pollution Risk and Protection Strategy: International Conference, 1987, Noordwijk Aan Zee, the Netherlands Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, 1987)
15.
go back to reference R.C. Gogu, A. Dassargues, Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ. Geol. 39, 549–559 (2000)CrossRef R.C. Gogu, A. Dassargues, Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ. Geol. 39, 549–559 (2000)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference J.E. Liggett, S. Talwar, Groundwater vulnerability assessments and integrated water resource management. Streamline Watershed Manag. Bull. 13 (2009) J.E. Liggett, S. Talwar, Groundwater vulnerability assessments and integrated water resource management. Streamline Watershed Manag. Bull. 13 (2009)
17.
go back to reference S. Stevenazzi, M. Masetti, G.P. Beretta, Groundwater vulnerability assessment: from overlay methods to statistical methods in the Lombardy Plain area. Acque Sotterranee - Ital. J. Groundw. 6 (2017) S. Stevenazzi, M. Masetti, G.P. Beretta, Groundwater vulnerability assessment: from overlay methods to statistical methods in the Lombardy Plain area. Acque Sotterranee - Ital. J. Groundw. 6 (2017)
18.
go back to reference C. Stumpp, A.J. Żurek, P. Wachniew, A. Gargini, A. Gemitzi, M. Filippini, S. Witczak, A decision tree tool supporting the assessment of groundwater vulnerability. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 1057 (2016) C. Stumpp, A.J. Żurek, P. Wachniew, A. Gargini, A. Gemitzi, M. Filippini, S. Witczak, A decision tree tool supporting the assessment of groundwater vulnerability. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 1057 (2016)
20.
go back to reference D. Van Stempvoort, L. Ewert, L. Wassenaar, Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS - compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can. Water Resour. J./Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques 18, 25–37 (1993)CrossRef D. Van Stempvoort, L. Ewert, L. Wassenaar, Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS - compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can. Water Resour. J./Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques 18, 25–37 (1993)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference P. Wachniew, A.J. Zurek, C. Stumpp, A. Gemitzi, A. Gargini, M. Filippini, K. Rozanski, J. Meeks, J. Kværner, S. Witczak, Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 827–884 (2016)CrossRef P. Wachniew, A.J. Zurek, C. Stumpp, A. Gemitzi, A. Gargini, M. Filippini, K. Rozanski, J. Meeks, J. Kværner, S. Witczak, Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 827–884 (2016)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Aquifer Vulnerability and Contamination Risk
Authors
Rajandrea Sethi
Antonio Di Molfetta
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20516-4_7