Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Empirical Software Engineering 4/2016

01-08-2016

Archetypal personalities of software engineers and their work preferences: a new perspective for empirical studies

Authors: Makrina Viola Kosti, Robert Feldt, Lefteris Angelis

Published in: Empirical Software Engineering | Issue 4/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As the area of Software Engineering (SE) matures the role of human factors in software development is commonly recognized as important. Increasingly we see empirical studies that investigate the connection between, for example, personalities and preferences, attitudes or performances of software engineers. Statistical analysis holds a key role by providing the means for uncovering associations between various facets of human factors and behavioral effects on projects and outcomes. Traditional statistical techniques tend to explore and interpret the multidimensional personality and behavioral data from an “average-point” perspective, targeting central trends. This paper introduces a methodology with statistical tools that can provide a new and different perspective for this type of SE data. It seeks the boundaries of a psychometric dataset and discovers reference or “benchmark” personalities, the archetypal personalities. Then, the method examines the placement of all individuals in the dataset in relation to the archetypes. Furthermore, the SE preference characteristics, or generally, any other types of behavioral SE data, are analyzed with respect to the archetypes. As a case to exemplify the methodology we analyze personality and project preference data from 276 master level SE students and compare to previous “average-point” statistical analysis of the same data. We also discuss how Archetypal Analysis, the heart of the proposed methodology, combined with multi-correspondence analysis might be of general use in empirical SE.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abdi H, Valentin, D (2007) Multiple correspondence analysis. Encycl Meas Stat 651–657 Abdi H, Valentin, D (2007) Multiple correspondence analysis. Encycl Meas Stat 651–657
go back to reference Acuña ST, Juristo N (2004) Assigning people to roles in software projects. Softw Pract Exp 34(7):675–696CrossRef Acuña ST, Juristo N (2004) Assigning people to roles in software projects. Softw Pract Exp 34(7):675–696CrossRef
go back to reference Acuña ST, Gómez M, Juristo N (2009) How do personality, team processes and task characteristics relate to job satisfaction and software quality? Inf Softw Technol 51(3):627–639CrossRef Acuña ST, Gómez M, Juristo N (2009) How do personality, team processes and task characteristics relate to job satisfaction and software quality? Inf Softw Technol 51(3):627–639CrossRef
go back to reference Arcuri A, Briand L. (2012) A hitchhiker’s guide to statistical tests for assessing randomized algorithms in software engineering. Softw Test Verification Reliab Arcuri A, Briand L. (2012) A hitchhiker’s guide to statistical tests for assessing randomized algorithms in software engineering. Softw Test Verification Reliab
go back to reference Aoyama M (2005) Persona-and-scenario based requirements engineering for software embedded in digital consumer products. In: Requirements Engineering, 2005. Proceedings. 13th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp 85–94 Aoyama M (2005) Persona-and-scenario based requirements engineering for software embedded in digital consumer products. In: Requirements Engineering, 2005. Proceedings. 13th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp 85–94
go back to reference Bartholomew D J (ed). (2002) The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. CRC Press Bartholomew D J (ed). (2002) The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. CRC Press
go back to reference Bell D, Hall T, Hannay J E, Pfahl D, Acuna S T (2010) Software engineering group work: personality, patterns and performance. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Special Interest Group on Management Information System’s 48th annual conference on Computer personnel research on Computer personnel research. ACM, pp 43–47 Bell D, Hall T, Hannay J E, Pfahl D, Acuna S T (2010) Software engineering group work: personality, patterns and performance. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Special Interest Group on Management Information System’s 48th annual conference on Computer personnel research on Computer personnel research. ACM, pp 43–47
go back to reference Capretz LF, Ahmed F (2010) Making sense of software development and personality types. IT Professional 12(1):6–13CrossRef Capretz LF, Ahmed F (2010) Making sense of software development and personality types. IT Professional 12(1):6–13CrossRef
go back to reference Chao J, Atli G (2006) Critical personality traits in successful pair programming. In: Agile Conference. IEEE, pp 5-pp Chao J, Atli G (2006) Critical personality traits in successful pair programming. In: Agile Conference. IEEE, pp 5-pp
go back to reference Costa P T, MacCrae R R (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI): Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Costa P T, MacCrae R R (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI): Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources
go back to reference Cruz S, da Silva FQ, Capretz LF (2015) Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: a mapping study. Comput Hum Behav 46:94–113CrossRef Cruz S, da Silva FQ, Capretz LF (2015) Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: a mapping study. Comput Hum Behav 46:94–113CrossRef
go back to reference Da Cunha AD, Greathead D (2007) Does personality matter?: an analysis of code-review ability. Commun ACM 50(5):109–112CrossRef Da Cunha AD, Greathead D (2007) Does personality matter?: an analysis of code-review ability. Commun ACM 50(5):109–112CrossRef
go back to reference Dick A J, Zarnett B (2002) Paired programming and personality traits. In: Third International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Alghero, Sardinia, Italy Dick A J, Zarnett B (2002) Paired programming and personality traits. In: Third International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Alghero, Sardinia, Italy
go back to reference Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE (2006) The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychol Assess 18(2):192CrossRef Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE (2006) The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychol Assess 18(2):192CrossRef
go back to reference Eugster M, Leisch F (2009) From Spider-man to Hero-archetypal analysis in R Eugster M, Leisch F (2009) From Spider-man to Hero-archetypal analysis in R
go back to reference Feldt R, Angelis L, Torkar R, Samuelsson M (2010) Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers. Inf Softw Technol 52(6):611–624CrossRef Feldt R, Angelis L, Torkar R, Samuelsson M (2010) Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers. Inf Softw Technol 52(6):611–624CrossRef
go back to reference Furnham A (1996) The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personal Individ Differ 21(2):303–307CrossRef Furnham A (1996) The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personal Individ Differ 21(2):303–307CrossRef
go back to reference Gorla N, Lam YW (2004) Who should work with whom?: building effective software project teams. Commun ACM 47(6):79–82CrossRef Gorla N, Lam YW (2004) Who should work with whom?: building effective software project teams. Commun ACM 47(6):79–82CrossRef
go back to reference Hainmueller J, Hazlett C, (2013) Kernel Regularized Least Squares: Reducing Misspecification Bias with a Flexible and Interpretable Machine Learning Approach. Political Analysis, mpt019 Hainmueller J, Hazlett C, (2013) Kernel Regularized Least Squares: Reducing Misspecification Bias with a Flexible and Interpretable Machine Learning Approach. Political Analysis, mpt019
go back to reference Hannay JE, Arisholm E, Engvik H, Sjoberg DI (2010) Effects of personality on pair programming. Softw Eng IEEE Trans 36(1):61–80CrossRef Hannay JE, Arisholm E, Engvik H, Sjoberg DI (2010) Effects of personality on pair programming. Softw Eng IEEE Trans 36(1):61–80CrossRef
go back to reference Karn J, Cowling T (2006) A follow up study of the effect of personality on the performance of software engineering teams. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering. ACM, pp 232–241 Karn J, Cowling T (2006) A follow up study of the effect of personality on the performance of software engineering teams. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering. ACM, pp 232–241
go back to reference Kitchenham B, Pearl Brereton O, Budgen D, Turner M, Bailey J, Linkman S (2009) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 51(1):7–15CrossRef Kitchenham B, Pearl Brereton O, Budgen D, Turner M, Bailey J, Linkman S (2009) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 51(1):7–15CrossRef
go back to reference Kosti MV, Feldt R, Angelis L (2014) Personality, emotional intelligence and work preferences in software engineering: an empirical study. Inf Softw Technol 56(8):973–990CrossRef Kosti MV, Feldt R, Angelis L (2014) Personality, emotional intelligence and work preferences in software engineering: an empirical study. Inf Softw Technol 56(8):973–990CrossRef
go back to reference Lenberg P, Feldt R, Wallgren G L (2014) Towards a Behavioral Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, June 2–3, Hyderabad, India, pp 16 Lenberg P, Feldt R, Wallgren G L (2014) Towards a Behavioral Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, June 2–3, Hyderabad, India, pp 16
go back to reference Martínez LG, Rodríguez-Díaz A, Licea G, Castro JR (2010) Big five patterns for software engineering roles using an ANFIS learning approach with RAMSET, Advances in Soft Computing. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 428–439 Martínez LG, Rodríguez-Díaz A, Licea G, Castro JR (2010) Big five patterns for software engineering roles using an ANFIS learning approach with RAMSET, Advances in Soft Computing. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 428–439
go back to reference Martínez L G, Licea G, Rodríguez A, Castro J R, Castillo O (2011) Using MatLab’s fuzzy logic toolbox to create an application for RAMSET in software engineering courses. Comput Appl Eng Educ Martínez L G, Licea G, Rodríguez A, Castro J R, Castillo O (2011) Using MatLab’s fuzzy logic toolbox to create an application for RAMSET in software engineering courses. Comput Appl Eng Educ
go back to reference McGinn J J, Kotamraju N (2008) Data-driven persona development. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, (pp 1521–1524) McGinn J J, Kotamraju N (2008) Data-driven persona development. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, (pp 1521–1524)
go back to reference Mittas N, Karpenisi V, Angelis L (2014) Benchmarking effort estimation models using archetypal analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering. ACM, pp 62–71 Mittas N, Karpenisi V, Angelis L (2014) Benchmarking effort estimation models using archetypal analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering. ACM, pp 62–71
go back to reference Mørup M, Hansen LK (2012) Archetypal analysis for machine learning and data mining. Neurocomputing 80:54–63CrossRef Mørup M, Hansen LK (2012) Archetypal analysis for machine learning and data mining. Neurocomputing 80:54–63CrossRef
go back to reference Olson MH (1980) Review of software: human factors in computer and information systems, by Ben Shneiderman, Winthrop computer systems series, 1980. ACM SIGMIS Database 11(4):21CrossRef Olson MH (1980) Review of software: human factors in computer and information systems, by Ben Shneiderman, Winthrop computer systems series, 1980. ACM SIGMIS Database 11(4):21CrossRef
go back to reference Porzio GC, Ragozini G, Vistocco D (2006) Archetypal Analysis for Data Driven Benchmarking, Data Analysis, Classification and the Forward Search. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 309–318 Porzio GC, Ragozini G, Vistocco D (2006) Archetypal Analysis for Data Driven Benchmarking, Data Analysis, Classification and the Forward Search. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 309–318
go back to reference Rehman M, Mahmood A K, Salleh R, Amin A (2012). Mapping job requirements of software engineers to Big Five Personality Traits. In: Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), 2012 International Conference on, vol 2. IEEE, pp 1115–1122 Rehman M, Mahmood A K, Salleh R, Amin A (2012). Mapping job requirements of software engineers to Big Five Personality Traits. In: Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), 2012 International Conference on, vol 2. IEEE, pp 1115–1122
go back to reference Sabini J (1995) Social Psychology, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton & Co Inc. Sabini J (1995) Social Psychology, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton & Co Inc.
go back to reference Salleh N, Mendes E, Grundy J, Burch G S J (2009). An empirical study of the effects of personality in pair programming using the five-factor model. In: Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE Computer Society, pp 214–225 Salleh N, Mendes E, Grundy J, Burch G S J (2009). An empirical study of the effects of personality in pair programming using the five-factor model. In: Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE Computer Society, pp 214–225
go back to reference Salleh N, Mendes E, Grundy J, Burch G S J (2010a) An empirical study of the effects of conscientiousness in pair programming using the five-factor personality model. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol 1. ACM, pp 577–586 Salleh N, Mendes E, Grundy J, Burch G S J (2010a) An empirical study of the effects of conscientiousness in pair programming using the five-factor personality model. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol 1. ACM, pp 577–586
go back to reference Salleh N, Mendes E, Grundy J, Burch G S J (2010b) The effects of neuroticism on pair programming: An empirical study in the higher education context. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, p 22 Salleh N, Mendes E, Grundy J, Burch G S J (2010b) The effects of neuroticism on pair programming: An empirical study in the higher education context. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, p 22
go back to reference Sfetsos P, Stamelos I, Angelis L, Deligiannis I (2009) An experimental investigation of personality types impact on pair effectiveness in pair programming. Empir Softw Eng 14(2):187–226CrossRef Sfetsos P, Stamelos I, Angelis L, Deligiannis I (2009) An experimental investigation of personality types impact on pair effectiveness in pair programming. Empir Softw Eng 14(2):187–226CrossRef
go back to reference Team R D C (2005) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2013. url: http://www.R-project.org Team R D C (2005) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2013. url: http://​www.​R-project.​org
go back to reference Wiggins J S (ed) (1996) The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press Wiggins J S (ed) (1996) The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press
Metadata
Title
Archetypal personalities of software engineers and their work preferences: a new perspective for empirical studies
Authors
Makrina Viola Kosti
Robert Feldt
Lefteris Angelis
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9395-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Empirical Software Engineering 4/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner