Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Business Ethics
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2022

26-02-2021 | Original Paper

Changes in Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Performance

Authors: Hui-Ju Tsai, Yangru Wu

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 3/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance by comparing the portfolio returns of firms with changes in corporate social responsibility (CSR) intensity. Using an extensive US sample from the MSCI ESG database, we find that improvement in the overall CSR is generally value enhancing. The relationship varies with CSR dimensions. More importantly, the relationship shifts differently for various CSR dimensions during the crisis period when trust in the society is low and financial resource is limited. Improvement in environment, human rights, and product characteristics shows higher financial returns during the financial crisis period, whereas the value enhancement of improvement in employee relations is more pronounced during the non-crisis period.
previous article Law Lost, Compliance Found: A Frontline Understanding of the Non-linear Nature of Business and Employee Responses to Law
next article Deliberating Our Frames: How Members of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives Use Shared Frames to Tackle Within-Frame Conflicts Over Sustainability Issues

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
3
For example, in 2012, 11.3% of the $33.3 trillion assets under professional management in the U.S. are invested according to the concept of socially responsible investing. From 1995 to 2012, assets engaged in sustainable and responsible investing practice increased by 486%, while the growth rate of total assets under professional management is only 376% during the same period. See the 2012 Report on Sustainable and Responsible Investing Trends in the United States.
 
4
Detailed information about the number of firms covered by the database over time is available from the authors upon request.
 
5
Other researchers have also specifically studied the CSR aspect of companies involved in the controversial business. See, e.g., Jo and Na (2012), and Oh et al.(2017).
 
6
We use the SIC-based industry classifications of Moskowitz and Grinblatt (1999).
 
7
The data of market value before 1997 is not available from COMPUSTAT, so the statistics of market value are based on the data for the period of 1998–2012.
 
8
In an untabulated analysis, however, we find that such effect is at most temporary. Firms with decreasing commitment to employee relations do not have higher stock returns than those with improvements in employee relations two years after the crisis. The result is available from the authors upon request.
 
9
Here we consider year-fixed effects except when year t + 1 is 2008 or 2009, which is defined as the crisis period.
 
10
The portfolio is constructed based on changes in social performance in 2003–2012. We compare the returns of the up and down portfolios in the subsequent years, i.e., 2004–2013.
 
Literature
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 783–827.CrossRef
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Econometrica, 77, 1–19.
Borgers, A., Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Horst, J. T. (2013). Stakeholder relations and stock returns: On errors in investors’ expectations and learning. Journal of Empirical Finance, 22, 159–175.CrossRef
Bowman, E., & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18, 49–58.CrossRef
Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 467–480.CrossRef
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52, 57–82.CrossRef
Cheng, I.-H., H. Hong, & K. Shue. (2014). Do managers do good with other people’s money? Working Paper, Princeton University.
Chih, H.-L., Chih, H.-H., & Chen, T.-Y. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 115–135.CrossRef
Deng, X., Kang, J.-K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110, 87–109.CrossRef
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61, 51–63.CrossRef
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Horst, J. T. (2011). A tale of value-seeking versus profit-driven investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 2137–2147.CrossRef
Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111, 158–180.CrossRef
Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier. Harvard Business Review, 91, 50–60.
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 621–640.CrossRef
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, Chuck C. Y., & Mishra, Dev R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 2388–2406.CrossRef
Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122, 585–606.CrossRef
Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61, 2549–2568.CrossRef
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13(32–33), 122–124.
Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 2646–2654.CrossRef
Godfrey, P., Merrill, C., & Hansen, J. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.CrossRef
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1794–1810.CrossRef
Gössling, T., & Vocht, C. (2007). Social role conceptions and CSR policy success. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 363–372.CrossRef
Henke, H.-M. (2016). The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 67, 69–84.CrossRef
Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRef
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: the effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36.CrossRef
Hong, H., J. D. Kubik, & J. A. Scheinkman. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate goodness, Working Paper, Princeton University.
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 8–21.CrossRef
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef
Jiao, Y. (2010). Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2549–2561.CrossRef
Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441–456.CrossRef
Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13, 908–922.CrossRef
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Review, 91, 1697–1724.CrossRef
Koh, P.-S., Qian, C., & Wang, H. (2014). Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1464–1482.CrossRef
Kruger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 304–325.CrossRef
Lewis, P. V. (1985). Defining “Business Ethics”: Like nailing jello to a wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 377–383.CrossRef
Lins, K., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72, 1785–1823.CrossRef
Lys, T., Naughton, J., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60, 56–72.CrossRef
Macintosh, J. (1999). The issues, effects, and consequences of the Berle-Dodd debate, 1931–1932. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 139–153.CrossRef
Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409–422.CrossRef
Masulis, R., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problem and corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 28, 592–636.CrossRef
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRef
Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299–315.CrossRef
Moskowitz, T. J., & Grinblatt, M. (1999). Do industries explain momentum? Journal of Finance, 54, 1249–1290.CrossRef
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heterogeneity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.CrossRef
Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking and Finance, 48, 180–193.CrossRef
Oh, H., Bae, J., & Kim, S.-J. (2017). Can sinful firms benefit from advertising their CSR efforts? Adverse effect of advertising sinful firms’ CSR engagements on firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 643–663.CrossRef
Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 167–180.CrossRef
Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship. A typology and analysis. Business and Society, 36, 419–429.CrossRef
Renneboog, L., Horst, J. T., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance and investor behavior. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1723–1742.CrossRef
Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 195–211.CrossRef
Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59, 1045–1061.CrossRef
Sharfman, Mark, & Fernando, Chitru. (2008). Environment risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569–592.CrossRef
Shiu, Y.-M., & Yang, S.-L. (2017). Does management in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38, 455–470.CrossRef
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 97–109.CrossRef
Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65, 33–46.CrossRef
van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values - A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424.CrossRef
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRef
Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1159–1181.CrossRef
Wang, X., Cao, F., & Ye, K. (2018). Mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting and financial reporting quality: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 253–274.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Changes in Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Performance
Authors
Hui-Ju Tsai
Yangru Wu
Publication date
26-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04772-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2022 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Deliberating Our Frames: How Members of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives Use Shared Frames to Tackle Within-Frame Conflicts Over Sustainability Issues

Original Paper

Antagonism to Protagonism: Tracing the Historical Contours of Legalization in an Emerging Industry

Original Paper

Between Market Failures and Justice Failures: Trade-Offs Between Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics

Original Paper

Law Lost, Compliance Found: A Frontline Understanding of the Non-linear Nature of Business and Employee Responses to Law

Original Paper

Doing Well and Doing Good: How Responsible Entrepreneurship Shapes Female Entrepreneurial Success

Original Paper

Ethics, Economics, and the Specter of Naturalism: The Enduring Relevance of the Harmony Doctrine School of Economics