Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Political Behavior
Published in: Political Behavior 1/2023

16-03-2021 | Original Paper

Attacking the Weak or the Strong? An Experiment on the Targets of Parochial Altruism

Authors: Simon Varaine, Ismaël Benslimane, Raul Magni-Berton, Paolo Crosetto

Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 1/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Studies on parochial altruism have insofar focused on the causes leading individuals to attack any outgroup on the behalf of one’s group. Yet, we lack clues to understand why parochial altruists target specific groups, such as dominant groups in some contexts and minority groups in others. The present paper introduces an experiment to analyze the conditions under which individuals costly attack strong versus weak outgroups. In a first study, 300 participants played a repeated Inter-group Prisoner Dilemma involving multiple groups and inter-group differences in resources. Results show that individuals have a preference for targeting strong outgroups, but that attacks decrease when the inequality in destructive capacity between groups is high. Besides, individuals target weak outgroups when they are threatening their ingroup status. Decisions in the game correlate with participants’ political ideology and Social Dominance Orientation. In a second study, we provide evidence that our results generalize to historical linkages between economic inequality and left-wing versus right-wing terrorist attacks.
previous article Elections, Party Rhetoric, and Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe
next article Does Radical-Right Success Make the Political Debate More Negative? Evidence from Emotional Rhetoric in German State Parliaments

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The present paper focuses on the hypotheses 2 and 3 (about social comparison) of the preregistered project. The hypothesis 1 (about the ingroup situation) is explored in a separate study.
 
2
Our version of the IPD game entails the likelihood that subjects have negative payoffs. To address this issue, we decided that a subject who has negative points can no longer attack and no longer loses points from outgroup attacks. Yet, subjects of the outgroups continue to gain points when attacking the subject’s ingroup irrespectively of the subject’s number of points. When all subjects of the ingroup attain zero, we consider the ingroup “dead” and the outgroups can no longer attack it.
 
3
Except the case in which the resources in points \({p}_{0}\) of the poor subject are below the absolute limit \(\beta\).
 
5
Instructions and screenshots from the software are provided in the online appendix. The oTree package is available upon request.
 
6
This reduces the sample to N = 17,728. Including all observations in the analyses does not alter our conclusions. The authors can send results upon request.
Note that the sample is further reduced in the regression analyses, due to the inclusion of some variables (e.g. variable measuring behaviors during a previous round). We specify in notes under the regression tables the rationale behind sample reductions.
 
7
We also present in the online appendix alternative models based on ingroup-outgroup dyads with ingroup random effects and models based on subject-outgroup dyads with subject fixed effects.
 
8
Detailed summary statistics are provided in the online appendix.
 
9
The negative binomial regression is a generalization of the poisson regression for count variables with overdispersion (the variance exceeds the mean). Such model is appropriate for our dependent variable, which is an observed count (of the number of points contributed in attacks) with overdispersion (M = 6.54, Var = 100.61).
 
10
Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses of the level of individual attacks by subjects’ characteristics are presented in the online appendix.
 
11
The variable theoretically goes from 20% (perfect equality across the five groups) to 100% (perfect concentration of the resources in the richest group). Empirically, the variable goes from 20.0% to 34.2%.
 
12
In unequal societies, economically powerful groups have a higher political influence on policies (Gilens, 2012).
 
13
The results are robust to dropping interpolation, robustness checks are available upon request.
 
14
The final sample includes Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Finland, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Lebanon, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and Uruguay.
 
Literature
Abbink, K., & de Haan, T. (2014). Trust on the brink of Armageddon: The first-strike game. European Economic Review, 67, 190–196.CrossRef
Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2012). Parochial altruism in inter-group conflicts. Economics Letters, 117(1), 45–48.CrossRef
Abbink, K., Masclet, D., & Mirza, D. (2018). Inequality and inter-group conflicts: Experimental evidence. Social Choice and Welfare, 50(3), 387–423.CrossRef
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Atran, S., & Sheikh, H. (2015). Dangerous terrorists as devoted actors. Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology (pp. 401–416). Cham: Springer.CrossRef
Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gomez, A. (2014). Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 111(50), 17702–17703.CrossRef
Benslimane, I., Crosetto, P., Magni-Berton, R., & Varaine, S. (2020). Intellectual property reform in the laboratory, Working Papers. Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442(7105), 912.CrossRef
Bizumic, B., Duckitt, J., Popadic, D., Dru, V., & Krauss, S. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation into a reconceptualization of ethnocentrism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 871–899.CrossRef
Böhm, R., Rusch, H., & Gürerk, Ö. (2016). What makes people go to war? Defensive intentions motivate retaliatory and preemptive intergroup aggression. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 29–34.CrossRef
Bornstein, G. (1992). The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 597.CrossRef
Bornstein, G. (2003). Intergroup conflict: Individual, group, and collective interests. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(2), 129–145.CrossRef
Bornstein, G., Erev, I., & Goren, H. (1994). The effect of repeated play in the IPG and IPD team games. Journal of Conflict resolution, 38(4), 690–707.CrossRef
Boutcher, S. A., Jenkins, J. C., & Van Dyke, N. (2017). Strain, ethnic competition, and power devaluation: White supremacist protest in the US, 1948–1997. Social Movement Studies, 16(6), 686–703.CrossRef
Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21(4), 471–475.CrossRef
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(6), 641–657.CrossRef
Card, D., Mas, A., Moretti, E., & Saez, E. (2012). Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2981–3003.CrossRef
Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97.
Choi, J. K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318(5850), 636–640.CrossRef
Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological Science, 22(3), 306–313.CrossRef
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.CrossRef
Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446(7137), 794.CrossRef
De Dreu, C. K., Balliet, D., & Halevy, N. (2014). Parochial cooperation in humans: Forms and functions of self-sacrifice in intergroup conflict. Advances in Motivation Science (pp. 1–47). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., & Feith, S. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328(5984), 1408–1411.CrossRef
Dvash, J., Gilam, G., Ben-Ze’ev, A., Hendler, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2010). The envious brain: The neural basis of social comparison. Human Brain Mapping, 31(11), 1741–1750.
Freilich, J. D., Chermak, S. M., Gruenewald, J., Parkin, W. S., & Klein, B. R. (2018). Patterns of fatal extreme-right crime in the United States. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(6), 38–51.
Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2009). What motivates participation in violent political action. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 115–123.CrossRef
Green, D. P., Strolovitch, D. Z., & Wong, J. S. (1998). Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 372–403.CrossRef
Halevy, N., Bornstein, G., & Sagiv, L. (2008). “Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological Science, 19(4), 405–411.CrossRef
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Cohen, T. R., & Bornstein, G. (2010). Relative deprivation and intergroup competition. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(6), 685–700.CrossRef
Halevy, N., Weisel, O., & Bornstein, G. (2012). “In-group love” and “out-group hate” in repeated interaction between groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 188–195.CrossRef
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron, 68(1), 149–160.CrossRef
Heisig, J. P., & Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258–279.CrossRef
Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press.
Jeon, S., Johnson, T., & Robinson, A. L. (2017). Nationalism and social sanctioning across ethnic lines: Experimental evidence from the Kenya-Tanzania Border. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 4(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Kis-Katos, K., Liebert, H., & Schulze, G. G. (2014). On the heterogeneity of terror. European Economic Review, 68, 116–136.CrossRef
Krueger, A. B. (2008). What makes a terrorist. Princeton University Press.
Luo, Y., Eickhoff, S. B., Hétu, S., & Feng, C. (2018). Social comparison in the brain: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies on the downward and upward comparisons. Human Brain Mapping, 39(1), 440–458.CrossRef
Malkki, L. (2018). Left-wing terrorism. Routledge Handbook of Terrorism and Counterterrorism (pp. 87–97). London: Routledge.CrossRef
Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 906.CrossRef
Raihani, N. J., & McAuliffe, K. (2012). Human punishment is motivated by inequity aversion, not a desire for reciprocity. Biology Letters, 8(5), 802–804.CrossRef
Ravndal, J. A. (2016). Right-wing terrorism and violence in Western Europe: Introducing the RTV dataset. Perspectives on Terrorism, 10(3), 2–15.
Rusch, H. (2014). The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: A review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281(1794), 20141539.
Salovey, P., & Rodin, J. (1991). Provoking jealousy and envy: Domain relevance and self-esteem threat. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(4), 395–413.CrossRef
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simunovic, D., Mifune, N., & Yamagishi, T. (2013). Preemptive strike: An experimental study of fear-based aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1120–1123.CrossRef
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Solnick, S. J., & Hemenway, D. (1998). Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37(3), 373–383.CrossRef
Takahashi, H., Kato, M., Matsuura, M., Mobbs, D., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2009). When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: Neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude. Science, 323(5916), 937–939.CrossRef
Varaine, S. (2018). Bad times are not good times for revolutions: Collective deprivation and the mobilization level of French radical movements (1882–1980). Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 258–271.CrossRef
Varaine, S. (2019). Revisiting the economics and terrorism nexus: Collective deprivation, ideology and domestic radicalization in the US (1948–2016). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 667–699.CrossRef
Weisel, O., & Böhm, R. (2015). “Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 110–120.CrossRef
Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M., & Swann, W. B. (2014). Brothers in Arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences unites States of America, 111(50), 17783–17785.CrossRef
Yamagishi, T., & Mifune, N. (2016). Parochial altruism: does it explain modern human group psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 39–43.CrossRef
Zack-Williams, A. B. (2001). Child soldiers in the civil war in Sierra Leone. Review of African Political Economy, 28(87), 73–82.CrossRef
Zizzo, D. J. (2003). Money burning and rank egalitarianism with random dictators. Economics Letters, 81(2), 263–266.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Attacking the Weak or the Strong? An Experiment on the Targets of Parochial Altruism
Authors
Simon Varaine
Ismaël Benslimane
Raul Magni-Berton
Paolo Crosetto
Publication date
16-03-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09696-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Political Behavior 1/2023 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting

Original Paper

When are Explicit Racial Appeals Accepted? Examining the Role of Racial Status Threat

Original Paper

Elections, Party Rhetoric, and Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe

Original Paper

The Gender Backlash in the Vote for Brexit

Original Paper

Is a Rational Politics of Disaster Possible? Making Useful Decisions for Others in an Experimental Disaster Game

Original Paper

In Need of the Devil’s Advocate? The Impact of Cross-Cutting Exposure on Political Discussion