Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Social Indicators Research
Published in: Social Indicators Research 1/2016

11-04-2015

Are Happier People More Willing to Make Income Sacrifices to Protect the Environment?

Author: Iddisah Sulemana

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 1/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is considerable amount of debate about the effect of affluence on environmental concern. The empirical literature is inconclusive on this debate. Increasingly, more studies are examining individual level correlates of environmental concern. On the other hand, a large number of studies examine the correlates of happiness. An important aspect of the economics of happiness literature emphasizes the relationship between environmental quality or concern and happiness. A few scholars suggest that happiness may influence environmental concern. Yet studies on whether happiness affects environmental concern are lacking. This paper empirically investigates the effect of happiness on environmental concern in a cross-national sample. Using data for 18 countries, I find that happier people are more willing to make income sacrifices to protect the environment. This finding holds for residents of both African and developed countries.
previous article Linking Social Support to Psychological Distress in the Unemployed: The Moderating Role of Core Self-Evaluations

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Happiness, well-being, subjective well-being and life satisfaction are often used interchangeably, especially in the economics of happiness literature (see e.g., Easterlin 2005).
 
2
I wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for drawing my attention to this paper.
 
3
Although Duroy (2008) explores the relationship between happiness and various measures of environmental concern, the study’s main focus was to test the “affluence” hypothesis. Consequently, the study uses aggregate variables.
 
4
Inglehart’s thesis is consistent with Maslow’s (1954) hierarchy of needs. That is, environmental concern is a higher order need that people with lower incomes would generally not focus on. Instead, they focus on the basic needs for human survival.
 
5
This problem is empirically addressed later in the paper. I wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for comments on this issue.
 
6
Although most of the environmental issues questions were asked in most countries, preliminary inspection of the data revealed that the questions used to generate the dependent variables in this study were not asked in some countries. For instance, among advanced countries, they were not asked in the United Kingdom, France, and Netherlands.
 
7
I thank an anonymous reviewer for raising this issue.
 
8
They wonder if the relationship between willingness to pay to prevent environmental pollution and membership in environmental organization is a result of a selection bias. Using instrumental variable estimation, they find consistent results between 2SLS results and their ordered probit results, suggesting a lack of endogenity.
 
9
OLS regressions are also run for the models (1) to check for multicollinearity, and (2) for robustness checks. I wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for requesting that tests for multicollinearity be conducted and reported.
 
10
I owe this to a reviewer who suggested that I check for multicollinearity.
 
11
Because this study is a micro-study, macro-level variables such as GNP per capita were not used. Also, the individual variables were not averaged at the national level because the individual (rather than a country) is the unit of analysis.
 
Literature
Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2013). Trust, growth and well-being: New evidence and policy implications. North Holland: Elsevier.
Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.CrossRef
Beja, E. (2012). Subjective well-being approach to environmental valuation: Evidence for greenhouse gas emissions. Social Indicators Research, 109(2), 243–266.CrossRef
Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56(1), 3–16.CrossRef
Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research Quality Life, 3(1), 43–62.CrossRef
Bord, R. J., & O’Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes—the case of perceived vulnerability to risk: Research on the environment. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 830–840.
Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2000). Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Applied Economics, 32(6), 661–669.CrossRef
Craney, T. A., & Surles, J. G. (2002). Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Quality Engineering, 14(3), 391–403.CrossRef
Cuñado, J., & de Gracia, F. P. (2013). Environment and happiness: New evidence for Spain. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 549–567.CrossRef
Davis, D. W. (2000). Individual level examination of postmaterialism in the US: Political tolerance, racial attitudes, environmentalism, and participatory norms. Political Research Quarterly, 53(3), 455–475.
Derksen, L., & Gartrell, J. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 434–442.CrossRef
Diekmann, A., & Franzen, A. (1999). The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 31(4), 540–549.CrossRef
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRef
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRef
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455.CrossRef
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRef
Drori, G. S. (2000). Science education and economic development: Trends, relationships, and research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 35(1), 27–57.CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H, Jr, & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Of global concern: Results of the health of the planet survey. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 35(9), 7–39.CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482–524). Westport: Greenwood Press.
Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? Journal of Social Issues, 51(4), 121–137.CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1997). Global environmental concern: An anomaly for postmaterialism. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 24–29.
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.CrossRef
Dupont, D. P. (2004). Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation. Ecological Economics, 49(3), 273–286.CrossRef
Duroy, Q. M. (2008). Testing the affluence hypothesis: A cross-cultural analysis of the determinants of environmental action. The Social Science Journal, 45(3), 419–439.CrossRef
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.
Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In Luigino Bruni & Pier L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 29–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Gowdy, J. M. (2007). Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 509–516.CrossRef
Franzen, A. (2003). Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 297–308.CrossRef
Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234.CrossRef
Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1001–1008.CrossRef
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRef
García-Valiñas, M. A., Macintyre, A., & Torgler, B. (2012). Volunteering, pro-environmental attitudes and norms. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 455–467.CrossRef
Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection: A multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392–415.CrossRef
Gerhards, J., & Lengfeld, H. (2008). Support for European Union environmental policy by citizens of EU-member and accession states. Comparative Sociology, 7(2), 215–241.CrossRef
Givens, J. E., & Jorgenson, A. K. (2011). The effects of affluence, economic development, and environmental degradation on environmental concern: A multilevel analysis. Organization and Environment, 24(1), 74–91.CrossRef
Gowdy, J. (2005). Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 3(2), 211–222.CrossRef
Greeley, A. (1993). Religion and attitudes toward the environment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(1), 19–28.CrossRef
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRef
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.CrossRef
Hand, C. M., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces, 63(2), 555–570.CrossRef
Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic Record, 80(s1), S24–S33.CrossRef
Helliwell, J. F. (2001). Social capital, the economy and well-being. In K. Banting, A. Sharpe, & F. St-Hilaire (Eds.), The review of economic performance and social progress. The longest decade: Canada in the 1990s (pp. 43–60). Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital, and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45.CrossRef
Inglehart, R. (1990). Cultural shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28(01), 57–72.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Israel, D. K. (2004). International support for environmental protection. Environment and Development Economics, 9(06), 757–780.CrossRef
Israel, D., & Levinson, A. (2004). Willingness to pay for environmental quality: Testable empirical implications of the growth and environment literature. Contributions in Economic Analysis and Policy, 3(1), 1–29, Article 2.
James, H. S. (2011). Is the just man a happy man? An empirical study of the relationship between ethics and subjective well-being. Kyklos, 64(2), 193–212.CrossRef
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57(1), 28–47.CrossRef
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRef
Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern—It does make a difference how it’s measured: Research on the environment. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 734–753.
Knight, K. W., & Messer, B. L. (2012). Environmental concern in cross-national perspective: The effects of affluence, environmental degradation, and world society. Social Science Quarterly, 93(2), 521–537.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
Leigh, A., & Wolfers, J. (2006). Happiness and the human development index: Australia is not a paradox. Australian Economic Review, 39(2), 176–184.CrossRef
Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 285–307.CrossRef
Levinson, A. (2012). Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9), 869–880.CrossRef
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557.CrossRef
MacDonald, W. L., & Hara, N. (1994). Gender differences in environmental concern among college students. Sex Roles, 31(5–6), 369–374.CrossRef
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
McGowan, K. (2006). The pleasure paradox. Psychology Today, 25, 52–55.
Meier, S. (2007). A survey on economic theories and field evidence on pro-social behavior. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica, 75(297), 39–59.
Mohai, P. (1990). Black environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 71(4), 744–765.
Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2005). Climate and happiness. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 111–125.CrossRef
Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2008). Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 787–797.CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.CrossRef
Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time-series and cross-country evidence (Vol. 904). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Sulemana, I., & James, H. S, Jr. (2014). Farmer identity, ethical attitudes and environmental practices. Ecological Economics, 98, 49–61.CrossRef
Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.CrossRef
Torgler, B., & Garcia-Valiñas, M. A. (2007). The determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological Economics, 63(2), 536–552.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 333–354.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R. (2009). The international scale interval study: Improving the comparability of responses to survey questions about happiness. In Quality of life and the millennium challenge (pp. 45–58). Springer: Netherlands.
Veisten, K., Fredrik Hoen, H., Navrud, S., & Strand, J. (2004). Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(4), 317–331.CrossRef
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(20), 1580–1607.CrossRef
Welsch, H. (2002). Preferences over prosperity and pollution: Environmental valuation based on happiness surveys. Kyklos, 55(4), 473–494.CrossRef
Welsch, H. (2006). Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 801–813.CrossRef
Welsch, H. (2007). Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 544–551.CrossRef
White, M. J., & Hunter, L. M. (2009). Public perception of environmental issues in a developing setting: Environmental concern in Coastal Ghana. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4), 960–982.CrossRef
Witzke, H. P., & Urfei, G. (2001). Willingness to pay for environmental protection in Germany: Coping with the regional dimension. Regional Studies, 35(3), 207–214.CrossRef
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457.CrossRef
Zhou, M. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of public environmental concern in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 50(4), 453–481.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Are Happier People More Willing to Make Income Sacrifices to Protect the Environment?
Author
Iddisah Sulemana
Publication date
11-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0960-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Social Indicators Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

On Well-Being and Public Policy: Are We Capable of Questioning the Hegemony of Happiness?

OriginalPaper

Structural Gender Equality in Europe and Its Evolution Over the First Decade of the Twentyfirst Century

OriginalPaper

How Does Leisure Time Affect Production Efficiency? Evidence from China, Japan, and the US

OriginalPaper

Studying Income Inequality of Immigrant Communities in Italy

OriginalPaper

Linking Social Support to Psychological Distress in the Unemployed: The Moderating Role of Core Self-Evaluations

OriginalPaper

Cultural Endorsement of Broad Leadership Prototypes and Wealth as Predictors of Corruption