Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2022

14-03-2022

Characterizing Students’ 4C Skills Development During Problem-based Digital Making

Authors: Xiaojing Weng, Zhihao Cui, Oi-Lam Ng, Morris S. Y. Jong, Thomas K. F. Chiu

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 3/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Amid the maker movement, educators are proposing various making activities with programmable artifacts to prepare students for coping with the challenges in the twenty-first century. Today, the “4C” skills—critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration—are regarded as significant learning outcomes in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics education; however, few researchers have investigated the adoption of problem-based learning in K-12 programming education for developing students’ 4C skills. A case study was conducted in a “digital making” camp in which 54 upper elementary and lower secondary school students (10–14 years old) were engaged in harnessing a block-based programming tool, Scratch, to conduct various problem-solving tasks. Through triangulating multiple sources of qualitative data (including lesson plans, classroom field notes, videotaped lesson records, student solutions/artifacts, and post-intervention interviews), together with the microgenetic learning analysis, this study characterizes students’ 4C skills development in the process of problem-based digital making. We found that the problem-based digital making environment supported the students’ development of (a) critical thinking in the form of critical modeling and critical data handling; (b) creativity in the form of creative explorations, creative solutions, and creative expressions; and (c) communication and collaboration in the form of communicative scaffolding and collaborative debugging. Complementary evidence-based suggestions for scaffolding problem-based digital making activities are suggested.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 438. Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 438.
go back to reference Akcaoglu, M. (2014). Learning problem-solving through making games at the game design and learning summer program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 583–600.CrossRef Akcaoglu, M. (2014). Learning problem-solving through making games at the game design and learning summer program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 583–600.CrossRef
go back to reference Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647.CrossRef Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647.CrossRef
go back to reference Carbonell-Carrera, C., Saorin, J. L., Melian-Diaz, D., & De la Torre-Cantero, J. (2019). Enhancing creative thinking in STEM with 3D CAD modelling. Sustainability, 11(21), 6036.CrossRef Carbonell-Carrera, C., Saorin, J. L., Melian-Diaz, D., & De la Torre-Cantero, J. (2019). Enhancing creative thinking in STEM with 3D CAD modelling. Sustainability, 11(21), 6036.CrossRef
go back to reference Charlton, P., & Avramides, K. (2016). Knowledge construction in computer science and engineering when learning through making. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 379–390.CrossRef Charlton, P., & Avramides, K. (2016). Knowledge construction in computer science and engineering when learning through making. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 379–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Chounta, I. A., Manske, S., & Hoppe, H. U. (2017). “From making to learning”: Introducing Dev Camps as an educational paradigm for Re-inventing Problem-based Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRef Chounta, I. A., Manske, S., & Hoppe, H. U. (2017). “From making to learning”: Introducing Dev Camps as an educational paradigm for Re-inventing Problem-based Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Clark, R. M., & Mahboobin, A. (2017). Scaffolding to support problem-solving performance in a bioengineering lab–A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(2), 109–118.CrossRef Clark, R. M., & Mahboobin, A. (2017). Scaffolding to support problem-solving performance in a bioengineering lab–A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(2), 109–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Cutumisu, M., Adams, C., & Lu, C. (2019). A scoping review of empirical research on recent computational thinking assessments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 651–676.CrossRef Cutumisu, M., Adams, C., & Lu, C. (2019). A scoping review of empirical research on recent computational thinking assessments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 651–676.CrossRef
go back to reference Demartini, C., & Benussi, L. (2017). Do Web 4.0 and industry 4.0 imply education X. 0?. IT Professional, 19(3), 4–7. Demartini, C., & Benussi, L. (2017). Do Web 4.0 and industry 4.0 imply education X. 0?. IT Professional, 19(3), 4–7.
go back to reference Dohn, N. B. (2020). Students’ interest in Scratch coding in lower secondary mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 71–83.CrossRef Dohn, N. B. (2020). Students’ interest in Scratch coding in lower secondary mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 71–83.CrossRef
go back to reference Eberbach, C., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Taylor, J., & Hunter, R. (2021). Multidimensional trajectories for understanding ecosystems. Science Education, 105(3), 521–540.CrossRef Eberbach, C., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Taylor, J., & Hunter, R. (2021). Multidimensional trajectories for understanding ecosystems. Science Education, 105(3), 521–540.CrossRef
go back to reference English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8.CrossRef English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Fazio, L. K., & Siegler, R. S. (2013). Microgenetic learning analysis: A distinction without a difference. Human Development, 56(1), 52–58.CrossRef Fazio, L. K., & Siegler, R. S. (2013). Microgenetic learning analysis: A distinction without a difference. Human Development, 56(1), 52–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Fields, D., Vasudevan, V., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). The programmers’ collective: Fostering participatory culture by making music videos in a high school Scratch coding workshop. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 613–633.CrossRef Fields, D., Vasudevan, V., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). The programmers’ collective: Fostering participatory culture by making music videos in a high school Scratch coding workshop. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 613–633.CrossRef
go back to reference Gadhamshetty, V., Shrestha, N., & Kilduff, J. E. (2016). Project-based introduction to an engineering design course incorporating microbial fuel cells as a renewable energy technology. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142(3), 05016001.CrossRef Gadhamshetty, V., Shrestha, N., & Kilduff, J. E. (2016). Project-based introduction to an engineering design course incorporating microbial fuel cells as a renewable energy technology. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142(3), 05016001.CrossRef
go back to reference Geng, J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2019). Hong Kong teachers’ self-efficacy and concerns about STEM education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 35–45.CrossRef Geng, J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2019). Hong Kong teachers’ self-efficacy and concerns about STEM education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 35–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Godhe, A. L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 317–328.CrossRef Godhe, A. L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 317–328.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer. Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
go back to reference Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.CrossRef Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.CrossRef
go back to reference Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
go back to reference Hu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2020). Enhancing STEM competence by making electronic musical pencil for non-engineering students. Computers & Education, 150, 103840. Hu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2020). Enhancing STEM competence by making electronic musical pencil for non-engineering students. Computers & Education, 150, 103840.
go back to reference Hu, W., & Guo, X. (2021). Toward the development of key competencies: A conceptual framework for STEM curriculum design and a case study. Frontiers in Education, 6, 684265. Hu, W., & Guo, X. (2021). Toward the development of key competencies: A conceptual framework for STEM curriculum design and a case study. Frontiers in Education, 6, 684265.
go back to reference Ke, F., Clark, K. M., & Uysal, S. (2019). Architecture game-based mathematical learning by making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 167–184.CrossRef Ke, F., Clark, K. M., & Uysal, S. (2019). Architecture game-based mathematical learning by making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 167–184.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.CrossRef Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–11.CrossRef Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, K. Y., Yu, K. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chang, Y. S., & Chien, Y. H. (2020). Effects of web-based versus classroom-based STEM learning environments on the development of collaborative problem-solving skills in junior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 21–34.CrossRef Lin, K. Y., Yu, K. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chang, Y. S., & Chien, Y. H. (2020). Effects of web-based versus classroom-based STEM learning environments on the development of collaborative problem-solving skills in junior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 21–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Litts, B. K., Lewis, W. E., & Mortensen, C. K. (2020). Engaging youth in computational thinking practices through designing place-based mobile games about local issues. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 302–315.CrossRef Litts, B. K., Lewis, W. E., & Mortensen, C. K. (2020). Engaging youth in computational thinking practices through designing place-based mobile games about local issues. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 302–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16.CrossRef Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014). “What do you want to say?” How adolescents use translanguaging to expand learning opportunities. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(3), 208–230.CrossRef Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014). “What do you want to say?” How adolescents use translanguaging to expand learning opportunities. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(3), 208–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Newman, J. L., Dantzler, J., & Coleman, A. N. (2015). Science in action: How middle school students are changing their world through STEM service-learning projects. Theory into Practice, 54(1), 47–54.CrossRef Newman, J. L., Dantzler, J., & Coleman, A. N. (2015). Science in action: How middle school students are changing their world through STEM service-learning projects. Theory into Practice, 54(1), 47–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Owens, A. D., & Hite, R. L. (2020). Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project-based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–27. Owens, A. D., & Hite, R. L. (2020). Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project-based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–27.
go back to reference Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. U. (2019). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–22. Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. U. (2019). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–22.
go back to reference Papert, S. (1996). A word for learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in digital world (pp. 9–24). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Papert, S. (1996). A word for learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in digital world (pp. 9–24). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Papert, S. A. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic books. Papert, S. A. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic books.
go back to reference Parnafes, O., & diSessa, A. A. (2013). Microgenetic learning analysis. Human Development, 56(1), 5–37.CrossRef Parnafes, O., & diSessa, A. A. (2013). Microgenetic learning analysis. Human Development, 56(1), 5–37.CrossRef
go back to reference Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. Grossman Publishers. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. Grossman Publishers.
go back to reference Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579–595.CrossRef Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579–595.CrossRef
go back to reference Richard, G. T., & Giri, S. (2019). Digital and physical fabrication as multimodal learning: Understanding youth computational thinking when making integrated systems through bidirectionally responsive design. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(3), 1–35.CrossRef Richard, G. T., & Giri, S. (2019). Digital and physical fabrication as multimodal learning: Understanding youth computational thinking when making integrated systems through bidirectionally responsive design. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(3), 1–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
go back to reference Silber-Varod, V., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2019). Tracing research trends of 21st-century learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3099–3118.CrossRef Silber-Varod, V., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2019). Tracing research trends of 21st-century learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3099–3118.CrossRef
go back to reference Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(3), 333–341.CrossRef Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(3), 333–341.CrossRef
go back to reference Swanson, H., & Collins, A. (2018). How failure is productive in the creative process: Refining student explanations through theory-building discussion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 54–63.CrossRef Swanson, H., & Collins, A. (2018). How failure is productive in the creative process: Refining student explanations through theory-building discussion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 54–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.CrossRef Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.CrossRef
go back to reference Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2019). Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: A study of university students’ experiences. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 880–894.CrossRef Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2019). Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: A study of university students’ experiences. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 880–894.CrossRef
go back to reference Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.CrossRef Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.CrossRef Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., & Lin, Q. (2020). Correction to: Improving and assessing Computational Thinking in Maker activities: The integration with Physics and Engineering learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 215–215.CrossRef Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., & Lin, Q. (2020). Correction to: Improving and assessing Computational Thinking in Maker activities: The integration with Physics and Engineering learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 215–215.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characterizing Students’ 4C Skills Development During Problem-based Digital Making
Authors
Xiaojing Weng
Zhihao Cui
Oi-Lam Ng
Morris S. Y. Jong
Thomas K. F. Chiu
Publication date
14-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09961-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partners