Top

Published in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. Cardiovascular Imaging, Navigation and Intervention: Hybrid Imaging and Therapeutics

Authors : Daynene Vykoukal, Ponraj Chinnadurai, Mark G. Davies

Published in: Computational Surgery and Dual Training

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The abilities to identify a target through imaging and to navigate through the blood vessels and interrogate the vessel wall are core technical competencies in cardiovascular medicine. The imaging modalities used in the cardiovascular space include ultrasound, intravascular imaging, real-time X-ray (fluoroscopy), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. When merged, these imaging components provide a 3-dimensional (3D) functional view of a vessel and the pathway for an interventional system to access and to target a lesion. In addition to this fused imaging, other components are integral to intravascular navigation, including spatial awareness of the imaging system that builds on the fused images and the ability to steer a catheter based on that knowledge. Hybrid procedural rooms where fluoroscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and post-processing systems are concomitantly available allow for integration of real-time anatomy with real-time images and previously acquired images. Once this fused imaging array is linked to a robotically driven catheter that can maintain stability, follow center line flow and articulate in a 3D space, one has achieved a hybrid integrated therapeutic system which is capable of complex interventions. At present, cardiac, neurovascular, and endovascular interventions can be markedly enhanced by such integrated hybrid imaging. The potential to extend the fundamentals of the hybrid systems into other medical fields is significant, as is the potential to build more rapid computational capabilities to take the systems to the next level and further minimize the human operator/device interface.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Hardware and Performance Considerations for Computational Medicine

next chapter Towards Automatic Computer-Aided Planning in Arthroplasty Surgery by Innovative Methods for Processing the Bone Surface Models

Ramaswami G, Tegos T, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Al-Kutoubi A et al (1999) Ultrasonic plaque character and outcome after lower limb angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 29(1):110–121CrossRef

Marks NA, Ascher E, Hingorani AP, Shiferson A, Puggioni A (2008) Gray-scale median of the atherosclerotic plaque can predict success of lumen re-entry during subintimal femoral-popliteal angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 47(1):109–116CrossRef

Kashyap VS, Pavkov ML, Bishop PD, Nassoiy SP, Eagleton MJ, Clair DG et al (2008) Angiography underestimates peripheral atherosclerosis: lumenography revisited. J Endovasc Ther 15(1):117–125CrossRef

Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ (2009) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301(4):415–424CrossRef

Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Kock MC, Hunink MG (2007) Lower extremity arterial disease: multidetector CT angiography meta-analysis. Radiology 245(2):433–439CrossRef

Mell M, Tefera G, Thornton F, Siepman D, Turnipseed W (2007) Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 45(3):543–548CrossRef

Huegli RW, Thalhammer C, Jacob AL, Jaeger K, Bilecen D (2008) Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur J Radiol 66(3):519–525CrossRef

Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Craig D, Wright K et al (2007) A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess 11(20):iii–iv, xi–xiii, 1–184CrossRef

Kawano T, Honye J, Takayama T, Yokoyama S, Chiku M, Ando H et al (2008) Compositional analysis of angioscopic yellow plaques with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data. Int J Cardiol 125(1):74–78CrossRef

10.

Bishop PD, Feiten LE, Ouriel K, Nassoiy SP, Pavkov ML, Clair D et al (2008) Arterial calcification increases in distal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg 22(6):799–805CrossRef

11.

Gussenhoven EJ, van der Lugt A, Pasterkamp G, van der Berg FG, Sie LH, Vischjager M et al (1995) Intravascular ultrasound predictors of outcome after peripheral balloon angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10(3):279–288CrossRef

12.

Vogt KC, Just S, Rasmussen JG, Schroeder TV (1997) Prediction of outcome after femoropopliteal balloon angioplasty by IVUS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 13(6):563–568CrossRef

13.

van der Lugt A, Gussenhoven EJ, Pasterkamp G, Stijnen T, Reekers JA, van der Berg FG et al (1998) Intravascular ultrasound predictor of restenosis after balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 16(2):110–119CrossRef

14.

Spijkerboer AM, Nass PC, de Valois JC, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP (1996) Evaluation of femoropopliteal arteries with duplex ultrasound after angioplasty, can we predict results at one year? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12(4):418–423CrossRef

15.

van Lankeren W, Gussenhoven EJ, Honkoop J, Stijnen T, van Overhagen H, Wittens CHA et al (1999) Plaque area increase and vascular remodeling contribute to lumen area change after PTA of the femoropopliteal artery: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Vasc Surg 29(3):430–441CrossRef

16.

Tatò F, Hoffmann U, Weber C, Reiser M, Rieger J (2006) Comparison of angiography, duplex sonography and intravascular ultrasound for the graduation of femoropopliteal stenoses before and after balloon angioplasty. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(12):1837–1843CrossRef

17.

Sarno G, Garg S, Gomez-Lara J, Garcia Garcia HM, Ligthart J, Bruining N et al (2011) Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis after optimal coronary stenting with initial quantitative coronary angiography guidance: an ATHEROREMO sub-study. EuroIntervention 6(8):977–984CrossRef

18.

Parise H, Maehara A, Stone GW, Leon MB, Mintz GS (2011) Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiographic guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in pre-drug-eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol 107(3):374–382CrossRef

19.

Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, Aretz HT, Jang I-K, Schlendorf KH et al (2002) Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 106:1540–1545CrossRef

20.

Jang I-K, Bouma BE, Kang D-H, Park S-J, Park S-W, Seung K-B et al (2002) Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(4):604–609CrossRef

21.

Den Heijer P, Foley DP, Hillege H (1994) The “Ermenonville” classification of observations at coronary angioscopy: evaluation of intra- and inter-observer agreement. Eur Heart J 15:815

22.

Thieme T, Wernecke KD, Meyer R (1996) Angioscopic evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques: validation by histomorphologic analysis and association with stable and unstable coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1–6CrossRef

23.

Den Heijer P, Dijk RB, Hillege HL (1994) Serial angioscopic and angiographic observations during the first hour after successful coronary angioplasty: a preamble to a multicenter trial addressing angioscopic markers of restenosis. Am Heart J 128:656–663CrossRef

24.

Kanamasa K, Ishikawa K (2002) Haziness on coronary angiogram after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty evaluated with angioscopy. Angiology 53:171–176CrossRef

25.

Sakatani H, Degawa T, Nakamura M (1999) Intracoronary surface changes after Palmar–Schatz stent implantation: serial observations with coronary angioscopy. Am Heart J 138:962–967CrossRef

26.

Ueda Y, Nanto S, Komamura K (1994) Neointimal coverage of stents in coronary arteries observed by angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:341–346CrossRef

27.

Sassower M, Abela, Kock MC (1993) Angioscopic evaluation of periprocedural and postprocedural abrupt closure after percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 126:444–450CrossRef

28.

White C, Ramee S, Collins T (1995) Coronary angioscopy of abrupt occlusion after angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1681–1684CrossRef

29.

van Ooijen PMA, de Jonge G, Oudkerk M (2007) Coronary fly-through or virtual angioscopy using dual-source MDCT data. Eur Radiol 17:2852–2859CrossRef

30.

Voigt JU (2009) Ultrasound molecular imaging. Methods 48(2):92–97CrossRef

31.

Ferrara KW, Borden MA, Zhang H (2009) Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. Acc Chem Res 42(7):881–892CrossRef

32.

Villanueva FS (2008) Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease using ultrasound. J Nucl Cardiol 15(4):576–586CrossRef

33.

Lécart M, Cardinal MH, Qin Z, Soulez G, Cloutier G (2009) In vitro in-stent restenoses evaluated by 3D ultrasound. Med Phys 36(2):513–522CrossRef

34.

Awad J, Krasinski A, Parraga G, Fenster A (2010) Texture analysis of carotid artery atherosclerosis from three-dimensional ultrasound images. Med Phys 37(4):1382–1391CrossRef

35.

Janvier MA, Soulez G, Allard L, Cloutier G (2010) Validation of 3D reconstructions of a mimicked femoral artery with an ultrasound imaging robotic system. Med Phys 37(7):3868–3879CrossRef

36.

Szmigielski C, Rajpoot K, Grau V, Myerson SG, Holloway C, Noble JA et al (2010) Real-time 3D fusion echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(7):682–690CrossRef

37.

Hoe J (2009) CT coronary angiography of chronic total occlusions of the coronary arteries: how to recognize and evaluate and usefulness for planning percutaneous coronary interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(Suppl 1):43–54CrossRef

38.

Louis N, Bruguiere E, Kobeiter H, Desgranges P, Allaire E, Kirsch M et al (2010) Virtual angioscopy and 3D navigation: a new technique for analysis of the aortic arch after vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40(3):340–347CrossRef

39.

Eraso LH, Reilly MP, Sehgal C, Mohler ER 3rd (2011) Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic molecular imaging applications in vascular disease. Vasc Med 16:145–156

40.

Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, Daly TS, Harrison AT et al (2010) Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(7):751–758CrossRef

41.

Bismuth J, Garami Z, Anaya-Ayala JE, Naoum JJ, El Sayed HF, Peden EK et al (2011) Transcranial Doppler findings during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 54(2):364–369

42.

Sidhu R, Weir-McCall J, Cochennec F, Riga C, DiMarco A, Bicknell CD (2012) Evaluation of an electromagnetic 3D navigation system to facilitate endovascular tasks: a feasibility study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:22–29

43.

Jeron A, Fredersdorf S, Debl K, Oren E, Izmirli A, Peleg A et al (2009) First-in-man (FIM) experience with the magnetic medical positioning system (MPS) for intracoronary navigation. EuroIntervention 5(5):552–557CrossRef

44.

Tsuchida K, García-García HM, van der Giessen WJ, McFadden EP, van der Ent M, Sianos G et al (2006) Guidewire navigation in coronary artery stenoses using a novel magnetic navigation system: first clinical experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(3):356–363CrossRef

45.

Ramcharitar S, van Geuns RJ, Patterson M, van der Giessen WJ, van der Ent M, van Domburg RT et al (2008) A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72(6):761–770CrossRef

46.

IJsselmuiden AJ, Patterson MS, van Nooijen FC, Tangelder GJ, Dirksen MT, Amoroso G et al (2009) Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption. EuroIntervention 4(4):517–523CrossRef

47.

Pappone C, Augello G, Gugliotta F, Santinelli V (2007) Robotic and magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. How and why? Expert Rev Med Devices 4(6):885–894CrossRef

48.

Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, Gugliotta F, Mazzone P, Gulletta S et al (2006) Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(7):1390–1400CrossRef

49.

Chun KR, Wissner E, Koektuerk B, Konstantinidou M, Schmidt B, Zerm T et al (2010) Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 3(5):458–464CrossRef

50.

Ernst S (2008) Robotic approach to catheter ablation. Curr Opin Cardiol 23(1):28–31MathSciNetCrossRef

51.

Kwartowitz DM, Miga MI, Herrell SD, Galloway RL (2009) Towards image guided robotic surgery: multi-arm tracking through hybrid localization. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4(3):281–286CrossRef

52.

Malcolme-Lawes L, Kanagaratnam P (2010) Robotic navigation and ablation. Minerva Cardioangiol 58(6):691–699

53.

Antoniou GA, Riga CV, Mayer EK, Cheshire NJ, Bicknell CD (2011) Clinical applications of robotic technology in vascular and endovascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 53(2):493–499CrossRef

54.

Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Cochennec F, Normahani P, Chadha P, Kashef E et al (2011) Advanced catheter technology: is this the answer to overcoming the long learning curve in complex endovascular procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:531–538CrossRef

55.

Riga CV, Cheshire NJ, Hamady MS, Bicknell CD (2010) The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting. J Vasc Surg 51(4):810–819CrossRef

56.

Ma Y, Penney GP, Bos D, Frissen P, Rinaldi CA, Razavi R et al (2010) Hybrid echo and X-ray image guidance for cardiac catheterization procedures by using a robotic arm: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 55(13):N371–N382CrossRef

57.

Ahmed K, Keeling AN, Fakhry M, Ashrafian H, Aggarwal R, Naughton PA et al (2010) Role of virtual reality simulation in teaching and assessing technical skills in endovascular intervention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(1):55–66CrossRef

58.

Lin PH, Bush RL, Peden EK, Zhou W, Guerrero M, Henao EA et al (2005) Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection;assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. Am J Surg 190:850–857CrossRef

59.

van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, Brightwell R, Vermassen FE, Cheshire NJ (2007) Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg 46(5):855–863CrossRef

60.

Hsu JH, Younan D, Pandalai S, Gillespie BT, Jain RA, Schippert DW et al (2004) Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg 4(6):1118–1125CrossRef

61.

Dayal R, Faries PL, Lin SC, Bernheim J, Hollenbeck S, DeRubertis B et al (2004) Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training. J Vasc Surg 40(6):1112–1117CrossRef

62.

van Herzeele I, O’Donoghue KG, Aggarwal R, Vermassen FE, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ (2010) Visuospatial and psychomotor aptitude predicts endovascular performance of inexperienced individuals on a virtual reality simulator. J Vasc Surg 51(4):1035–1042CrossRef

63.

Hislop SJ, Hedrick JH, Singh MJ, Rhodes JM, Gillespie DL, Johansson M et al (2009) Simulation case rehearsals for carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38(6):750–754CrossRef

64.

Roguin A, Beyar R (2010) Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75(2):279–282CrossRef

65.

Berry M, Lystig T, Beard J, Klingestierna H, Reznick R, Lönn L (2007) Porcine transfer study: virtual reality simulator training compared with porcine training in endovascular novices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30(3):455–461CrossRef

66.

Chaer RA, Derubertis BG, Lin SC, Bush HL, Karwowski JK, Birk D et al (2006) Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg 244(3):343–352

67.

Suzuki Y, Fujitsuka M, Chaloupka JC (2005) Simulation of endovascular neurointervention using silicone models; imaging and manipulation. Neurol Med Chir 45:567–572CrossRef

Title: Cardiovascular Imaging, Navigation and Intervention: Hybrid Imaging and Therapeutics
Authors: Daynene Vykoukal
Ponraj Chinnadurai
Mark G. Davies
Publisher: Springer New York
Book: Computational Surgery and Dual Training
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8647-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4614-8648-0

Copyright Year: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_8