Top

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Published in:

09-09-2020 | Research Article-Civil Engineering

Assessment of Seismic Behavior Factor of Code-Designed Steel–Concrete Composite Buildings

Authors: Serkan Etli, Esra Mete Güneyisi

Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Issue 5/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In this study, the seismic behavior factor of steel–concrete composite buildings was examined. For this purpose, 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-story composite moment-resisting frame (CMRF) buildings having concrete-filled steel tube columns and composite beams were designed at medium ductility (DCM) and high ductility (DCH) levels as per the regulations of Eurocode 8. Examined DCM structures were designed for a PGA of 0.2 g while DCH structures were designed for a PGA of 0.4 g. SeismoStruct software was utilized in the design and performance assessment of the case study structures. Nonlinear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses were used. In the pushover analysis, the uniform and triangular load distributions were adopted while 12 earthquake ground motions were employed in the dynamic analysis. The effect of ductility levels and number of stories on the seismic behavior of CMRFs was studied using the results of the nonlinear analysis. To this, the variation in the lateral response, global yielding value, code-based behavior factor and component, and dynamic behavior factor were presented for CMRF structures with DCM and DCH. It was observed that the behavior factor of all CMRFs exhibited well above the design assumptions, especially DCM class CMRFs.

previous article The Possibility of Producing Self-Compacting Lightweight Concrete by Using Expanded Polystyrene Beads as Coarse Aggregate

next article A Hybrid Model Integrating Principal Component Analysis, Fuzzy C-Means, and Gaussian Process Regression for Dam Deformation Prediction

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Kuddus, M.A.; Dey, P.P.: Cost analysis of RCC, steel and composite multi-storied car parking subjected to high wind exposure in Bangladesh. Civ. Eng. J. 3(2), 95–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2017-00000076CrossRef

Abbas, J.L.; Allawi, A.A.: Experimental and numerical investigations of composite concrete–steel plate shear walls subjected to axial load. Civ. Eng. J. 5(11), 2402–2422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091420CrossRef

Alhan, C.; Öncü-Davas, S.: Performance limits of seismically isolated buildings under near-field earthquakes. Eng. Struct. 116, 83–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.043CrossRef

Elghazouli, A.Y.; Castro, J.M.; Izzuddin, B.A.: Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting frames. Eng. Struct. 30(7), 1802–1819 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.004CrossRef

Di Sarno, L.; Pecce, M.R.: Performance-based assessment of steel and concrete composite frames. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, paper no. 3, pp. 436–441 (2007)

Broderick, B.M.; Elnashai, A.S.: Seismic response of composite frames—I. Response criteria and input motion. Eng. Struct. 18(9), 696–706 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00211-1CrossRef

Elnashai, A.S.; Di Sarno, L.: Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering: From Source to Fragility, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)

Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EN1998-1-2004, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels (2004)

UBC: Uniform Building Code (1997)

10.

Building Seismic Safety Council: NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450): Provisions/Prepared by the Building Seismic Safety Council. Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington (2004)

11.

SEAOC-Seismology Committee Structural Engineers Association of California: Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary, 7 edn. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), California (1999)

12.

ANSI/ASCE 7-10: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York (2010)

13.

American Concrete Institute ACI 318-14, Building code requirements for reinforced concrete. ACI 318-14, Farmington Hills, Mich (2014)

14.

AISC: Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-10. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago (2010)

15.

Eurocode-2: Design of Concrete Structures Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. prEN 1992-1:2001 (1st draft), European Committee for Standardization. Brussels (2000)

16.

Elghazouli, A.Y.: Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 8(1), 65–89 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6CrossRef

17.

Ferraioli, M.; Avossa, A.M.: Progressive collapse of seismic resistant multistory frame buildings. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, Vienna, Austria, p. 413 (2013)

18.

Rahgozar, P.: Free vibration of tall buildings using energy method and Hamilton’s principle. Civ. Eng. J. 6(5), 945–953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091519CrossRef

19.

Leon, R.T.; Hajjar, J.F.; Gustafson, M.A.; Shield, C.: Seismic response of composite moment-resisting connections. II: behavior. J. Struct. Eng. 124(8), 868–876 (1998)CrossRef

20.

Hawkins, N.M.; Mitchell, D.: Seismic response of composite shear connections. J. Struct. Eng. 110(9), 2120–2136 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:9(2120)CrossRef

21.

Bursi, O.S.; Roberto, C.: Composite substructures with partial shear connection: low cycle fatigue behaviour and analysis issues. In: 12 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering-Conference Proceeding (2000)

22.

Plumier, A.: European research and code developments on seismic design of composite steel concrete structures. In: 12 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering–Conference Proceeding, pp. 1–8 (2000)

23.

Miranda, B.E.: Strength reduction factors in performance-based design. In: Proceedings of EERC-CUREe Symposium, Berkeley, CA (1997)

24.

Thermou, G.E.; Elnashai, A.S.; Plumier, A.; Done, C.: Seismic design and performance of composite frames. J. Constr. Steel Res. 60(1), 31–57 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.006CrossRef

25.

Denavit, M.D.; Hajjar, J.F.; Perea, T.; Leon, R.T.: Seismic performance factors for moment frames with steel-concrete composite columns and steel beams. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45(10), 1685–1703 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2737CrossRef

26.

Denavit, M.D.; Hajjar, J.F.; Perea, T.; Leon, R.T.: Stability analysis and design of composite structures. J. Struct. Eng. (United States) 142(3), 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001434CrossRef

27.

Denavit, M.D.; Hajjar, J.F.; Leon, R.T.; Perea, T.: Analysis and design of steel-concrete composite frame systems. In: Structures Congress 2014—Proceedings of the 2014 Structures Congress, pp. 2605–2616 (2014)

28.

Denavit, M.D.; Hajjar, J.F.: Nonlinear seismic analysis of circular concrete-filled steel tube members and frames. J. Struct. Eng. (United States) 138(9), 1089–1098 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000544CrossRef

29.

Martínez-Rueda, J.E.; Elnashai, A.S.: Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Mater. Struct. 30(197), 139–147 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486385CrossRef

30.

Xiao, Y.; Wu, H.: Compressive behavior of concrete confined by carbon fiber composite jackets. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 12(2), 139–146 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139)CrossRef

31.

Uy, B.: Strength of short concrete filled high strength steel box columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 57(2), 113–134 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00014-6MathSciNetCrossRef

32.

Choi, K.K.; Xiao, Y.: Analytical studies of concrete-filled circular steel tubes under axial compression. J. Struct. Eng. 136(5), 565–573 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000156CrossRef

33.

SeismoSoft: A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. SeismoStruct. http://www.seismosoft.com (2018)

34.

Susantha, K.A.S.; Ge, H.; Usami, T.: Uniaxial stress-strain relationship of concrete confined by various shaped steel tubes. Eng. Struct. 23(10), 1331–1347 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00020-7CrossRef

35.

Antoniou, S.; Fragiadakis, M.; Pinho, R.: Modelling inelastic buckling of reinforcing bars under earthquake loading. In: Computational Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: Structures and Infrastructures Book Series, pp. 347–361 (2008)

36.

Shahrooz, B.M.; Pantazopoulou, S.J.; Chern, S.P.: Modeling slab contribution in frame connections. J. Struct. Eng. 118(9), 2475–2494 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118CrossRef

37.

Filippou, F.C.; Popov, E.P.; Bertero, V.V.: Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete joints. Report to the National Science Foundation. Earthq. Eng. Res. Cent., pp. 1–212 (1983)

38.

Menegotto, M.; Pinto, P.E.: Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R. C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Proceedings of IABSE Symp. Resist. Ultim. Deform. Struct. Acted by Well Defin. Loads, pp. 15–22 (1973). https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-13741

39.

Monti, G.; Nuti, C.; Santini, S.: CYRUS, CYclic Response of Upgraded Sections: a program for the analysis of retrofitted or repaired r.c. sections under biaxial cyclic loading including buckling of rebars. Report DSSAR 1/96 materiali, Dipartimento di Scienze Storia e Restauro, Università degli Studi G. D’Annunzio di Chieti (1996)

40.

Xu, J.J.; Chen, Z.P.; Xue, J.Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Zhang, J.T.: Simulation of seismic behavior of square recycled aggregate concrete—filled steel tubular columns. Constr. Build. Mater. 149, 553–566 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.013CrossRef

41.

Srinivasan, C.N.; Schneider, S.P.: Axially loaded concrete-filled steel tubes. J. Struct. Eng. 125(10), 1202–1206 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:10(1202)CrossRef

42.

Baba, T.; Inai, E.; Kai, M.T.N.; Mukai, A.: Structural behaviour of concrete filled steel tubular columns under axial compressive load, part 2: test results on rectangular columns. Abstr. Annu. Conv. Archit. Inst. Japan, pp. 737–738 (1995)

43.

Huang, Z.; Huang, X.; Li, W.; Zhou, Y.; Sui, L.; Liew, J.Y.R.: Experimental behaviour of very high-strength concrete-encased steel composite column subjected to axial compression and end moment. In: In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures, pp. 323–329 (2018)

44.

Tomii, M.; Yoshimura, K.; Morishita, Y.: Experimental studies on concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns under concentric loading. In: International Colloquium on Stability of Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads, pp. 718–741 (1977)

45.

Boukhalkhal, S.H.; Ihaddoudène, A.N.T.; Da Costa Neves, L.F.; Madi, W.: Dynamic behavior of concrete filled steel tubular columns. Int. J. Struct. Integr. 10(2), 244–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-07-2018-0040CrossRef

46.

Bruneau, M.; Uang, C.; Sabelli, R.: Ductile design of steel structures. In: Animal Genetics (2008)

47.

Xu, J.J.; Chen, Z.P.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Zhao, X.Y.; Demartino, C.: A critical assessment of the compressive behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete columns. Eng. Struct. 161, 161–175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.003CrossRef

48.

Li, J.T.; Chen, Z.P.; Xu, J.J.; Jing, C.G.; Xue, J.Y.: Cyclic behavior of concrete-filled steel tubular column–reinforced concrete beam frames incorporating 100% recycled concrete aggregates. Adv. Struct. Eng. 21(12), 1802–1814 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218755521CrossRef

49.

Zhang, X.; Gao, X.: The hysteretic behavior of recycled aggregate concrete-filled square steel tube columns. Eng. Struct. 198, 109523 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109523CrossRef

50.

Kim, K.D.; Engelhardt, M.D.: Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames. J. Constr. Steel Res. 58(5), 605–635 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00079-7CrossRef

51.

Altoontash, A.: Simulation and damage models for performance assessment of reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Ph.D. Thesis, p. 232 (2004)

52.

Ricles, J.M.; Peng, S.W.; Lu, L.W.: Seismic behavior of composite concrete filled steel tube column-wide flange beam moment connections. J. Struct. Eng. 130(2), 223–232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(223)CrossRef

53.

Ji, H.; Kanatani, H.; Tabuchi, M.; Ishikawa, M.: A study on concrete filled RHS column to H-beam connections fabricated with HT bolts in rigid frames: part 1. Elemental study. J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (Trans. AIJ) 414, 35–45 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsx.414.0_35CrossRef

54.

Fukumoto, T.; Morita, K.: Elastoplastic behavior of panel zone in steel beam-to-concrete filled steel tube column moment connections. J. Struct. Eng. 131, 1841–1853 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1841)CrossRef

55.

Nogueiro, P.; Simoesdasilva, L.; Bento, R.; Simoes, R.: Numerical implementation and calibration of a hysteretic model with pinching for the cyclic response of steel and composite joints. In: Fourth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, pp. 767–774 (2005)

56.

Lu, S.; Zhao, W.; Han, P.; Hang, Z.: Mechanical behavior of hybrid connectors for rapid-assembling steel–concrete composite beams. Civ. Eng. J. 5(10), 2081–2092 (2019). https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091395CrossRef

57.

Castro, J.M.; Elghazouli, A.Y.; Izzuddin, B.A.: Performance assessment of composite moment-resisting frames. In: 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2008)

58.

Eurocode-4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1994-1-1, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels (2004)

59.

Castro, J.M.; Elghazouli, A.Y.; Izzuddin, B.A.: Assessment of effective slab widths in composite beams. J. Constr. Steel Res. 63(10), 1317–1327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.11.018CrossRef

60.

Broderick, B.M.; Elnashai, A.S.: Seismic response of composite frames–II. Calculation of behaviour factors. Eng. Struct. 18(9), 696–706 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00211-1CrossRef

61.

ATC-40: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Applied Technology Council (1996)

62.

The Ministry of Land, I. and T.: Design example and commentary for the calculation of response and limit strength (2001)

63.

FEMA-356: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings American Society of Civil Engineers (2000)

64.

Vamvatsikos, D.: Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, California (2002)

65.

Vamvatsikos, D.; Cornell, C.A.: Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq. Spectra 20(2), 523–553 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737737CrossRef

66.

Ferraioli, M.; Lavino, A.; Mandara, A.: Behaviour factor of code-designed steel moment-resisting frames. Int. J. Steel Struct. 14(2), 243–254 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-2005-1CrossRef

67.

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, (PEER): PEER ground motion database. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/ (2011)

68.

Mohsin, A.A.; Risan, H.K.: Major parameters affect the non-liner response of structure under near-fault earthquakes. Civ. Eng. J. 5(8), 1714–1725 (2019). https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091365CrossRef

69.

Heydari, M.; Mousavi, M.: The comparison of seismic effects of near-field and far-field earthquakes on relative displacement of seven-storey concrete building with shear wall. Curr. World Environ. 10(1), 40–46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12944/cwe.10.special-issue1.07CrossRef

70.

Alavi, B.; Krawinkler, H.: Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33(6), 687–706 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.369CrossRef

71.

Wong, K.K.F.; Yang, R.: Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30(12), 1769–1789 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.92CrossRef

72.

SeismoSoft: A computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records. Seismomatch. http://www.seismosoft.com (2018)

73.

FEMA-273: NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997)

74.

ASCE-41: Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), USA (2006)

75.

Rastegarian, S.; Sharifi, A.: An investigation on the correlation of inter-story drift and performance objectives in conventional RC frames. Emerg. Sci. J. 2(3), 140–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2018-01137CrossRef

76.

Mwafy, A.M.; Elnashai, A.S.: Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Eng. Struct. 23(5), 407–424 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7CrossRef

77.

Yahmi, D.; Branci, T.; Bouchaïr, A.; Fournely, E.: Evaluation of behaviour factors of steel moment-resisting frames using standard pushover method. Procedia Eng. 199, 397–403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.130CrossRef

78.

Louzai, A.; Abed, A.: Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13(6), 1773–1793 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9689-7CrossRef

79.

ATC-19: Structural response modification factors: Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1995)

80.

Miranda, E.: Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra. J. Struct. Eng. 119(5), 1319–1338 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1319)CrossRef

81.

Nassar, A.A.; Krawinkler, H.: Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No. 95 (1991)

82.

Hays, W.W.; et al.: The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP): postearthquake investigations (1993)

83.

Maheri, M.R.; Akbari, R.: Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Eng. Struct. 25(12), 1505–1513 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00117-2CrossRef

84.

Skalomenos, K.A.; Hatzigeorgiou, G.D.; Beskos, D.E.: Seismic behavior of composite steel/concrete MRFs: deformation assessment and behavior factors. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13(12), 3871–3896 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9794-2CrossRef

Title: Assessment of Seismic Behavior Factor of Code-Designed Steel–Concrete Composite Buildings
Authors: Serkan Etli
Esra Mete Güneyisi
Publication date: 09-09-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Electronic ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04913-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Acoustic Emission Monitoring of RC Beams Corroded to Different Levels Under Flexural Loading

Uplift Behavior of Belled Piles Subjected to Static Loading

Effect of Particle Size of Quartz Sand Filler on Microstructure and Strength of Alkali-Activated Slag-Based Materials

Strength and Durability Characteristics of Red Soil Stabilised with Foundry Sand and Cement

Structural Behavior of GFRP-Reinforced Circular HFRC Columns Under Concentric and Eccentric Loading

Artificial Intelligence-Based Protocol for Macroscopic Traffic Simulation Model Development

Premium Partners