Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

25. Beidhändig führen

Author : Julien Nussbaum

Published in: Leadership und People Management

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Der Führung kommt in ambidextren bzw. beidhändigen Organisationen, die simultan und mit gleicher Gewandtheit sowohl ihr gegenwärtiges Kerngeschäft als auch ihr zukunftsorientiertes Innovationsgeschäft vorantreiben, eine tragende Rolle zu. Ambidextrie – die Fähigkeit, Exploration und Exploitation gleichzeitig zu verfolgen – stellt heute mehr denn je eine zentrale Voraussetzung dafür dar, dass Unternehmen sowohl kurz- als auch langfristig wettbewerbsfähig und somit erfolgreich sein können. Das simultane Verfolgen von Exploration und Exploitation ist aufgrund der gegensätzlichen Anforderungen der beiden Orientierungen jedoch kein einfaches Unterfangen und stellt besonders Führungskräfte vor neue Herausforderungen, denen klassische Führungsansätze nur ungenügend Rechnung tragen. In den vergangenen Jahren haben Forschende deshalb intensiv untersucht, welche Führungsstile, -praktiken und -merkmale sich in solchen Kontexten am effektivsten erweisen, und darauf aufbauend das Konzept der ambidextren Führung entwickelt. Dieses Konzept wird im folgenden Kapitel vorgestellt und anhand verschiedener Ansätze beleuchtet. Im Fokus steht dabei die Frage, wie Führungskräfte auf unterschiedlichen Hierarchiestufen Beidhändigkeit in Teams, Abteilungen oder gesamten Organisationen ermöglichen und fördern können, um so die widersprüchlichen Anforderungen, mit denen sie immer häufiger konfrontiert sind, in Einklang zu bringen.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.CrossRef Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.CrossRef
go back to reference Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
go back to reference Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.CrossRef Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–317.CrossRef Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, 58(4), 36–58.CrossRef Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, 58(4), 36–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Bledow, R., Frese, M., & Mueller, V. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership for innovation: The influence of culture. In W. H. Mobley, M. Li, & Y. Wang (Hrsg.), Advances in global leadership (Bd. 6, S. 41–69). Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRef Bledow, R., Frese, M., & Mueller, V. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership for innovation: The influence of culture. In W. H. Mobley, M. Li, & Y. Wang (Hrsg.), Advances in global leadership (Bd. 6, S. 41–69). Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRef Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. Slevin (Hrsg.), The management of organizational design: Strategies and implementation (S. 167–188). North Holland. Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. Slevin (Hrsg.), The management of organizational design: Strategies and implementation (S. 167–188). North Holland.
go back to reference Duwe, J. (2018). Beidhändige Führung. Wie Sie als Führungskraft in großen Organisationen Innovationssprünge ermöglichen. Springer Gabler. Duwe, J. (2018). Beidhändige Führung. Wie Sie als Führungskraft in großen Organisationen Innovationssprünge ermöglichen. Springer Gabler.
go back to reference Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.CrossRef Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.CrossRef Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.CrossRef
go back to reference Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRef Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRef
go back to reference He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration and exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.CrossRef He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration and exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.CrossRef
go back to reference Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982–1007.CrossRef Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982–1007.CrossRef
go back to reference Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18.CrossRef Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.CrossRef Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.CrossRef
go back to reference Kassotaki, O. (2019). Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations. European Management Journal, 37(5), 552–563.CrossRef Kassotaki, O. (2019). Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations. European Management Journal, 37(5), 552–563.CrossRef
go back to reference Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.CrossRef Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.CrossRef Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.CrossRef
go back to reference March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRef March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Mom, T. J. M., Chang, Y.-Y., Cholakova, M., & Jansen, J. J. P. (2019). A multilevel integrated framework of firm HR practices, individual ambidexterity, and organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management, 45(7), 3009–3034.CrossRef Mom, T. J. M., Chang, Y.-Y., Cholakova, M., & Jansen, J. J. P. (2019). A multilevel integrated framework of firm HR practices, individual ambidexterity, and organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management, 45(7), 3009–3034.CrossRef
go back to reference Mueller, J., Renzl, B., & Will, M. G. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership: A meta-review applying static and dynamic multi-level perspectives. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 37–59.CrossRef Mueller, J., Renzl, B., & Will, M. G. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership: A meta-review applying static and dynamic multi-level perspectives. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 37–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 19–33.CrossRef Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 19–33.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.CrossRef O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.CrossRef
go back to reference Probst, G., Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 40(4), 326–334.CrossRef Probst, G., Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 40(4), 326–334.CrossRef
go back to reference Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass. Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.CrossRef Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.CrossRef
go back to reference Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.CrossRef Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974.CrossRef Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974.CrossRef
go back to reference Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894.CrossRef Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
go back to reference Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.CrossRef Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). „Both/and“ leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 62–70. Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). „Both/and“ leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 62–70.
go back to reference Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317–332.CrossRef Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317–332.CrossRef
go back to reference Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.CrossRef Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222. Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222.
go back to reference Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., & Binns, A. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 74–80. Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., & Binns, A. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 74–80.
go back to reference Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222–240.CrossRef Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222–240.CrossRef
go back to reference West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Hrsg.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. John Wiley & Sons. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Hrsg.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. John Wiley & Sons.
go back to reference Yukl, G. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 49–53.CrossRef Yukl, G. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 49–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 54–68.CrossRef Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 54–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2014). Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24–46.CrossRef Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2014). Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Cardinal, L. B. (2018). Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: A configurational perspective on ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 739–769.CrossRef Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Cardinal, L. B. (2018). Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: A configurational perspective on ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 739–769.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Beidhändig führen
Author
Julien Nussbaum
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35521-0_25

Premium Partner