Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 8/2022

01-12-2022

Blockchain Technology in 5G Networks: Performance Comparison of Private and Public Blockchains

Authors: I. R. Fedorov, A. V. Pimenov, G. A. Panin, S. V. Bezzateev

Published in: Automatic Control and Computer Sciences | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The use of blockchain in 5G networks gives a number of opportunities to improve security, privacy, and quality of service. However, despite all its advantages, blockchain technology has a number of disadvantages associated with low performance and high transaction latency. This article describes an experiment that compares public and private blockchains. The main goal of the experiment is to test the possibility of using private blockchains in mobile networks in order to resolve problems of network performance.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Maharjan, P.S., Performance analysis of blockchain platforms, UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, 2018, p. 3367. Maharjan, P.S., Performance analysis of blockchain platforms, UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, 2018, p. 3367.
7.
go back to reference Dinh, T.T.A., Wang, Ji, Chen, G., Liu, R., and Ooi, B.Ch., BLOCKBENCH: A framework for analyzing private blockchains, SIGMOD ’17: Proc. 2017 ACM Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Chicago, 2017, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3064033. Dinh, T.T.A., Wang, Ji, Chen, G., Liu, R., and Ooi, B.Ch., BLOCKBENCH: A framework for analyzing private blockchains, SIGMOD ’17: Proc. 2017 ACM Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Chicago, 2017, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 1085–1100. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3035918.​3064033.
8.
go back to reference Cooper, B.F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., and Sears, R., Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB, SoCC ’10: Proc. 1st ACM Symp. on Cloud Computing, Indianapolis, 2010, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, pp. 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807128.1807152 Cooper, B.F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., and Sears, R., Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB, SoCC ’10: Proc. 1st ACM Symp. on Cloud Computing, Indianapolis, 2010, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, pp. 143–154.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​1807128.​1807152
9.
go back to reference Coleman, J., What proof of work function does Ethereum use?, 2016. http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/ questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October, 17, 2021. Coleman, J., What proof of work function does Ethereum use?, 2016. http://​ethereum.​stackexchange.​com/​ questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October, 17, 2021.
10.
go back to reference B. F. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with ycsb. In SoCC, 2010. B. F. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with ycsb. In SoCC, 2010.
11.
go back to reference http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October 17, 2021. http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October 17, 2021.
12.
go back to reference Busygin, A. and Kalinin, M., Criterion of blockchain vulnerability to majority attack based on hashing power distribution assessment, Futuristic Trends in Network and Communication Technologies. FTNCT 2020, Singh, P.K., Veselov, G., Vyatkin, V., Pljonkin, A., Dodero, J.M., and Kumar, Y., Eds., Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1395, Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp. 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1480-4_6 Busygin, A. and Kalinin, M., Criterion of blockchain vulnerability to majority attack based on hashing power distribution assessment, Futuristic Trends in Network and Communication Technologies. FTNCT 2020, Singh, P.K., Veselov, G., Vyatkin, V., Pljonkin, A., Dodero, J.M., and Kumar, Y., Eds., Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1395, Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp. 68–77.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-981-16-1480-4_​6
14.
go back to reference Busygin, A., Konoplev, A., Kalinin, M., and Zegzhda, D., Floating genesis block enhancement for blockchain based routing between connected vehicles and software-defined VANET security services, SIN ’18: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Security of Information and Networks, Cardiff, UK, 2018, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264437.3264463 Busygin, A., Konoplev, A., Kalinin, M., and Zegzhda, D., Floating genesis block enhancement for blockchain based routing between connected vehicles and software-defined VANET security services, SIN ’18: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Security of Information and Networks, Cardiff, UK, 2018, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 24.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3264437.​3264463
Metadata
Title
Blockchain Technology in 5G Networks: Performance Comparison of Private and Public Blockchains
Authors
I. R. Fedorov
A. V. Pimenov
G. A. Panin
S. V. Bezzateev
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Pleiades Publishing
Published in
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0146-4116
Electronic ISSN: 1558-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411622080053

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 8/2022 Go to the issue