Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2022

04-01-2021 | Original Paper

Business Ethics and Quantification: Towards an Ethics of Numbers

Author: Gazi Islam

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Social practices of quantification, or the production and communication of numbers, have been recognized as important foundations of organizational knowledge, as well as sources of power. With the advent of increasingly sophisticated digital tools to capture and extract numerical data from social life, however, there is a pressing need to understand the ethical stakes of quantification. The current study examines quantification from an ethical lens, to frame and promote a research agenda around the ethics of quantification. After a brief overview of quantification research and its uses in state and market organization, I discuss quantification in terms of three core subprocesses—capture, specification, and appropriation, illustrating and identifying ethical concerns around each process. Linking these processes to the performative effects of measures, I present a working model of quantification from which the discussion builds ideas for developing a research agenda around quantification.
Footnotes
1
For a description of the various (and sometimes opposing) conceptions of performativity, see Gond et al (2016).
 
Literature
go back to reference Aitken, R. (2017). ‘All data is credit data’: Constituting the unbanked. Competition & Change, 21(4), 274–300. Aitken, R. (2017). ‘All data is credit data’: Constituting the unbanked. Competition & Change, 21(4), 274–300.
go back to reference Alexandrova, A. (2012). Well-being as an object of science. Philosophy of Science, 79, 678–689. Alexandrova, A. (2012). Well-being as an object of science. Philosophy of Science, 79, 678–689.
go back to reference Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press. Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Alexandrova, A., & Haybron, D. M. (2016). Is construct validation valid? Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 1098–1109. Alexandrova, A., & Haybron, D. M. (2016). Is construct validation valid? Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 1098–1109.
go back to reference Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
go back to reference Appadurai, A. (2016). Banking on words: The failure of language in the age of derivative finance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Appadurai, A. (2016). Banking on words: The failure of language in the age of derivative finance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Bache, I. (2019). How does evidence matter? Understanding ‘what works’ for wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 1153–1173. Bache, I. (2019). How does evidence matter? Understanding ‘what works’ for wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 1153–1173.
go back to reference Baud, C., Brivot, M., & Himick, D. (2019). Accounting Ethics and the Fragmentation of Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 1121–1142. Baud, C., Brivot, M., & Himick, D. (2019). Accounting Ethics and the Fragmentation of Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 1121–1142.
go back to reference Berman, E. P., & Hirschman, D. (2018). The sociology of quantification: Where are we now? Contemporary Sociology, 47(3), 257–266. Berman, E. P., & Hirschman, D. (2018). The sociology of quantification: Where are we now? Contemporary Sociology, 47(3), 257–266.
go back to reference Beverungen, A., Beyes, T., & Conrad, L. (2019). The organizational powers of (digital) media. Organization, 26(5), 621–635. Beverungen, A., Beyes, T., & Conrad, L. (2019). The organizational powers of (digital) media. Organization, 26(5), 621–635.
go back to reference Beverungen, A., Bohm, S., & Land, C. (2015). Free labour, social media, management: Challenging marxist organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(4), 473–489. Beverungen, A., Bohm, S., & Land, C. (2015). Free labour, social media, management: Challenging marxist organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(4), 473–489.
go back to reference Boje, D. M., Gardner, C. L., & Smith, W. L. (2006). (Mis)Using numbers in the Enron story. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 456–474. Boje, D. M., Gardner, C. L., & Smith, W. L. (2006). (Mis)Using numbers in the Enron story. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 456–474.
go back to reference Boltanski, L. (2016). Alain Desrosières’s reflexive numbers. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 33–42). Cham: Springer. Boltanski, L. (2016). Alain Desrosières’s reflexive numbers. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 33–42). Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–774. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–774.
go back to reference Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 5(15), 662–679. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 5(15), 662–679.
go back to reference Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Prévieux, J. (Eds.). (2014a). Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte. Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Prévieux, J. (Eds.). (2014a). Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.
go back to reference Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014b). Statactivism: forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 2(7), 198–220. Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014b). Statactivism: forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 2(7), 198–220.
go back to reference Bruno, I., Jany-Catrice, F., & Touchelay, B. (Eds.). (2016). The social sciences of quantification: from politics of large numbers to target-driven policies. Cham: Springer. Bruno, I., Jany-Catrice, F., & Touchelay, B. (Eds.). (2016). The social sciences of quantification: from politics of large numbers to target-driven policies. Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90.
go back to reference Charitsis, V. (2016). Prosuming(the)self. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 16(3), 37–59. Charitsis, V. (2016). Prosuming(the)self. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 16(3), 37–59.
go back to reference Chelli, M., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 187–203. Chelli, M., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 187–203.
go back to reference Corkery M. & Silver-Greenberg J. (2015). Banks reject New York City IDs, leaving ‘unbanked’ on sidelines. New York Times, 23 December. Corkery M. & Silver-Greenberg J. (2015). Banks reject New York City IDs, leaving ‘unbanked’ on sidelines. New York Times, 23 December.
go back to reference Cussó, R. (2016). From statistics to international quantification: A dialogue with Alain Desrosières. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 55–65). Cham: Springer. Cussó, R. (2016). From statistics to international quantification: A dialogue with Alain Desrosières. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 55–65). Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Davis, K. E., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (Eds.). (2012). Governance by indicators: Global power through classification and rankings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University of Press. Davis, K. E., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (Eds.). (2012). Governance by indicators: Global power through classification and rankings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University of Press.
go back to reference De Santos, M. (2009). Fact-totems and the statistical imagination: The public life of a statistic in Argentina 2001. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 466–489. De Santos, M. (2009). Fact-totems and the statistical imagination: The public life of a statistic in Argentina 2001. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 466–489.
go back to reference Dean, J. (2006). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 1(1), 51–74. Dean, J. (2006). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 1(1), 51–74.
go back to reference Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in circuits of drive. Cambridge: Polity Press. Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in circuits of drive. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Dean, J. (2016). Crowds and party. London: Verso. Dean, J. (2016). Crowds and party. London: Verso.
go back to reference Desrosières, A. (1993). La Politique des grands nombres: Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: Editions la Decouverte. Desrosières, A. (1993). La Politique des grands nombres: Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: Editions la Decouverte.
go back to reference Desrosières, A. (2016). The quantification of the social sciences: An historical comparison. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 183–204). Cham: Springer. Desrosières, A. (2016). The quantification of the social sciences: An historical comparison. In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 183–204). Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Didier, E. (2018). Globalization of quantitative policing: Between management and statactivism. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 515–534. Didier, E. (2018). Globalization of quantitative policing: Between management and statactivism. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 515–534.
go back to reference Dourish, P., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2018). Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–10. Dourish, P., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2018). Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–10.
go back to reference Elden, S. (2006). Speaking against number: Heidegger, language and the politics of calculation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Elden, S. (2006). Speaking against number: Heidegger, language and the politics of calculation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
go back to reference Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40.
go back to reference Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.
go back to reference Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49, 401–436. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49, 401–436.
go back to reference Eyraud C. (2012). Une comptabilité d’entreprise pour l’Etat. Sociologie d’un dispositif de quantification économique. Mémoire en vue de l’Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Paris-Sorbonne. Eyraud C. (2012). Une comptabilité d’entreprise pour l’Etat. Sociologie d’un dispositif de quantification économique. Mémoire en vue de l’Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Paris-Sorbonne.
go back to reference Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage. Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage.
go back to reference Fuchs, C. (2012). The political economy of privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, 13, 139–159. Fuchs, C. (2012). The political economy of privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, 13, 139–159.
go back to reference Gephart, R. P. (2006). Ethnostatistics and organizational research methodologies: An Introduction. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 417–431. Gephart, R. P. (2006). Ethnostatistics and organizational research methodologies: An Introduction. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 417–431.
go back to reference Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 1–30. Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 1–30.
go back to reference Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440–463. Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440–463.
go back to reference Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Brooklyn: Verso Books. Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Brooklyn: Verso Books.
go back to reference Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Hornstein, G. A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas, and implications. In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology. New Haven: Yale University Press. Hornstein, G. A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas, and implications. In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Humphreys, L. (2018). The qualified self, social media and the accounting of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Humphreys, L. (2018). The qualified self, social media and the accounting of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Ingram, D., & Bar-Tura, A. (2014). The public sphere as site of emancipation and enlightenment: A discourse-theoretic critique of digital communication. In D. Boros & J. Glass (Eds.), Re-imagining public space: The Frankfurt School in the 21st century (pp. 65–85). New York: Palgrave. Ingram, D., & Bar-Tura, A. (2014). The public sphere as site of emancipation and enlightenment: A discourse-theoretic critique of digital communication. In D. Boros & J. Glass (Eds.), Re-imagining public space: The Frankfurt School in the 21st century (pp. 65–85). New York: Palgrave.
go back to reference Jany-Catrice, F. (2016). Evaluating public policies or measuring the performance of public services? In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 123–135). Cham: Springer. Jany-Catrice, F. (2016). Evaluating public policies or measuring the performance of public services? In I. Bruno, F. Jany-Catrice, & B. Touchelay (Eds.), The social sciences of quantification: From the politics of large numbers to target-driven policies (pp. 123–135). Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Jay, M. (2005). Songs of experience: Modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley: University of California Press. Jay, M. (2005). Songs of experience: Modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley: University of California Press.
go back to reference John, S., & Alexandrova, A. (2018). Limits of the Numerical. An ISRF-funded research project 2015–2018 CRASSH. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. John, S., & Alexandrova, A. (2018). Limits of the Numerical. An ISRF-funded research project 2015–2018 CRASSH. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
go back to reference Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2020). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. The Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513–540. Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2020). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. The Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513–540.
go back to reference Loveman, M. (2005). The modern state and the primitive accumulation of symbolic power. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1651–1683. Loveman, M. (2005). The modern state and the primitive accumulation of symbolic power. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1651–1683.
go back to reference Löwy, M. (1987). The romantic and the Marxist critique of modern civilization. Theory and Society, 16(6), 891–904. Löwy, M. (1987). The romantic and the Marxist critique of modern civilization. Theory and Society, 16(6), 891–904.
go back to reference Markham, A. N. (2019). Critical pedagogy as a response to datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 754–760. Markham, A. N. (2019). Critical pedagogy as a response to datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 754–760.
go back to reference Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. London: Polity Press. Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. London: Polity Press.
go back to reference Mayer-Schoenberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. London: John Murray. Mayer-Schoenberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. London: John Murray.
go back to reference Mazmanian, M., & Beckman, C. M. (2018). “Making” your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification. Organization Science, 29(3), 357–379. Mazmanian, M., & Beckman, C. M. (2018). “Making” your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification. Organization Science, 29(3), 357–379.
go back to reference Mennicken, A., & Espeland, W. N. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 1–23. Mennicken, A., & Espeland, W. N. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 1–23.
go back to reference Mingers, J., & Willmott, H. (2013). Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66, 1051–1073. Mingers, J., & Willmott, H. (2013). Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66, 1051–1073.
go back to reference Neff, G. (2013). Why big data won’t cure us. Big Data., 1, 117–123. Neff, G. (2013). Why big data won’t cure us. Big Data., 1, 117–123.
go back to reference Ottaviani, F. (2015). Performativité des indicateurs: indicateurs alternatifs et transformation des modes de rationalisation. Economies et finances: Université Grenoble Alpes. Ottaviani, F. (2015). Performativité des indicateurs: indicateurs alternatifs et transformation des modes de rationalisation. Economies et finances: Université Grenoble Alpes.
go back to reference Peter, M., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable Person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 235–266. Peter, M., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable Person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 235–266.
go back to reference Pink, S., & Lanzeni, D. (2018). Future anthropology ethics and datafication: Temporality and responsibility in research. Social Media and Society, 4(2), 1–9. Pink, S., & Lanzeni, D. (2018). Future anthropology ethics and datafication: Temporality and responsibility in research. Social Media and Society, 4(2), 1–9.
go back to reference Porter, T. M. (1995a). Statistical and social facts from Quetelet to Durkheim. Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 15–26. Porter, T. M. (1995a). Statistical and social facts from Quetelet to Durkheim. Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 15–26.
go back to reference Porter, T. M. (1995b). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Porter, T. M. (1995b). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Power, M. (1994). From the science of accounts to the financial accountability of science. Science in Context, 7(3), 355–387. Power, M. (1994). From the science of accounts to the financial accountability of science. Science in Context, 7(3), 355–387.
go back to reference Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
go back to reference Raffnsøe, S., Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2019). The Foucault effect in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 40(2), 155–182. Raffnsøe, S., Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2019). The Foucault effect in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 40(2), 155–182.
go back to reference Ruckenstein, M., & Schüll, N. D. (2017). The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 261–278. Ruckenstein, M., & Schüll, N. D. (2017). The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 261–278.
go back to reference Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data and Society, 6(1), 1–12. Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data and Society, 6(1), 1–12.
go back to reference Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Shapiro, A. (2018). Street-level: Google Street View’s abstraction by datafication. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1201–1219. Shapiro, A. (2018). Street-level: Google Street View’s abstraction by datafication. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1201–1219.
go back to reference Sibilia, P. (2008). La intimidad como espectáculo. Buenos Aires: Fondo Cultura Económica. Sibilia, P. (2008). La intimidad como espectáculo. Buenos Aires: Fondo Cultura Económica.
go back to reference Singh, R., & Alexandrova, A. (2020). Happiness economics as technocracy. Behavioural Public Policy, 4, 236–244. Singh, R., & Alexandrova, A. (2020). Happiness economics as technocracy. Behavioural Public Policy, 4, 236–244.
go back to reference Stein, M.-K., Wagner, E. L., Tierney, P., Newell, S., & Galliers, R. D. (2019). Datification and the pursuit of meaningfulness in work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 685–717. Stein, M.-K., Wagner, E. L., Tierney, P., Newell, S., & Galliers, R. D. (2019). Datification and the pursuit of meaningfulness in work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 685–717.
go back to reference Supiot, A. (2015). La gouvernance par les nombres. Paris: Fayard. Supiot, A. (2015). La gouvernance par les nombres. Paris: Fayard.
go back to reference Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton. Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton.
go back to reference Taylor, L. (2020). The price of certainty: How the politics of pandemic data demand an ethics of care. Big Data & Society, 3, 1–9. Taylor, L. (2020). The price of certainty: How the politics of pandemic data demand an ethics of care. Big Data & Society, 3, 1–9.
go back to reference Thévenot, L. (2011). Conventions for measuring and questioning policies. The case of 50 years of policies evaluations through a statistical survey. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 192–217. Thévenot, L. (2011). Conventions for measuring and questioning policies. The case of 50 years of policies evaluations through a statistical survey. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 192–217.
go back to reference Thévenot, L. (2019). Measure for measure: Politics of quantifying individuals to govern them. Historical Social Research, 44(2), 44–76. Thévenot, L. (2019). Measure for measure: Politics of quantifying individuals to govern them. Historical Social Research, 44(2), 44–76.
go back to reference Toraldo, M. L., Islam, G., & Mangia, G. (2018). Modes of knowing: Video research and the problem of elusive knowledges. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 438–465. Toraldo, M. L., Islam, G., & Mangia, G. (2018). Modes of knowing: Video research and the problem of elusive knowledges. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 438–465.
go back to reference Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Urueña, R. (2015). Indicators and the law: A case study of the rule of law index. In S. E. Merry, K. E. Davis, & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law (pp. 75–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Urueña, R. (2015). Indicators and the law: A case study of the rule of law index. In S. E. Merry, K. E. Davis, & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law (pp. 75–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Ustek-Spilda, F. (2019). Statisticians as back-office policy-makers: Counting asylum-seekers and refugees in Europe. Science Technology and Human Values, 25, 1–28. Ustek-Spilda, F. (2019). Statisticians as back-office policy-makers: Counting asylum-seekers and refugees in Europe. Science Technology and Human Values, 25, 1–28.
go back to reference van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208.
go back to reference Vanoli, A. (2005). A history of national accounting. Amsterdam: IOS Press. Vanoli, A. (2005). A history of national accounting. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
go back to reference Williams, R. (1977). Structures of feeling. In Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Williams, R. (1977). Structures of feeling. In Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Zelizer, V. (1994). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Zelizer, V. (1994). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Zelizer, V. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Zelizer, V. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.
go back to reference Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Hatchett. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Hatchett.
go back to reference Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1–16. Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1–16.
go back to reference Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2019). Statistics and probability have always been value-laden: An historical ontology of quantitative research methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 1–18. Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2019). Statistics and probability have always been value-laden: An historical ontology of quantitative research methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 1–18.
Metadata
Title
Business Ethics and Quantification: Towards an Ethics of Numbers
Author
Gazi Islam
Publication date
04-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04694-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner