Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2018

15-05-2017 | SOCIETAL LCA

Assessing the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle: the case of nano-enabled biocidal paint

Authors: Vrishali Subramanian, Elena Semenzin, Alex Zabeo, Peter Saling, Tom Ligthart, Toon van Harmelen, Ineke Malsch, Danail Hristozov, Antonio Marcomini

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of the social aspects of sustainability of products is a topic of significant interest to companies, and several methodologies have been proposed in the recent years. The significant environmental health and safety concerns about nano-enabled products calls for the early establishment of a clear benefit-risk framework in order to decide which novel products should be developed further. This paper proposes a method to assess the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle that is (a) quantitative, (b) integrates performance and attitudinal dimensions of social impacts and (c) considers the overall and stakeholder balance of benefits and costs. Social life cycle assessment (s-LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are integrated to address this need, and the method is illustrated on a case study of a nano-enabled product.

Methods

The s-LCA framework comprises 15 indicators to characterize the social context of the product manufacture placed within the classification structure of benefit/cost and worker/community. The methodology includes four steps: (a) normalization of company level data on the social indicator to country level data for the year, (b) nested weighting at stakeholder and indicator level and its integration with normalized scores to create social indicator scores, (c) aggregation of social indicator scores into benefit score, cost score and net benefit scores as per the s-LCA framework and (d) classification of social indicator scores and aggregated scores as low/medium/high based on benchmarks created using employment and value-added proxies.

Results and discussion

A prospective production scenario involving novel product, a nano-copper oxide (n-CuO)-based paint with biocidal functionality, is assessed with respect to its social impacts. The method was applied to 12 indicators at the company level. Classification of social indicator scores and aggregated scores showed that the n-CuO paint has high net benefits.

Conclusions

The framework and method offer a flexible structure that can be revised and extended as more knowledge and data on social impacts of nano-enabled products becomes available. The proposed method is being implemented in the social impact assessment sub-module of the SUN Decision Support (SUNDS) software system. Companies seeking to improve the social footprint of their products can also use the proposed method to consider relevant social impacts to achieve this goal.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
LICARA NanoSCAN is the only assessment tool that specifically addresses nano-enabled products.
 
2
“Cost” in the SIA methodology means a negative social benefit or risk and do not include real economic costs which are considered in the economic assessment methodology of SUNDS to be described in an upcoming publication.
 
3
The EU countries used to calculate the relative potential index include Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden, United Kingdom and Norway. Data was extracted from Eurostat.
 
Literature
go back to reference Althaus H-J, Pablo A, Bouamrane M et al (2009) In: Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP-DTIE, Paris Althaus H-J, Pablo A, Bouamrane M et al (2009) In: Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP-DTIE, Paris
go back to reference Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRef Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRef
go back to reference Benoit-Norris C (2012b) Social life cycle assessment: a technique providing a new wealth of information to inform sustainability-related decision making. In: Curran MA (ed) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 433–451CrossRef Benoit-Norris C (2012b) Social life cycle assessment: a technique providing a new wealth of information to inform sustainability-related decision making. In: Curran MA (ed) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 433–451CrossRef
go back to reference Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012a) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRef Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012a) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRef
go back to reference European Commission (EC) Report (2009) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC(2009) Accessed 03.09.2015 European Commission (EC) Report (2009) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC(2009) Accessed 03.09.2015
go back to reference Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRef Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRef
go back to reference Freeman MH, McIntyre CR (2008) A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives. Forest Prod J 58:6 Freeman MH, McIntyre CR (2008) A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives. Forest Prod J 58:6
go back to reference Giove S, Brancia A, Satterstrom FK, Linkov I (2009) Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA. In Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites, eds. A. Marcomini, G. W. Suter II and A. Critto Springer US Giove S, Brancia A, Satterstrom FK, Linkov I (2009) Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA. In Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites, eds. A. Marcomini, G. W. Suter II and A. Critto Springer US
go back to reference Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef
go back to reference Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA method and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382CrossRef Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA method and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382CrossRef
go back to reference Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96CrossRef
go back to reference Lebow ST (2010) Wood preservation. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 Lebow ST (2010) Wood preservation. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190
go back to reference Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef
go back to reference Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRef Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRef
go back to reference Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles-towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104 Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles-towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104
go back to reference O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:231–237CrossRef O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:231–237CrossRef
go back to reference Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:106–117CrossRef Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:106–117CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C-O (2004) SEEbalance. Greener Management International, pp 78–94 Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C-O (2004) SEEbalance. Greener Management International, pp 78–94
go back to reference Siebert A, Bezama A, O’Keeffe S, Thrän D (2016) Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0 Siebert A, Bezama A, O’Keeffe S, Thrän D (2016) Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.​1007/​s11367-016-1066-0
go back to reference Smith J, Barling D (2014) Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:944–949CrossRef Smith J, Barling D (2014) Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:944–949CrossRef
go back to reference Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Mcalea E, Murphy F, Mullins M, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Linov I, Marcomini A (2016a) Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk Governance. J Nanopart Res 18:89CrossRef Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Mcalea E, Murphy F, Mullins M, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Linov I, Marcomini A (2016a) Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk Governance. J Nanopart Res 18:89CrossRef
go back to reference Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Saling P, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Marcomini A (2016b) Integrating the social impacts into risk Governance of nanotechnology. In: Murphy F, Mcalea E, Mullins M (eds) Managing risk in nanotechnology: topics in Governance, assurance and transfer. Springer, New York Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Saling P, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Marcomini A (2016b) Integrating the social impacts into risk Governance of nanotechnology. In: Murphy F, Mcalea E, Mullins M (eds) Managing risk in nanotechnology: topics in Governance, assurance and transfer. Springer, New York
go back to reference van Harmelen T, Zondervan-van den Beuken EK, Brouwer DH, Kuijpers E, Fransman W, Buist HB, Ligthart TN, Hincapié I, Hischier R, Linkov I, Nowack B (2016) LICARA nanoSCAN - A tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. Environ Int 91:150 van Harmelen T, Zondervan-van den Beuken EK, Brouwer DH, Kuijpers E, Fransman W, Buist HB, Ligthart TN, Hincapié I, Hischier R, Linkov I, Nowack B (2016) LICARA nanoSCAN - A tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. Environ Int 91:150
go back to reference WBCSD (2016) Social Metrics for Chemical Products in their Application - A guide by the chemical sector to assess and report on the social impact and value of products in a life cycle perspective WBCSD (2016) Social Metrics for Chemical Products in their Application - A guide by the chemical sector to assess and report on the social impact and value of products in a life cycle perspective
Metadata
Title
Assessing the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle: the case of nano-enabled biocidal paint
Authors
Vrishali Subramanian
Elena Semenzin
Alex Zabeo
Peter Saling
Tom Ligthart
Toon van Harmelen
Ineke Malsch
Danail Hristozov
Antonio Marcomini
Publication date
15-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1324-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2018 Go to the issue

LCA FOR MANUFACTURING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY

Life cycle assessment of spectrally tunable light engines