Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 6/2020

29-01-2020 | Original Empirical Research

Cheaper and smaller or more expensive and larger: how consumers respond to unit price increase tactics that simultaneously change product price and package size

Authors: Jun Yao, Harmen Oppewal, Di Wang

Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Issue 6/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To increase the unit price of a product, marketers of packaged groceries generally either raise the retail price or reduce the package size. We describe two unit price increase tactics in which the retail price and package size of a product simultaneously increase or decrease. Five studies, including a field study conducted in a grocery store, show that when unit price information is available, consumer decisions are influenced more by changes in both retail price and unit price than by changes in package size. Consumers thus respond more favorably to simultaneous decreases than to simultaneous increases. We further show that when unit price information is unavailable, consumers focus on the observed retail price increase for simultaneous increases, whereas they tend to estimate the unit price increase for simultaneous decreases. Since both forms of processing result in the cognition of an increase in “price,” consumers respond similarly to the two tactics.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Aaker, D. A., & Ford, G. T. (1983). Unit pricing ten years later: A replication. Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 118–122.CrossRef Aaker, D. A., & Ford, G. T. (1983). Unit pricing ten years later: A replication. Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 118–122.CrossRef
go back to reference Bagchi, R., & Davis, D. F. (2012). $29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? How presentation order affects package perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 62–73.CrossRef Bagchi, R., & Davis, D. F. (2012). $29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? How presentation order affects package perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 62–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Bogomolova, S., Oppewal, H., Cohen, J., & Yao, J. (2018). How the layout of a unit price label affects eye-movements and product choice: An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Business Research. Advance online publication. Bogomolova, S., Oppewal, H., Cohen, J., & Yao, J. (2018). How the layout of a unit price label affects eye-movements and product choice: An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Business Research. Advance online publication.
go back to reference Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 474–491.CrossRef Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 474–491.CrossRef
go back to reference Çakır, M., & Balagtas, J. V. (2014). Consumer response to package downsizing: Evidence from the Chicago ice cream market. Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 1–12.CrossRef Çakır, M., & Balagtas, J. V. (2014). Consumer response to package downsizing: Evidence from the Chicago ice cream market. Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 1–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Calabuig, F., Núñez-Pomar, J., Prado-Gascó, V., & Añó, V. (2014). Effect of price increases on future intentions of sport consumers. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 729–733.CrossRef Calabuig, F., Núñez-Pomar, J., Prado-Gascó, V., & Añó, V. (2014). Effect of price increases on future intentions of sport consumers. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 729–733.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 187–199.CrossRef Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 187–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, M. C. (2007). “Says who?!” How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (un) fairness. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 261–271.CrossRef Campbell, M. C. (2007). “Says who?!” How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (un) fairness. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 261–271.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, H., & Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 327–340.CrossRef Chen, H., & Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 327–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheng, L., & Monroe, K. (2013). An appraisal of behavioral price research (part 1): Price as a physical stimulus. AMS Review, 3(3), 103–129.CrossRef Cheng, L., & Monroe, K. (2013). An appraisal of behavioral price research (part 1): Price as a physical stimulus. AMS Review, 3(3), 103–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170–183.CrossRef Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64–76.CrossRef Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Dawes, J. (2009). The effect of service price increases on customer retention: The moderating role of customer tenure and relationship breadth. Journal of Service Research, 11(3), 232–245.CrossRef Dawes, J. (2009). The effect of service price increases on customer retention: The moderating role of customer tenure and relationship breadth. Journal of Service Research, 11(3), 232–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.CrossRef Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Dieckmann, N. F., Slovic, P., & Peters, E. M. (2009). The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy. Risk Analysis, 29(10), 1473–1488.CrossRef Dieckmann, N. F., Slovic, P., & Peters, E. M. (2009). The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy. Risk Analysis, 29(10), 1473–1488.CrossRef
go back to reference Fitzsimons, G. J., & Williams, P. (2000). Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(3), 195–206. Fitzsimons, G. J., & Williams, P. (2000). Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(3), 195–206.
go back to reference Friedman, M. (1972). Consumer price comparisons of retail products: The role of packaging and pricing practices and the implications for consumer legislation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 439–446.CrossRef Friedman, M. (1972). Consumer price comparisons of retail products: The role of packaging and pricing practices and the implications for consumer legislation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 439–446.CrossRef
go back to reference Gourville, J. T., & Koehler, J. J. (2004). Downsizing price increases: A greater sensitivity to price than quantity in consumer markets. Harvard Business School Marketing Research Paper No. 04–01. Gourville, J. T., & Koehler, J. J. (2004). Downsizing price increases: A greater sensitivity to price than quantity in consumer markets. Harvard Business School Marketing Research Paper No. 04–01.
go back to reference Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 148–155.CrossRef Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 148–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Grewal, D., Hardesty, D. M., & Iyer, G. R. (2004). The effects of buyer identification and purchase timing on consumers’ perceptions of trust, price fairness, and repurchase intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 87–100.CrossRef Grewal, D., Hardesty, D. M., & Iyer, G. R. (2004). The effects of buyer identification and purchase timing on consumers’ perceptions of trust, price fairness, and repurchase intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 87–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Guha, A., Biswas, A., Grewal, D., Verma, S., Banerjee, S., & Nordfält, J. (2018). Reframing the discount as a comparison against the sale price: Does it make the discount more attractive? Journal of Marketing Research, 55(3), 339–351.CrossRef Guha, A., Biswas, A., Grewal, D., Verma, S., Banerjee, S., & Nordfält, J. (2018). Reframing the discount as a comparison against the sale price: Does it make the discount more attractive? Journal of Marketing Research, 55(3), 339–351.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, O. K., Tandon, S., Debnath, S., & Rominger, A. S. (2007). Package downsizing: Is it ethical? AI & Society, 21(3), 239–250. Gupta, O. K., Tandon, S., Debnath, S., & Rominger, A. S. (2007). Package downsizing: Is it ethical? AI & Society, 21(3), 239–250.
go back to reference Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: The moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of Retailing, 79(1), 17–25.CrossRef Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: The moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of Retailing, 79(1), 17–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Hardesty, D. M., Bearden, W. O., & Carlson, J. P. (2007). Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 199–210.CrossRef Hardesty, D. M., Bearden, W. O., & Carlson, J. P. (2007). Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 199–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Hardie, B. G., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12(4), 378–394.CrossRef Hardie, B. G., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12(4), 378–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
go back to reference Homburg, C., Hoyer, W. D., & Koschate, N. (2005). Customers’ reactions to price increases: Do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 36–49.CrossRef Homburg, C., Hoyer, W. D., & Koschate, N. (2005). Customers’ reactions to price increases: Do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 36–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Totzek, D. (2010). How price increases affect future purchases: The role of mental budgeting, income, and framing. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 36–53.CrossRef Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Totzek, D. (2010). How price increases affect future purchases: The role of mental budgeting, income, and framing. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 36–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Isakson, H. R., & Maurizi, A. R. (1973). The consumer economics of unit pricing. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(3), 277–285.CrossRef Isakson, H. R., & Maurizi, A. R. (1973). The consumer economics of unit pricing. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(3), 277–285.CrossRef
go back to reference Janakiraman, N., Meyer, R. J., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Spillover effects: How consumers respond to unexpected changes in price and quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 361–369.CrossRef Janakiraman, N., Meyer, R. J., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Spillover effects: How consumers respond to unexpected changes in price and quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 361–369.CrossRef
go back to reference Kachersky, L. (2011). Reduce content or raise price? The impact of persuasion knowledge and unit price increase tactics on retailer and product brand attitudes. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 479–488.CrossRef Kachersky, L. (2011). Reduce content or raise price? The impact of persuasion knowledge and unit price increase tactics on retailer and product brand attitudes. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 479–488.CrossRef
go back to reference Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., & Sugita, Y. (1990). A price expectations model of customer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 251–262.CrossRef Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., & Sugita, Y. (1990). A price expectations model of customer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 251–262.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, H. M., & Kramer, T. (2006). “Pay 80%” versus “get 20% off”: The effect of novel discount presentation on consumers’ deal perceptions. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 311–321.CrossRef Kim, H. M., & Kramer, T. (2006). “Pay 80%” versus “get 20% off”: The effect of novel discount presentation on consumers’ deal perceptions. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 311–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Koschate-Fischer, N., Huber, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2016). When will price increases associated with company donations to charity be perceived as fair? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 608–626.CrossRef Koschate-Fischer, N., Huber, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2016). When will price increases associated with company donations to charity be perceived as fair? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 608–626.CrossRef
go back to reference Koslow, S. (2000). Can the truth hurt? How honest and persuasive advertising can unintentionally lead to increased consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 34(2), 245–267.CrossRef Koslow, S. (2000). Can the truth hurt? How honest and persuasive advertising can unintentionally lead to increased consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 34(2), 245–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Kramer, T., & Block, L. (2008). Conscious and nonconscious components of superstitious beliefs in judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 783–793.CrossRef Kramer, T., & Block, L. (2008). Conscious and nonconscious components of superstitious beliefs in judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 783–793.CrossRef
go back to reference Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behaviour: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(2), 234–245.CrossRef Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behaviour: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(2), 234–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Liefeld, J., & Heslop, L. A. (1985). Reference prices and deception in newspaper advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 868–876.CrossRef Liefeld, J., & Heslop, L. A. (1985). Reference prices and deception in newspaper advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 868–876.CrossRef
go back to reference Manning, K. C., Sprott, D. E., & Miyazaki, A. D. (1998). Consumer response to quantity surcharges: Implications for retail price setters. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 373–399.CrossRef Manning, K. C., Sprott, D. E., & Miyazaki, A. D. (1998). Consumer response to quantity surcharges: Implications for retail price setters. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 373–399.CrossRef
go back to reference Manning, K. C., Sprott, D. E., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2003). Unit price usage knowledge: Conceptualization and empirical assessment. Journal of Business Research, 56(5), 367–377.CrossRef Manning, K. C., Sprott, D. E., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2003). Unit price usage knowledge: Conceptualization and empirical assessment. Journal of Business Research, 56(5), 367–377.CrossRef
go back to reference Marn, M. V., & Rosiello, R. L. (1992). Managing price, gaining profit. Harvard Business Review, Sep–Oct., 84–94. Marn, M. V., & Rosiello, R. L. (1992). Managing price, gaining profit. Harvard Business Review, Sep–Oct., 84–94.
go back to reference Mayhew, G. E., & Winer, R. S. (1992). An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 62–70.CrossRef Mayhew, G. E., & Winer, R. S. (1992). An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 62–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Mazumdar, T., & Jun, S. Y. (1993). Consumer evaluations of multiple versus single price change. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 441–450.CrossRef Mazumdar, T., & Jun, S. Y. (1993). Consumer evaluations of multiple versus single price change. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 441–450.CrossRef
go back to reference McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010). I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 915–929.CrossRef McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010). I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 915–929.CrossRef
go back to reference Mela, C. F., & Urbany, J. E. (1996). Consumer beliefs about retail prices and promotions. In K. P. Kaufman & G. J. Lynch (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 23 (pp. 78–79). Provo: Association for Consumer Research. Mela, C. F., & Urbany, J. E. (1996). Consumer beliefs about retail prices and promotions. In K. P. Kaufman & G. J. Lynch (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 23 (pp. 78–79). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
go back to reference Mitchell, V. W., Lennard, D., & McGoldrick, P. (2003). Consumer awareness, understanding and usage of unit pricing. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 173–187.CrossRef Mitchell, V. W., Lennard, D., & McGoldrick, P. (2003). Consumer awareness, understanding and usage of unit pricing. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 173–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Miyazaki, A. D., Sprott, D. E., & Manning, K. C. (2000). Unit prices on retail shelf labels: An assessment of information prominence. Journal of Retailing, 76(1), 93–112.CrossRef Miyazaki, A. D., Sprott, D. E., & Manning, K. C. (2000). Unit prices on retail shelf labels: An assessment of information prominence. Journal of Retailing, 76(1), 93–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Monroe, K. B. (2003). Pricing: Making profitable decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Monroe, K. B. (2003). Pricing: Making profitable decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
go back to reference Monroe, K. B., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). Remembering versus knowing: Issues in buyers' processing of price information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 207–225.CrossRef Monroe, K. B., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). Remembering versus knowing: Issues in buyers' processing of price information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 207–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.CrossRef Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 21–35.CrossRef Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 21–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413.CrossRef Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413.CrossRef
go back to reference Pham, M. T., & Muthukrishnan, A. V. (2002). Search and alignment in judgment revision: Implications for brand positioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 18–30.CrossRef Pham, M. T., & Muthukrishnan, A. V. (2002). Search and alignment in judgment revision: Implications for brand positioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 18–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Roth, S., Himbert, L., & Zielke, S. (2017). Does unit pricing influence store price image dimensions and shopping intentions for retail stores? European Journal of Marketing, 51(7/8), 1396–1413.CrossRef Roth, S., Himbert, L., & Zielke, S. (2017). Does unit pricing influence store price image dimensions and shopping intentions for retail stores? European Journal of Marketing, 51(7/8), 1396–1413.CrossRef
go back to reference Russo, J. E., Krieser, G., & Miyashita, S. (1975). An effective display of unit price information. Journal of Marketing, 39(2), 11–19. Russo, J. E., Krieser, G., & Miyashita, S. (1975). An effective display of unit price information. Journal of Marketing, 39(2), 11–19.
go back to reference Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–417.CrossRef Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–417.CrossRef
go back to reference Shimp, T. A., & Bearden, W. O. (1982). Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers' risk perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 38–46.CrossRef Shimp, T. A., & Bearden, W. O. (1982). Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers' risk perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 38–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292.CrossRef Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292.CrossRef
go back to reference Sivakumar, K., & Raj, S. P. (1997). Quality tier competition: How price change influences brand choice and category choice. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 71–84.CrossRef Sivakumar, K., & Raj, S. P. (1997). Quality tier competition: How price change influences brand choice and category choice. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 71–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRef Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 54–64.CrossRef Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 54–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(1), 166–179. Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(1), 166–179.
go back to reference Yan, D., Sengupta, J., & Wyer, R. S. (2014). Package size and perceived quality: The intervening role of unit price perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 4–17.CrossRef Yan, D., Sengupta, J., & Wyer, R. S. (2014). Package size and perceived quality: The intervening role of unit price perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 4–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Yao, J., & Oppewal, H. (2016a). Unit pricing increases price sensitivity even when products are of identical size. Journal of Retailing, 92(1), 109–121.CrossRef Yao, J., & Oppewal, H. (2016a). Unit pricing increases price sensitivity even when products are of identical size. Journal of Retailing, 92(1), 109–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Yao, J., & Oppewal, H. (2016b). Unit pricing matters more when consumers are under time pressure. European Journal of Marketing, 50(5/6), 1094–1114.CrossRef Yao, J., & Oppewal, H. (2016b). Unit pricing matters more when consumers are under time pressure. European Journal of Marketing, 50(5/6), 1094–1114.CrossRef
go back to reference Yonezawa, K., & Richards, T. J. (2016). Competitive package size decisions. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 445–469.CrossRef Yonezawa, K., & Richards, T. J. (2016). Competitive package size decisions. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 445–469.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cheaper and smaller or more expensive and larger: how consumers respond to unit price increase tactics that simultaneously change product price and package size
Authors
Jun Yao
Harmen Oppewal
Di Wang
Publication date
29-01-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Electronic ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00716-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 6/2020 Go to the issue

Original Empirical Research

Consumer arrogance and word-of-mouth