Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2015

01-01-2015 | CARBON FOOTPRINTING

Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study

Authors: Cristiane Maria de Léis, Edivan Cherubini, Clandio Favarini Ruviaro, Vamilson Prudêncio da Silva, Vinícius do Nascimento Lampert, Airton Spies, Sebastião Roberto Soares

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 1/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Livestock production is a recognized source of environmental impact, and this sector indirectly involves approximately 5 million people in Brazil. Livestock production includes nearly 1.5 million milk producers that use several different production systems. We chose the southern region of Brazil to evaluate the carbon footprint (CF) per 1 kg of energy-corrected milk (ECM) at the farm gate for different dairy production systems with the use of a good level of technology.

Methods

The dairy production systems were confined feedlot system, semi-confined feedlot system (including some grazing), and pasture-based grazing system. A sensitivity analysis of the dry matter intake (DMI) in each farming system and an uncertainty analysis based on a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation were performed to complement the discussion. The standards ISO 14040: 2006 and ISO 14044: 2006 were used for the comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) focused on the CF. The LCA software tool SimaPro 7.3.3 was used. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on input data for total digestible nutrients (TDN) and crude protein (CP) based on values from the literature.

Results and discussion

The comparative LCA showed that the confined feedlot system had a lower CF than the other systems studied. Total greenhouse gas emissions were 0.535 kg CO2e kg ECM−1 for the confined feedlot system, 0.778 kg CO2e kg ECM−1 for the semi-confined feedlot system, and 0.738 kg CO2e kg ECM−1 for the pasture-based system without considering the impact from direct land use change (dLUC). When considering these emissions, the CFs for grain and cottonseed production showed CF increases of 45.0, 36.9, and 37.3 % for the confined feedlot, semi-confined feedlot, and pasture-based systems, respectively. The results from the MC simulations showed low uncertainty through variations in TDN and CP. The coefficient of variation was 1.1 % for the confined feedlot, 0.7 % for the semi-confined feedlot, and 1.0 % for the pasture systems.

Conclusions

The uncertainties were due mainly to variations in N2O emissions from manure for the three systems. The CF in Brazilian systems was lower than almost all the results found in the literature, even when impacts from the dLUC were considered. The lowest CF in this case study was due mainly to the emission factor used for enteric fermentation.
previous article Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options
next article Life cycle assessment study of a field emission display television device

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Alvarenga RAF, Prudêncio da Silva V, Soares SR (2012) Comparison of the ecological footprint and a life cycle impact assessment method for a case study on Brazilian broiler feed production. J Clean Prod 28:25–32CrossRef
Bartl K, Gómez CA, Nemecek T (2011) Life cycle assessment of milk produced in two smallholder dairy systems in the highlands and the coast of Peru. J Clean Prod 19:1494–1505CrossRef
Basset-Mens C, van der Werf HMG (2005) Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:127–144CrossRef
Basset-Mens C, Kelliher FM, Ledgard S, Cox N (2009a) Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:630–638CrossRef
Basset-Mens C, Ledgard S, Boyes M (2009b) Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand. Ecol Econ 68:1615–1625CrossRef
Beever DE, Doyle PT (2007) Feed conversion efficiency as a key determinant of dairy herd performance: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 47:645–657CrossRef
Bonesmo H, Beauchemin KA, Harsta OM, Skjelv AO (2013) Greenhouse gas emission intensities of grass silage based dairy and beef production: a systems analysis of Norwegian farms. Livest Sci 152:239–252CrossRef
Brasil (1986) Ministério da Agricultura- Abastecimento e Reforma Agrária. Normas Técnicas parágrafo Execuções do serviço de Controle Leiteiro bovídeos EM. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 out, N.195, Seção 1:1532–1535
BSI - British Standard Institution, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Carbon Trust (2008) PAS 2050:2008—Specification for the assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London, UK
Buddle BM, Denis M, Attwood GT, Altermann E, Janssen PH, Ronimus RS et al (2011) Strategies to reduce methane emissions from farmed ruminants grazing on pasture. Vet J 188:11–17CrossRef
Campos AT de, Ferreira A de M, Pires M de FA (2001) Composição do rebanho e sua influência na produção de leite. Embrapa Gado de Leite. Circular técnica n 3, 23p
Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L, Amaro R (2010) The environmental performance of milk production on a typical Portuguese dairy farm. Agric Syst 103:498–507CrossRef
Cederberg C, Flysjö A (2004) Life cycle inventory of 23 dairy farms in South Western Sweden. Report. Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology Report No.: 728
Cederberg C, Mattson B (2000) Life cycle assessment of milk production—a comparison of conventional and organic farming. J Clean Prod 8:49–60CrossRef
Cederberg C, Persson MU, Neovius K, Molander S, Clift R (2011) Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environ Sci Technol 45:1773–1779CrossRef
Dalgaard R (2007) The environmental impact of pork production from a life cycle perspective [thesis]. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus and Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University
Del Prado A, Mas K, Pardo G, Gallejones P (2013) Modelling the interactions between C and N farm balances and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in northern Spain. Sci Total Environ 465:156–165CrossRef
Embrapa–Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária/Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (2012) Estoques de carbono e emissões de gases de efeito estufa na agropecuária brasileira. In: Lima M, Boddey RM, Alves BJR, Machado PLO de A, Urquiaga S editors. Brasília, DF, Embrapa, 347 p
Flysjö A, Henriksson M, Cederberg C, Ledgard S, Englund J-E (2011a) The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Agric Syst 104:459–469CrossRef
Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard S (2011b) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:420–430CrossRef
Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard L (2012) The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change e critical considerations in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk. J Clean Prod 28:134–142CrossRef
Frischknecht R, Tuchschmid M, Faist-Emmenegger M, Bauer C, Dones R (2007) Strommix und Stromnetz. Ecoinvent report n°6, v2.0. Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. Duebendorf, Switzerland
Gerosa S, Skoet J (2012) Milk availability trends in production and demand and medium-term outlook. ESA Working paper No. 12–01. Agricultural Development Economics Division-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Available from: www.​fao.​org/​economic/​esa
González-García S, Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013) Using life cycle assessment methodology to assess UHT milk production in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 442:225–234CrossRef
Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Koning Ade, Oers LV, Wegener SA, Suh S, Haes HAUde, Bruijn Hde, Duin RV, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. IIa: Guide. IIb: operational annex. III: scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 1-4020-0228-9, Dordrecht, 692 p
Henriksson M, Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Swensson C (2011) Variation in carbon footprint of milk due to management differences between Swedish dairy farms. Animal 5:1474–1484CrossRef
IDF–International Dairy Federation (2009) Environmental/ecological impact of the dairy sector: literature review on dairy products for an inventory of key issues- list of environmental initiatives and influences on the dairy sector. Bulletin of International Dairy Federation. Report No.: 436
IDF–International Dairy Federation (2010a) The World Dairy Situation 2010. Bulletin of International Dairy Federation Report No.: 446
IDF–International Dairy Federation (2010b) A common carbon footprint approach for Dairy, The IDF Guide to Standard Lifecycle Assessment Methodology for the Dairy Sector. Bulletin of International Dairy Federation. Report No.: 445
IPCC–Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006a) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other land use, Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management (Chapter 10)
IPCC–Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006b) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4 Agriculture, forestry and other land use, N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application (Chapter 11)
IPCC–Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, editors. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Chapter 2. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press [cited 2012 Nov 26]. Available from: http://​www.​ipcc.​ch/​ipccreports/​ar4-wg1.​htm
Iribarren D, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Sci Total Environ 409:1786–1798CrossRef
ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO 14067 (2013) Greenhouse gases–carbon footprint of products–requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Jungbluth N, Chudacoff M, Dauriat A, Dinkerl F, Doka G, Faist Emmenegger M, et al. (2007) Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Ecoinvent report No. 17. Dübendorf (Switzerland): Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories
Knudsen MT, Yu-Hui Q, Yan L, Halberg N (2010) Environmental assessment of organic soybean (Glycine max.) imported from China to Denmark: a case study. J Clean Prod 18:1431–1439CrossRef
Koeppen W (1948) Climatology a study of the climates land. Economic Culture Fund, Mexico
Kristensen T, Mogensen L, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE (2011) Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livest Sci 140:136–148CrossRef
Leip A, Weiss F, Wassenaar T, Perez I, Fellmann T, Loudjani P, et al. (2010) Evaluation of the livestock sector’s contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGELS). Final report. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Ispra
Marques D (2003) Criação de Bovinos. 7th ed. Belo Horizonte: CVP Consultoria Veterinária e Publicações
Martin C, Rouel J, Jouany JP, Doreau M, Chilliard Y (2008) Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. J Anim Sci 86:2642–2650CrossRef
Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4:351–365CrossRef
Massuda E M, Alves AF, Parré JL, Santos GT (2010) Panorama da cadeia produtiva do leite no Brasil. In: Santos GT dos, Massuda EM, Kazama DC da S, Jobim CC, Branco AF. Bovinocultura leiteira: bases zootécnicas, fisiológicas e de produção. Maringá: Eduem, p 9–25
Merino P, Ramirez-Fanlo E, Arriaga H, del Hierro O, Artetxe A, Viguria M (2011) Regional inventory of methane and nitrous oxide emission from ruminant livestock in the Basque Country. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166:628–640CrossRef
NRC–National Research Council (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition, Committe on Animal Nutrition, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, 7th rev. ed., p 401
Nemecek T, Kägi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of Swiss and European agricultural systems. Final report Ecoinvent v2.0 No. 15a. Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon Research Station ART, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Dübendorf, CH. Available from: www.​ecoinvent.​ch
Nguyen TLT, Hermansen J, Mogensen L (2011) Environmental assessment of Danish pork. Report n° 103, Department of Agroecology–Aarhus University, Denmark. Available from: www.​agrsci.​au.​dk
Notarnicola B, Hayashi K, Curran MA, Huisingh D (2012) Progress in working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry. J Clean Prod 28:1–8CrossRef
Oliveira ED (2002) Opções de forrageiras de entressafra e inverno em sistema de integração lavoura e pecuária. In: Santos G, Branco A, Cecato U, Oliveira E, Parizotto ML editors. II Sul- Leite: Simpósio sobre Sustentabilidade da Pecuária Leiteira na Região Sul do Brasil. Maringá/ PR, p 189–205
Peripolli V, Prates ER, Barcellos JOJ, Neto JB (2011) Fecal nitrogen to estimate intake and digestibility in grazing ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 163:170–176CrossRef
Primavesi O, Berndt A, Lima MA de, Frighetto RTS, Demarchi JJA de A, Pedreira M dos S (2012) Produção de gases de efeito estufa em sistemas agropecuários: bases para inventário de emissão de metano por ruminantes. In: Lima MA, Boddey RM, Alves BJR, Machado P LO de A, Urquiaga S editors. Estoques de carbono e emissões de gases de efeito estufa na agropecuária brasileira. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, p 239–70
Prudêncio da Silva V (2011) Effects of intensity and scale of production on environmental impacts of poultry meat production chains: Life cycle assessment of French and Brazilian poultry production scenarios [thesis]. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil Available from: http://​www.​ciclodevida.​ufsc.​br/​publicacoes.​php
Prudêncio da Silva V, van der Werf HMG, Soares SR, Spies A (2010) Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios. J Environ Manag 91:1831–1839CrossRef
Ribeiro AC, McAllister AJ, de Queiroz AS (2003) Efeito das taxas de descarte sobre medidas econômicas de vacas leiteiras em kentucky. Rev Bras Zootec 32:1737–1746CrossRef
Rotz CA, Montes F, Chianese DS (2010) The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. J Dairy Sci 93:1266–1282CrossRef
Roy P, Daisuke N, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N et al (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90:1–10CrossRef
Ruviaro CF, Gianezini M, Brandão FS, Winck CA, Dewes H (2012) Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends. J Clean Prod 28:9–24CrossRef
Sjaunja LO, Baevre L, Junkkarinen L, Pedersen J, Setãlä J (1990) A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. Proceedings of the 27th Bienal Session of the International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR); 1990 July 2–6; Paris, France: EAAP Publication, pp 156–7
Soussana JF, Tallec T, Blanfort V (2009) Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands. Animal 4:334–350CrossRef
Spies A (2003) The sustainability of the pig and poultry industries in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a framework for change [thesis]. University of Queensland, Australia
Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, Haan C de (2006) Livestock’s long shadow. Environmental issues and options. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Thomassen MA, van Calker KJ, Smits MCJ, Iepema GL, de Boer IJM (2008) Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric Syst 96:95–107CrossRef
Thomassen MA, Dolman MA, van Calker KJ, de Boer IJM (2009) Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecol Econ 68:2278–2284CrossRef
Tumuluru JS, Wright CT, Hess JH, Kenney KL (2011) A review of biomass densification systems to develop uniform feedstock commodities for bioenergy application. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 5:683–707CrossRef
Valadares Filho SC, Machado PAS, Chizzotti ML, Amaral HF, Magalhães KA, Rocha Junior VR et al. (2011) CQBAL 3.0. Tabelas Brasileiras de Composição de Alimentos para Bovinos [cited 2011 Dec]. Available from: www.​ufv.​br/​cqbal
Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A definition of carbon footprint. Ecological economics research trends. C. C. Pertsova, ed. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, pp 1–11
Williams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL (2006) Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205. Bedford: Cranfield University and Defra. Available from: www.​silsoe.​cranfield.​ac.​uk/​ www.​defra.​gov.​uk
WRI WBCSD – World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2011) The Greenhouse Gas Protocol - Initiative calculation tool –Available from: http://​www.​ghgprotocol.​org/​
Yan M-J, Humphreys J, Holden NM (2011) An evaluation of life cycle assessment of European milk production. J Environ Manag 92:372–379CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study
Authors
Cristiane Maria de Léis
Edivan Cherubini
Clandio Favarini Ruviaro
Vamilson Prudêncio da Silva
Vinícius do Nascimento Lampert
Airton Spies
Sebastião Roberto Soares
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0813-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2015 Go to the issue

LCI METHODOLOGY AND DATABASES

Life cycle assessment study of a field emission display television device

BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS

Impact of maintenance on life cycle impact and cost assessment for residential flooring options

WATER USE IN LCA

Spatial and temporal specific characterisation factors for water use impact assessment in Spain

WATER USE IN LCA

Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators

CONFERENCE REPORT

Sustainable buildings, construction products and technologies: linking research and construction practice

BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS

LCA-based study on structural retrofit options for masonry buildings