Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

19-06-2017 | LAND USE IN LCA

Capturing the potential biodiversity effects of forestry practices in life cycle assessment

Authors: Vincent Rossi, Timo Lehesvirta, Urs Schenker, Lars Lundquist, Oona Koski, Sokhna Gueye, Robert Taylor, Sebastien Humbert

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 6/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The pressure of forestry operations on biodiversity is not appropriately characterized using existing life cycle inventories and impact assessment methodologies. As a consequence, it is not possible to distinguish between well-managed and poorly managed forests in terms of biodiversity. Several attempts have been made to establish a biodiversity impact assessment method to be used in life cycle assessment (LCA). Those methods cannot be easily implemented by practitioners, or they cannot be used to differentiate forestry practices. We therefore propose an alternative approach that requires limited data collection, while reflecting effects of forestry practices on biodiversity.

Methods

This paper demonstrates that the biodiversity level of managed boreal forests can be captured in LCA by means of a relatively simple method based on known forestry practices and using the notion of hemeroby, compatible with previously proposed approaches for biodiversity assessment. This method allows differentiating between wood products produced with different forestry practices from one and the same forest type.

Results and discussion

The proposed method is a clear improvement compared to commonly used approaches: it does not require measuring field data yet allows the quantification of potential environmental impacts of different forestry practices in boreal forests. The proposed inventory data and characterization factors can contribute to better assess the biodiversity impacts or benefits of forest management practices.

Conclusions

The present description demonstrates how a biodiversity evaluation can be conducted in the case of boreal forestry and how the way it is built converges to values that are comparable to field measurements. It also opens doors for similar methods to be developed for tree plantations under other climates and further to other types of land use.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Kuhlmann H (2002) Life cycle impact assessment of land use based on the hemeroby concept. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:339–348CrossRef Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Kuhlmann H (2002) Life cycle impact assessment of land use based on the hemeroby concept. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:339–348CrossRef
go back to reference Bulle C, Jolliet O, Humbert S et al (2012) IMPACT World+: a new global regionalized life cycle impact assessment method. StartFragmentSociety of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 6th World Congress/Europe 22nd Annual Meeting, Berlin Bulle C, Jolliet O, Humbert S et al (2012) IMPACT World+: a new global regionalized life cycle impact assessment method. StartFragmentSociety of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 6th World Congress/Europe 22nd Annual Meeting, Berlin
go back to reference Chaudhary A, Verones F, de Baan L, Hellweg S (2015) Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species-area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49:9987–9995CrossRef Chaudhary A, Verones F, de Baan L, Hellweg S (2015) Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species-area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49:9987–9995CrossRef
go back to reference Curran M, de Baan L, De Schryver AM et al (2011) Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:70–79CrossRef Curran M, de Baan L, De Schryver AM et al (2011) Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:70–79CrossRef
go back to reference de Baan L, Alkemade R, Koellner T (2012) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1216–1230CrossRef de Baan L, Alkemade R, Koellner T (2012) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1216–1230CrossRef
go back to reference de Baan L, Curran M, Rondinini C et al (2015) High-resolution assessment of land use impacts on biodiversity in life cycle assessment using species habitat suitability models. Environ Sci Technol 49:2237–2244CrossRef de Baan L, Curran M, Rondinini C et al (2015) High-resolution assessment of land use impacts on biodiversity in life cycle assessment using species habitat suitability models. Environ Sci Technol 49:2237–2244CrossRef
go back to reference de Souza DM, Flynn DFB, DeClerck F et al (2013) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1231–1242CrossRef de Souza DM, Flynn DFB, DeClerck F et al (2013) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1231–1242CrossRef
go back to reference Fehrenbach H, Grahl B, Giegrich J, Busch M (2015) Hemeroby as an impact category indicator for the integration of land use into life cycle (impact) assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1511–1527CrossRef Fehrenbach H, Grahl B, Giegrich J, Busch M (2015) Hemeroby as an impact category indicator for the integration of land use into life cycle (impact) assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1511–1527CrossRef
go back to reference Forest Europe (2002) Improved Pan-European Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE), Vienna, Austria Forest Europe (2002) Improved Pan-European Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE), Vienna, Austria
go back to reference Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology Annex, Amersfoort Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology Annex, Amersfoort
go back to reference Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R et al (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330CrossRef Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R et al (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330CrossRef
go back to reference Koellner T, Scholz RW (2007) Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 1: an analytical framework for pure land occupation and land use change. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:16–23CrossRef Koellner T, Scholz RW (2007) Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 1: an analytical framework for pure land occupation and land use change. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:16–23CrossRef
go back to reference Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T et al (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1188–1202CrossRef Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T et al (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1188–1202CrossRef
go back to reference Kowarik I (1999) Natürlichkeit, Naturnähe und Hemerobie als Bewertungskriterien. In: Konold W, Böcker R, Hampicke U (eds) Handb. Naturschutz und Landschaftspfl. Ecomed, Landsberg, pp 1–18 Kowarik I (1999) Natürlichkeit, Naturnähe und Hemerobie als Bewertungskriterien. In: Konold W, Böcker R, Hampicke U (eds) Handb. Naturschutz und Landschaftspfl. Ecomed, Landsberg, pp 1–18
go back to reference Lindner JP, Niblick B, Eberle U et al (2014) Proposal of a unified biodiversity impact assessment method. StartFragment9th International Conference LCA of Food, San Francisco, USA Lindner JP, Niblick B, Eberle U et al (2014) Proposal of a unified biodiversity impact assessment method. StartFragment9th International Conference LCA of Food, San Francisco, USA
go back to reference Michelsen O (2008) Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity—proposal of a new methodology exemplified with forestry operations in Norway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:22–31 Michelsen O (2008) Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity—proposal of a new methodology exemplified with forestry operations in Norway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:22–31
go back to reference Michelsen O, McDevitt JE, Coelho CRV (2014) A comparison of three methods to assess land use impacts on biodiversity in a case study of forestry plantations in New Zealand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1214–1225CrossRef Michelsen O, McDevitt JE, Coelho CRV (2014) A comparison of three methods to assess land use impacts on biodiversity in a case study of forestry plantations in New Zealand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1214–1225CrossRef
go back to reference Tiedemann A, Böttcher Tiedemann C, Buschardt A et al (2000) Ökobilanzen für graphische Papiere. Umweltbundesamt Deutschland, Berlin Tiedemann A, Böttcher Tiedemann C, Buschardt A et al (2000) Ökobilanzen für graphische Papiere. Umweltbundesamt Deutschland, Berlin
go back to reference Weidema BP (2008) Framework for and review of biodiversity indicators for forest management in the context of product life cycle assessment - Final report. 2.-0 LCA consultants, Hørsholm, Denmark Weidema BP (2008) Framework for and review of biodiversity indicators for forest management in the context of product life cycle assessment - Final report. 2.-0 LCA consultants, Hørsholm, Denmark
go back to reference Weidema BP, Lindeijer E (2001) Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment. Final report of the EURENVIRON-LCAGAPS sub-project on land use. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark Weidema BP, Lindeijer E (2001) Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment. Final report of the EURENVIRON-LCAGAPS sub-project on land use. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
go back to reference World Wildlife Fund (2015) WildFinder: Online database of species distributions. www.worldwildlife.org/wildfinder. Accessed 25 Nov 2015 World Wildlife Fund (2015) WildFinder: Online database of species distributions. www.worldwildlife.org/wildfinder. Accessed 25 Nov 2015
Metadata
Title
Capturing the potential biodiversity effects of forestry practices in life cycle assessment
Authors
Vincent Rossi
Timo Lehesvirta
Urs Schenker
Lars Lundquist
Oona Koski
Sokhna Gueye
Robert Taylor
Sebastien Humbert
Publication date
19-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1352-5