Top

Journal of Business Ethics

Published in:

01-04-2014

Beyond Stakeholder Utility Function: Stakeholder Capability in the Value Creation Process

Author: Elisabet Garriga

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 4/2014

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In spite of the thousands of articles on stakeholder theory, research on value creation has had a shorter history and narrower breadth. Only a few studies have researched value creation from stakeholder perspective looking at how stakeholders appropiate value or the processes or activities by which stakeholders create value. Consequently to date, certain questions still remain unanswered regarding how a firm should treat stakeholders in order to create value. Several questions arise specifically from the stakeholder's side: What does "value" mean for a particular group of stakeholders and how do firms create these different types of value? How do we measure the value created by stakeholders? The purpose of this paper is to answer these questions from Amartya Sen's Capability Approach, identifying and measuring stakeholders' capabilities in the value creation process. Stakeholder Capability is the adequate concept for understanding stakeholder welfare rather than the utility function concept. The empirical evidence comes from an in-depth case study of the company The Grobo Group and its stakeholders. According to the results, the following stakeholder capabilities are relevant to value creation: being employable, being autonomus, being innovative, being entreprenurial, being responsive, being socially integrated, being emphatic, being "green" and being healthy.

previous article Expanding Workers’ ‘Moral Space’: A Liberal Critique of Corporate Capitalism

next article Mediatized Humanitarianism: Trust and Legitimacy in the Age of Suspicion

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

This paper focuses on stakeholder theory as it was conceptualsed as a strategic management theory (Freeman 1984). Stakeholder theory is mainly concerned on value creation and trade, and not on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (Freeman et al., 2010; Harrison et al., 2010).

My focus will be on value creation and not on value appropriation. Lepak et al. (2007) and Coff (1999) amongst others have distinguished two sides: value creation and value appropriation. In this paper, my focus will be only on the value creation side and not on value appropriation.

I do not consider any type of distinction (if stakeholder theory may be normative, instrumental or descriptive) in my approach to value creation because this distinction supports the separation thesis (Jones et al. 2002; Scherer and Patzer 2011). Freeman et al. (2010) has proposed an integration thesis for the value creation process and a pragmatic approach.

Please checked at http//:www.losgrobo.com.ar

Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative measures of human agency. Social Indicators Research, 45, 78–98.

Anand, P., & van Hess, M. (2006). Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 268–284.CrossRef

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equations modelling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRef

Barney, J. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.CrossRef

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRef

Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677–687.CrossRef

Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447–456.CrossRef

Bowan, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy, British Journal of Management, 11, 1–15.

Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2007). Firm value creation and levels of strategy. Management Decision, 45(3), 360–371.CrossRef

Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2010). How value is created, captured and destroyed. European Business Review, 22, 5479–5495.CrossRef

Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(2), 119–133.CrossRef

Coff, R. W. (2010). The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 711–733.

Di Tomasso, M. L. (2007). Children capabilities: A structural equation model for India. Journal of Socio Economics, 36, 436–450.CrossRef

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–555.

Ford, J., McCallum, R., & Tant, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis on applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291–314.CrossRef

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Freeman, E., Harrison, J. E., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Freeman, E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–4.

Gaertner, W. (1993). Amartya Sen: Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 62–67). New York: Clarendon Press.CrossRef

Giovanola, B. (2009). Rethinking the anthropological and ethical foundation of economics and business: Human richness and capabilities enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 431–444.CrossRef

Glaser, B., & Strauss, M. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (1997). Strategy as action. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2009). Stakeholder theory and competitive advantage. Paper presented at the Best Academy of Management Proceedings, Philadelphia, PA.

Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.CrossRef

Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–438.

Jones, T., Wicks, A., & Freeman, R. E. (2002). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. In N. Bowie (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to business ethics (pp. 19–37). Oxford: Blackwell.

Jones, T., & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206–222.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.CrossRef

Krishnakumar, J., & Ballon, P. (2008). Estimating basic capabilities: A structural equation model applied to Bolivia. World Development, 36(6), 992–1023.CrossRef

Kuklys, W. (2005). Measurement and determinants of welfare achievement—Evidence from the UK. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194.CrossRef

Nusbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. New York: Oxford Clarendon Press.CrossRef

Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press.

Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.CrossRef

Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219–235.CrossRef

Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.CrossRef

Renouard, C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 85–97.CrossRef

Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities’. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.CrossRef

Robeyns, I. (2005). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74, 191–215.CrossRef

Rowley, T., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder group act? An interest and identity based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28, 204–230.

Scherer, A. G., & Patzer, M. (2011). Where is the theory in stakeholder theory? A meta-analysis of the pluralism in stakeholder theory. In R. A. Philips (Ed.), Stakeholder Theory: impact and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (2003). On ethics and economics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Stabell, C., & Fjeldstad, O. (1998). Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 413–431.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Walsh, J. P. (2005). Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426–438.CrossRef

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. New York: Sage.

Title: Beyond Stakeholder Utility Function: Stakeholder Capability in the Value Creation Process
Author: Elisabet Garriga
Publication date: 01-04-2014
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2001-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

CSR and the Mediated Emergence of Strategic Ambiguity

Beyond Legitimacy: A Case Study in BP’s “Green Lashing”

Organizations as Human Communities and Internal Markets: Searching for Duality

Grounding Positive Duties in Commercial Life

Editorial: The Caring Organisation

The Corporation as Citoyen? Towards a New Understanding of Corporate Citizenship