Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

30. Business Models for Sustainability in Living Labs

Authors : Mike Burbridge, Gregory M. Morrison, Menno van Rijn, Sasha Silvester, David V. Keyson, Lali Virdee, Carolin Baedeker, Christa Liedtke

Published in: Living Labs

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There are an estimated 170 active living labs across the globe. All have common elements but not all of them contribute to the delivery of sustainable living. Here we consider the business models of sustainability in living labs (SusLabs). Specifically we review four active living laboratories that are part of the SusLab North West Europe network. We show that the business cases are different for at least two reasons. One is that each SusLab project has a specific focus even though all are seeking to develop energy efficient innovative products, services or systems. Examples of focus include demonstration projects, knowledge generation through research and business to business development. The other is that each came about for different reasons which might include significant public or private sponsorship, or through academia-business co-creation, and this too is reflected in the business case. We also show that the business cases are not static, but may evolve over time as opportunities are created and as partners develop a clearer understanding of the potential of each SusLab. We propose that, based on a common definition of a SusLab, theoretical considerations and societal needs, as well as insights from the cases, it should be possible to build a business case for a SusLab which draws on knowledge rather than learning-by-doing.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
User is used in general terms and may refer to those living in the lab, if there are any, but equally well to stakeholders from business, society and academia.
 
Literature
go back to reference Baedeker, C., Greiff, K., Grinewitschus, V., Hasselkuß, D., Keyson, D., Knutsson, J., et al. (2014). Transition through sustainable Product and Service Innovations in Sustainable Living Labs: application of user-centred research methodology within four Living Labs in Northern Europe. Paper for presentation at the 5th International Sustainable Transitions (IST) Conference, August 27–29, 2014 Utrecht, The Netherlands. Baedeker, C., Greiff, K., Grinewitschus, V., Hasselkuß, D., Keyson, D., Knutsson, J., et al. (2014). Transition through sustainable Product and Service Innovations in Sustainable Living Labs: application of user-centred research methodology within four Living Labs in Northern Europe. Paper for presentation at the 5th International Sustainable Transitions (IST) Conference, August 27–29, 2014 Utrecht, The Netherlands.
go back to reference Bednar J., Jones-Rooy, A., & Page, S. (2015). Choosing a future based on the past: Institutions, behaviour, and path dependency. European Journal of Political Economy (in print). Bednar J., Jones-Rooy, A., & Page, S. (2015). Choosing a future based on the past: Institutions, behaviour, and path dependency. European Journal of Political Economy (in print).
go back to reference Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalisation of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35, 56–67.CrossRef Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalisation of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35, 56–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, C. (1997). The innovators dilemma. Harvard Business Review, USA. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovators dilemma. Harvard Business Review, USA.
go back to reference Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities, education, research and innovation. COM(2006) 208 final, Brussels. Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities, education, research and innovation. COM(2006) 208 final, Brussels.
go back to reference Dell’Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living Lab: A methodology between user-centred design and participatory design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 137–155. Dell’Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living Lab: A methodology between user-centred design and participatory design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 137–155.
go back to reference Dolan, P. (2015). Happiness by design. London: Plume. Dolan, P. (2015). Happiness by design. London: Plume.
go back to reference Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorf, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRef Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorf, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRef
go back to reference Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–320.CrossRef Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–320.CrossRef
go back to reference Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Sciences Information, 52(3), 486–511.CrossRef Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Sciences Information, 52(3), 486–511.CrossRef
go back to reference Erosa, V. (2012). Dealing with cultural issues in the Triple Helix Model implementation: A comparison among Government, University and Business Culture. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 52, 25–34. Erosa, V. (2012). Dealing with cultural issues in the Triple Helix Model implementation: A comparison among Government, University and Business Culture. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 52, 25–34.
go back to reference Franzen, S. (2015). Sustainable transitions at home: HSB living lab project member organisations’ view on sustainability and the living lab itself. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology. Franzen, S. (2015). Sustainable transitions at home: HSB living lab project member organisations’ view on sustainability and the living lab itself. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology.
go back to reference Gebhardt, C. (2015). The spatial dimension of the triple helix: the city revisited—towards a mode 3 of innovation systems. Triple Helix, 2(11). Gebhardt, C. (2015). The spatial dimension of the triple helix: the city revisited—towards a mode 3 of innovation systems. Triple Helix, 2(11).
go back to reference Geels, F., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29, 441–455.CrossRef Geels, F., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29, 441–455.CrossRef
go back to reference Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60, 119–128.CrossRef Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60, 119–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Hessels, L., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking knowledge production: A literature review and research agenda. Research Policy, 37, 740–760.CrossRef Hessels, L., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking knowledge production: A literature review and research agenda. Research Policy, 37, 740–760.CrossRef
go back to reference Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary University: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences, 1, 403–428.CrossRef Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary University: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences, 1, 403–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple helix model of smart cities. A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.CrossRef Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple helix model of smart cities. A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Liedtke, C., Baedeker, C., Hasselkuß, M., Rohn, H., & Grinewitschus, V. (2015). User-integrated innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 106–116.CrossRef Liedtke, C., Baedeker, C., Hasselkuß, M., Rohn, H., & Grinewitschus, V. (2015). User-integrated innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 106–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Malm, A., Ljunggren, O., Bergstedt, O., Pettersson, T., & Morrison, M. (2012). Replacement predictions for drinking water networks through historical data. Water Research, 46, 2149–2158.CrossRef Malm, A., Ljunggren, O., Bergstedt, O., Pettersson, T., & Morrison, M. (2012). Replacement predictions for drinking water networks through historical data. Water Research, 46, 2149–2158.CrossRef
go back to reference Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2010). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 6, 757–769. Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2010). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 6, 757–769.
go back to reference Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of trandisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5–16.CrossRef Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of trandisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Nee, V., & Cao, Y. (1999). Path dependent societal transformation: Stratification in hybrid mixed economies. Theory & Society, 28, 799–834.CrossRef Nee, V., & Cao, Y. (1999). Path dependent societal transformation: Stratification in hybrid mixed economies. Theory & Society, 28, 799–834.CrossRef
go back to reference Nicolescu, B. (2015). How can we enter in dialogue? Transdisciplinary methodology of the dialogue between people, cultures and spiritualities. Dialogue and Universalism, 1, 9–19.CrossRef Nicolescu, B. (2015). How can we enter in dialogue? Transdisciplinary methodology of the dialogue between people, cultures and spiritualities. Dialogue and Universalism, 1, 9–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Nyman, G. (2015). University-business-government collaboration: From institutes to platforms and ecosystems. Triple Helix, 2(2). Nyman, G. (2015). University-business-government collaboration: From institutes to platforms and ecosystems. Triple Helix, 2(2).
go back to reference Pohl, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 46–53.CrossRef Pohl, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 46–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures, 43, 618–626.CrossRef Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures, 43, 618–626.CrossRef
go back to reference Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2015). Triple Helix Systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. H-STAR, Stanford University Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2015). Triple Helix Systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. H-STAR, Stanford University
go back to reference Salter, R. & White, S. (2013). Collaborative research in the real world: review of living labs. Living Lab Framework Project, CRC for Low Carbon Living Salter, R. & White, S. (2013). Collaborative research in the real world: review of living labs. Living Lab Framework Project, CRC for Low Carbon Living
go back to reference Senge, P. (1995). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday. Senge, P. (1995). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday.
go back to reference Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practice: Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. In Global Environmental Change, 21, 813–822. Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practice: Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. In Global Environmental Change, 21, 813–822.
go back to reference Sunitiyoso, Y., Wicaksono, A., Utomo, A., Putro, U., & Mangkusubroto, K. (2012). Developing strategic initiatives through triple helix interactions: Systems modelling for policy development. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 52, 140–149. Sunitiyoso, Y., Wicaksono, A., Utomo, A., Putro, U., & Mangkusubroto, K. (2012). Developing strategic initiatives through triple helix interactions: Systems modelling for policy development. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 52, 140–149.
go back to reference United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world—the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world—the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations.
go back to reference Vanaker, T., Manigart, S., & Meuleman, M. (2014). Path dependent evolution versus intentional management of investment ties in science based entrepreneurial firms. Baylor University,. doi:10.111/etap.12007. Vanaker, T., Manigart, S., & Meuleman, M. (2014). Path dependent evolution versus intentional management of investment ties in science based entrepreneurial firms. Baylor University,. doi:10.​111/​etap.​12007.
Metadata
Title
Business Models for Sustainability in Living Labs
Authors
Mike Burbridge
Gregory M. Morrison
Menno van Rijn
Sasha Silvester
David V. Keyson
Lali Virdee
Carolin Baedeker
Christa Liedtke
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_30

Premium Partners