Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality & Quantity
Published in: Quality & Quantity 4/2018

27-09-2017

Border is better than distance? Contagious corruption in one belt one road economies

Authors: Gen-Fu Feng, Bo Sui, Min-Yi Dong, Chun-xia Jiang, Chun-Ping Chang

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Employing data of one belt one road (OBOR) countries from 2002 to 2013, this study compares the contagious corruption difference between geographic border and distance through the dynamic spatial econometric model. The empirical results not only confirm that corruption in OBOR countries exists under various contagious channels, but also indicate that border effects, serving as contagious channels for corruption, are better than distance effects. The empirical implication is that OBOR countries with a common border tend to possess contagious corruption due to the hosts’ demonstration effect and the convenience of transferring illegal assets. We advise that those OBOR countries should enhance the supervision of cash flow, look for any opportunity of kicking back a portion of the stolen money, and establish a specific task force on corruption.
previous article Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
next article A mathematical approach to study and forecast racial groups interactions: deterministic modeling and scenario method

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Few political economists are concerned about the definition of neighbor in their research on corruption. Anselin and Moreno (2003), Becker et al. (2009), and Márquez et al. (2011) define the average corruption value as neighbors’ corruption, which is the sum of the corruption values of neighbors sharing a common border, and this sum is then divided by the number of neighbors. In addition, Attila (2008) expands the definition of neighbors through geographic distance in order to better represent contagious corruption.
 
2
In order to define the geographic-weighted matrix, we choose land borders rather than maritime borders. Thus, we have to abandon some island countries.
 
3
Anselin (1990) argues for delineating a specified circle area that defines a certain distance as the radius of a circle, which is the rough measure of the spatial-weighted matrix.
 
4
Reviewing the political economic perspective, contagious corruption is possible in the spatial economy. Researchers summarize the institutional characteristics of geographic infection, including democracy (Brinks and Coppedge 2001), liberty (Simmons and Elkins 2004), and policy choice (Meseguer 2006). Inter-communication in the World Bank and OECD accelerates corruption infection (Márquez et al. 2011; Becker et al. 2009; Attila 2008). However, our topic concerns what is an optimal neighbor from the geographic perspective; thus, we focus on which is a better contagious channel between border and distance.
 
5
In line with the viewpoint of Goel and Saunoris (2014), distance is a spherical distance, calculated by the longitude and latitude of the capitals in the OBOR countries.
 
6
The theory is ambiguous on how these factors influence national corruption (La Palombara 1994; Rose-Ackerman and Coolidge 1997; Huntington 1996).
 
7
Regime durability (Durable) might lead to changes in the level of national corruption. In calculating the Durable value, the first year during which a new (post-change) polity is established is coded as the baseline “year zero” (value = 0), and each subsequent year adds one to the value of the Durable variable consecutively until a new regime change or transition period occurs.
 
8
We use diagrams of Moran from the 33 OBOR countries, and Table 4 contains the countries’ full name and abbreviation.
 
9
It is worth noting that apart from spatial-weighted matrix l corruption, all the variables in any econometric specification are defined at the national single country level.
 
10
Although the previous literature argues that higher GDP per capita usually leads to lower corruption, developed countries may not have lower corruption. The various factors of corruption from economy, politics, and society are the main reason. We also discover that all OECD countries are located in quadrant I in the scatter diagram of spatial autocorrelation, meaning some developed countries have higher corruption in the real world.
 
Literature
Abdih, Y., Chami, R., Montiel, J.: Remittances and institutions: Are remittances a curse? World Dev. 40(4), 657–666 (2012)CrossRef
Accinelli, E., Sanchez, C.E.: Corruption driven by imitative behavior. Econ. Lett. 117(1), 84–87 (2012)CrossRef
Ades, A., Di Tella, R.: The causes and consequences of corruption: a review of recent empirical contributions. IDS Bull. 27(2), 6–11 (1996)CrossRef
Ades, A., Di Tella, R.: Rents, competition, and corruption. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(4), 982–993 (1999)CrossRef
Aidt, T.S.: Economic analysis of corruption: a survey. Econ. J. 113(491), 632–652 (2003)CrossRef
Akhter, S.H.: Is globalization what it’s cracked up to be? Economic freedom, corruption, and human development. J. World Bus. 39(3), 283–295 (2004)CrossRef
Anselin, L.: Some robust approaches to testing and estimation in spatial econometrics. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 20(2), 141–163 (1990)CrossRef
Anselin, L., Moreno, R.: Properties of tests for spatial error components. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 33(5), 595–618 (2003)CrossRef
Attila, G.: Is Corruption Contagious? An Econometric Analysis. NUPI Working Paper, 742 (2008)
Azfar, O., Gurgur, T.: Does corruption affect health outcomes in the Philippines? Econ. Gov. 9(3), 197–244 (2008)CrossRef
Batory, A.: Why do anti-corruption laws fail in central eastern europe? A target compliance perspective. Regul. Gov. 6(1), 66–82 (2012)CrossRef
Becker, G.: Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J. Polit. Econ. 76(2), 169–217 (1968)CrossRef
Becker, S.O., Egger, P.H., Seidel, T.: Common political culture: evidence on regional corruption contagion. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 25(3), 300–310 (2009)CrossRef
Bliss, C., Di Tella, R.: Does competition kill corruption? J. Polit. Econ. 105(5), 1001–1023 (1997)CrossRef
Bojnec, Š., Fertő, I.: Effects of globalization and corruption on the outward FDI in OECD countries. Ekonomický časopis 65(3), 201–219 (2017)
Brinks, D., Coppedge, M.: Patterns of Diffusion in The Third Wave of Democracy. Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association. San Fransisco, CA (2001)
Budak, J.: Corruption in croatia: perceptions rise, problems remain. Croat. Econ. Surv. 9, 35–68 (2007)
Celentani, M., Ganuza, J.J.: Corruption and competition in procurement. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46(7), 1273–1303 (2002)CrossRef
Chang, C.P., Hao, Y.: Environmental performance, corruption and economic growth: global evidence using a new data set. Appl. Econ. 49(5), 498–514 (2017)CrossRef
Collier, P., Hoeffler, A.: Resource rents, governance, and conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 49(4), 625–633 (2005)CrossRef
Conley, T.G., Ligon, E.: Economic distance and cross-country spillovers. J. Econ. Growth 7(2), 157–187 (2002)CrossRef
Dettori, B., Marrocu, E., Paci, R.: Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions. Region. Stud. 46(10), 1401–1416 (2012)
Dong, B., Torgler, B.: The Consequences of Corruption: Evidences from China. FEEM Working Paper (2010)
Ertur, C., Koch, W.: Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence. J. Appl. Econom. 22, 1033–1062 (2007)CrossRef
Fearon, J.D., Laitin, D.D.: Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2(1), 75–90 (2003)CrossRef
Firmino Costa da Silva, D., Elhorst, J.P., Silveira Neto, R.D.M.: Urban and rural population growth in a spatial panel of municipalities. Reg. Stud. 51(6), 894–908 (2017)CrossRef
Fischer, M.M., Scherngell, T., Reismann, M.: Knowledge spillovers and total factor productivity: evidence using a spatial panel data model. Geogr. Anal. 41(2), 204–220 (2009)CrossRef
Getis, A., Ord, J.K.: The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24(3), 189–206 (1992)CrossRef
Ghonghadze, J., Lux, T.: Bringing an elementary agent-based model to the data: estimation via GMM and an application to forecasting of asset price volatility. J. Empir. Finance 37, 1–19 (2016)CrossRef
Glüpker, G.: Effectiveness of EU conditionality in the Western Balkans: minority rights and the fight against corruption in Croatia and Macedonia. J. Contemp. Eur. Res. 9(2), 223–241 (2013)
Goel, R.K., Saunoris, J.W.: Global corruption and the shadow economy: spatial aspects. Public Choice 161(1–2), 119–139 (2014)CrossRef
Hacek, M., Kukovic, S., Brezovsek, M.: Problems of corruption and distrust in political and administrative institutions in Slovenia. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 46(2), 255–261 (2013)CrossRef
Herzfeld, T., Weiss, C.: Corruption and legal in effectiveness: an empirical investigation. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 19(3), 621–632 (2003)CrossRef
Huntington, S.P.: Democracy for the long haul. J. Democr. 7(2), 3–13 (1996)CrossRef
Javaid, U.: Corruption and its deep impact on good governance in Pakistan. Pak. Econ. Soc. Rev. 48(1), 123–134 (2010)
Kapeli, N.S., Mohamed, N.: Insight of anti-corruption initiatives in Malaysia. Procedia Econ. Finance 31, 525–534 (2015)CrossRef
Katsios, S.: The shadow economy and corruption in Greece. South-Eastern Eur. J. Econ. 4(1), 61–80 (2015)
Kaymak, T., Bektas, E.: Corruption in emerging markets: a multidimensional study. Soc. Indic. Res. 124(3), 785–805 (2015)CrossRef
Khan, M.H.: Patron-Client networks and the economic effects of corruption in Asia. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 10(1), 15–39 (1998)CrossRef
La Palombara, J.: The structural aspects of corruption. In: Corruption and Democracy. Institute for Constitutional and Legislative Policy, Budapest (1994)
Lalountas, D.A., Manolas, G.A., Vavouras, I.S.: Corruption, globalization and development: How are these three phenomena related? J. Policy Model. 33(4), 636–648 (2011)CrossRef
Larrain, F., Tavares, J.: Does foreign direct investment decrease corruption? Cuadernos de Economia 41(123), 217–230 (2004)
Lau, C.K.M., Demir, E., Bilgin, M.H.: Experience-based corporate corruption and stock market volatility: evidence from emerging markets. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 17, 1–13 (2013)CrossRef
Lesage, J.P.: Estimation of limited dependent variable spatial autoregressive models. Geogr. Anal. 32(1), 19–35 (2000)CrossRef
Levy-Yeyati, E., Sturzenegger, F., Reggio, I.: On the endogeneity of exchange rate regimes. Eur. Econ. Rev. 54(5), 659–677 (2010)CrossRef
Lopez, R., Mitra, S.: Corruption, pollution, and the kuznets environment curve. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 40(2), 137–150 (2000)CrossRef
Mahmood, S.A.I.: Public procurement and corruption in Bangladesh confronting the challenges and opportunities. J. Public Adm. Policy Res. 2(6), 103–111 (2010)
Márquez, M.A., Salinas-Jiménez, J., Salinas-Jiménez, M.D.: Exploring differences in corruption: the role of neighboring countries. J. Econ. Policy Reform 14(1), 11–19 (2011)CrossRef
Mbaku, J.M.: Bureaucratic corruption in Africa: the futility of cleanups. Cato J. 16(1), 99–118 (1996)
McManus-Czubińska, C., Miller, W.L., Markowski, R., Wasilewski, J.: Why is corruption in poland a serious cause for concern? Crime Law Soc. Change 41(2), 107–132 (2004)CrossRef
Meseguer, C.: Learning and economic policy choices. J. Polit. Econ. 22(1), 156–178 (2006)CrossRef
Nguyen, T.T., Van Dijk, M.A.: Corruption, growth, and governance: private vs. state-owned firms in Vietnam. J. Bank. Finance 36(11), 2935–2948 (2012)CrossRef
Orttung, R.: Causes and consequences of corruption in Putin’s Russia. PONARS Policy Memo 430, 1–5 (2006)
Paldam, M.: The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 18(2), 215–240 (2002)CrossRef
Pinkse, J., Slade, M.: Contracting in space: an application of spatial statistics to discrete-choice models. J. Econom. 85(1), 125–154 (1998)CrossRef
Plümper, T., Neumayer, E.: Model specification in the analysis of spatial dependence. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 49(3), 418–442 (2010)CrossRef
Porter, M.E.: Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. Int. Region. Sci. Rev. 19(1–2), 85–90 (1996)CrossRef
Quah, J.S.T.: Globalization and corruption control in Asian countries: the case for divergence. Publ. Manag. Rev. 3(4), 453–470 (2001)CrossRef
Rahim, Q., Langley, S., Till, A.: Corruption contagion in South Asia and East Asia: an econometric study. Int. J. Dev. Soc. 2(3), 87–95 (2013)
Riley, P., Roy, R.K.: Corruption and anticorruption: the case of India. J. Dev. Soc. 32(1), 73–99 (2016)
Rock, M.T., Bonnett, H.: The comparative politics of corruption: accounting for the East Asian paradox in empirical studies of corruption, growth and investment. World Dev. 32(6), 999–1017 (2004)CrossRef
Rosa, S.D., Schwietz, T., Fischer, A.: Circulating MicroRNAs in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ. Res. 107, 677–684 (2010)CrossRef
Rose, R., Mishler, W.: Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case. Global Crime 11(2), 145–163 (2010)CrossRef
Rose-Akerman, S.: The Political Economy of Corruption—Causes and Consequences. Public Policy for the Private Sector. The World Bank (74) (1996)
Rose-Ackerman, S., Coolidge, J.: High-Level Rent-Seeking and Corruption in African Regimes: Theory and Cases. World Bank Policy Research, 1780, Washington DC (1997)
Satpayev, D.: Corruption in Kazakhstan and the Quality of Governance. Institute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper, 475 (2014)
Scott, J.C.: The analysis of corruption in developing nations. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 11(3), 315–341 (1969)CrossRef
Sekrafi, H., Sghaier, A.: Examining the relationship between corruption, economic growth, environmental degradation, and energy consumption: a panel analysis in MENA region. J. Knowl. Econ. (2017). doi:10.​1007/​s13132-016-0384-6
Siddiquee, N.A.: Combating corruption and managing integrity in malaysia: a critical overview of recent strategies and initiatives. Publ. Organ. Rev. 10(2), 153–171 (2010)CrossRef
Simmons, B.A., Elkins, Z.: The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98(1), 171–189 (2004)CrossRef
Stern, D.I., Van Dijk, J.: Economic growth and global particulate pollution concentrations. Clim. Change 142(3), 1–16 (2017)
Talvitie, A.: Observed differences in corruption between Asia and Africa: the industrial organization of corruption and its cure. Transp. Res. Procedia 25, 4476–4494 (2017)CrossRef
Tanzi, V., Davoodi, H.R.: Corruption, Growth, and Public Finances. Washington, D.C.: The International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department: Working Paper, 182 (2000)
Tavits, M.: Why do people engage in corruption? The case of Estonia. Soc. Forces 88(3), 1257–1279 (2010)CrossRef
Treisman, D.: The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J. Public Econ. 76(3), 399–457 (2000)CrossRef
Wallace, C., Latcheva, R.: Economic transformation outside the law: corruption, trust in public institutions and the informal economy in transition countries of central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Stud. 58(1), 81–102 (2006)CrossRef
Wei, S.J.: Local corruption and global capital flows. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 31(2), 303–346 (2000)CrossRef
Wilson, J.K., Damania, R.: Corruption, political competition and environmental policy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 49(3), 516–535 (2005)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Border is better than distance? Contagious corruption in one belt one road economies
Authors
Gen-Fu Feng
Bo Sui
Min-Yi Dong
Chun-xia Jiang
Chun-Ping Chang
Publication date
27-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0579-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Quality & Quantity 4/2018 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Skills and labour incomes: how unequal is Italy as part of the Southern European countries?

OriginalPaper

Measuring differences in economic standard of living between immigrant communities in Italy

OriginalPaper

Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization

OriginalPaper

Women and corruption: evidence from multinational panel data

OriginalPaper

Assessing information integration processes: a comparison of findings obtained with between-subjects designs versus within-subjects designs

OriginalPaper

Modelling bullying propagation in Spain: a quantitative and qualitative approach