Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Human Studies
Published in: Human Studies 4/2019

04-02-2019 | Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Beyond Postphenomenolgy: Ihde’s Heidegger and the Problem of Authenticity

Author: Wessel Reijers

Published in: Human Studies | Issue 4/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The quickening pace of technological development on a global scale and its increasing impact on the relation between human beings and their lifeworld has led to a surge in philosophical discussions concerning technology. Philosophy of technology after the “empirical turn” has been dominated by three approaches: actor-network theory, critical theory of technology and postphenomenology. Recently, scholars have started to question the philosophical roots of these approaches. This paper critically questions Ihde’s early adoption of Heidegger’s philosophy of technology in postphenomenology. First, the paper clarifies the central contributions of Heidegger’s philosophy of technology to postphenomenology. It then uses Heidegger’s early work on Aristotle to argue that Ihde’s notion of “use context” is based on a distorted account of Heidegger’s notion of the “totality of relevance”. Correspondingly, it contends that this has led to a misinterpretation of Heidegger’s technology critique. Second, an alternative reading of Heidegger’s ideas concerning technology is offered. This reading traces Heidegger’s use of the concept of telos in the totality of relevance to his discussion of Aristotelian virtue. It is subsequently shown how the question of the temporality of the mode of being of virtue is related to the notion of authenticity, which lies at the heart of Heidegger’s philosophy. Finally, the paper argues that postphenomenology could gain from philosophers who targeted Heidegger’s central notion of authenticity, notably Arendt and Ricoeur.
previous article The Intensity of Lived-Experience in Martin Heidegger’s Basic Problems of Phenomenology (WS 1919/2020): A Comparison to Being and Time
next article Seeing Through the Fumes: Technology and Asymmetry in the Anthropocene

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Feenberg engaged with Heidegger in length as well, but his interpretation has already thoroughly been critiqued by Thompson (2005). Latour, in contrast, rarely engages with Heidegger in his work.
 
2
Surprisingly, Ihde does not confront Aristotle directly in his work, but he makes it abundantly clear that he is trying to revive the Aristotelian “praxis-philosophies” as the basis for his philosophy of technology. In the Introduction of Technics and Praxis, Ihde explicitly states: “It will be noted here that I have left out the Aristotelian tradition. This is purposeful in that it was precisely against what was taken as Aristotelian that early modern philosophy reacted. What I intend to pair here is the dominant contemporary situation with its ancient roots”.
 
3
Ihde’s strategy in setting up his postphenomenological programme can basically be derived from his interpretation of Husserl’s notion of the intentional arc (ego-cognising-world), reinterpreted through the Heideggerian notion of the praxical as the basis for this intentional arc, therefore restating is as (human-technology-world) (Ihde1979: 116f.).
 
4
It should be noted that for Ihde, human-technology-world relation seems to be the equivalent of a human-technology-world context. For instance, while discussing embodiment relations, he argues: “I call this first set of existential technological relations with the world embodiment relations, because in this use context I take the technologies into my experiencing in a particular way by way of perceiving through such technologies and through the reflexive transformation of my perceptual and body sense” (Ihde 1990: 72).
 
5
“Technology” is more consistently used by Stiegler who defines it as a “discourse on technics” (Stiegler 1998: 93).
 
6
As Brogan shows, the virtues are implicitly present in Being and Time in the form of some of Heidegger’s central German concepts. Especially care (Sorge) is argued to be derived from Heidegger’s interpretation of Aristotle’s phronêsis (Brogan 2005: 19).
 
7
Aristotle argues: “there is virtue [or vice] in the use of craft, but not [in the use] of prudence,” which implies that the use of prudence always involves virtue, and that, in contrast to prudence: “in a craft, someone who makes errors voluntarily is more choiceworthy” (NE, 6.5, 1140b23-26, trans. Irwin—emphasis added).
 
8
Poeisis and praxis, as those activities that admit for being otherwise, are limited by phusis (as self-producing) on the side of poeisis (Heidegger 2009: 55) and by “Gelassenheit”—“higher acting” and “awaiting” (Pezze 2006: 110) on the side of praxis.
 
9
It should be noted as well that in Heidegger we can distinguish three different meanings of “world”: (1) an ultimate totalising horizon, (2) a concrete lifeworld (or “work-world”) or (3) a historical epoch (Bartky 1979: 213). It is unclear to which of these three meanings Ihde refers.
 
10
Moreover, Heidegger states that the way of revealing of enframing blocks poeisis (Heidegger 1977: 30), which indicates that he did not intend to make his concepts “collapse” into one-another.
 
11
Similar to Ihde, Verbeek also inadequately deals with this point. Initially, Verbeek’s criticism of Heidegger’s philosophy of technology is appealing, when he states that we should question whether to accept Heidegger’s claim that in the modern epoch enframing is the only way in which technological devices bring the real into unconcealment (Verbeek 2005: 66). His reasons for this questioning, however, are inadequate because he mostly plays on the reader’s intuition (e.g., by stating rhetorically: “medical technologies interpreting the body as standing reserve certainly have to do with care as well?”), without challenging Heidegger’s notion of “challenging into ordering”.
 
12
As Thompson argues, in reply to Feenberg’s criticism of Heidegger, Heidegger understands technology ontologically, but also understands ontology historically (Thomson 2005: 58).
 
13
Only in its “narrow sense” does action oppose production (Heidegger 2009: 127). That is, in “theoria”—“the mere treating of something in the sense of debating it”—praxis can lose the character of poeisis (Heidegger 2009: 146).
 
14
As Heidegger asserts: “the technê, the method, that is related to beings as political animals, is the political science, this knowing-one’s-way-around in the being of human beings that is determined as being-with-one-another” (Heidegger 2009: 48).
 
15
Similar to MacIntyre, Heidegger argues that a person’s virtue consists in having a good at one’s disposal in undertaking an activity. However, Heidegger’s notion of a good diverges from MacIntyre’s in that it from the outset does not admit for a distinction between goods “internal” or “external” to any particular activity. For Heidegger—contra MacIntyre—there is no “good in itself” and a good always refers to a limit of praxis, understood as a “being-completed” of praxis.
 
16
As a related determination of technical practice, we have to connect virtue with the mean (meson), which entails that, as a mode of being, virtue is “maintaining the mean”. Just as the mode of ready-to-hand, Heidegger approaches the mean initially through pragmata, through “things,” not insofar as things in general have an “average” mode of being, but insofar things mean something to human-beings (they “matter”) in the sense of being “not too much nor too little” (Heidegger 2009: 125).
 
17
A primary example of political action for Arendt is the American Revolution, which she argues constituted a radical new beginning (Arendt 1958: 228).
 
18
Considerations of space and scope for this paper do not allow me to go into the intricacies of Ricoeur’s (1988) outstanding critique of Heidegger’s notion of temporality. Suffice it to say, in brief, that he attacks Heidegger’s notion of ordinary time, the time of everydayness, by arguing that ordinary time does not solely result from a process of ‘levelling off’ of authentic temporality through datability, lapse of time, and the publicness of time of preoccupation (Ricoeur 1988: 84), but also from human apprehension of cosmic movement. He thereby denies the possibility of phenomenology to offer a unified account of temporality, and instead puts phenomenology’s notion of temporality, that ultimately appeals to a time of the soul, in an unresolvable tension with world time, that ultimately appeals to the movement of celestial bodies. Human time, according to Ricoeur, can only be understood as mediating between these two contrasting temporalities, through the narrative mode. Authenticity is therefore never completely attained, but can only be approached in an open-ended fashion.
 
Literature
Achterhuis, H. (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Bartky, S. L. (1979). Heidegger and the modes of world-disclosure. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,40(2), 212–236.CrossRef
Brogan, W. (2005). Heidegger and Aristotle: The twofoldness of being (Vol. 5). New York: SUNY Press.
Dottori, R. (2009). The concept of phronesis by aristotle and the beginning of hermeneutic philosophy. Ethics & Politics,1, 301–310.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.
Gransche, B. (2017). The art of staging simulations: Mise-en-scene, social impact and simulation literacy. The science and art of simulation I: Exploring-understanding-knowing (pp. 33–50). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Graland Publishing Inc.
Heidegger, M. (1996). In J. Stambaugh (Ed.), Being and time. New York: State University of New York Press.
Heidegger, M. (2009). Basic concepts of Aristotelian philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hemming, L. P. (1998). Speaking out of turn: Martin Heidegger and die Kehre. International Journal of Philosophical Studies,6(3), 393–423.CrossRef
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and Praxis (Vol. 33). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental realism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology: Essays in the postmodern context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Inwood, M. (1997). Heidegger, A very short introduction. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Porter, C. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Pezze, B. D. (2006). Heidegger on Gelassenheit. Minerva-An Internet Journal of Philosophy,10, 94–122.
Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Romele, A. (2017). Imaginative machines. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology,22(1), 98–125.
Rosales, A. (1984). Zum Problem der Kehre im Denken Heideggers. Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung,38(2), 241–262.
Selinger, E. (2006). Postphenomenology: A critical companion to Ihde. New York: State University of New York Press.
Sinclair, M. (2005). On Heidegger’s account of equipment in being and time as metaphysics in its repetition. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology,36(3), 237–257.CrossRef
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Thomson, I. (2005). Heidegger on ontotheology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do; Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.
Metadata
Title
Beyond Postphenomenolgy: Ihde’s Heidegger and the Problem of Authenticity
Author
Wessel Reijers
Publication date
04-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Human Studies / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0163-8548
Electronic ISSN: 1572-851X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09492-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Human Studies 4/2019 Go to the issue

Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

The Intensity of Lived-Experience in Martin Heidegger’s Basic Problems of Phenomenology (WS 1919/2020): A Comparison to Being and Time

Empirical Study/Analysis

Experimental Philosophy, Ethnomethodology, and Intentional Action: A Textual Analysis of the Knobe Effect

Empirical Study / Analysis

“Hearability” Versus “Hearership”: Comparing Garfinkel’s and Schegloff’s Accounts of the Summoning Phone

Book Review

Serene Khader: Decolonizing Universalism: A Transnational Feminist Ethic

Theoretical/Philosophical Paper

Freud and Heidegger on the ‘Origins’ of Sexuality

Book Review

Andrew J. Mitchell and Peter Trawny (Eds): Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: Responses to Anti-semitism