Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Büro als Treiber von Wissens- und Innovationsprozessen

Authors : Prof. Dr. Markus F. Peschl, Thomas Fundneider

Published in: Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Um die Zukunftsfähigkeit eines Unternehmens zu sichern, muss der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft ein Workspace für Wissens- und Innovationsarbeiter sein. In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, wie Innovation, Wissen, Organisation und Raum beziehungsweise Büro zusammenhängen. Ausgehend von einer Darstellung des Konzeptes der Innovation wird deutlich, dass kognitive Prozesse für alle Formen von Wissens- und Innovationsprozessen verantwortlich sind und dass diese niemals ohne die sie umgebenden Rahmenbedingungen (Raum, Organisation, soziale Strukturen) verstanden werden können. Innovation kann demnach nur ermöglicht und nicht „gemacht“ werden. Notwendig ist es, eben diese „Ermöglicher“ zu verstehen und zu einem ganzheitlichen Organisations- und Raumkonzept für den Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft zu integrieren. Aus der Darstellung der „Ermöglicher“ werden die Konsequenzen für die Gestaltung von Workspaces abgeleitet und praktische Implikationen, Handlungsempfehlungen sowie konkrete Beispiele vorgestellt.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Adolf, M., & Stehr, N. (2014). Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge. Adolf, M., & Stehr, N. (2014). Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
go back to reference Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Allen, T. J., & Henn, G. W. (2007). The organization of architecture and innovation. Managing the flow of technology. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier. Allen, T. J., & Henn, G. W. (2007). The organization of architecture and innovation. Managing the flow of technology. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier.
go back to reference Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.
go back to reference Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.CrossRef Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–93. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–93.
go back to reference Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.CrossRef Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Coughlan, P., Suri, J. F., & Canales, K. (2007). Prototypes as (design) tools for behavioral and organizational change. A design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1–13.CrossRef Coughlan, P., Suri, J. F., & Canales, K. (2007). Prototypes as (design) tools for behavioral and organizational change. A design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation. Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716.CrossRef Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation. Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716.CrossRef
go back to reference Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2010). Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2010). Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Dorst, K. (2003). The problem of design problems. In N. Cross & E. Edmonds (Hrsg.), Expertise in design (S. 135–147). Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press. Dorst, K. (2003). The problem of design problems. In N. Cross & E. Edmonds (Hrsg.), Expertise in design (S. 135–147). Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press.
go back to reference Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues (National Council of State Boards of Nursing (U. S.)), 22(3), 4–17. Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues (National Council of State Boards of Nursing (U. S.)), 22(3), 4–17.
go back to reference Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66, 45–53. Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66, 45–53.
go back to reference Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
go back to reference d.school. (2010). Design thinking bootcamp bootleg. Methodbook. Stanford: d.school, Hasso Platter, Institute of Design. d.school. (2010). Design thinking bootcamp bootleg. Methodbook. Stanford: d.school, Hasso Platter, Institute of Design.
go back to reference Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets. Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets. Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organisational strategic and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.CrossRef Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organisational strategic and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.CrossRef
go back to reference European Commission. (1995). Green paper on innovation. Brussels: European Commission. European Commission. (1995). Green paper on innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
go back to reference European Commission. (2004). Innovation management and the knowledge-driven economy. Brussels: European Commission. (Directorate-general for Enterprise) European Commission. (2004). Innovation management and the knowledge-driven economy. Brussels: European Commission. (Directorate-general for Enterprise)
go back to reference Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218–233.CrossRef Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Hrsg.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Hrsg.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28(5), 605–634.CrossRef Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28(5), 605–634.CrossRef
go back to reference Felin, T., Kauffman, S. A., Koppl, R., et al. (2014). Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 269–282.CrossRef Felin, T., Kauffman, S. A., Koppl, R., et al. (2014). Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 269–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Friedenberg, J., & Silverman, G. (2006). Cognitive science. An introduction to the study of the mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Friedenberg, J., & Silverman, G. (2006). Cognitive science. An introduction to the study of the mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Ferrar, Straus and Giroux. Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Ferrar, Straus and Giroux.
go back to reference Gedenryd, H. (1998). How designers work. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies. Gedenryd, H. (1998). How designers work. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies.
go back to reference Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRef Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRef
go back to reference Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.CrossRef Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.CrossRef
go back to reference Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype?. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Hrsg.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Second (S. 367–381). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype?. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Hrsg.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Second (S. 367–381). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Kauffman, S. A. (2014). Prolegomenon to patterns in evolution. BioSystems, 123(2014), 3–8.CrossRef Kauffman, S. A. (2014). Prolegomenon to patterns in evolution. BioSystems, 123(2014), 3–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Hrsg.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Hrsg.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelley, T. (2004). The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. London: Profile Books. Kelley, T. (2004). The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. London: Profile Books.
go back to reference Koppl, R., Kauffman, S. A., Felin, T., et al. (2014). Economics for a creative world. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2014, 1–31. Koppl, R., Kauffman, S. A., Felin, T., et al. (2014). Economics for a creative world. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2014, 1–31.
go back to reference Krogh, G. v., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Krogh, G. v., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Laurel, B.. (Hrsg.). (2003). Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press. Laurel, B.. (Hrsg.). (2003). Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Leifer, R. (2000). Radical innovation. How mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Leifer, R. (2000). Radical innovation. How mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Moggridge, B., Suri, J. F., & Bray, D. (2007). People and prototypes. In B. Moggridge (Hrsg.), Designing interactions (S. 641–735). Cambridge: MIT Press. Moggridge, B., Suri, J. F., & Bray, D. (2007). People and prototypes. In B. Moggridge (Hrsg.), Designing interactions (S. 641–735). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of „ba“: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.CrossRef Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of „ba“: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies manage the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies manage the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference O’Connor, G. C., & McDermott, C. M. (2004). The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 11–30. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.002.CrossRef O’Connor, G. C., & McDermott, C. M. (2004). The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 11–30. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.002.CrossRef
go back to reference Onarheim, B. (2012). Creativity from constraints in engineering design: Lessons learned at Coloplast. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 323–336.CrossRef Onarheim, B. (2012). Creativity from constraints in engineering design: Lessons learned at Coloplast. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 323–336.CrossRef
go back to reference Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2008a). Emergent innovation and sustainable knowledge co-creation. A socio-epistemological approach to „Innovation from within“. In M. D. Lytras, J. M. Carroll, E. Damiani, et al. (Hrsg.), The open knowledge society: A computer science and information systems manifesto (S. 101–108). New York: Springer (CCIS 19).CrossRef Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2008a). Emergent innovation and sustainable knowledge co-creation. A socio-epistemological approach to „Innovation from within“. In M. D. Lytras, J. M. Carroll, E. Damiani, et al. (Hrsg.), The open knowledge society: A computer science and information systems manifesto (S. 101–108). New York: Springer (CCIS 19).CrossRef
go back to reference Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012a). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC), 9(1), 41–61.CrossRef Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012a). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC), 9(1), 41–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012b). Vom „digital turn“ zum „socio-epistemological creative turn“. Räume der Ermöglichung von Innovation und Wissensgenerierung. In B. Kossek & M. F. Peschl (Hrsg.), Digital Turn? Zum Einfluss digitaler Medien auf Wissensgenerierungsprozesse von Studierenden und Hochschullehrenden (S. 47–62). Göttingen: V & R unipress. Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012b). Vom „digital turn“ zum „socio-epistemological creative turn“. Räume der Ermöglichung von Innovation und Wissensgenerierung. In B. Kossek & M. F. Peschl (Hrsg.), Digital Turn? Zum Einfluss digitaler Medien auf Wissensgenerierungsprozesse von Studierenden und Hochschullehrenden (S. 47–62). Göttingen: V & R unipress.
go back to reference Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014a). Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology. Computers and Human Behavior, 37, 346–359.CrossRef Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014a). Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology. Computers and Human Behavior, 37, 346–359.CrossRef
go back to reference Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014b). Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering (IJODE), 3(3/4), 358–391. Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014b). Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering (IJODE), 3(3/4), 358–391.
go back to reference Peschl, M. F., Raffl, C., Fundneider, T., et al. (2010).Creating sustainable futures by innovation from within. Radical change is in demand of radical innovation. In R. Trappl (Hrsg.), Cybernetics and Systems 2010 (S. 354–359). Wien. Peschl, M. F., Raffl, C., Fundneider, T., et al. (2010).Creating sustainable futures by innovation from within. Radical change is in demand of radical innovation. In R. Trappl (Hrsg.), Cybernetics and Systems 2010 (S. 354–359). Wien.
go back to reference Poli, R. (2006). The ontology of what is not there. In J. Malinowski & A. Pietruszczak (Hrsg.), Essays in logic and ontology (Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities, vol. 91) (S. 73–80). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Poli, R. (2006). The ontology of what is not there. In J. Malinowski & A. Pietruszczak (Hrsg.), Essays in logic and ontology (Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities, vol. 91) (S. 73–80). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
go back to reference Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 137–150.CrossRef Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 137–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge: Society for Organizational Learning. Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge: Society for Organizational Learning.
go back to reference Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints. The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer. Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints. The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Stokes, P. D. (2007). Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 107–113.CrossRef Stokes, P. D. (2007). Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 107–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Tedlock, B. (2005). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Third (S. 455–486). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Tedlock, B. (2005). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Third (S. 455–486). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
go back to reference UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO World Report). UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO World Report).
go back to reference Varela, F. J. (1990). Kognitionswissenschaft – Kognitionstechnik. Eine Skizze aktueller Perspektiven. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Varela, F. J. (1990). Kognitionswissenschaft – Kognitionstechnik. Eine Skizze aktueller Perspektiven. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
go back to reference Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman. Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
Metadata
Title
Büro als Treiber von Wissens- und Innovationsprozessen
Authors
Prof. Dr. Markus F. Peschl
Thomas Fundneider
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12606-3_2