Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare 4/2016

09-12-2015 | Original Paper

Bargaining, conditional consistency, and weighted lexicographic Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions

Author: Bram Driesen

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare | Issue 4/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We reconsider the class of weighted Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions of Dubra (Econ Lett 73:131–136, 2001), and using methods of Imai (Econometrica 51:389–401, 1983), extend their characterization to the domain of multilateral bargaining problems. Aside from standard axioms in the literature, this result involves a new property that weakens the axiom Bilateral Consistency (Lensberg, J Econ Theory 45:330–341, 1988), by making the notion of consistency dependent on how ideal values in a reduced problem change relative to the original problem.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Lensberg calls this axiom Bilateral Stability.
 
2
This claim is more carefully motivated in Sect. 2.3.1.
 
3
These papers provide non-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash solution (Nash 1950; Harsanyi and Selten, 1972; Kalai 1977a).
 
4
Vector inequalities: \(\geqq \), \(\ge \), \(>\).
 
5
Inclusion is denoted \(\subseteq \), and strict inclusion \(\subset \).
 
6
For \(N\in \mathcal {N}\) and \(S\in \Sigma ^{N}\), the Nash solution (Nash 1950) is defined as the unique maximizer of \(\prod _{i\in N}x_{i}\) on \(S\cap \mathbb {R}^{N}_{+}\). A proportional solution is defined as \(\beta ^{*}w\) where w is some vector in \(\mathbb {R}^{N}_{++}\), and \(\beta ^{*}:=\max \{\beta \mid \beta w\in S\}\). The Kalai-Smorodinsky solution (Kalai and Smorodinsky 1975) is defined as \(K(S):=\beta ^{*}u(S)\), where \(\beta ^{*}:=\max \{\beta \mid \beta u(S)\in S\}\). The Raiffa solution is defined as the (possibly infinite) sum \(\frac{1}{|N|}u(S)+\frac{1}{|N|}u(S-\frac{1}{|N|}u(S))+\frac{1}{|N|}u(S-\frac{1}{|N|}u(S)-\frac{1}{|N|}u(S-\frac{1}{|N|}u(S)))+\ldots \).
 
7
See also Luce and Raiffa (1957, p. 133).
 
8
Peters et al. refer to reduced problems as reduced games.
 
9
Given \(N\in \mathcal {N}\) and \(V\subset \mathbb {R}^{N}\), \(cch\, V\) denotes the convex comprehensive hull of (the points in) V. It is defined as the intersection of all convex and comprehensive sets in \(\mathbb {R}^{N}\) that contain (the points in) V.
 
10
See the solution D, defined in Sect. 4.1.
 
11
This proof is included in the Appendix.
 
12
Parts (i) and (ii) of Lemma 3.5 respectively correspond with Lemmas 3 and 8 of Imai (1983, pp. 395, 397).
 
13
For all \(Q,N\in \mathcal {N}\) with \(Q\subset N\) and \(|Q|=2\), and for all \(S\in \Sigma ^{N}\).
 
14
It is not known in general whether Imai’s (1983) lexicographic Kalai-Smorodinsky solution – and by extension, the weighted generalizations considered in this paper—can be characterized on this smaller domain.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anbarci N, Sun C (2013) Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions: a simple Nash program. Econ. Lett. 120:211–214CrossRef Anbarci N, Sun C (2013) Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions: a simple Nash program. Econ. Lett. 120:211–214CrossRef
go back to reference Bossert W (1993) An alternative solution to bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. 25:205–220CrossRef Bossert W (1993) An alternative solution to bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. 25:205–220CrossRef
go back to reference Britz V, Herings JJ, Predtetchinski A (2010) Non-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash bargaining solution. J. Econ. Theory 145:1951–1967CrossRef Britz V, Herings JJ, Predtetchinski A (2010) Non-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash bargaining solution. J. Econ. Theory 145:1951–1967CrossRef
go back to reference Chang C, Hwang Y (1999) A characterization of the leximin solution of the bargaining problem. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 49:395–400CrossRef Chang C, Hwang Y (1999) A characterization of the leximin solution of the bargaining problem. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 49:395–400CrossRef
go back to reference Chang C, Liang M (1998) A characterization of the lexicographic Kalai-Smorodinsky solution for \(n=3\). Math. Soc. Sci. 35:307–319CrossRef Chang C, Liang M (1998) A characterization of the lexicographic Kalai-Smorodinsky solution for \(n=3\). Math. Soc. Sci. 35:307–319CrossRef
go back to reference Chen M (2000) Individual monotonicity and the leximin solution. Econ. Theory 15:353–365 Chen M (2000) Individual monotonicity and the leximin solution. Econ. Theory 15:353–365
go back to reference Chun Y, Peters H (1989a) The lexicographic egalitarian solution. Cahiers du C.E.R.O 30:149–156 Chun Y, Peters H (1989a) The lexicographic egalitarian solution. Cahiers du C.E.R.O 30:149–156
go back to reference Chun Y, Peters H (1989b) Lexicographic monotone path solutions. OR Spektrum 11:43–47 Chun Y, Peters H (1989b) Lexicographic monotone path solutions. OR Spektrum 11:43–47
go back to reference Chun Y, Peters H (1991) The lexicographic equal-loss solution. Math. Soc. Sci. 22:151–161CrossRef Chun Y, Peters H (1991) The lexicographic equal-loss solution. Math. Soc. Sci. 22:151–161CrossRef
go back to reference Chun Y, Thomson W (1992) Bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. 24:19–33CrossRef Chun Y, Thomson W (1992) Bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. 24:19–33CrossRef
go back to reference del Carmen MGM (1995) Efficient solutions for bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. 30:57–69CrossRef del Carmen MGM (1995) Efficient solutions for bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. 30:57–69CrossRef
go back to reference Driesen B (2012) Proportional concessions and the leximin solution. Econ. Lett. 114:288–291CrossRef Driesen B (2012) Proportional concessions and the leximin solution. Econ. Lett. 114:288–291CrossRef
go back to reference Dubra J (2001) An asymmetric Kalai-Smorodinsky solution. Econ. Lett. 73:131–136CrossRef Dubra J (2001) An asymmetric Kalai-Smorodinsky solution. Econ. Lett. 73:131–136CrossRef
go back to reference Harsanyi J (1959) A bargaining model for the cooperative \(n\)-person game. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contributions to the theory of games IV. Princeton University Press, Princeton Harsanyi J (1959) A bargaining model for the cooperative \(n\)-person game. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contributions to the theory of games IV. Princeton University Press, Princeton
go back to reference Imai H (1983) Individual monotonicity and lexicographic maxmin solution. Econometrica 51:389–401CrossRef Imai H (1983) Individual monotonicity and lexicographic maxmin solution. Econometrica 51:389–401CrossRef
go back to reference Kalai E (1977a) Nonsymmetric Nash solutions and replications of 2-person bargaining. Int. J. Game Theory 6:129–133CrossRef Kalai E (1977a) Nonsymmetric Nash solutions and replications of 2-person bargaining. Int. J. Game Theory 6:129–133CrossRef
go back to reference Kalai E (1977b) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45:1623–1630CrossRef Kalai E (1977b) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45:1623–1630CrossRef
go back to reference Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43:513–518CrossRef Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43:513–518CrossRef
go back to reference Laruelle A, Valenciano F (2008) Non-cooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley–Shubik index. Games Econ. Behav. 63:341–353CrossRef Laruelle A, Valenciano F (2008) Non-cooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley–Shubik index. Games Econ. Behav. 63:341–353CrossRef
go back to reference Lensberg T (1988) Stability and the Nash solution. J. Econ. Theory 45:330–341CrossRef Lensberg T (1988) Stability and the Nash solution. J. Econ. Theory 45:330–341CrossRef
go back to reference Luce D, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. Wiley, New York Luce D, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Nieto J (1992) The lexicographic egalitarian solution on economic environments. Soc. Choice Welf. 9:203–212CrossRef Nieto J (1992) The lexicographic egalitarian solution on economic environments. Soc. Choice Welf. 9:203–212CrossRef
go back to reference Peters H, Tijs S, Zarzuelo J (1994) A reduced-game property for the Kalai-Smorodinsky and egalitarian bargaining solutions. Math. Soc. Sci. 27:11–18CrossRef Peters H, Tijs S, Zarzuelo J (1994) A reduced-game property for the Kalai-Smorodinsky and egalitarian bargaining solutions. Math. Soc. Sci. 27:11–18CrossRef
go back to reference Raiffa H (1953) Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. In: Kuhn H, Tucker A (eds) Contributions to the Theory of Games II, vol 28., Annals of Mathematics StudiesPrinceton University Press, Princeton, pp 361–387 Raiffa H (1953) Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. In: Kuhn H, Tucker A (eds) Contributions to the Theory of Games II, vol 28., Annals of Mathematics StudiesPrinceton University Press, Princeton, pp 361–387
go back to reference Roth A (1977) Independence of irrelevant alternatives, and solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. J. Econ. Theory 16:247–251CrossRef Roth A (1977) Independence of irrelevant alternatives, and solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. J. Econ. Theory 16:247–251CrossRef
go back to reference Roth A (1979) An impossibility result concerning \(n\)-person bargaining games. Int. J. Game Theory 8:129–132CrossRef Roth A (1979) An impossibility result concerning \(n\)-person bargaining games. Int. J. Game Theory 8:129–132CrossRef
go back to reference Thomson W, Lensberg T (1989) Axiomatic theory of bargaining with a variable number of agents. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Thomson W, Lensberg T (1989) Axiomatic theory of bargaining with a variable number of agents. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bargaining, conditional consistency, and weighted lexicographic Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions
Author
Bram Driesen
Publication date
09-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Electronic ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-015-0936-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Social Choice and Welfare 4/2016 Go to the issue