Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Economics 3/2020

07-11-2019 | Original Paper

Business model innovation in family firms: dynamic capabilities and the moderating role of socioemotional wealth

Authors: Vanessa Weimann, Maike Gerken, Marcel Hülsbeck

Published in: Journal of Business Economics | Issue 3/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Today’s dynamic environment demands firms to adapt their business models as a new source of competitive advantage. This poses significant challenges to firms that are locked in their long-established structures, like family firms. We quantitatively test (n = 154) how dynamic capabilities (DC) affect business model innovation (BMI) in family firms and how this relationship is moderated by socioemotional wealth (SEW). DCs are essential for all types of firms to exploit opportunities and respond to technological changes in general. For family firms, they are particular important due to the desire to succeed for future generations. Given that family involvement in business creates idiosyncratic motivations and long-term characteristics that considerably affect the firm’s behavior, we state that their SEW endowment may influence the relationship between DCs and BMI. Measuring the constructs independently, our findings reveal strong sensing and seizing as well as transforming capabilities as relevant antecedents of BMI and stress upon the positive moderating role of SEW for the relationship between reflecting and BMI.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Journal of Business Economics

From January 2013, the Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) is published in English under the title Journal of Business Economics (JBE). The Journal of Business Economics (JBE) aims at encouraging theoretical and applied research in the field of business economics and business administration, promoting the exchange of ideas between science and practice.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Achtenhagen L, Melin L, Naldi L (2013) Dynamics of business models-strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Plan 46:1–25CrossRef Achtenhagen L, Melin L, Naldi L (2013) Dynamics of business models-strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Plan 46:1–25CrossRef
go back to reference Aldrich HE, Cliff JE (2003) The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. J Bus Vent 18:573–596CrossRef Aldrich HE, Cliff JE (2003) The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. J Bus Vent 18:573–596CrossRef
go back to reference Amit R, Zott C (2012) Creating value through business model innovation. Sloan Manag Rev 53:41–49 Amit R, Zott C (2012) Creating value through business model innovation. Sloan Manag Rev 53:41–49
go back to reference Archibugi D (2017) Blade Runner economics: will innovation lead the economic recovery? Res Policy 46:535–543CrossRef Archibugi D (2017) Blade Runner economics: will innovation lead the economic recovery? Res Policy 46:535–543CrossRef
go back to reference Ashforth B, Humphrey R (1995) Emotion in the workplace: a reappraisal. Hum Rel 48:97–125CrossRef Ashforth B, Humphrey R (1995) Emotion in the workplace: a reappraisal. Hum Rel 48:97–125CrossRef
go back to reference Audretsch DB, Hülsbeck M, Lehmann EE (2013) Families as active monitors of firm performance. J Fam Bus Strat 4:118–130CrossRef Audretsch DB, Hülsbeck M, Lehmann EE (2013) Families as active monitors of firm performance. J Fam Bus Strat 4:118–130CrossRef
go back to reference Babelytė-Labanauskė K, Nedzinskas S (2017) Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations, R&D and innovation performance. J Modell Manag 12:603–630CrossRef Babelytė-Labanauskė K, Nedzinskas S (2017) Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations, R&D and innovation performance. J Modell Manag 12:603–630CrossRef
go back to reference Baden-Fuller C, Morgan MS (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Plan 43:156–171CrossRef Baden-Fuller C, Morgan MS (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Plan 43:156–171CrossRef
go back to reference Baden-Fuller C, Stopford JM (1994) Rejuvenating the mature business. Routledge, London Baden-Fuller C, Stopford JM (1994) Rejuvenating the mature business. Routledge, London
go back to reference Bammens Y, Notelaers G, Van Gils A (2015) Implications of family business employment for employees’ innovative work involvement. Fam Bus Rev 28:123–144CrossRef Bammens Y, Notelaers G, Van Gils A (2015) Implications of family business employment for employees’ innovative work involvement. Fam Bus Rev 28:123–144CrossRef
go back to reference Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120 Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120
go back to reference Barros I, Hernangómez J, Martin-Cruz N (2016) A theoretical model of strategic management of family firms. A dynamic capabilities approach. J Fam Bus Strat 7:149–159CrossRef Barros I, Hernangómez J, Martin-Cruz N (2016) A theoretical model of strategic management of family firms. A dynamic capabilities approach. J Fam Bus Strat 7:149–159CrossRef
go back to reference Becker KL, Fleming J, Keijsers W (2012) E-learning: aging workforce versus technology-savvy generation. Educ Plus Train 54:385–400CrossRef Becker KL, Fleming J, Keijsers W (2012) E-learning: aging workforce versus technology-savvy generation. Educ Plus Train 54:385–400CrossRef
go back to reference Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR, Larraza-Kintana M (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less? Admin Sci Quart 55:82–113CrossRef Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR, Larraza-Kintana M (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less? Admin Sci Quart 55:82–113CrossRef
go back to reference Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR (2012) Socioemotional wealth in family firms. Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam Bus Rev 25:258–279CrossRef Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR (2012) Socioemotional wealth in family firms. Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam Bus Rev 25:258–279CrossRef
go back to reference Bingham C, Heimeriks KH, Schijven M, Gates S (2015) Concurrent learning: how firms develop multiple dynamic capabilities in parallel. Strat Manag J 36:1802–1825CrossRef Bingham C, Heimeriks KH, Schijven M, Gates S (2015) Concurrent learning: how firms develop multiple dynamic capabilities in parallel. Strat Manag J 36:1802–1825CrossRef
go back to reference Block J (2012) R&D investments in family and founder firms: an agency perspective. J Bus Vent 27:248–265CrossRef Block J (2012) R&D investments in family and founder firms: an agency perspective. J Bus Vent 27:248–265CrossRef
go back to reference Block J, Miller D, Jaskiewicz P, Spiegel F (2013) Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: an analysis of patent data. Fam Bus Rev 26:180–199CrossRef Block J, Miller D, Jaskiewicz P, Spiegel F (2013) Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: an analysis of patent data. Fam Bus Rev 26:180–199CrossRef
go back to reference Bogers M, Boyd B, Hollensen S (2015) Managing turbulence: business model development in a family-owned airline. Calif Manag Rev 58:41–64CrossRef Bogers M, Boyd B, Hollensen S (2015) Managing turbulence: business model development in a family-owned airline. Calif Manag Rev 58:41–64CrossRef
go back to reference Bowman C, Ambrosini V (2003) How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. Brit J Manag 14:289–303CrossRef Bowman C, Ambrosini V (2003) How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. Brit J Manag 14:289–303CrossRef
go back to reference Brumana M, Minola T, Garrett RP, Digan SP (2017) How do family firms launch new businesses? A developmental perspective on internal corporate venturing in family business. J Small Bus Manag 55:594–613CrossRef Brumana M, Minola T, Garrett RP, Digan SP (2017) How do family firms launch new businesses? A developmental perspective on internal corporate venturing in family business. J Small Bus Manag 55:594–613CrossRef
go back to reference Bucherer E, Eisert U, Gassmann O (2012) Towards systematic business model innovation: lessons from product innovation management. Crea Innov Manag 2:183–198CrossRef Bucherer E, Eisert U, Gassmann O (2012) Towards systematic business model innovation: lessons from product innovation management. Crea Innov Manag 2:183–198CrossRef
go back to reference Buliga O, Scheiner CW, Voigt KI (2016) Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework. J Bus Econ 86:647–670 Buliga O, Scheiner CW, Voigt KI (2016) Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework. J Bus Econ 86:647–670
go back to reference Cabrera-Suárez K, De Saá-Pérez P, García-Almeida D (2001) The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 14:37–47CrossRef Cabrera-Suárez K, De Saá-Pérez P, García-Almeida D (2001) The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 14:37–47CrossRef
go back to reference Calabrò A, Vecchiarini M, Gast J, Campopiano G, De Massis A, Kraus S (2018) Innovation in family firms: a systematic literature review and guidance for future research. Int J Manag Rev 21:1–32 Calabrò A, Vecchiarini M, Gast J, Campopiano G, De Massis A, Kraus S (2018) Innovation in family firms: a systematic literature review and guidance for future research. Int J Manag Rev 21:1–32
go back to reference Capaldo A (2007) Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strat Manag J 28:6585–6608CrossRef Capaldo A (2007) Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strat Manag J 28:6585–6608CrossRef
go back to reference Capron L, Mitchell W (2009) Selection capability: how capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ Sci 20:294–312CrossRef Capron L, Mitchell W (2009) Selection capability: how capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ Sci 20:294–312CrossRef
go back to reference Carnes CM, Ireland RD (2013) Familiness and innovation: resource bundling as the missing link. Entrep Theory Pract 37:1399–1419CrossRef Carnes CM, Ireland RD (2013) Familiness and innovation: resource bundling as the missing link. Entrep Theory Pract 37:1399–1419CrossRef
go back to reference Carr JC, Ring JK (2017) Family firm knowledge integration and noneconomic value creation. J Manag Issues 29:30–56 Carr JC, Ring JK (2017) Family firm knowledge integration and noneconomic value creation. J Manag Issues 29:30–56
go back to reference Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan 43:195–215CrossRef Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan 43:195–215CrossRef
go back to reference Casprini E, De Massis A, Di Minin A, Frattini F, Piccaluga A (2017) How family firms execute open innovation strategies: the Loccioni case. J Know Manag 21:1459–1485CrossRef Casprini E, De Massis A, Di Minin A, Frattini F, Piccaluga A (2017) How family firms execute open innovation strategies: the Loccioni case. J Know Manag 21:1459–1485CrossRef
go back to reference Cavagnou D (2011) A conceptual framework for innovation: an application to human resource management policies in Australia. Innov Manag Policy Pract 13:111–125CrossRef Cavagnou D (2011) A conceptual framework for innovation: an application to human resource management policies in Australia. Innov Manag Policy Pract 13:111–125CrossRef
go back to reference Cennamo C, Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía L (2012) Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrep Theory Pract 36:1153–1173CrossRef Cennamo C, Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía L (2012) Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrep Theory Pract 36:1153–1173CrossRef
go back to reference Chang S, Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Intern Bus Stud 41:178–184CrossRef Chang S, Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Intern Bus Stud 41:178–184CrossRef
go back to reference Chen J, Nadkarni S (2017) It’s about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Adm Sci Qu 62:31–66CrossRef Chen J, Nadkarni S (2017) It’s about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Adm Sci Qu 62:31–66CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363CrossRef Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363CrossRef
go back to reference Chrisman JJ, Patel PC (2012) Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad Manag J 55:976–997CrossRef Chrisman JJ, Patel PC (2012) Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad Manag J 55:976–997CrossRef
go back to reference Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma P (2005) Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrep Theory Pract 29:555–576CrossRef Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma P (2005) Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrep Theory Pract 29:555–576CrossRef
go back to reference Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, De Massis A, Frattini F, Wright M (2015) The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 32:310–318CrossRef Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, De Massis A, Frattini F, Wright M (2015) The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 32:310–318CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen CM, Wang D, van Bever D (2013) Consulting on the cusp of disruption. Harv Bus Rev 91:106–114 Christensen CM, Wang D, van Bever D (2013) Consulting on the cusp of disruption. Harv Bus Rev 91:106–114
go back to reference Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 23:19–39CrossRef Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 23:19–39CrossRef
go back to reference Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, De Massis A (2015) A closer look at socioemotional wealth. Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrep Theory Pract 39:173–182CrossRef Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, De Massis A (2015) A closer look at socioemotional wealth. Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrep Theory Pract 39:173–182CrossRef
go back to reference Classen N, Carree M, Van Gils A, Peters B (2014) Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Bus Econ 42:595–609CrossRef Classen N, Carree M, Van Gils A, Peters B (2014) Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Bus Econ 42:595–609CrossRef
go back to reference Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strat Manag J 10:75–87CrossRef Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strat Manag J 10:75–87CrossRef
go back to reference Cozzolino A, Verona G, Rothaermel FT (2018) Unpacking the disruption process: new technology, business models, and incumbent adaptation. J Manag Stud 55:1167–1202CrossRef Cozzolino A, Verona G, Rothaermel FT (2018) Unpacking the disruption process: new technology, business models, and incumbent adaptation. J Manag Stud 55:1167–1202CrossRef
go back to reference Crossan M, Berdrow I (2003) Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strat Manag J 24:1087–1105CrossRef Crossan M, Berdrow I (2003) Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strat Manag J 24:1087–1105CrossRef
go back to reference Danneels E (2008) Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strat Manag J 29:519–543CrossRef Danneels E (2008) Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strat Manag J 29:519–543CrossRef
go back to reference DaSilva CM, Trkman P (2014) Business model: what it is and what it is not. Long Range Plan 47:379–389CrossRef DaSilva CM, Trkman P (2014) Business model: what it is and what it is not. Long Range Plan 47:379–389CrossRef
go back to reference De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 26:10–31CrossRef De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 26:10–31CrossRef
go back to reference De Massis A, Kotlar J, Chua J, Chrisman J (2014) Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. J Small Bus Manag 52:344–364CrossRef De Massis A, Kotlar J, Chua J, Chrisman J (2014) Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. J Small Bus Manag 52:344–364CrossRef
go back to reference De Massis A, Frattini F, Kotlar J, Petruzzelli AM, Wright M (2016) Innovation through tradition: lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Acad Manag Persp 30:93–116CrossRef De Massis A, Frattini F, Kotlar J, Petruzzelli AM, Wright M (2016) Innovation through tradition: lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Acad Manag Persp 30:93–116CrossRef
go back to reference Demil B, Lecocq X (2010) Business model evolution. In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plan 43:227–246CrossRef Demil B, Lecocq X (2010) Business model evolution. In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plan 43:227–246CrossRef
go back to reference Dyer GW, Whetten DA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility. Preliminary evidence from the S&P500. Entrep Theory Pract 30:785–802CrossRef Dyer GW, Whetten DA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility. Preliminary evidence from the S&P500. Entrep Theory Pract 30:785–802CrossRef
go back to reference Eddleston K, Kellermanns FW, Sarathy R (2008) Resource configuration in family firms: linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. J Manag Stud 45:26–50 Eddleston K, Kellermanns FW, Sarathy R (2008) Resource configuration in family firms: linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. J Manag Stud 45:26–50
go back to reference Eisenhardt KM, Santos FM (2002) Knowledge based view: a new theory of strategy? Handbook of strategy and management. In: Thomas H, Whittington R (eds) London, Sage Eisenhardt KM, Santos FM (2002) Knowledge based view: a new theory of strategy? Handbook of strategy and management. In: Thomas H, Whittington R (eds) London, Sage
go back to reference Ferreira FNH, Proença JF, Spencer R, Cova B (2013) The transition from products to solutions: external business model fit and dynamics. Ind Mark Manag 42:1093–1101CrossRef Ferreira FNH, Proença JF, Spencer R, Cova B (2013) The transition from products to solutions: external business model fit and dynamics. Ind Mark Manag 42:1093–1101CrossRef
go back to reference Fitz-Koch S, Nordqvist M (2017) The reciprocal relationship of innovation capabilities and socioemotional wealth: a study of family firm. J Small Bus Manag 55:547–570CrossRef Fitz-Koch S, Nordqvist M (2017) The reciprocal relationship of innovation capabilities and socioemotional wealth: a study of family firm. J Small Bus Manag 55:547–570CrossRef
go back to reference Fjeldstad OD, Snow CC (2018) Business models and organisational design. Long Range Plan 51:32–39CrossRef Fjeldstad OD, Snow CC (2018) Business models and organisational design. Long Range Plan 51:32–39CrossRef
go back to reference Foss N, Saebi T (2017) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: how far have we come, and where should we go? J Manag 43:200–227 Foss N, Saebi T (2017) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: how far have we come, and where should we go? J Manag 43:200–227
go back to reference Foss N, Saebi T (2018) Business models and business model innovation: between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Plan 51:9–21CrossRef Foss N, Saebi T (2018) Business models and business model innovation: between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Plan 51:9–21CrossRef
go back to reference Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes KT, Nunez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin Sci Quart 52:106–137CrossRef Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes KT, Nunez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin Sci Quart 52:106–137CrossRef
go back to reference Gómez-Mejía LR, Campbell JT, Martin G, Makri M, Sirmon DG, Hoskisson RE (2014) Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrep Theory Pract 38:1351–1374 Gómez-Mejía LR, Campbell JT, Martin G, Makri M, Sirmon DG, Hoskisson RE (2014) Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrep Theory Pract 38:1351–1374
go back to reference Gómez-Mejía LR, Patel PC, Zellweger TM (2018) In the horns of the dilemma: socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. J Manag 44:1369–1397 Gómez-Mejía LR, Patel PC, Zellweger TM (2018) In the horns of the dilemma: socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. J Manag 44:1369–1397
go back to reference Gruber M, Heinemann F, Brettel M, Hungeling S (2010) Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures. Strat Manag J 31:1337–1356CrossRef Gruber M, Heinemann F, Brettel M, Hungeling S (2010) Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures. Strat Manag J 31:1337–1356CrossRef
go back to reference Günzel F, Holm AB (2013) One size does not fit all—understanding the front-end and back-end of business model innovation. Intern J Innov Manag 17:1–34CrossRef Günzel F, Holm AB (2013) One size does not fit all—understanding the front-end and back-end of business model innovation. Intern J Innov Manag 17:1–34CrossRef
go back to reference Hacklin F, Björkdahl J, Wallin MW (2018) Strategies for business model innovation: how firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Plan 51:82–110CrossRef Hacklin F, Björkdahl J, Wallin MW (2018) Strategies for business model innovation: how firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Plan 51:82–110CrossRef
go back to reference Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
go back to reference Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9:193–206CrossRef Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9:193–206CrossRef
go back to reference Harman HH (1967) Modern factor analysis. Chicago University of Chicago Press, Chicago Harman HH (1967) Modern factor analysis. Chicago University of Chicago Press, Chicago
go back to reference Hauck J, Suess-Reyes J, Beck S, Prügl R, Frank H (2016) Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: a validation and short form of the FIBER Scale. J Fam Bus Strat 7:133–148CrossRef Hauck J, Suess-Reyes J, Beck S, Prügl R, Frank H (2016) Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: a validation and short form of the FIBER Scale. J Fam Bus Strat 7:133–148CrossRef
go back to reference Hienerth C, Keinz P, Lettl C (2011) Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Plan 44:344–374CrossRef Hienerth C, Keinz P, Lettl C (2011) Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Plan 44:344–374CrossRef
go back to reference Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP (2011) Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strat Manag J 32:1500–1516CrossRef Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP (2011) Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strat Manag J 32:1500–1516CrossRef
go back to reference Jaskiewicz P, Combs JG, Rau SB (2015) Entrepreneurial legacy: toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. J Bus Vent 30:29–49CrossRef Jaskiewicz P, Combs JG, Rau SB (2015) Entrepreneurial legacy: toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. J Bus Vent 30:29–49CrossRef
go back to reference Kammerlander N, Ganter M (2015) An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. J Prod Innov Manag 32:361–383CrossRef Kammerlander N, Ganter M (2015) An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. J Prod Innov Manag 32:361–383CrossRef
go back to reference König N, Kammerlander N, Enders A (2014) The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Acad Manag Rev 38:418–441CrossRef König N, Kammerlander N, Enders A (2014) The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Acad Manag Rev 38:418–441CrossRef
go back to reference Kotlar J, De Massis A, Frattini F, Bianchi M, Fang H (2013) Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: a longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. J Prod Innov Manag 30:1073–1088CrossRef Kotlar J, De Massis A, Frattini F, Bianchi M, Fang H (2013) Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: a longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. J Prod Innov Manag 30:1073–1088CrossRef
go back to reference Kraus S, Pohjola M, Koponen A (2012) Innovation in family firms: an empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Rev Manag Sci 6:265–286CrossRef Kraus S, Pohjola M, Koponen A (2012) Innovation in family firms: an empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Rev Manag Sci 6:265–286CrossRef
go back to reference Kump B, Engelmann A, Kessler A, Schweiger C (2018) Towards a dynamic capabilities scale: measuring sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities. Industrial Corp Change 1–24 Kump B, Engelmann A, Kessler A, Schweiger C (2018) Towards a dynamic capabilities scale: measuring sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities. Industrial Corp Change 1–24
go back to reference Lambert SC, Davidson RA (2013) Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, Innovation and classification: an analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010. Europ Manag J 31:668–681CrossRef Lambert SC, Davidson RA (2013) Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, Innovation and classification: an analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010. Europ Manag J 31:668–681CrossRef
go back to reference Laudien SM, Daxböck BJ (2016) Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study. J Bus Econ 86:611–645 Laudien SM, Daxböck BJ (2016) Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study. J Bus Econ 86:611–645
go back to reference Liao SH, Wu CC, Hu DC, Tsuei GA (2009) Knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries. World Acad Sci, Engin Tech 53:160–167 Liao SH, Wu CC, Hu DC, Tsuei GA (2009) Knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries. World Acad Sci, Engin Tech 53:160–167
go back to reference Marchisio G, Mazzola P, Sciascia S, Miles M, Astrachan J (2010) Corporate venturing in family business: the effects on the family and its members. Entrep Reg Develop 22:349–377CrossRef Marchisio G, Mazzola P, Sciascia S, Miles M, Astrachan J (2010) Corporate venturing in family business: the effects on the family and its members. Entrep Reg Develop 22:349–377CrossRef
go back to reference Martin GP, Gómez-Mejía LR, Wiseman R (2013) Strategic implications of CEO compensation design: revisiting the behavioral agency model. Acad Manag J 56:451–472CrossRef Martin GP, Gómez-Mejía LR, Wiseman R (2013) Strategic implications of CEO compensation design: revisiting the behavioral agency model. Acad Manag J 56:451–472CrossRef
go back to reference Martin WL, McKelvie A, Lumpkin GT (2016) Centralization and delegation practices in family versus non- family SMEs: a Rasch analysis. Small Bus Econ 30:1–15 Martin WL, McKelvie A, Lumpkin GT (2016) Centralization and delegation practices in family versus non- family SMEs: a Rasch analysis. Small Bus Econ 30:1–15
go back to reference Martínez-Romero MJ, Rojo-Ramírez AA (2017) Socioemotional wealth’s implications in the calculus of the minimum rate of return required by family businesses’ owners. Rev Manag Sci 11:95–118CrossRef Martínez-Romero MJ, Rojo-Ramírez AA (2017) Socioemotional wealth’s implications in the calculus of the minimum rate of return required by family businesses’ owners. Rev Manag Sci 11:95–118CrossRef
go back to reference Matzler K, Veider V, Hautz J, Stadler C (2015) The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 32:319–333CrossRef Matzler K, Veider V, Hautz J, Stadler C (2015) The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 32:319–333CrossRef
go back to reference Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Admin Sci Quart 51:262–292CrossRef Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Admin Sci Quart 51:262–292CrossRef
go back to reference Mazzelli A, Kotlar J, De Massis A (2018) Blending in while standing out: selective conformity and new product introduction in family firms. Entrep Theor Pract 42:206–230CrossRef Mazzelli A, Kotlar J, De Massis A (2018) Blending in while standing out: selective conformity and new product introduction in family firms. Entrep Theor Pract 42:206–230CrossRef
go back to reference McGrath RG (2010) Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Plan 43:247–261CrossRef McGrath RG (2010) Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Plan 43:247–261CrossRef
go back to reference McKelvie A, McKenney A, Lumpkin G, Short JC (2014) Corporate entrepreneurship in family businesses: past contributions and future opportunities. In: Melin L, Nordqvist M, Sharma P (eds) The SAGE handbook of family business. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 340–363CrossRef McKelvie A, McKenney A, Lumpkin G, Short JC (2014) Corporate entrepreneurship in family businesses: past contributions and future opportunities. In: Melin L, Nordqvist M, Sharma P (eds) The SAGE handbook of family business. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 340–363CrossRef
go back to reference Mezger F (2014) Toward a capability-based conceptualization of business model innovation: insights from an explorative study. R&D Manag 44:429–449CrossRef Mezger F (2014) Toward a capability-based conceptualization of business model innovation: insights from an explorative study. R&D Manag 44:429–449CrossRef
go back to reference Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2014) Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrep Theory Pract 6:713–720CrossRef Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2014) Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrep Theory Pract 6:713–720CrossRef
go back to reference Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholnick B (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: an empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. J Manag Stud 45:51–78 Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholnick B (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: an empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. J Manag Stud 45:51–78
go back to reference Miller D, Wright M, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholes L (2015) Resources and innovation in family businesses: the Janus-face of socioemotional preferences. Calif Manag Rev 58:20–40CrossRef Miller D, Wright M, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholes L (2015) Resources and innovation in family businesses: the Janus-face of socioemotional preferences. Calif Manag Rev 58:20–40CrossRef
go back to reference Minola T, Brumana M, Campopiano G, Garrett RP, Cassia L (2016) Corporate venturing in family business: a developmental approach of the enterprising family. Strat Entrep J 10:395–412CrossRef Minola T, Brumana M, Campopiano G, Garrett RP, Cassia L (2016) Corporate venturing in family business: a developmental approach of the enterprising family. Strat Entrep J 10:395–412CrossRef
go back to reference Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management in a digital world. MIS Q 41:223–238CrossRef Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management in a digital world. MIS Q 41:223–238CrossRef
go back to reference Nieto M, Santamaria L, Fernandez Z (2013) Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. J Small Bus Manag 53:1–18 Nieto M, Santamaria L, Fernandez Z (2013) Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. J Small Bus Manag 53:1–18
go back to reference Nordqvist M, Melin N (2010) Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrep Reg Dev 22:11–239CrossRef Nordqvist M, Melin N (2010) Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrep Reg Dev 22:11–239CrossRef
go back to reference Nunnally J, Bernstein I (1994) Psychometric theory, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York Nunnally J, Bernstein I (1994) Psychometric theory, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York
go back to reference Pieper T (2010) Non solus: toward a psychology of family business. J Fam Bus Strat 1:26–39CrossRef Pieper T (2010) Non solus: toward a psychology of family business. J Fam Bus Strat 1:26–39CrossRef
go back to reference Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12:69–82 Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12:69–82
go back to reference Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psych 88:879–903CrossRef Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psych 88:879–903CrossRef
go back to reference Randolph RV, Li Z, Daspit JJ (2017) Toward a typology of family firm corporate entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Manag 55:530–546CrossRef Randolph RV, Li Z, Daspit JJ (2017) Toward a typology of family firm corporate entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Manag 55:530–546CrossRef
go back to reference Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract 33:761–787CrossRef Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract 33:761–787CrossRef
go back to reference Repenning NP, Sterman J (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin Sci Q 47:265–295CrossRef Repenning NP, Sterman J (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin Sci Q 47:265–295CrossRef
go back to reference Rindfleisch A, O’Hern M, Sachdev V (2017) The digital revolution, 3D printing, and innovation as data. J Prod Innov Manag 34:681–690CrossRef Rindfleisch A, O’Hern M, Sachdev V (2017) The digital revolution, 3D printing, and innovation as data. J Prod Innov Manag 34:681–690CrossRef
go back to reference Ritter T, Lettl C (2018) The wider implications of business-model research. Long Range Plan 51:1–8CrossRef Ritter T, Lettl C (2018) The wider implications of business-model research. Long Range Plan 51:1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Riviere M, Suder G, Bass AE (2018) Exploring the role of internationalization knowledge in fostering strategic renewal: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Intern Bus Rev 27:66–77CrossRef Riviere M, Suder G, Bass AE (2018) Exploring the role of internationalization knowledge in fostering strategic renewal: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Intern Bus Rev 27:66–77CrossRef
go back to reference Rondi E, Überbacher R, von Schlenk Barnsdorf L, De Massis A, Hülsbeck M (2019) Digital innovation in family firms—a case study approach. Working paper, Univ Witten Herdecke, Witten Rondi E, Überbacher R, von Schlenk Barnsdorf L, De Massis A, Hülsbeck M (2019) Digital innovation in family firms—a case study approach. Working paper, Univ Witten Herdecke, Witten
go back to reference Samei H, Feyzbakhsh A (2015) A framework of successor competencies to promote corporate entrepreneurship in family firms. J Enterpr Culture 23:321–355CrossRef Samei H, Feyzbakhsh A (2015) A framework of successor competencies to promote corporate entrepreneurship in family firms. J Enterpr Culture 23:321–355CrossRef
go back to reference Schachtebeck C, Nieuwenhuizen C (2015) The role of management support in promoting corporate entrepreneurship within SME’s in the seafreight transport industry. S Afr Trans Conf 34:670–682 Schachtebeck C, Nieuwenhuizen C (2015) The role of management support in promoting corporate entrepreneurship within SME’s in the seafreight transport industry. S Afr Trans Conf 34:670–682
go back to reference Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strat Manag J 35:179–203CrossRef Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strat Manag J 35:179–203CrossRef
go back to reference Schneider S, Spieth P (2013) Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda. Intern J Innov Manag 17:1–34CrossRef Schneider S, Spieth P (2013) Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda. Intern J Innov Manag 17:1–34CrossRef
go back to reference Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN (2002) Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Manag Dec Econom 23:247–259CrossRef Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN (2002) Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Manag Dec Econom 23:247–259CrossRef
go back to reference Sciascia S, Bettinelli C (2016) Corporate family entrepreneurship: the seven circumstances. In: Randerson K, Bettinelli C, Dossena G, Fayolle A (eds) Family entrepreneurship: rethinking the research agenda. Routledge, New York, pp 47–70 Sciascia S, Bettinelli C (2016) Corporate family entrepreneurship: the seven circumstances. In: Randerson K, Bettinelli C, Dossena G, Fayolle A (eds) Family entrepreneurship: rethinking the research agenda. Routledge, New York, pp 47–70
go back to reference Sharma P, Manikutty S (2005) Strategic divestments in family firms: role of family structure and community culture. Entrep Theor Pract 29:293–312CrossRef Sharma P, Manikutty S (2005) Strategic divestments in family firms: role of family structure and community culture. Entrep Theor Pract 29:293–312CrossRef
go back to reference Sirmon D, Hitt M (2003) Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27:339–358CrossRef Sirmon D, Hitt M (2003) Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27:339–358CrossRef
go back to reference Smith WK, Binns A, Tushman ML (2010) Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Plan 43:448–461CrossRef Smith WK, Binns A, Tushman ML (2010) Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Plan 43:448–461CrossRef
go back to reference Sosna M, Trevinyo-Rodríguez RN, Velamuri SR (2010) Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the naturhouse case. Long Range Plan. 43:383–407CrossRef Sosna M, Trevinyo-Rodríguez RN, Velamuri SR (2010) Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the naturhouse case. Long Range Plan. 43:383–407CrossRef
go back to reference Spieth P, Schneider S (2016) Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation. J Bus Econ 86:671–696 Spieth P, Schneider S (2016) Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation. J Bus Econ 86:671–696
go back to reference Suess-Reyes J (2017) Understanding the transgenerational orientation of family businesses: the role of family governance and business family identity. J Bus Econ 87:749–777 Suess-Reyes J (2017) Understanding the transgenerational orientation of family businesses: the role of family governance and business family identity. J Bus Econ 87:749–777
go back to reference Tagiuri R, Davis JA (1996) Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 2:199–208CrossRef Tagiuri R, Davis JA (1996) Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 2:199–208CrossRef
go back to reference Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat Manag J 28:1319–1350CrossRef Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat Manag J 28:1319–1350CrossRef
go back to reference Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194CrossRef Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194CrossRef
go back to reference Teece DJ (2018) Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan 51:40–49CrossRef Teece DJ (2018) Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan 51:40–49CrossRef
go back to reference Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Indust Corpor Change 3:537–556CrossRef Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Indust Corpor Change 3:537–556CrossRef
go back to reference Tehseen S, Ramayah T, Sajilan S (2017) Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J Manag Sci 4:142–168 Tehseen S, Ramayah T, Sajilan S (2017) Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J Manag Sci 4:142–168
go back to reference Urban D, Mayerl J (2006) Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung, 2nd edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden Urban D, Mayerl J (2006) Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung, 2nd edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
go back to reference Urbinati A, Franzò S, De Massis A, Frattini F (2017) Innovation in family firms: a review of prior studies and a framework for future research. In: Brem A, Viardot E (eds) Revolution of innovation management. Macmillan, Palgrave, pp 213–246CrossRef Urbinati A, Franzò S, De Massis A, Frattini F (2017) Innovation in family firms: a review of prior studies and a framework for future research. In: Brem A, Viardot E (eds) Revolution of innovation management. Macmillan, Palgrave, pp 213–246CrossRef
go back to reference William LJ, Hartmann N, Cavazotte F (2010) Method variance and marker variables: a review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Org Res Methods 13:477–514CrossRef William LJ, Hartmann N, Cavazotte F (2010) Method variance and marker variables: a review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Org Res Methods 13:477–514CrossRef
go back to reference Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strat Manag J 24:991–996CrossRef Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strat Manag J 24:991–996CrossRef
go back to reference Wiseman RM, Gómez-Mejía LR (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad Manag Rev 23:133–153CrossRef Wiseman RM, Gómez-Mejía LR (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad Manag Rev 23:133–153CrossRef
go back to reference Wu Q, He Q, Duan Y, O’Regan N (2012) Implementing dynamic capabilities for corporate strategic change towards sustainability. Strat Change 21:231–247CrossRef Wu Q, He Q, Duan Y, O’Regan N (2012) Implementing dynamic capabilities for corporate strategic change towards sustainability. Strat Change 21:231–247CrossRef
go back to reference Zahra SA (2005) Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 18:23–40CrossRef Zahra SA (2005) Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 18:23–40CrossRef
go back to reference Zahra SA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Vent 22:443–452CrossRef Zahra SA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Vent 22:443–452CrossRef
go back to reference Zahra SA, Sapienza HJ, Davidsson P (2006) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. J Manag Stud 43:917–955CrossRef Zahra SA, Sapienza HJ, Davidsson P (2006) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. J Manag Stud 43:917–955CrossRef
go back to reference Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Larrañeta B (2007) Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. J Bus Res 60:1070–1079CrossRef Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Larrañeta B (2007) Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. J Bus Res 60:1070–1079CrossRef
go back to reference Zellweger TM, Nason RS, Nordqvist M (2012) From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Fam Bus Rev 25:136–155CrossRef Zellweger TM, Nason RS, Nordqvist M (2012) From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Fam Bus Rev 25:136–155CrossRef
go back to reference Zott C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strat Manag J 24:97–125CrossRef Zott C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strat Manag J 24:97–125CrossRef
go back to reference Zott C, Amit R (2017) Business model innovation: how to create value in a digital world. Bus Model Innovat GfK MIR 19(9):19–23 Zott C, Amit R (2017) Business model innovation: how to create value in a digital world. Bus Model Innovat GfK MIR 19(9):19–23
go back to reference Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: recent developments and future research. J Manag 37:1019–1042 Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: recent developments and future research. J Manag 37:1019–1042
Metadata
Title
Business model innovation in family firms: dynamic capabilities and the moderating role of socioemotional wealth
Authors
Vanessa Weimann
Maike Gerken
Marcel Hülsbeck
Publication date
07-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Business Economics / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0044-2372
Electronic ISSN: 1861-8928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00958-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Business Economics 3/2020 Go to the issue