Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Interplays of Sustainability, Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Blockchain for Good? Digital Ledger Technology and Sustainable Development Goals

Authors : Richard Adams, Beth Kewell, Glenn Parry

Published in: Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Blockchain technology (aka Distributed Ledger Technology or DLT) is a novel configuration of Peer-to-Peer, cryptographic and distributed computing technologies that have the potential to shift the internet from an internet of information to an internet of value network, with significant disruptive potential. To date, the cryptocurrency ‘bitcoin’ is the application of DLT that has attracted most attention, not all of it favourable. However, DLTs are about much more than cryptocurrencies and, as Kranzberg’s (1986) first law of technology, that ‘Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral’ reminds us, we can ethically frame applications of new technologies. To date, research has tended to focus on the technical characteristics of DLTs, and there has been little reflection on potential socially and environmentally beneficial use cases: Blockchain for Good (B4G). The aim of this this exploratory and descriptive paper is to reflect on innovative B4G applications that could help deliver socially and environmentally beneficial outcomes, framed in terms of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, through challenging existing business models and providing new opportunities for value creation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter The Teaching Green Building: Five Theoretical Perspectives
next chapter Psychological Distance and Response to Human Versus Non-Human Victims of Climate Change
Footnotes
1
See, for example http://​www.​r3cev.​com/​ R3 is a financial innovation firm managing a consortium of some of the world's leading financial institutions to design and deliver DLTs to the global financial markets.
 
3
Immutable to the extent that that particular blockchain continues to be maintained. It is not clear what happens in the circumstance that the blockchain ceases to continue.
 
4
Anyone, subject to, of course, the nature of the permissions.
 
5
For more details on mining, see Antonopoulos, A.M. (2014). Mastering Bitcoin: unlocking digital cryptocurrencies, O'Reilly Media, Inc.; Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy, O'Reilly Media, Inc., and: http://​www.​coindesk.​com/​information/​how-bitcoin-mining-works/​.
 
Literature
Adams, R., Parry, G., Godsiff, P., & Ward, P. (2017). Editorial: The future of money and further applications of the blockchain. Strategic change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance.
Ajana, B. (2010). Recombinant identities: Biometrics and narrative bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 7, 237–258.CrossRef
Ali, R., Barrdear, J., Clews, R., & Southgate, J. (2014). Innovations in payment technologies and the emergence of digital currencies. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 54(3), 262–275.
Birch, D. (2014). Identity is the new money. London Publishing Partnership.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. HarperBusiness.
Buterin, V. (2014). DAOs, DACs, DAS and more: An incomplete terminology guide.
Casalotti, A. (2016). Global carbon trading on the blockchain. Bitcoin and blockchain leadership forum.
CPTM. (2016). Commonwealth partnership for technology management (CPTM) brief on “Adaptive flexibility approaches to financial inclusion in a digital age: Recommendations and proposals”. London: CPTM Smart Partners’ Hub.
Dahan, M., & Gelb, A. (2015). The role of identification in the post-2015 development agenda. World Bank Working Paper 2015.
De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41, 614–623.CrossRef
Dierksmeier, C., & Seele, P. (2016). Cryptocurrencies and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14.
Doguet, J. (2013). The nature of the form: Legal and regulatory issues surrounding Bitcoin digital currency system. Louisiana Law Review, 73(4), 1118–1153.
Fish, J. N., & Priest, J. B. (2011). Identity structures: Holons, boundaries, hierarchies, and the formation of the collaborative identity. The Family Journal, 19, 182–190.CrossRef
Fox-Brewster, T. (2015). How hackers abused tor to rob blockchain, steal bitcoin, target private email and get away with it. Forbes, 24(2), 7.
Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11, 227–235.CrossRef
Helbing, D. (2013). Economics 2.0: The natural step towards a self-regulating, participatory market society. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 10, 3–41.CrossRef
Helbing, D. (2014). Qualified money-a better financial system for the future. Available at SSRN 2526022.
Huckle, S., Bhattacharya, R., White, M., & Beloff, N. (2016). Internet of things, blockchain and shared economy applications. Procedia Computer Science, 98, 461–466.CrossRef
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General purpose technologies. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 1181–1224.CrossRef
Koestler, A. (1968). The ghost in the machine. Oxford, England: Macmillan.
Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history:” Kranzberg’s laws”. Technology and Culture, 27, 544–560.CrossRef
Lemieux, P. (2013) Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? Regulation, Fall 36, 14–15.
Majchrzak, A., & Markus, L. (2012). Technology affordances and constraint theory of MIS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Malhotra, A., & Van Alstyne, M. (2014). The dark side of the sharing economy… and how to lighten it. Communications of the ACM, 57, 24–27.CrossRef
Martin, C. J. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149–159.CrossRef
Mattila, J. (2016). The blockchain phenomenon: The disruptive potential of distributed consensus architectures. http://​brie.​berkeley.​edu/​BRIE/​. Berkeley roundtable on the international economy (BRIE). Berkeley: University of California.
McWaters, R., Galaski, R., & Chaterjee, S. (2016). The future of financial infrastructure: An ambitious look at how blockchain can reshape financial services: World economic forum.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted, 1, 28.
Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices for distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Potts, J., Davidson, S., & De Filippi, P. (2016). Disrupting governance: The new institutional economics of distributed ledger technology. Available at SSRN.
Price, R. (2016). Digital currency ethereum is cratering amid claims of a $ 50 million hack. Business Insider, 17 June, 2016.
Ranson, S., Hinings, B., & Greenwood, R. (1980). The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1–17.CrossRef
Reber, D., & Feuerstein, S. (2014). Bitcoins-hype or real alternative? Internet Economics VIII, 81.
Rizzo, P. (2016). Sweden tests blockchain smart contracts for land registry. CoinDesk, June 16, 2016.
Russell, S. V., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence: An open letter. A association for the advancement of artificial intelligence.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Seidel, S., Recker, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2013). Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: Functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1275–1299.CrossRef
Shin, L. (2016). Republic of georgia to develop blockchain land registry system. Forbes, 21 April.
Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Thebault-Spieker, J., Terveen, L. G., & Hecht, B. (2015). Avoiding the south side and the suburbs: The geography of mobile crowdsourcing markets. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 2015. 265–275.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2007). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. Evidence for policy and practice information and co-ordinating (EPPI-) centre, social science research unit. London: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
UN Millennium Project. (2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. New York: United Nations and Earthscan.
Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37, 819–834.CrossRef
Walport, M. (2016). Distributed ledger technology: Beyond block chain. A report by the UK government chief scientific adviser. Government office for science.
WCED. (1987). Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Welch, A. (2015). The bitcoin blockchain as financial market infrastructure: A consideration of operational risk. Legislation and Public Policy, 18, 837–893.
Wright, A., & De Filippi. P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664.
Zuberi M, & Levin, R. (2016). Schumpeter’s revenge: The gale of creative destruction. Banking and Financial Services Policy Report, 35(5).
Metadata
Title
Blockchain for Good? Digital Ledger Technology and Sustainable Development Goals
Authors
Richard Adams
Beth Kewell
Glenn Parry
Copyright Year
2018
Book
Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67121-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-67122-2

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_7